Safety of aerosolized amphotericin B

Inhaled Antifungal Agents for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Pulmonary Mycoses

Pulmonary mycoses are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The current standard treatment by systemic administration is limited by inadequate local bioavailability and systemic toxic effects. Aerosolisation of antifungals is an attractive approach to overcome these problems, but no inhaled antifungal formulation is currently available for the treatment of pulmonary mycoses. Hence, the development of respirable antifungals formulations is of interest and in high demand. In this review, the recent advances in the development of antifungal formulations for pulmonary delivery are discussed, including both nebulised and dry powder formulations. Although the clinical practices of nebulised parenteral amphotericin B and voriconazole formulations (off-label use) are reported to show promising therapeutic effects with few adverse effects, there is no consensus about the dosage regimen (e.g. the dose, frequency, and whether they are used as single or combination therapy). To maximise the benefits of nebulised antifungal therapy, it is important to establish standardised protocol that clearly defines the dose and specifies the device and the administration conditions. Dry powder formulations of antifungal agents such as itraconazole and voriconazole with favourable physicochemical and aerosol properties are developed using various powder engineering technologies, but it is important to consider their suitability for use in patients with compromised lung functions. In addition, more biological studies on the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile are needed to demonstrate their clinical potential.

Inhaled anti-infective chemotherapy for respiratory tract infections: successes, challenges and the road ahead

One of the most common causes of illnesses in humans is from respiratory tract infections caused by bacterial, viral or fungal pathogens. Inhaled anti-infective drugs are crucial for the prophylaxis and treatment of respiratory tract infections. The benefit of anti-infective drug delivery via inhalation is that it affords delivery of sufficient therapeutic dosages directly to the primary site of infection, while minimizing the risks of systemic toxicity or avoiding potential suboptimal pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics associated with systemic drug exposure. This review provides an up-to-date treatise of approved and novel developmental inhaled anti-infective agents, with particular attention to effective strategies for their use, pulmonary pharmacokinetic properties and safety.

Safety and efficacy of amphotericin-B deoxycholate inhalation in critically ill patients with respiratory Candida spp. colonization: a retrospective analysis

Background

Candida spp. are frequently cultured from the respiratory tract in critically ill patients. Most intensivists start amphotericin-B deoxycholate (ABDC) inhalation therapy to eradicate Candida spp. from the respiratory tract. However, the safety and efficacy of this treatment are not well established. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ABDC inhalation for the treatment of respiratory Candida spp. colonization in critically ill patients.

Methods

All non-neutropenic patients admitted into the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital from December 2010–2011, who had positive Candida spp. cultures of the respiratory tract for more than 1 day and required mechanical ventilation >48 h were retrospectively included. The decision to start ABDC inhalation had been made by attending intensivists on clinical grounds in the context of selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Infection characteristics and patient courses were assessed.

Results

Hundred and thirteen consecutive patients were studied. Fifty-one of them received ABDC inhalation and their characteristics at baseline and day 1 of respiratory colonization did not differ from those of colonized patients not receiving treatment (n = 62). The ABDC-treated group had a similar Candida spp. load but did not decolonize more rapidly as compared to untreated patients. The clinical pulmonary infection and lung injury scores did not decrease as in the untreated group. In a Cox proportional hazard model, the duration of mechanical ventilation was increased (P < 0.003) by ABDC treatment independently of other potential determinants and Candida spp. colonization. No differences in ventilator-associated pneumonia or in overall mortality (up to day 90) were observed.

Conclusion

Treatment of respiratory Candida spp. colonization in non-neutropenic critically ill patients by inhaled ABDC may not affect respiratory colonization but may increase duration of mechanical ventilation, because of direct toxicity of the drug on the lung.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0575-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aerosolized Delivery of Antifungal Agents

Pulmonary infections caused by Aspergillus species are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Although the treatment of pulmonary fungal infections requires the use of systemic agents, aerosolized delivery is an attractive option in prevention because the drug can concentrate locally at the site of infection with minimal systemic exposure. Current clinical evidence for the use of aerosolized delivery in preventing fungal infections is limited to amphotericin B products, although itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin are under investigation. Based on conflicting results from clinical trials that evaluated various amphotericin B formulations, the routine use of aerosolized delivery cannot be recommended. Further research with well-designed clinical trials is necessary to elucidate the therapeutic role and risks associated with aerosolized delivery of antifungal agents. This article provides an overview of aerosolized delivery systems, the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic properties of aerosolized antifungal agents, and key findings from clinical studies.

A review on the clinical use of inhaled amphotericin B

BACKGROUND

Despite the systemic toxicity of amphotericin B (AMB), it still has a place in treatment or prophylactic regimes of fungal infections.

METHODS

A strategy for minimizing the potential of systemic side effects is to bring it in direct contact with the body site most likely to be infected, such as the administration of AMB as an aerosol. Nebulized amphotericin has been used in humans since 1959. However, due to a lack of sufficient data regarding efficacy, its use is still not established. Little is known about the optimal dose, frequency, duration of administration, and the pharmacokinetics of inhaled AMB in humans.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this review, published data regarding inhaled AMB are summarized, including available descriptions regarding preparation, dose, efficacy, and toxicity, and its place in therapy is discussed. The results from the studies that were reviewed in this article indicate that inhaled AMB may have a place in the prophylactic regimens of patients with prolonged neutropenia and in lung transplant recipients. Furthermore, nebulized (liposomal) AMB may have a place in the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in patients with corticosteroid-dependent ABPA.

Efficiency and safety of inhaled amphotericin B lipid complex (Abelcet) in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections following lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LT) are associated with significant mortality. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of aerosolized amphotericin B deoxycholate and oral fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis. Evolving data show a potential advantage of prophylaxis with lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B in the prevention of IFIs. We reviewed the incidence of IFIs among patients receiving aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in LT.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of the results of our antifungal protocol in a cohort of 60 LT patients. We analyzed the efficiency, safety, and tolerability of 50 mg of aerosolized ABLC administered postoperatively for IFI prophylaxis once every 2 days for 2 weeks and then once per week for at least 13 weeks. In addition, these transplanted patients received fluconazole (200 mg/d) during the first 21 days posttransplant. The prophylaxis-related efficiency and safety were quantified for IFIs and adverse events (AEs) for 6 months after study drug initiation.

RESULTS

Prophylaxis was efficient in 59 (98.3%) patients. Only one patient developed a possible IFI, due to Aspergillus fumigatus. Four patients presented nausea and vomiting as an AE, although aerosolized amphotericin B was ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

Nebulized ABLC was effective, safe, and well tolerated for the prophylaxis of aspergillosis in lung transplant patients during the early posttransplant period.