Immune mediation of hypersensitivity adverse drug reactions: implications for therapy

Pathophysiology of drug hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are type B adverse drug reactions (ADRs) traditionally defined as unpredictable, dose independent and not related to the drug pharmacology. DHRs, also called drug allergy if the immune system involvement is confirmed, represent around one-sixth of all ADRs and can cause major clinical problems due to their vague clinical presentation and irregular time course. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology of DHRs is very important for their diagnosis and management. Multiple layers of evidence exist pointing to the involvement of the immune system in DHRs. Recent data have led to a paradigm shift in our understanding of the exact pathophysiology of these reactions. Numerous hypotheses proposing explanation on how a low molecular weight drug molecule can elicit an immune reaction have been proposed. In addition to the classical "hapten" hypothesis, the reactive metabolite hypothesis, the pharmacological interaction with the immune system (p-i) concept, the danger/injury hypothesis and the altered peptide repertoire hypothesis have been proposed. We here introduce the inflammasome activation hypothesis and the cross-reactivity hypothesis as additional models explaining the pathophysiology of DHRs. Available data supporting these hypotheses are briefly summarized and discussed. We also introduced the cross-reactivity model, which may provide a platform to appreciate the potential role played by other factors leading to the activation of the immune system. We believe that although the drug in question could be the trigger of the reaction, the components of the immune system mediating the reaction do not act in isolation but rather are affected by the proinflammatory milieu occurring at the time of the reaction. This review attempts to summarize the available evidence to further illustrate the pathophysiology of DHRs.

Variability of the Genes Involved in the Cellular Redox Status and Their Implication in Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions

Adverse drug reactions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Of the great diversity of drugs involved in hypersensitivity drug reactions, the most frequent are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs followed by β-lactam antibiotics. The redox status regulates the level of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). RONS interplay and modulate the action of diverse biomolecules, such as inflammatory mediators and drugs. In this review, we address the role of the redox status in the initiation, as well as in the resolution of inflammatory processes involved in drug hypersensitivity reactions. We summarize the association findings between drug hypersensitivity reactions and variants in the genes that encode the enzymes related to the redox system such as enzymes related to glutathione: Glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1, GSTP, GSTT1) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX1), thioredoxin reductase (TXNRD1 and TXNRD2), superoxide dismutase (SOD1, SOD2, and SOD3), catalase (CAT), aldo-keto reductase (AKR), and the peroxiredoxin system (PRDX1, PRDX2, PRDX3, PRDX4, PRDX5, PRDX6). Based on current evidence, the most relevant candidate redox genes related to hypersensitivity drug reactions are GSTM1, TXNRD1, SOD1, and SOD2. Increasing the understanding of pharmacogenetics in drug hypersensitivity reactions will contribute to the development of early diagnostic or prognosis tools, and will help to diminish the occurrence and/or the severity of these reactions.

Role of Oxidative Stress in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Sulfonamides

Antimicrobial sulfonamides are important medications. However, their use is associated with major immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions with a rate that ranges from 3% to 4% in the general population. The pathophysiology of sulfa-induced drug hypersensitivity reactions is not well understood, but accumulation of reactive metabolites (sulfamethoxazole [SMX] hydroxylamine [SMX-HA] and SMX N-nitrosamine [SMX-NO]) is thought to be a major factor. These reactive metabolites contribute to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) known to cause cellular damage and induce cell death through apoptosis and necroptosis. ROS can also serve as "danger signals," priming immune cells to mount an immunological reaction. We recruited 26 sulfa-hypersensitive (HS) patients, 19 healthy control subjects, and 6 sulfa-tolerant patients to this study. Peripheral blood monocytes and platelets were isolated from blood samples and analyzed for in vitro cytotoxicity, ROS and carbonyl protein formation, lipid peroxidation, and GSH (glutathione) content after challenge with SMX-HA. When challenged with SMX-HA, cells isolated from sulfa-HS patients exhibited significantly (P ≤ .05) higher cell death, ROS and carbonyl protein formation, and lipid peroxidation. In addition, there was a high correlation between cell death in PBMCs and ROS levels. There was also depletion of GSH and lower GSH/GSSG ratios in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from sulfa-HS patients. The amount of ROS formed was negatively correlated with intracellular GSH content. The data demonstrate a major role for oxidative stress in in vitro cytotoxicity of SMX reactive metabolites and indicate increased vulnerability of cells from sulfa-HS patients to the in vitro challenge.

