Reactivation of hepatitis B virus with rituximab

Rituximab as an effective add-on maintenance therapy for disease activities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease that can result in high morbidity if not treated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of rituximab treatment in a paediatric SLE cohort in Taiwan.

METHODS

The medical records of paediatric patients diagnosed with SLE at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 1992 and August 2022 who received rituximab as maintenance therapy between January 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. To enhance our analysis, we included a contemporary comparison group, matching in case number and demographic characteristics. This study aimed to describe the indications, efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of paediatric SLE and to analyse the factors associated with disease outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 40 rituximab-treated patients with a median age of 14.3 years at the time of disease diagnosis. In the rituximab-treated cohort, the median score on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 decreased from 8 before rituximab administration to 4 after 2 years. The levels of C3 and C4 increased and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels decreased significantly within 6 months. The equivalent oral prednisolone dose halved after 6 months. Finally, 8 (20%) patients achieved disease control and 35 (87.5%) patients had no flare-ups during the follow-up period (median, 2 years). Those patients who achieved disease control had a significantly shorter interval between diagnosis and rituximab administration. In terms of adverse effects, only one patient developed hypogammaglobulinaemia that required intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement. Compared with the comparison group (n=53), the rituximab-treated cohort exhibited superior disease outcomes and a reduced incidence of flare-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides real-world data and illuminates rituximab's role in maintaining disease stability among patients with paediatric-onset SLE who are serologically active without major clinical deterioration. Most importantly, no mortality or development of end-stage renal disease was observed in the rituximab-treated cohort.

Recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on risk management of biological treatment and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To present recommendations based on the available evidence and the consensus of experts, for risk management of biological treatment and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the purpose of the document were identified. These questions were reformulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome or outcome) by a panel of experts, selected based on their experience in the area. A systematic review of the evidence was carried out, grading according to the GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Specific recommendations were then formulated.

RESULTS

6 PICO questions were proposed by the panel of experts based on their clinical relevance and the existence of recent information regarding the risk of occurrence of serious infections, the risk of reactivation of the hepatitis B virus, the risk of reactivation of the virus varicella-zoster, the risk of appearance of skin (melanoma and non-melanoma) or haematological cancer, the risk of appearance of thromboembolic disease and the risk of progression of the human papilloma virus. A total of 28 recommendations were formulated, structured by question, based on the evidence found and the consensus of the experts.

CONCLUSIONS

The SER recommendations on risk management of treatment with biologic therapies and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis are presented.

Efficacy of Antiviral Prophylaxis up to 6 or 12 Months From Completion of Rituximab in Resolved Hepatitis B Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Rituximab occasionally induces reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with resolved HBV, at times with fatal consequences. The optimal duration of prophylactic antiviral therapy in this situation is unclear. We aimed to investigate the difference in HBV reactivation according to the duration of prophylactic tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with resolved HBV and receiving rituximab.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, prospective study was conducted in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and anti-HBc-positive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-based chemotherapy. A total of 90 patients were randomized and received prophylactic TDF from the initiation of rituximab until 6 months (the 6-month group) or 12 months (the 12-month group) after the completion of rituximab. The primary outcome was the difference in HBV reactivation and the secondary outcomes were the difference in hepatitis flare and adverse events between the two groups.

RESULTS

In an intention to treat (ITT) analysis, HBV reactivation occurred in 1 of 43 patients (2.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-12%) at a median of 13.3 months in the 6-month group and 2 of 41 patients (4.9%; 95% CI, 1.4-16%) at a median of 13.7 months in the 12-month group. In a per protocol (PP) analysis, HBV reactivation occurred in 1 of 18 patients (5.6%; 95% CI, 0.99-26%) at 13.3 months in the 6-month group and 1 of 13 patients (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4-33%) at 9.7 months in the 12-month group. The cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation was not significantly different between the two groups in ITT and PP analyses (P = 0.502 and 0.795, respectively). The occurrence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups in ITT (9.3% in the 6-month group, 22.0% in the 12-month group, P = 0.193) and PP analyses (5.6% in the 6-month group, 7.7% in the 12-month group, P > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic TDF up to 6 months after completion of rituximab-based chemotherapy is sufficient in terms of the efficacy and safety of reducing HBV reactivation in patients with resolved HBV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02585947.

Use of Rituximab in Childhood Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Rituximab is an established therapy in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome to sustain short- to medium-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. Recent trials focus on its use as a first-line agent among those with milder disease severity. Rituximab is used in multidrug refractory nephrotic syndrome and post-transplant disease recurrence, although the evidence is much less substantial. Available data suggest that the treatment response to rituximab depends on various patient factors, dosing regimen, and the concomitant use of maintenance immunosuppression. After repeated treatments, patients are found to have an improving response overall with a longer relapse-free period. The drug effect, however, is not permanent, and 80% of patients eventually relapse and many will require an additional course of rituximab. This underpins the importance of understanding the long-term safety profile on repeated treatments. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are concerns about long-term hypogammaglobulinemia, especially in young children. Reliable immunophenotyping and biomarkers are yet to be discovered to predict treatment success, risk of both rare and severe side effects, e.g. , persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and guiding of redosing strategy. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the use of rituximab for childhood nephrotic syndrome and how the therapeutic landscape is evolving.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Rituximab to Maintain Remission in Idiopathic Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome: An International Study

