Emerging drugs for polycythemia vera

The evolving landscape of polycythemia vera therapies

INTRODUCTION

The treatment landscape of polycythemia vera (PV) has seen major advancements within the last decade including approval of ruxolitinib in the second line setting after hydroxyurea, ropegylated interferon-α2b, and advanced clinical development of a novel class of agents called hepcidin mimetics.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive review of the evidence discussing the risk stratification, treatment indications, role and limitations of phlebotomy only approach and pivotal trials covering nuances related to the use of interferon-α (IFN-α), ruxolitinib, hepcidin mimetics, and upcoming investigational agents including HDAC and LSD1 inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

The research paradigm in PV is slowly shifting from the sole focus on hematocrit control and moving toward disease modification. The discovery of hepcidin mimetics has come as a breakthrough in restoring iron homeostasis, achieving phlebotomy-independence and may lead to improved thrombosis-free survival with stricter hematocrit control. On the other hand, emerging data with IFN- α and ruxolitinib as well as combination of the two agents suggests the potential for achieving molecular remission in a subset of PV patients and long-term follow-up is awaited to validate the correlation of molecular responses with clinically relevant outcomes of progression-free and thrombosis-free survival.

Experience with ruxolitinib in the treatment of polycythaemia vera

Polycythaemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm classically characterized by an erythrocytosis and is associated with a high risk of thromboembolic events, constitutional symptoms burden and risk of transformation to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukaemia. Therapy is directed at the haematocrit (HCT) to reduce the risk of thrombotic events and usually comprises low-dose aspirin and phlebotomy to maintain HCT at >45%. Frequently in addition, cytoreductive therapy is indicated in high-risk patients for normalizing haematological parameters to mitigate the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Unfortunately, there is no clear evidence that current therapies reduce the risk of transformation to myelofibrosis and for some a risk of a therapy related complication is unknown for example leukaemia due to hydroxycarbamide (HC). First-line therapy for treating PV remains HC or interferon, the latter most often in younger patients, especially those of childbearing age. However, therapy related intolerance or resistance is a common feature and results in limited treatment options for such patients. The discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation and consequently targeted therapy with Janus kinase inhibitors, in particular ruxolitinib, has extended the spectrum of agents that can be used as second or third line in PV. The findings of the phase II trial RESPONSE and the preliminary data from RESPONSE 2 trial have identified a role for ruxolitinib in PV patients who are resistant or intolerant to HC. In this article, using clinical cases we demonstrate our experience with ruxolitinib highlighting the clinical benefits and limitations we encountered in clinical practice.

Management of side effects of BCR/ABL-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm therapies. Focus on anagrelide

Although hydroxyurea is considered the first-line cytoreductive therapy in high-risk patients with polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia, approximately 20-25% of patients develop resistance or intolerance and they need an alternative therapy. Anagrelide is the treatment of choice in patients with essential thrombocythemia intolerant or with resistance to hydroxyurea. Anagrelide is usually well tolerated. Although there is concern about the increased risk of cardiac side effects, in most cases these are mild, and easily manageable. In this paper, the available evidence about the management of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, with a special focus on the side effects of drug therapies is reviewed.

Current and future treatment options for polycythemia vera

Patients with polycythemia vera (PV), a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an elevated red blood cell mass, are at high risk of vascular and thrombotic complications and have reduced quality of life due to a substantial symptom burden that includes pruritus, fatigue, constitutional symptoms, microvascular disturbances, and bleeding. Conventional therapeutic options aim at reducing vascular and thrombotic risk, with low-dose aspirin and phlebotomy as first-line recommendations for patients at low risk of thrombotic events and cytoreductive therapy (usually hydroxyurea or interferon alpha) recommended for high-risk patients. However, long-term effective and well-tolerated treatments are still lacking. The discovery of mutations in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) as the underlying molecular basis of PV has led to the development of several targeted therapies, including JAK inhibitors, and results from the first phase 3 clinical trial with a JAK inhibitor in PV are now available. Here, we review the current treatment landscape in PV, as well as therapies currently in development.

Reducing symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms in the era of Janus kinase inhibitors

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell-derived malignancies that include primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia and are characterized by dysregulated Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling. Clinical manifestations include splenomegaly, cytopenias and/or systemic inflammation. Patients have a heterogeneous symptom profile that includes fatigue, loss of appetite, pruritus and night sweats, which significantly impact quality of life (QoL) and lead to poor survival outcomes. With the introduction of JAK inhibitors, improvement in disease-related symptoms has emerged as a realistic expectation of therapy and an integral measure of clinical efficacy. The JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis and is currently under clinical development for polycythemia vera. Ruxolitinib has demonstrated significant reductions in symptom burden, with consequent improvements in QoL measures. With the potential to improve QoL, recognition of the impact and burden of symptoms on patients with MPNs is critical.

Ruxolitinib versus standard therapy for the treatment of polycythemia vera

BACKGROUND

Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor, was shown to have a clinical benefit in patients with polycythemia vera in a phase 2 study. We conducted a phase 3 open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus standard therapy in patients with polycythemia vera who had an inadequate response to or had unacceptable side effects from hydroxyurea.

METHODS

We randomly assigned phlebotomy-dependent patients with splenomegaly, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive ruxolitinib (110 patients) or standard therapy (112 patients). The primary end point was both hematocrit control through week 32 and at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume at week 32, as assessed by means of imaging.

RESULTS

The primary end point was achieved in 21% of the patients in the ruxolitinib group versus 1% of those in the standard-therapy group (P<0.001). Hematocrit control was achieved in 60% of patients receiving ruxolitinib and 20% of those receiving standard therapy; 38% and 1% of patients in the two groups, respectively, had at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume. A complete hematologic remission was achieved in 24% of patients in the ruxolitinib group and 9% of those in the standard-therapy group (P=0.003); 49% versus 5% had at least a 50% reduction in the total symptom score at week 32. In the ruxolitinib group, grade 3 or 4 anemia occurred in 2% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 5%; the corresponding percentages in the standard-therapy group were 0% and 4%. Herpes zoster infection was reported in 6% of patients in the ruxolitinib group and 0% of those in the standard-therapy group (grade 1 or 2 in all cases). Thromboembolic events occurred in one patient receiving ruxolitinib and in six patients receiving standard therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who had an inadequate response to or had unacceptable side effects from hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib was superior to standard therapy in controlling the hematocrit, reducing the spleen volume, and improving symptoms associated with polycythemia vera. (Funded by Incyte and others; RESPONSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01243944.).

The future of JAK inhibition in myelofibrosis and beyond

The identification of aberrant JAK-STAT signaling in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms has served as the basis for the development of a new class of targeted agents. Ruxolitinib, the first-in-class oral small molecule JAK1/2 inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy and shown a potential overall survival benefit in two randomized phase III clinical trials. However, this agent has not been associated with improvements in cytopenias, molecular remissions, or resolution of bone marrow fibrosis. Therefore, further translational research is needed to improve the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms driving this myeloid malignancy to ultimately address remaining unmet clinical needs. A number of novel JAK inhibitors are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials and the full clinical potential of these newer agents remains incompletely understood. The use of JAK inhibition in combination therapy approaches, as well as mono- and combination therapies in the treatment of advanced forms of polycythemia vera are also under active investigation. This review will update the reader on the current understanding of oncogenic JAK-STAT pathway activity in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms and the current success and limitations of anti-JAK therapy.