Integration of dose counters in pressurized metered-dose inhalers for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: review of evidence

Geriatric drug delivery - barriers, current technologies and the road ahead

The geriatric population encompasses the largest part of the health care system worldwide. Chronic medical conditions are highly prevalent in the elderly, consequently, due to their complex health needs, there is a significant rate of multi-drug therapy. Despite the high numbers of medications prescribed, geriatric patients face several barriers when it comes to successful drug delivery including alterations in cognitive and physical function. The current review highlights the impact of chronic diseases on the ageing population along with how changes in drug pharmacokinetics could impact drug efficacy and safety. Also discussed are applications of administration routes in the geriatric population and complications that could arise. A focus is placed on the traditional and upcoming drug delivery advancements being employed in seniors with a focus addressing obstacles faced by this patient category. Nanomedicines, three-dimensional printing, long-acting formulations, transdermal systems, orally disintegrating tablets, and shape/taste modification technologies are discussed. Several barriers to drug delivery in the elderly have been identified in literature and directions for future studies should focus on addressing these gaps for geriatric drug formulation development including personalised medicine, insights into novel drug delivery systems like nanomedicines, methods for decreasing pill burden and shape/size modifications.ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTSTypically, senior citizens take more medications than any other patient population, yet most drug delivery technologies are not tailored to address the specific cognitive and physical barriers that these individuals encounter.The safety of drug delivery systems in the elderly patients should be prioritised with considerations on changes in pharmacokinetics with age, use of non-toxic excipients, and selecting drugs with minimal off-target side effects.Several commercialised and upcoming drug delivery technologies have begun to address the current limitations that the ageing population faces.Future research should focus on applying novel strategies like 3D printing, personalised medicine, and long-acting formulations to improve drug delivery to elderly patients.

A narrative review on the Synchrobreathe™: A novel breath-actuated pressurised metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of obstructive airway diseases

Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs), are widely used to deliver drugs for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Incorrect use of inhalers is one of the main obstacles to achieving better clinical control. Indeed, with pMDIs, patients fail to synchronise actuation with inhalation due to a lack of coordination and with DPIs insufficient inspiratory effort compromises drug deposition in lungs. More than 50% of patients desire to switch their pMDIs and DPIs for a better device. This led to the development of pressurised breath-actuated inhalers (BAIs) with the aim of combining the beneficial features of pMDIs and DPIs and mitigating their problems. BAIs, e.g., Synchrobreathe™, are designed such that they are activated by a low inhalation effort and mechanically actuate the dose in synchrony to inspiration, thereby resolving the need to coordinate actuation with inspiration. BAIs have advantages, including ease of use, high lung deposition of medication, and greater patient preference. We discussed the design features, operating procedure, and clinical evidence of the Synchrobreathe™ device (Cipla Ltd, India), a BAI available with a wide range of drug combinations. Studies have shown that a higher number of patients (68.19%) used the Synchrobreathe™ without any error than the pMDI (56.21%), and that the vast majority of them (92%) found it easy to understand and use. The Synchrobreathe™ is an innovative, easy-to-use inhaler that may overcome many limitations associated with pMDIs and DPIs, thus potentially improving management of obstructive airway diseases and patients' quality of life.

Advancing Treatment Strategies: A Comprehensive Review of Drug Delivery Innovations for Chronic Inflammatory Respiratory Diseases

Chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis, present ongoing challenges in terms of effective treatment and management. These diseases are characterized by persistent inflammation in the airways, leading to structural changes and compromised lung function. There are several treatments available for them, such as bronchodilators, immunomodulators, and oxygen therapy. However, there are still some shortcomings in the effectiveness and side effects of drugs. To achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes while minimizing systemic side effects, targeted therapies and precise drug delivery systems are crucial to the management of these diseases. This comprehensive review focuses on the role of drug delivery systems in chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases, particularly nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), novel biologicals, gene therapy, and personalized medicine. By examining the latest advancements and strategies in these areas, we aim to provide a thorough understanding of the current landscape and future prospects for improving treatment outcomes in these challenging conditions.

Usability of administration devices for oral and respiratory medicines: views from a UK primary school

The correct use of medicine administration devices is pivotal for optimal drug therapy in children. Little is known about end users' perspectives on administration device use. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a survey to gain information and opinions from caregivers and children regarding the usability of paediatric medicine administration devices. A survey was conducted at a primary school in the United Kingdom in children aged 10-12 years and their caregivers. It focused on oral and respiratory devices and comprised two identical parts: 1) for the caregivers, 2) for the children with parental consent. Ethics approval (REC4612-016) was obtained. A total of 57 caregiver-child pairs accessed the survey and it was completed by parents only (n=4), children only (n=31) or jointly (n=22). Most participants (65%) had taken liquid dosage forms (e.g., syrups/suspensions) compared to solid dosage forms (34%). Oral devices most frequently used were oral syringes (42%), measuring spoons (22%), and household spoons (18%), with parents most frequently demonstrating device use to their children. Respiratory devices were used less frequently, and pressurised metered-dose inhalers with/without spacer (pMDIs) were the most commonly used devices (11/13). Instructions on use were provided by healthcare professionals to both caregivers and children. Generally, oral and respiratory devices were considered easy to use and instructions were clear. However, for both oral and respiratory devices, some suggestions for device improvement were provided by participants. Education/training by healthcare professionals and clear supplier instructions (e.g., pictograms) may be especially effective in ensuring that caregivers and children are able to use administration devices appropriately and receive sufficient information on their correct use.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of formoterol/budesonide pMDI versus its mono-components and other LABA/ICS in patients with asthma