Background: Long-term outcomes following multiple rituximab courses among children with frequently-relapsing, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRSDNS) are unknown. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at 16 pediatric nephrology centers from 10 countries in Asia, Europe, and North America included children with FRSDNS who received ≥2 rituximab courses. Primary outcomes were relapse-free survival and adverse events. Results: 346 children (age 9.8 years, IQR 6.6-13.5; 73% boys) received 1149 rituximab courses. 145, 83, 50, 28, 22, and 18 children received 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and ≥7 courses, respectively. Median follow-up was 5.9 years (IQR, 4.3-7.7). Relapse-free survival differed by treatment courses (clustered log-rank test p<0.001). Compared to the first course (10.0 months, 95% CI, 9.0-10.7), relapse-free period and relapse risk progressively improved following subsequent courses (12.0-16.0 months; HRadj, 0.03-0.13; 95% CI, 0.01-0.18; ps<0.001). B-cell depletion duration remained similar with repeated treatments (6.1 months, 95% CI, 6.0-6.3). Adverse events were mostly mild, most commonly hypogammaglobulinemia (50.9%), infection (4.5%), and neutropenia (3.7%). Side effects did not increase with more treatment courses nor higher cumulative dose. Only 78 of the 353 episodes of hypogammaglobulinemia were clinically significant. Younger age at presentation (2.8 vs 3.3 years; p=0.05) and at first rituximab (8.0 y vs 10.0 years; p=0.01) and history of steroid resistance (28% vs 18%; p=0.01) were associated with significant hypogammaglobulinemia. All 53 infective episodes resolved, except one patient with hepatitis B infection and another with EBV infection. There were 42 episodes of neutropenia, associated with history of steroid resistance (30% vs 20%, p=0.04). Upon last follow-up, 332 children (96%) had normal kidney function. Conclusion: Children receiving repeated rituximab for FRSDNS experience an improving clinical response. Side effects appear acceptable but significant complications can occur. These findings support repeated rituximab use in FRSDNS.

Successful treatment of refractory chronic bullous disease of childhood with rituximab

Chronic bullous disease of childhood is a rare subepidermal bullous disease with a hallmark of linear IgA deposition along basement membrane zone seen on direct immunofluorescence. We report a case of a 2-year-old male child, who had recurrent and multiple bullous eruptions over body and he was not responding to conventional therapy. He had earlier developed a drug reaction to dapsone which is considered the drug of choice for this condition. We report successful management of this case with injection rituximab which is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20, which is primarily found on the surface of B cells.

Rituximab in children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: in quest of the optimal regimen

Rituximab has emerged as an effective and important therapy in children with complicated frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome to induce long-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. The optimal rituximab regimen is not totally well defined, and there are many varying practices worldwide. We will in this review describe how patient factors, rituximab dose, and use of maintenance immunosuppression affect treatment outcomes. Specifically, low-dose rituximab without concomitant immunosuppression is associated with shorter relapse-free duration while other regimens have comparable outcomes. Patients with more severe disease generally have worse response to rituximab. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are growing concerns of chronic hypogammaglobulinemia and impaired immunity especially in young children. Reliable prognostications and biomarkers for guiding subsequent treatments to avoid excessive treatments are yet to be identified. In this review, we will outline the, as we see it, best approach of rituximab in childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome at the present state of knowledge.

Prophylactic rituximab administration in children with complicated nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is effective for maintaining remission in patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome, although a history of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a risk factor for early relapse. We investigated the efficacy of prophylactic rituximab treatment for maintaining remission after B cell recovery.

METHODS

Patients with complicated steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome with history of SRNS who received a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) and continued immunosuppressive agents were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: a prophylaxis group, which received additional rituximab treatment at B cell recovery and a non-prophylaxis group. The relapse-free period from the last rituximab infusion (the second treatment in prophylaxis group and the first treatment in non-prophylaxis group) was compared between two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for early relapse were calculated using multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients in the prophylaxis group and 45 in the non-prophylaxis group were enrolled. Fifty-percent relapse-free survival after the last rituximab treatment was 667 days in the former and 335 days in the latter (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that additional rituximab treatment was the only significant negative factor for early relapse, with a hazard ratio of 0.40 (p = 0.02). Fifty-percent relapse-free survival after B cell recovery was much longer in the prophylaxis group (954 vs. 205.5 days, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional rituximab treatment at B cell recovery can maintain prolonged remission even after B cell recovery in patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome with history of SRNS.

Rituximab experience in children with nephrotic syndrome: what have we observed differently

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab therapy in children with nephrotic syndromes and to share our experiences.

Material and Methods

Twelve children with nephrotic syndrome (four with steroid-dependent, eight with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome) who were treated with rituximab were retrospectively evaluated in terms of clinical and laboratory data and CD19-20 levels. All patients received rituximab (375 mg/m²) once weekly for 4 weeks. A proteinuria-free period under steroid therapy was not sought prior to initiating rituximab therapy.

