Comparison of intuitiveness, ease of use and preference among three prefilled, disposable growth hormone injection pens

Patient preferences for prophylactic regimens requiring regular injections in children and adolescents: a systematic review and thematic analysis

BACKGROUND

At present, limited literature exists exploring patient preferences for prophylactic treatment of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Given low treatment completion rates to this treatment in Australia, where the burden of disease predominantly affects Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, an improved understanding of factors driving patient preference is required to improve outcomes. Due to limited available literature, this review sought to explore treatment preferences for conditions for which the findings might be generalisable to the ARF/RHD context.

OBJECTIVE

Explore treatment preferences of patients, parents/caregivers and healthcare providers towards regular injection regimens in paediatric and adolescent populations for any chronic condition. Findings will be applied to the development of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylactic regimens that are informed by treatment preferences of patients and their caregivers. This in turn should contribute to optimisation of successful BPG delivery.

METHODS

A systematic review of databases (Medline, Embase and Global Health) was conducted using a search strategy developed with expert librarian input. Studies were selected using a two-stage process: (1) title and abstract screen and (2) full text review. Data were extracted using a reviewer-developed template and appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool. Data were synthesised according to a thematic analytical framework.

RESULTS

1725 papers were identified by the database search, conducted between 12 February 2022 and 8 April 2022, and 25 were included in the review. Line-by-line coding to search for concepts generated 20 descriptive themes. From these, five overarching analytical themes were derived inductively: (1) ease of use, (2) tolerability of injection, (3) impact on daily life, (4) patient/caregiver agency and (5) home/healthcare interface.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review may be used to inform the development of preference-led regular injection regimens for paediatric and adolescent patient cohorts-specifically for BPG administration in ARF/RHD secondary prophylaxis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Patient, parent and health personnel preferences towards regular injection regimes in paediatric and adolescent populations-a protocol for a systematic review. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021284375. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021284375.

The role of growth hormone device optimization in patient-reported outcomes: real-world evidence from South Korea

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH) treatment preference and adherence are affected by delivery device convenience, injection-site pain, confidence in correct dose administration, and device satisfaction. This survey investigated if switching device to NordiFlex® improved treatment experience in pediatric patients in South Korea.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients aged 4-≤18 years were surveyed. Participants were NordiFlex® users who previously used NordiLet®/other devices. Participants compared preference, self-reported adherence, satisfaction, perceived ease of use, and device subjective benefits (across four domains: ease of use, self-efficacy, minimal disruption of daily life, positive feelings about injections) of NordiFlex® vs. previous device.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were enrolled, of which 91.5% previously used NordiLet®. Significantly more patients preferred, and were more satisfied with NordiFlex® vs. previous device; mean score: 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.41;0.88) and 0.61 (95% CI:0.36;0.85), respectively. Participants reported greater perceived ease of use (0.49 [95% CI:0.26;0.72]) and fewer missed injections (0.20 [95% CI:0.06;0.34], with NordiFlex® vs. previous device. Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between preference for NordiFlex® and higher scores on self-efficacy, ease of use, minimal disruption of daily life, and positive feelings about injection (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that improvements in device features could be associated with improved treatment experience.

Clinicians' Feedback on Patient/Carer Experience After Switching of Growth Hormone Treatment in Pediatric Patients During COVID-19

PURPOSE

This study investigated why some clinicians switched growth hormone (GH) brands in pediatric patients with GH-related disorders to Norditropin^® since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the clinicians' perceptions of the results, and whether observations from this period of disruption could inform clinical practice in the future.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicians (N=106) from the UK, France, Italy, and Japan who had switched at least one patient to Norditropin^® from a GH therapy manufactured by a different pharmaceutical company between February and November 2020 participated. They completed an online survey and submitted patient report forms for up to three switched patients.

RESULTS

Since the start of COVID-19, 39-54% of the reported consultations were virtual (ie, via telephone or online means) in the UK, France, and Italy. Overall, 17% of patients seen by respondents in the survey were switched to a different GH brand; approximately two-thirds of switches were to Norditropin^®. Clinicians' top considerations in choosing a GH brand were patient/carer feedback, patient support programs, and the need for easy-to-use therapies in the context of virtual consultations. The top reasons for switching patients to Norditropin^® included ease of use, device features and benefits, better patient/carer feedback, and ease of training in device use via virtual consultations. Norditropin^® was considered suitable for use in virtual or in-person consultations or a mixture of both. Based on patient/carer feedback, 66% of clinicians believed that patients preferred Norditropin^® to their previous therapy in terms of overall satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

In this survey, key considerations in prescribing GH therapy were ease of use and acceptability to patients and carers. If virtual consultations increasingly replace in-person ones, ease in training patients/carers in device use will be particularly important. A majority of clinicians considered that their patients preferred Norditropin^® to their previous therapy.

The burden of at-home preparation of lyophilized parenteral medications: an analysis of contributing factors and implications for chronic disease patients and caregivers

BACKGROUND

In the acute care setting, parenteral medication errors are well-studied. However, there is comparatively little research on how these issues translate to patient- or caregiver-prepared medications in the home, particularly with reconstituted medications.

METHODS

This was an ethnographic study designed to identify issues associated with four reconstitution use scenarios. Preparation burden was determined by measuring the time and manipulations required to prepare reconstituted medications across three preparation phases (assembly, reconstitution, and transfer). Deviations from product instructions for use, sterility breaches, self-reported preparation complications, and supply storage conditions were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 14 participants completed the study. Overall, preparation burden was markedly higher when purpose-built reconstitution devices were not available. The majority of participants reported experiencing at least one complication associated with their medication preparation process; the reconstitution phase was the most significant source of both instructions for use deviations and breaches in sterility. Participants reported that the volume and variety of medication preparation supplies were a significant source of burden.

CONCLUSIONS

At-home preparation of reconstituted medications poses several challenges for patients and caregivers. As parenteral medications continue to shift towards self-administration, manufacturers should carefully consider the usability of such products and employ purpose-built reconstitution devices whenever possible.

Formative usability evaluation of a fixed-dose pen-injector platform device

Background

This article for the first time presents a formative usability study of a fixed-dose pen injector platform device used for the subcutaneous delivery of biopharmaceuticals, primarily for self-administration by the patient. The study was conducted with a user population of both naïve and experienced users across a range of ages. The goals of the study were to evaluate whether users could use the devices safely and effectively relying on the instructions for use (IFU) for guidance, as well as to benchmark the device against another similar injector established in the market. Further objectives were to capture any usability issues and obtain participants’ subjective ratings on the properties and performance of both devices.

Methods

A total of 20 participants in three groups studied the IFU and performed simulated injections into an injection pad.

Results

All participants were able to use the device successfully. The device was well appreciated by all users with, maximum usability feedback scores reported by 90% or more on handling forces and device feedback, and by 85% or more on fit and grip of the device. The presence of clear audible and visible feedbacks upon successful loading of a dose and completion of injection was seen to be a significant improvement over the benchmark injector.

Conclusion

The observation that the platform device can be safely and efficiently used by all user groups provides confidence that the device and IFU in their current form will pass future summative testing in specific applications.