Is the toxicity of anti-angiogenic drugs predictive of outcome? A review of hypertension and proteinuria as biomarkers of response to anti-angiogenic therapy

Chapter 3: Management of kidney injury caused by cancer drug therapy, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022

Cisplatin should be administered with diuretics and Magnesium supplementation under adequate hydration to avoid renal impairment. Patients should be evaluated for eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) during the treatment with pemetrexed, as kidney injury has been reported. Pemetrexed should be administered with caution in patients with a CCr (creatinine clearance) < 45 mL/min. Mesna is used to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis in patients receiving ifosfamide. Febuxostat is effective in avoiding hyperuricemia induced by TLS (tumor lysis syndrome). Preventative rasburicase is recommended in high-risk cases of TLS. Thrombotic microangiopathy could be triggered by anticancer drugs and there is no evidence of efficacy of plasma exchange therapy. When proteinuria occurs during treatment with anti-angiogenic agents or multi-kinase inhibitors, dose reductions or interruptions based on grading should be considered. Grade 3 proteinuria and renal dysfunction require urgent intervention, including drug interruption or withdrawal, and referral to a nephrologist should be considered. The first-line drugs used for blood pressure elevation due to anti-angiogenic agents are ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers). The protein binding of drugs and their pharmacokinetics are considerably altered in patients with hypoalbuminemia. The clearance of rituximab is increased in patients with proteinuria, and the correlation with urinary IgG suggests similar pharmacokinetic changes when using other antibody drugs. AIN (acute interstitial nephritis) is the most common cause of ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor)-related kidney injury that is often treated with steroids. The need for renal biopsy in patients with kidney injury that occurs during treatment with ICI remains controversial.

Anlotinib-Induced Hypertension: Current Concepts and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China that targets the receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and stem cell factor. Therefore, anlotinib inhibits tumor angiogenesis, representing a new therapeutic alternative for lung cancer. Hypertension is one of its most common adverse effects, leading to discontinuation of the drug and limited clinical usefulness.

OBJECTIVE

The present review aims to summarize the evidence on the prevalence, physiopathology, and management of anlotinib-induced hypertension, as well as its effect on the cancer prognosis.

METHOD

Searches in Medline, Cochrane Central Library, and Embase were performed using the following terms: anlotinib, adverse effect, hypertension, clinical trial, vascular endothelial growth factor, and antiangiogenic drugs. Citations were also identified by checking the reference sections of selected papers.

RESULTS

Except for a phase I clinical trial with a small sample size (n = 6), almost all the clinical trials on anlotinib have reported the development of anlotinib-induced hypertension. In these trials, the incidence of hypertension ranged from 13% to 67.7%, and that of grade 3/4 hypertension ranged from4.8% to 16%. Alterations in nitric oxide, endothelin-1, microvascular rarefaction, selective vasoconstrictions, and renal injury have been cited as potential mechanisms leading to anlotinib-induced hypertension. When needed, treatment may include general hygienic measures and pharmacotherapy in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

To effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension, early prevention, a reasonable dosage regimen, and appropriate treatment are critical to effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension. Additionally, anlotinib-induced hypertension may be considered a marker for predicting efficacy.

The Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib Impairs the Vascular Development of Zebrafish Larvae

Ibrutinib is an orally bioavailable, irreversible selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated impressive therapeutic effects in patients with B cell malignancies. However, adverse effects, such as bleeding and hypertension, are also reported, implying that studies on the toxicological effect of ibrutinib on living organisms are needed. Here, we have used zebrafish, a successful model organism for studying toxicology, to investigate the influence of ibrutinib during embryogenesis. We found that ibrutinib had potent toxicity on embryonic development, especially vascular development in zebrafish embryos. We also revealed that ibrutinib perturbed vascular formation by suppressing angiogenesis, rather than vasculogenesis. In addition, ibrutinib exposure led to the collapse of the vascular lumen, as well as reduced proliferation and enhanced apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells. Moreover, the expression of vascular development-related genes was also altered in ibrutinib-treated embryos. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the vascular toxicity of ibrutinib in an animal model, providing a theoretical basis for clinical safety guidelines in ibrutinib treatment.

Proteinuria is a late-onset adverse event in patients treated with cabozantinib

PURPOSE

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in thyroid cancer patients is often limited by toxicities. Some have a long-term onset and potentially could impact patients' survival. Among them, there is the nephrotoxicity, mainly represented by proteinuria. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of proteinuria in medullary thyroid cancer patients treated with cabozantinib, to examine whether it could be a marker for treatment monitoring and to evaluate histological kidney alterations.

METHODS

We collected data of 31 medullary thyroid cancer patients enrolled in the EXAM trial. Proteinuria was defined and evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. In two symptomatic cases with high-grade proteinuria, a kidney biopsy was performed.

RESULTS

Proteinuria was observed in 4/18 patients (22.2%) and occurred after a mean period of 38 months (median: 35.5 months). It was significantly associated with previous chemotherapy (p = 0.005) and/or treatment with other TKIs (p = 0.04), a prolonged use of cabozantinib (p = 0.0004), and a better radiological response at the end of follow-up (p = 0.002). The kidney biopsy showed pathognomonic features of thrombotic microangiopathy in both cases and a focal amyloid deposit in one.

CONCLUSION

Proteinuria is a quite frequent adverse event during cabozantinib treatment. It is relatively well manageable with the early detection and correction of risk factors, the temporary discontinuation of cabozantinib and/or its dose reduction, and the use of anti-proteinuric and renoprotective drugs in patient with hypertension. The histological findings confirmed some typical features of the anti-VEGF inhibition injury, already described for other TKIs.