Results

The overall remission rates in patients with steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome were 100% and 27%. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was diagnosed in six patients and the remission rate was 33% in this population. CD19 cell depletion was observed in 10 of the 12 children. Seven of the 10 patients with CD19 depletion achieved remission, whereas the other three had persistent nephrotic proteinuria despite CD19 depletion. Two patients without CD19 depletion never achieved remission. Relapse occurred in three of the seven patients associated with increased CD19.

Conclusion

We observed that rituximab could be given without waiting for a proteinuria-free period under steroid therapy. Our result suggest that administering four weekly doses of rituximab increases the likelihood of remission, considering the amount of drug lost in the urine of children with nephrotic proteinuria. However, our findings must be confirmed with dose-comparison studies conducted with larger populations and an evaluation of long-term adverse effects. Some patients did not achieve remission despite B cell depletion, which suggests that B cell depletion is necessary but insufficient for remission in nephrotic syndromes.

Rituximab therapy for refractory steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

Patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) who develop resistance to immunosuppressive agents, defined as refractory SRNS, have poor renal outcomes. Although the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has shown efficacy for frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, its efficacy for refractory SRNS remains uncertain due to limited data. According to previous case reports, 50.4% of patients with refractory SRNS showed clinical improvements after rituximab treatment. Remission rates in patients with initial steroid resistance and late steroid resistance were 43.9 and 57.7%, respectively, and 41.5 and 63.6% in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minor glomerular abnormalities, respectively. However, various factors (race, disease severity, number of rituximab doses, concomitant treatments, and observation period) differed among these observational studies and their consensus may also have been affected by potential publication bias. Rituximab monotherapy may have some degree of efficacy and lead to satisfactory outcomes in a subset of patients with refractory SRNS. However, administration of concomitant treatments during rituximab-mediated B cell depletion, such as methylprednisolone pulse therapy, daily oral prednisolone therapy, and immunosuppressive agents, may lead to better outcomes in these patients. Large-scale, multi-center prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of such regimens.

Both the rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression in steroid-dependent/frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome have important effects on outcomes

Rituximab is an effective treatment for steroid-dependent/ frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDFRNS) in children. However, the optimal rituximab regimen remains unknown. To help determine this we conducted an international, multicenter retrospective study at 11 tertiary pediatric nephrology centers in Asia, Europe and North America of children 1-18 years of age with complicated SDFRNS receiving rituximab between 2005-2016 for 18 or more months follow-up. The effect of rituximab prescribed at three dosing levels: low (375mg/m²), medium (750mg/m²) and high (1125-1500mg/m²), with or without maintenance immunosuppression (defined as concurrent use of corticosteroids, mycophenolate motile or calcineurin inhibition at first relapse or for at least six months following the rituximab treatment) was examined. Among the 511 children (median age 11.5 year, 67% boys), 191, 208 and 112 received low, medium and high dose rituximab, respectively. Within this total cohort of 511 children, 283 (55%) received maintenance immunosuppression. Renal biopsies were performed in 317 children indicating the predominant histology was minimal change disease (74%). Without maintenance immunosuppression, low-dose rituximab had a shorter relapse-free period and a higher relapse risk (8.5 months) than medium (12.7 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62) and high dose (14.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50; all significant). With maintenance immunosuppression, the relapse-free survival in low-dose rituximab (14 months) was similar to medium (10.9 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23) and high dose (12.0 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; all non-significant). Most adverse events were mild. Thus, children receiving low-dose rituximab without maintenance immunosuppression had the shortest relapse-free survival. Hence, both rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression have important effects on the treatment outcomes.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with mixed cryoglobulinemic syndrome and cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis

Cryoglobulinemia is a common extrahepatic manifestation of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). When signs and symptoms of systemic vasculitis or glomerulonephritis occur in the presence of circulating cryoglobulins, this syndrome is called "mixed cryoglobulinemia syndrome" (MCS). Historically, interferon-based therapies in HCV have been associated with lower rates of viral cure in patients with MCS than in the general HCV-infected population. The advent of direct-acting antiviral therapies have revolutionized the treatment of HCV, dramatically increasing rates of cure. Early studies of first-generation protease inhibitors (telaprevir and boceprevir) in combination with interferon and ribavirin demonstrated HCV cure rates of 67% and complete clinical response rates of vasculitis symptoms in 60% of patients with MCS; however, regimens were poorly tolerated by patients, 22% discontinued treatment early. More recently, all-oral, interferon-free regimens have become available and combination therapies are now being approved for patients with and without renal impairment. Patients with HCV-MCS achieved sustained virologic response in 297 out of 313 patients (95%) treated with direct-acting antiviral therapy, and 85% had a complete or partial clinical response of MCS symptoms. Current direct-acting antiviral therapies are well tolerated in patients with HCV-MCS and only 1.6% discontinued treatment early. Patients with cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis also had an excellent cure rate (94%). The majority improved; 17/52 (33%) experienced full remission and 15/52 (29%) experienced partial remission. There were no reports of worsening kidney function in patients treated with direct-acting antiviral therapies. Less than 5% of patients with HCV-MCS treated with IFN-free direct-acting antiviral therapy required immunosuppression. However, patients with severe vasculitis appear to still require concomitant immunosuppression.