INTRODUCTION

Pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) are effective drug delivery devices prescribed in obstructive airway diseases due to their convenience, portability, ease of enabling multiple doses in a single formulation, and storage in any orientation. For the management of asthma, the fixed-dose combination of a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) has been recommended by Global Initiative for Asthma guideline as a preferred treatment option for patients who are uncontrolled with only ICS doses. One of the available LABA/ICS combinations is the formoterol/budesonide (FB).

AREAS COVERED

This article systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of the FB pMDI compared with the FB dry powder inhaler (DPI), individual mono-components (formoterol and budesonide) or salmeterol/fluticasone (SF) combination in the treatment of asthma among paediatric and adult patients. PubMed was searched with the string: ''((Budesonide) AND Formoterol) AND ((((pMDI) OR MDI) OR Pressurised Metered-dose inhaler) OR Metered-dose inhaler)'', in ALL fields. Screening of all the articles was done till February 2020. We have included 24 articles from the total of 142 hits received.

CONCLUSIONS

The FB pMDI is efficacious for the long-term management of asthma in patients 6 years of age and above. It has been shown to improve lung function and asthma control, and to reduce daytime and night-time symptoms, the number of rescue medication doses and asthma exacerbations. It also showed rapid onset of bronchodilatory effect with a dose-response relationship that allows patients to utilise it as a Single Maintenance And Reliever Therapy (SMART) regimen.

Preference of diagnostic tools, medications, and devices for asthma management: A survey of doctors in Algeria

Aim:

This study aimed to evaluate the doctors' perspectives in using tools for diagnosis, prescribing medications, and devices for the treatment of asthma in Algeria.

Methods:

Data were collected from randomly selected physicians, pediatricians, allergists, and pulmonologists through a questionnaire-based survey in 12 cities and 60 rural locations across Algeria.

Results:

Of the 213 doctors who responded to the survey, >90% doctors attended an average of 20 asthma patients daily. Peak flow meter was used by 69% doctors for diagnosis and by 93% for monitoring of asthma. Spirometer was used by 76% doctors for diagnosis of asthma. Budesonide (86%), fluticasone (46%), and beclomethasone (40%) were the most prescribed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) by doctors. Formoterol/budesonide was the most preferred ICS/long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) (72%), followed by salmeterol/fluticasone (57%) for asthma treatment. Salbutamol was preferred by 93% doctors as reliever medication. ICS was the preferred controller in mild asthma (76%), and ICS/LABA combination in moderate (74%) and severe asthma (80%). Most doctors (94%) preferred pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) with (46%) or without spacer (48%) for their asthma patients. About 83% doctors believed that pMDI with spacer would show a better outcome in asthma, over pMDI alone. Continuous exposure to allergens/smoking (73%) and incorrect inhaler technique (66%) were the most common reasons for uncontrolled asthma.

Conclusion:

The use of diagnostic tools in asthma was found to be adequate among the doctors in Algeria. Most of the doctors managed asthma in accordance with the global initiative for asthma guidelines. Spacers were found to be less prescribed in regular treatment, despite having good awareness about its better outcomes.

Drug delivery to the lungs: challenges and opportunities

Pulmonary drug delivery is relatively complex because the respiratory tract has evolved defense mechanisms to keep inhaled drug particles out of the lungs and to remove or inactivate them once deposited. In addition to these mechanical, chemical and immunological barriers, pulmonary drug delivery is adversely affected by the behavioral barriers of poor adherence and poor inhaler technique. Strategies to mitigate the effects of these barriers include use of inhaler devices and formulations that deliver drug to the lungs efficiently, appropriate inhaler technique and improved education of patients. Owing to the advantages offered by the pulmonary route, the challenges that the route poses are worth addressing, and if successfully addressed, the pulmonary route offers huge opportunities, often fulfilling unmet clinical needs.

Comparing Ran-Out Status of Inhaled Short-Acting Beta-Agonists in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Asthma: 1996-1998 versus 2015-2017

BACKGROUND

Medication nonadherence, including running out of inhaled asthma medications, is an important problem.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the changes in the proportion of adults with acute asthma who ran out of their short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) inhalers before presenting to the emergency department (ED) between 1996--1998 and 2015-2017.