Adverse Drug Reactions in Children: Pediatric Pharmacy and Drug Safety

An underappreciated problem in child health is the risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). While there is an impression that children are at a lower risk than adults for ADRs, in fact a number of factors germane to pediatric therapy place certain groups of children at a high risk for adverse events associated with therapy. Given the importance of drug safety, an understanding of a diagnostic classification for ADRs and of how to approach a possible ADR clinically are key skills for pediatric pharmacists. As drug therapy for children evolves, becomes more complex, and begins to use novel molecules and biologicals there will be an increasing need for pediatric pharmacists to be more involved in clinical care, education, and research specific to drug safety.

Adverse Drug Reactions in Children: The Double-Edged Sword of Therapeutics

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a major health problem worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. ADRs are classified into Type A (augmented) and Type B (bizarre) ADRs, with the former group being more common and the latter less common but often severe and clinically more problematic due to their unpredictable nature and occurrence at any dose. Pediatric populations are especially vulnerable to ADRs due to the lack of data for this age group from the drug development process and because of the wide use of off-label and unlicensed use of drugs. Children are more prone to specific types of ADRs because of the level of maturity of body systems involved in absorption, metabolism, transportation, and elimination of drugs. This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of definitions, classifications, epidemiology, and pathophysiology of ADRs and discusses the available evidence for related risk factors and causes of ADRs in the pediatric population.

In vitro testing for diagnosis of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: Implications for pathophysiology

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) represent a major health problem, as they are unpredictable, often severe and can be life threatening. The low incidence of IDRs makes their detection during drug development stages very difficult causing many post-marketing drug withdrawals and black box warnings. The fact that IDRs are always not predictable based on the drug's known pharmacology and have no clear dose-effect relationship with the culprit drug renders diagnosis of IDRs very challenging, if not impossible, without the aid of a reliable diagnostic test. The drug provocation test (DPT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of IDRs but it is not always safe to perform on patients. In vitro tests have the advantage of bearing no potential harm to patients. However, available in vitro tests are not commonly used clinically because of lack of validation and their complex and expensive procedures. This review discusses the current role of in vitro diagnostic testing for diagnosis of IDRs and gives a brief account of their technical and mechanistic aspects. Advantages, disadvantages and major challenges that prevent these tests from becoming mainstream diagnostic tools are also discussed here.

Pharmacogenomics and adverse drug reactions in children

Adverse drug reactions are a common and important complication of drug therapy in children. Over the past decade it has become increasingly apparent that genetically controlled variations in drug disposition and response are important determinants of adverse events for many important adverse events associated with drug therapy in children. While this research has been difficult to conduct over the past decade technical and ethical evolution has greatly facilitated the ability of investigators to conduct pharmacogenomic studies in children. Some of this research has already resulted in changes in public policy and clinical practice, for example in the case of codeine use by mothers and children. It is likely that the use of pharmacogenomics to enhance drug safety will first be realized among selected groups of children with high rates of drug use such as children with cancer, but it also likely that this research will be extended to other groups of children who have high rates of drug utilization and as well as providing insights into the mechanisms and pathophysiology of adverse drug reactions in children.