Rituximab Use in the Management of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome

Childhood nephrotic syndrome is a challenging and often persistent renal disorder, and its incidence varies between different ethnicities and regions. Corticosteroids have been the main treatment for decades and are effective in most children with idiopathic NS, although 10-15% of these children become steroid resistant. Furthermore, some initially steroid sensitive children follow a steroid dependent or frequently relapsing course and are therefore at increased risk for developing steroid toxicity. In such children, alternative immunosuppressive medications are used to induce and/or maintain remission of NS. One such drug, rituximab, is a monoclonal antibody directed against the B lymphocyte CD20 marker which induces depletion of B cells, and has shown promising results in the management of NS in children. In this review, we summarize recent studies on the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the different types of childhood nephrotic syndrome, the known and potential mechanisms of action of rituximab, its possible complications and side effects, and the available and potential biomarkers of rituximab activity.

Difficult-to-treat idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: established drugs, open questions and future options

The idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood can be classified according to the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC) based on the response to steroids. Typically, steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is characterised by minimal changes in disease (MCD) histology, whereas in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is the most prevalent lesion. Patients with SSNS may develop frequent relapses and/or steroid dependency, which can be difficult to treat. New studies confirm the value of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and mycophenolic acid in preventing relapses of SSNS. Rituximab also plays an important role, but many questions regarding initial dosing, repetitions of courses, and long-term side effects remain unclear. SRNS, especially when unresponsive to treatment, can lead to chronic kidney disease. In particular, treatment with CNIs has improved the prognosis and recent data indicate that treatment can even be discontinued in many patients with full remission. In CNI-unresponsive SRNS, rituximab is less effective than in SSNS and the role of other biologicals (such as ofatumumab, abatacept, and others) remains unclear. A significant proportion of children with FSGS have genetic causes and most patients do not respond to immunosuppression, although individual patients with partial and even complete response have been documented. Future studies should evaluate treatments leading to long-term remission without maintenance immunosuppression in SSNS; in both genetic and immune-mediated SRNS, novel options to decrease the number of treatment-unresponsive patients seem mandatory, as they are at a high risk of developing end-stage renal disease.

Rituximab in The Management of Pediatric Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome was performed. Data from studies, performed before April 2017 were collected, from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Study eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational studies with a minimal sample size of 5 patients, regarding treatment with rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Independent extraction of articles by 2 investigators using predefined data fields was performed.

RESULTS

We included 7 case series and 1 open-label randomized controlled trial. Among them, 3 studies were multicenter. A total of 226 patients were included. Mean age at onset was 5.6 ± 1.1 years. Mean number of rituximab administrations was 3.1 ± 1.1 infusions per patient. Remission was observed in 89 patients (46.4%). Remission was seen in 40.8% patients with initial steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and 52.8% patients with late steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Good initial response to rituximab therapy was observed in 63.2% patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome, 39.2% patients with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, 1 patient had diffuse mesangial hypercellularity, and 1 patient had IgM nephropathy. Sustained remission ranged from 18% to 93.7%. Five serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab exhibited a satisfactory profile regarding efficacy and safety indicating that this agent is a promising therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and should be further investigated by randomized clinical trials.

Rituximab in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: lessons from clinical trials

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common chronic glomerular disease in children. A total of 80-90% of patients with childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with steroid therapy [steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS)]. However, approximately 50% of children with SSNS develop frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). Children with FRNS or SDNS are usually treated with immunosuppressive agents, but 10-20% of children receiving immunosuppressive agents still show frequent relapses or steroid dependence during or after treatment, defined as complicated FRNS or SDNS. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that was originally developed to treat patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, is currently used for treating SSNS. In this review we highlight recent studies, mainly randomized controlled trials of rituximab for SSNS, including complicated and uncomplicated forms of FRNS or SDNS in children. We also discuss the effects of these studies on the management of patients suffering from these conditions.

HBV reactivation in rheumatic diseases patients under therapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. In patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy such as rheumatic diseases, reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is considered clinically important. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the prevalence rate of HBV reactivation in rheumatic patients from different parts of the world.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic literature review from several reliable databases including Scopus, ISI Web of Science and PubMed. Furthermore, the keywords of this research were "Hepatitis B virus", "Rheumatic diseases", "HBV reactivation", "Anti-TNF", "DMARDs" and "Biologic agents".

RESULTS

The authors selected 30 studies out of 983 for the present review. The overall estimation of the prevalence of HBV reactivation was 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-1.6). Also, the heterogeneity in estimating the pooled prevalence among the studies was shown; Cochran Q test, P < 0.001, I² = 99.9%. It should be noted that max and min reactivation rate of HBV were in Italy and France respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rheumatic disease patients with resolved hepatitis B should be tightly monitored for possible HBV reactivation by elevation of liver enzymes and HBV DNA levels.

Rituximab for nephrotic syndrome in children

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common chronic glomerular disease in children. At least 20 % of children with this syndrome show frequent relapses and/or steroid dependence during or after immunosuppressive therapies, a condition defined as complicated frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). Approximately 1-3 % of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome are resistant to steroids and all immunosuppressive agents, a condition defined as refractory steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS); these SRNS children have a high risk of end-stage renal failure. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective for patients with complicated FRNS/SDNS and refractory SRNS. This review describes the recent results of rituximab treatment applied to pediatric nephrotic syndrome, as well as those of our recent study, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab for childhood-onset complicated FRNS/SDNS (RCRNS01). The overall efficacy and safety of rituximab for this disease are discussed.