METHODS

We analyzed data from prospective multicenter observational cohort studies of ED adult patients (aged 18-54 years) with acute asthma. Within the same 3 EDs, we performed a structured interview during 2 time periods: 1996-1998 and 2015-2017. We fitted multivariable models to compare ran-out status between the 2 periods, adjusting for the baseline patient demographics, socioeconomic status, chronic asthma factors, and health care utilization factors. We further adjusted for the presence of a written action plan-an intervenable factor.

RESULTS

The analytic cohort comprised 353 patients (150 from the 1996-1998 studies and 203 from the 2015-2017 study). Over the approximately 20-year period, the proportion of patients who ran out of SABA inhalers increased (18% in 1996-1998 vs 26% in 2015-2017). In the multivariable model, compared with patients in 1996-1998, those in 2015-2017 had a significantly higher risk of running out of their SABA inhalers (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-3.81; P = .03). With further adjustment for the presence of a written action plan, this difference attenuated (adjusted OR 1.66; 95% CI 0.75-3.68; P = .21).

CONCLUSIONS

Between 1996 and 2017, the proportion of ED patients with asthma who ran out of SABA inhalers significantly increased. The increase was explained, at least partially, by a lack of a written action plan.

Continued Innovation in Respiratory Care: The Importance of Inhaler Devices

When it comes to the use in inhalers in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, there are many options, considerations and challenges, which health care professionals need to address. Considerations for prescribing and dispensing, administering and following up, education, and adherence; all of these factors impact on treatment success and all are intrinsically linked to the device selected. This review brings together relevant evidence, real-life data and practice tools to assist health care professionals in making decisions about the use of inhalers in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. It covers some of the key technical device issues to be considered, the evidence behind the role of inhalers in disease control, population studies which link behaviors and adherence to inhaler devices as well as practice advice on inhaler technique education and the advantages and disadvantages in selecting different inhaler devices. Finally, a list of key considerations to aid health care providers in successfully managing the use of inhaler devices are summarized.

Pulmonary drug delivery system: newer patents

Inhalational route for drug delivery and desired effects has been known since centuries. This lung-targeted therapy has benefited asthmatics and those with chronic respiratory problems. The technique has evolved greatly from crude pots and pipes to modern sophisticated drug-dispensing devices. This mode is effective, rapid and safe. Its outcome, however, is majorly determined by drug formulation, device structure and patient's coordinating skill. In spite of great advances in this field, more efforts are required to meet the unmet needs. This noninvasive mode is being increasingly studied for transfer of drugs for systemic action with promising results. The present article is an attempt to capture the recent development and progress in this field and review relevant newer patents.

Real-world health care utilization in asthma patients using albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol (ProAir HFA) with and without integrated dose counters

Background

Accurate tracking of the administered dose of asthma rescue inhalers is critical for optimal disease management and is related to reductions in rates of unscheduled health care utilization in asthma patients. There are few published data on the real-world impact of rescue inhalers with integrated dose counters (IDCs) on health care resource utilization (HRU) for asthma patients. This study evaluates HRU among users of ProAir^® hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) (albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol), with IDC versus without IDC, in asthma patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective administrative claims study of asthma patients receiving a new prescription for albuterol inhalation aerosol without IDC during 2 years (January 2011–December 2012) or with IDC during the first full year after IDC implementation in the USA (July 2013–July 2014). Six months of continuous enrollment with medical and prescription drug benefits were required before and after the first prescription during the study period. Data on respiratory-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits were collected during the follow-up period.

Results

A total of 135,305 (32%) patients used albuterol inhalation aerosol with IDC, and 287,243 (68%) patients received albuterol inhalation aerosol without IDC. After adjusting for baseline confounding factors, the odds ratio (OR) for experiencing a respiratory-related hospitalization (OR=0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–0.96) or ED visit (OR=0.92; 95% CI 0.90–0.94) was significantly lower among patients using albuterol inhalation aerosol with IDC versus without IDC.

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, asthma patients using ProAir HFA with IDC experienced significantly fewer hospitalizations and ED visits compared with patients using ProAir HFA without IDC. Dosage information provided by IDCs may allow providers to better understand patients’ disease severity and aid in titrating controller medications and also decrease the likelihood that the canister will be empty when needed, thereby enhancing disease management and reducing HRU.

Asthma treatments: new and emerging therapies

BACKGROUND

As part of this primer, this article is intended to introduce new and emerging therapies for treating asthma.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for the years 2013 through 2015 for asthma review, asthma treatment, asthma therapy, and asthma new. Subset searches were additionally performed as suggested by information contained in the first round of searches.

RESULTS

There is continuing work toward the identification of additional cellular and molecular mechanisms of asthma. Many of these suggest additional targets for therapy. New pharmaceuticals, biologics, and procedures are reviewed in greater depth.

CONCLUSION

This is a summary of new and emerging asthma therapies.