Oral administration of drugs with hypersensitivity potential induces germinal center hyperplasia in secondary lymphoid organ/tissue in Brown Norway rats, and this histological lesion is a promising candidate as a predictive biomarker for drug hypersensitivity occurrence in humans

It is important to evaluate the potential of drug hypersensitivity as well as other adverse effects during the preclinical stage of the drug development process, but validated methods are not available yet. In the present study we examined whether it would be possible to develop a new predictive model of drug hypersensitivity using Brown Norway (BN) rats. As representative drugs with hypersensitivity potential in humans, phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), amoxicillin (AMX), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) were orally administered to BN rats for 28days to investigate their effects on these animals by examinations including observation of clinical signs, hematology, determination of serum IgE levels, histology, and flow cytometric analysis. Skin rashes were not observed in any animals treated with these drugs. Increases in the number of circulating inflammatory cells and serum IgE level did not necessarily occur in the animals treated with these drugs. However, histological examination revealed that germinal center hyperplasia was commonly induced in secondary lymphoid organs/tissues in the animals treated with these drugs. In cytometric analysis, changes in proportions of lymphocyte subsets were noted in the spleen of the animals treated with PHT or CBZ during the early period of administration. The results indicated that the potential of drug hypersensitivity was identified in BN rat by performing histological examination of secondary lymphoid organs/tissues. Data obtained herein suggested that drugs with hypersensitivity potential in humans gained immune reactivity in BN rat, and the germinal center hyperplasia induced by administration of these drugs may serve as a predictive biomarker for drug hypersensitivity occurrence.

New ways to detect adverse drug reactions in pediatrics

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) complicate at least 5% of all courses of therapy for children. Dealing with an ADR requires a stepwise approach in appreciation of the possibility of an ADR, assessment of whether the adverse event in question is drug-related, assessment of causality, assistance in treating the symptoms of the ADR, and dealing with the aftermath of the event. Several new developments likely will improve the ability to assess, evaluate, treat, and prevent ADRs in children. These developments include tools to evaluate causality, laboratory tests to diagnose ADRs, pharmacogenomic approaches to prevent ADRs, and new insights into treating serious ADRs.

Predictive value of the lymphocyte toxicity assay in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity syndrome

BACKGROUND

Drug hypersensitivity syndrome (DHS) is a rare but potentially fatal adverse drug reaction that develops in susceptible patients following exposure to certain drugs. Because of the variable clinical picture of DHS and its resemblance to other diseases, the diagnosis of DHS is challenging. The lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA) is an in vitro test that has been used in the diagnosis of DHS. However, its predictive values are still controversial because of the lack of a 'gold standard' test to measure it against.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the LTA in the diagnosis of DHS due to different classes of drugs, based on systemic re-exposure as a gold standard, and to evaluate the current clinical utility of the LTA in clinical practice.

METHODS

Potential participants were identified from their medical records and contacted to obtain their consent to participate in the study. One hundred forty-seven patients were recruited and interviewed by telephone to identify events of re-exposure and their consequences. These data were used to determine true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative results of the test, which were then used to estimate the predictive value of the test.

RESULTS

We identified 26 re-exposure events in 22 patients: 4 were true positives, 17 were true negatives, 1 was a false positive, and 4 were false negatives, as determined by systemic re-exposure. Although the number of identified re-exposures limited the ability to calculate the predictive values, our data provide an estimate of the clinical value of the test for the diagnosis of DHS. The data also highlight the effect of the type of drug involved in the reaction on the predictive value of the test.

CONCLUSION

The LTA is potentially a valuable diagnostic tool for DHS; however, its sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV seem to vary according to the drug involved in the reaction.

The therapeutic test: an ancient malady in the 21st century

The response to treatment was the diagnostic mainstay in ancient times when diseases were poorly understood. Now that the bases of most diseases are known, appropriate diagnostic means are available. However, many physicians still rely on therapeutic tests to establish diagnoses. Since most illnesses are self-limited and because of the placebo effect, many physicians and patients attribute the improvement to the medication and believe that the correct diagnosis was made. However, inappropriate therapeutic tests often lead to diagnostic delays, rapid emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens, increased risks of adverse drug reactions, and unnecessary expenses. To reduce the frequency of unwarranted therapeutic tests, health-care professionals and educators must take steps to rectify the problem.