The Effect of Prophylactic Lamivudine plus Adefovir Therapy Compared with Lamivudine Alone in Preventing Hepatitis B Reactivation in Lymphoma Patients with High Baseline HBV DNA during Chemotherapy

Prophylactic antiviral therapy is essential for lymphoma patients with high baseline HBV DNA who undergo cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, there are limited data on the optimal options. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy of prophylactic lamivudine (LAM) with lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil (LAM+ADV) in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in lymphoma with, pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA load ≥2000 IU/ml. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 86 lymphoma patients with baseline HBV DNA load ≥2000 IU/ml during chemotherapy and received LAM or LAM+ADV as prophylaxis between January 1, 2008 and November 30, 2014 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, China. Sixty-five patients received LAM and 21 received LAM+ADV. The rate was significantly lower in the LAM+ADV group compared with the LAM group for HBV reactivation (23.8% vs 55.4%; p = 0.012), while no difference was observed between the two groups in patients for HBV-related hepatitis (21.3% vs 33.3%; p   =  0.349), and chemotherapy disruption (10.9% vs 19.0%; p = 0.337). In a multivariate analysis of factors associated with HBV reactivation in these patients, LAM+ADV treatment and HBeAg negative were the independent protective factors. Therefore, LAM+ADV should be considered for antiviral prophylaxis in lymphoma patients with pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA load ≥2000 IU/ml. Further study is warranted to confirm these findings.

Bendamustine associated immune suppression and infections during therapy of hematological malignancies

Bendamustine is being increasingly used in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This review summarizes available evidence regarding the effects of bendamustine on the immune system, examines its role in consequent infections as reported in randomized controlled trials, prospective observational investigations, retrospective studies and individual published case reports. Myelosuppression including lymphopenia occurs relatively frequently after therapy with bendamustine. It is mostly CD4 + T cell counts that are suppressed, yet when given in combination with rituximab, both T cell and B cell depletion have been recorded. In addition, hypogammaglobulinemia after bendamustine therapy has also been reported. Variable infection rates have been documented and these include different bacterial, viral and fungal infections. Finally, we also consider issues relating to the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients receiving the drug.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with antirheumatic therapy: Risk and prophylaxis recommendations

Accompanying the increased use of biological and non-biological antirheumatic drugs, a greater number of cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation have been reported in inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers and also in HBsAg-negative patients who have resolved HBV infection. The prevalence of resolved infection varies in rheumatic disease patients, ranging from 7.3% to 66%. Through an electronic search of the PubMed database, we found that among 712 patients with resolved infection in 17 observational cohort studies, 12 experienced HBV reactivation (1.7%) during biological antirheumatic therapy. Reactivation rates were 2.4% for etanercept therapy, 0.6% for adalimumab, 0% for infliximab, 8.6% for tocilizumab, and 3.3% for rituximab. Regarding non-biological antirheumatic drugs, HBV reactivation was observed in 10 out of 327 patients with resolved infection from five cohort studies (3.2%). Most of these patients received steroids concomitantly. Outcomes were favorable in rheumatic disease patients. A number of recommendations have been established, but most of the supporting evidence was derived from the oncology and transplantation fields. Compared with patients in these fields, rheumatic disease patients continue treatment with multiple immunosuppressants for longer periods. Optimal frequency and duration of HBV-DNA monitoring and reliable markers for discontinuation of nucleoside analogues should be clarified for rheumatic disease patients with resolved HBV infection.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation with a rituximab-containing regimen

Rituximab is currently used not only in the treatment of B-cell lymphoma but also for various other diseases, including autoimmune diseases, post-transplant graft vs host disease, and rejection following kidney transplants. Due to rituximab’s widespread use, great progress has been made regarding research into complications that arise from its use, one of the most serious being the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV), and efforts continue to establish guidelines for preventive treatment against this occurrence. This report discusses preventive measures against rituximab-induced HBV reactivation and future objectives.

Research advances in reactivation of hepatitis virus after chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma-combined hepatitis B virus infection

Infection rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in our country remains high. Many patients showed combined HBV infection; the most common blood system disease is non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)-combined HBV infection. Drugs used in treating lymphoma may induce different degrees of HBV reactivation. Such condition may lead to hepatic failure or death. Currently, scholars pay increasing attention to reactivation of HBV by rituximab and/or chemotherapy for NHL-combined HBV patients. This study summarizes research advances in this topic, with a view of providing background information for further research.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation and hepatitis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with resolved hepatitis B receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy: risk factors and survival

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported in B-cell lymphoma patients with resolved hepatitis B (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-negative and hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb]-positive). This study aimed to assess HBV reactivation and hepatitis occurrence in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with resolved hepatitis B receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy compared with HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-negative patients to identify risk factors for HBV reactivation and hepatitis occurrence and to analyze whether HBV reactivation and hepatitis affect the survival of DLBCL patients with resolved hepatitis B.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical data of 278 patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab-containing therapy between January 2004 and May 2008 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, China. Predictive factors for HBV reactivation, hepatitis development, and survival were examined by univariate analysis using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and by multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model.

Results

Among the 278 patients, 165 were HBsAg-negative. Among these 165 patients, 6 (10.9%) of 55 HBcAb-positive (resolved HBV infection) patients experienced HBV reactivation compared with none (0%) of 110 HBcAb-negative patients (P = 0.001). Patients with resolved hepatitis B had a higher hepatitis occurrence rate than HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-negative patients (21.8% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.013). HBcAb positivity and elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were independent risk factors for hepatitis. Among the 55 patients with resolved hepatitis B, patients with elevated baseline serum ALT or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were more likely to develop hepatitis than those with normal serum ALT or AST levels (P = 0.037, P = 0.005, respectively). An elevated baseline AST level was an independent risk factor for hepatitis in these patients. Six patients with HBV reactivation recovered after immediate antiviral therapy, and chemotherapy was continued. HBcAb positivity, HBV reactivation, or hepatitis did not negatively affect the survival of DLBCL patients.

Conclusions

DLBCL patients with resolved hepatitis B may have a higher risk of developing HBV reactivation and hepatitis than HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-negative patients. Close monitoring and prompt antiviral therapy are required in these patients.

Rituximab Treatment for Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

In the past 10 years, many reports have suggested that rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is effective for children with complicated, frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, those reports were case reports, case series, retrospective surveys, and single-arm or short-term trials. Therefore, well-designed controlled trials are required to establish the value of rituximab in this condition. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in childhood-onset, complicated FRNS/SDNS, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out by the Research Group of Childhood-onset Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome (RCRNS) in Japan (RCRNS01). RCRNS01 showed that rituximab is safe and effective for the treatment of childhood-onset, complicated FRNS/SDNS. In 2014, the use of rituximab for patients with complicated FRNS/SDNS was approved, first in the world, by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.

Hypogammaglobulinaemia after rituximab treatment-incidence and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20, is increasingly used in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas and autoimmune conditions. Transient peripheral B-cell depletion is expected following rituximab therapy. Although initial clinical trials did not show significant hypogammaglobulinaemia, reports of this are now appearing in the literature.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients previously treated with rituximab that were referred to Clinical Immunology with symptomatic or severe hypogammaglobulinaemia. Patient clinical histories, immunological markers, length of rituximab treatment and need for intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IVIG) were evaluated. An audit of patients receiving rituximab for any condition in a 12-month period and frequency of hypogammaglobulinaemia was also carried out.

RESULTS

We identified 19 post-rituximab patients with persistent, symptomatic panhypogammaglobulinaemia. Mean IgG level was 3.42 ± 0.4 g/l (normal range 5.8-16.3 g/l). All patients had reduced or absent B-cells. Haemophilus Influenzae B, tetanus and Pneumococcal serotype-specific antibody levels were all reduced and patients failed to mount an immune response post-vaccination. Nearly all of them ultimately required IVIG. The mean interval from the last rituximab dose and need for IVIG was 36 months (range 7 months-7 years). Of note, 23.7% of 114 patients included in the audit had hypogammaglobulinaemia.

CONCLUSION

With the increasing use of rituximab, it is important for clinicians treating these patients to be aware of hypogammaglobulinaemia and serious infections occurring even years after completion of treatment and should be actively looked for during follow-up. Referral to clinical immunology services and, if indicated, initiation of IVIG should be considered.

[Hepatitis B virus infection in pregnancy and the immunosuppressed patient]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to be a major public health problem worldwide. Although treatment indications are well established in clinical practice guidelines, there are some risk groups, such as pregnant women and immunosuppressed patients, who require different and specific management of HBV infection. In pregnant women, treatment indication should be individualized and the risk of HBV transmission to the newborn evaluated because cases of vertical transmission continue to be reported, despite active and passive immunoprophylaxis. In patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, HBV reactivation is associated with high morbidity and mortality, even in patients with past HBV infection, highlighting the importance of screening and the need to evaluate prophylactic therapy in some cases.

Treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis: new therapies and a look at old entities

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a small-vessel vasculitis that primarily comprises 2 clinical syndromes: granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have traditionally been used for induction of remission. However, more recent studies have shown that rituximab is as effective as cyclophosphamide for induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed severe AAV and superior for patients with relapsing AAV. There is also accumulating evidence indicating a potential role of rituximab for maintenance therapy in AAV. In this article, we will review the evidence supporting the various treatment choices for patients with AAV.

Rituximab in the treatment of peripheral neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy

Peripheral neuropathy associated with immunoglobulin (Ig)M gammopathy and anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies is frequently treatment-resistant and different treatment regimens carry substantial toxicity and side effects. More recently, the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has shown benefits in the treatment of peripheral neuropathy associated with IgM gammopathy with a favorable side-effect profile. There are no published reports of its use in the treatment of neuropathy associated with IgG and IgA gammopathies. Rituximab is usually given at 375 mg/m(2) intravenously with four weekly doses that may be repeated after 6-12 months. Large controlled studies are still pending but rituximab is an exciting and promising treatment offering another option in the treatment of peripheral neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab-containing regimen

Rituximab is recognized as a useful drug for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and its use has been extended to such diseases as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, chronic rheumatoid arthritis and ANCA-associated vasculitides. One serious complication associated with its use is the reactivation of hepatitis B virus and the search for methods to prevent this occurrence has resulted in the rapid accumulation of knowledge. In this review, we discuss case analyses from our department and other groups and outline the current knowledge on the topic and the remaining issues.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: beyond B-cells

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), employed in treating CD20⁺ lymphomas and autoimmune diseases, appear to have broader functions than just eradicating malignant B-cells and decreasing autoantibody production. Rituximab-induced T-cell inactivation, reported both in-vitro and in-vivo, may contribute to the increased risk of T-cell-dependent infections, observed in patients receiving this therapy. T-cell polarization into a suppressive phenotype, often observed in patients receiving rituximab for autoimmune disorders, was reported to be associated with prolonged remissions. Elimination of B-cells serving as antigen-presenting cells, thereby causing impaired T-cell activation, could play a significant role in induction of these changes. Direct binding of rituximab to a CD20dim T-cell population, inducing its depletion, may contribute to the decreased T-cell activation following rituximab therapy. Further investigation of the complex network through which rituximab and new anti-CD20 MoAbs act, would advance the employment of these agents in different clinical settings.

Incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients receiving rituximab and the use of intravenous immunoglobulin for recurrent infections

Rituximab targets normal B cells and tumor B cells. We used a unique data-mining tool to identify patients with lymphoma who were treated with rituximab and who had serial pre and post rituximab immunoglobulin concentrations evaluated. After treatment, 39% (69/179) of patients had low levels of immunoglobulin G. Recurrent sinopulmonary infections were seen in 6.6% (14/211). Intravenous immune globulin appeared to reduce the frequency of infection.

BACKGROUND

Rituximab has altered the treatment approach to B-cell malignancies and other diseases. Reports consider that rituximab had limited impact on serum immunoglobulins. However, anecdotes suggest that rituximab can cause symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia. This retrospective study examined the relationship among rituximab, hypogammaglobulinemia, and treatment of symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG).

METHODS

Patients with serial quantitative serum immunoglobulin (SIgG) concentrations before and subsequent to rituximab administration at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were identified. Information regarding rituximab administration, SIgG concentrations, frequency of infection, and administration of IVIG were recorded.

RESULTS

Between December 1998 and April 2009, 211 patients with B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab and with serial SIgG concentrations were identified. One hundred seventy-nine (85%) patients had normal SIgG before rituximab, 32 (15%) had low SIgG. After rituximab use, hypogammaglobulinemia was identified in 38.54% of patients with initially normal SIgG. The risk was greater in patients who received maintenance rituximab. Symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia that prompted IVIG administration developed in 6.6% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this data set, rituximab administration was associated with a high frequency of hypogammaglobulinemia, particularly symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia, among patients who received multiple courses of rituximab. Baseline and periodic monitoring of SIgGs is appropriate in patients who receive rituximab.

Acute exacerbation and reactivation of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in cancer patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Data on acute exacerbation and reactivation of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection following chemotherapy are very limited. We sought to characterize the episodes of acute exacerbation and viral reactivation of HCV infection in cancer patients.

METHODS

The medical records of HCV-infected patients seen at our institution (2008-2009) were analyzed retrospectively. Acute exacerbation was defined as greater than 3-fold increase in serum level of alanine aminotransferase, and viral reactivation as ≥ 1 log(10) IU/ml increase of HCV viral load following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Acute exacerbation occurred in 33 (11%) of 308 patients with proven HCV infection. Patients with acute exacerbation more often had underlying hematological malignancies (73% vs. 29%; p<0.001) and lymphopenia (6% vs. 0%; p=0.01) than patients without it. In multivariate analysis, underlying hematological malignancies (p=0.02; odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.7) and use of rituximab (p=0.004; odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-10.9) were associated with acute exacerbation. Patients with acute exacerbation received higher median cumulative dose of rituximab than those without exacerbation. Discontinuation of chemotherapy due to liver dysfunction was more common in patients with acute exacerbation than in patients without it (45% vs. 11%; p<0.001). Eight (36%) of 22 patients with known pre- and post-chemotherapy viral load had viral reactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute exacerbation and reactivation of chronic HCV infection occur often after chemotherapy. Liver dysfunction can lead to discontinuation of potentially life-saving chemotherapy in nearly one-half of the patients with exacerbation of HCV infection.

Effect of Antiviral Prophylaxis Strategy for Chemotherapy-Associated Hepatitis B Reactivation in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Recent data indicates that nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NUC) is effective in preventing and controlling hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV-carrying cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy, but the ideal antiviral agent and optimal application protocol still needs to be determined. Meanwhile, it is uncertain whether those with past HBV infection require antiviral prophylaxis during chemotherapy. This report retrospectively analyzed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients seen from January, 2004 to June, 2009 in West China Hospital. We found that the prevalence of chronic HBV infection in our NHL patients was 20.7 % while that of past HBV infection was 21.05 %. Compared with the high rate (25.6 %) of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic HBV infection, none of those with past HBV infection in fact had occult HBV infection thus none experienced reactivation. Of the 82 patients with chronic HBV infection who received chemotherapy, antiviral prophylaxis could significantly reduce the incidence of HBV reactivation (5.0 vs. 45.2 % in the control group) and the incidence of liver function damage (32.5 vs. 73.8 % in the control group). The results of the current study confirmed previous reports that prophylactic NUCs administration can effectively prevent HBV reactivation and significantly reduce the incidence of HBV reactivation especially for patients receiving rituximab-containing regimens. Due to the fact that none of individuals who had past HBV infection developed HBV reactivation reported in our study, antiviral prophylaxis may not be required for patients with past HBV infection. Close observation of alanine aminotransferase and HBV-DNA contributes to early diagnosis and timely treatment of HBV reactivation.

Rituximab-induced direct inhibition of T-cell activation

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is reported to increase the T-cell-dependent infection risk. The current study was designed to investigate whether rituximab interferes with T-cell activation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving 4-6 courses of 375 mg/m(2) rituximab underwent detailed assessment of T-cell activation pre- and post-rituximab. A similar analysis assessed the in vitro effect of rituximab on T-cell activation in response to allogeneic dendritic cells (allo-DCs) and other stimuli.

RESULTS

Patients receiving rituximab exhibited a significant decline in IL-2 and IFN-γ levels in peripheral blood, most prominent after repeated rituximab courses. Evaluation at 3 months after rituximab therapy showed restoration of inflammatory cytokine production. Similarly, in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the presence of rituximab resulted in a significant decrease in T-cell activation markers, inflammatory cytokine production and proliferative capacity. These effects were also observed using B-cell-depleted T cells (CD3(+)CD25(-)CD19(-)) and were accompanied with disappearance of CD3(+)CD20(dim) T-cell population.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab administration results in transient, dose-dependent T-cell inactivation. This effect is obtained even in B-cell absence and may increase the infection risk.

Rituximab-induced hepatitis C virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis

The B-cell depletion agent rituximab (RTX) is used in lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and there have been several case reports of an RTX-induced reactivation of hepatitis C virus in patients with lymphoma. However, there have been no papers detailing hepatitis C virus reactivation after RTX therapy in a patient with RA. Here we report a case of RTX-induced hepatitis C virus reactivation in a patient with RA. Physicians should be aware that a close follow-up of liver function and viral load is mandatory after RTX therapy in patients with RA and concomitant hepatitis C.

Current trends in management of hepatitis B virus reactivation in the biologic therapy era

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation represents an emerging cause of liver disease in patients undergoing treatment with biologic agents. In particular, the risk of HBV reactivation is heightened by the use monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab (anti-CD20) and alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) that cause profound and long-lasting immunosuppression. Emerging data indicate that HBV reactivation could also develop following the use of other biologic agents, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors. When HBV reactivation is diagnosed, it is mandatory to suspend biologic treatment and start antiviral agents immediately. However, pre-emptive antiviral therapy prior to monoclonal antibody administration is crucial in preventing HBV reactivation and its clinical consequences. Several lines of evidence have shown that risk of HBV reactivation is greatly reduced by the identification of high-risk patients and the use of prophylactic antiviral therapy. In this article, we discuss current trends in the management of HBV reactivation in immunosuppressed patients receiving biologic therapy, such as rituximab, alemtuzumab and TNF-α antagonists.

Late onset of hepatitis B virus reactivation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: successful treatment with combined entecavir plus tenofovir therapy

Prophylaxis with lamivudine (LAM) is recommended for hepatitis B core antibody-positive allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, but the optimal timing for the institution and duration of the prophylaxis is still unknown. Furthermore, considering the high rate of mortality associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV-R), the most potent and long-term effective antiviral regimen should be considered. We report here a case of late onset of HBV-R after a long-term prophylaxis with LAM in a patient who underwent HSCT for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and who was successfully treated with a combination antiviral regimen including entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated an association between hepatitis C virus and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). There is also evidence on the association between hepatitis B virus (HBV) and NHL. The aim of this study was to evaluate this evidence using a meta-analytic approach.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE database from 1962 to 2008 for case-control studies that have reported the association of HBV with NHL. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess the prevalence of HBV infection and pooled the results using three different statistical models.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 12 studies with 11 studies (3262 NHL patients, 1,523,205 controls) evaluating HBV infection in NHL and one study (3888 HBV-infected individuals, 205,203 controls) that had investigated for NHL in HBV infection. The OR of detecting HBV infection in NHL when compared with the control population was 2.56 (95% CI, 2.24-2.92) by the fixed effects model; 2.61 (95% CI, 2.29-2.98) by the exact method and 2.67 (95% CI, 2.04-3.49) by the random effects model suggesting a high prevalence of HBV carrier state in lymphoma. There was evidence of statistical heterogeneity which disappeared after exclusion of retrospective studies on sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest a possible causal relation between HBV infection and NHL which needs to be confirmed by experimental and epidemiological studies. In countries where prevalence of HBV infection is 1% or more, it may be prudent to screen patients with NHL for occult HBV infection.

Prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation under rituximab therapy

Rituximab is a useful drug for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and its use has been extended to other diseases such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and chronic rheumatoid arthritis. One serious complication associated with rituximab use is reactivation of hepatitis B virus, and the search for methods to prevent this occurrence has resulted in a rapid accumulation of knowledge in recent years. In this review, we will discuss case studies from our group, as well as other groups, and outline current knowledge on the topic together with issues that remain to be resolved.