Incidence and risk of proteinuria associated with newly approved vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer patients: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective: We performed a meta-analysis to quantify the overall incidence and risk of proteinuria associated with five newly approved VEGFR-TKIs (regorafenib, vandetanib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, axitinib) in cancer patients.Methods: Pubmed, Embase, ASCO abstracts, and ESMO abstracts were searched to identify relevant studies. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using random or fixed effects models according to the heterogeneity of included studies.Results: A total of 9,446 patients from 20 RCTs were included for the meta-analysis. The use of newly approved VEGFR-TKIs was associated with an increased risk of all-grade (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.69-3.27, P < 0.001) and high-grade (RR 3.70, 95% CI 2.09-6.54, P < 0.001) proteinuria. On subgroup analysis, lenvatinib, axitinib, and vandetanib significantly increased the risk of all-grade proteinuria, and lenvatinib was associated with an increased risk of high-grade proteinuria. In addition, the risk of developing high-grade proteinuria events was significant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but not for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and thyroid cancer (TC).Conclusion: Treatment with newly approved VEGFR-TKIs significantly increases the risk of developing proteinuria events in cancer patients, especially for patients treated with lenvatinib.

[Renovascular effects of antiangiogenic drugs]

During the last decade, inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were developed for the treatment of cancer. Many anti-VEGF are available but the issue is still the same: to inhibit the effect of the VEGF on their receptors. There are two main classes, depending on the mechanism of action by blocking the binding of the ligand on the receptor (VEGF trap or monoclonal antibody) or by affecting directly the receptor (tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI], monoclonal antibody directed against the VEGF receptor). These selective agents are safe. Nevertheless, side effects were described, in particular renal and vascular effects. In this article, we analyze the frequency of these renovascular complications, their clinical aspects and the interest of these indexes as a marker of treatment efficacy.

Risk factors of proteinuria in renal cell carcinoma patients treated with VEGF inhibitors: a secondary analysis of pooled clinical trial data

Background:

Proteinuria is a common adverse effect of vascular endothelial growth factor targeted agents, particularly in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, risk factors for proteinuria are poorly defined.

Methods:

Data on 1392 mRCC patients using pazopanib or sunitinib were pooled from two Phase-III clinical trials. Risk factors and prognostic effect of on-therapy proteinuria were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results:

Any-grade (1–4) and grade 3/4 proteinuria incidence were 15.0% and 3.7%, respectively. Asian ethnicity, diabetes, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), pre-existing grade 1 proteinuria and prior nephrectomy were significant independent predictors of either any-grade or grade 3/4 proteinuria. Proteinuria, particularly grade 3/4 (adjusted hazard ratio 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.30–0.92)), was associated with improved overall survival.

Conclusions:

In mRCC patients using pazopanib or sunitinib, Asian ethnicity, diabetes, SBP, pre-existing proteinuria and prior nephrectomy were independent predictors of on-therapy proteinuria, which was associated with improved survival.

Vascular Complications of Cancer Chemotherapy

Development of new anticancer drugs has resulted in improved mortality rates and 5-year survival rates in patients with cancer. However, many of the modern chemotherapies are associated with cardiovascular toxicities that increase cardiovascular risk in cancer patients, including hypertension, thrombosis, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmias. These limitations restrict treatment options and might negatively affect the management of cancer. The cardiotoxic effects of older chemotherapeutic drugs such as alkylating agents, antimetabolites, and anticancer antibiotics have been known for a while. The newer agents, such as the antiangiogenic drugs that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor signalling are also associated with cardiovascular pathology, especially hypertension, thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and proteinuria. Exact mechanisms by which vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors cause these complications are unclear but impaired endothelial function, vascular and renal damage, oxidative stress, and thrombosis might be important. With increasing use of modern chemotherapies and prolonged survival of cancer patients, the incidence of cardiovascular disease in this patient population will continue to increase. Accordingly, careful assessment and management of cardiovascular risk factors in cancer patients by oncologists and cardiologists working together is essential for optimal care so that prolonged cancer survival is not at the expense of increased cardiovascular events.

Cancer therapy and cardiovascular risk: focus on bevacizumab

Recognition and management of treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity, defined as either an acute cardiac event or a chronic condition, has been tightly integrated into routine cancer care and has become an important component in treatment selection. Several chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines, are traditionally characterized as cardiotoxic, but cardiovascular adverse events are also associated with commonly used molecular targeted therapies. In the past decade, bevacizumab, a monoclonal humanized antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, has been introduced in the treatment of a variety of metastatic malignancies. Despite its efficacy, bevacizumab has been associated with significant risk of cardiovascular complications, such as hypertension, cardiac ischemia, and congestive heart failure. This review will focus on the cardiovascular toxicity of bevacizumab, providing the latest evidence on the incidence, clinical spectrum, risk factors, and responsible mechanisms.

Etiology of angiogenesis inhibition-related hypertension

Angiogenesis inhibition, targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors, is an established treatment for solid tumors. A common side effect of this treatment is the development of sometimes severe hypertension. This hypertension is associated with a decrease in nitric oxide production, activation of the endothelin-signaling pathway and renin suppression. The mechanism underlying activation of the endothelin-signaling pathway is not fully understood. Both activation of endothelial cells and disinhibition of the VEGF-induced suppression of endothelin production by endothelial cells may be involved. The development of hypertension can be a reason to discontinue the angiogenesis inhibitor, thereby compromising anticancer treatment, but possibly is also a biomarker for a favorable antitumor response.

Pharmacodynamic change in plasma angiogenic proteins: a dose-escalation phase 1 study of the multi-kinase inhibitor lenvatinib

Background

Lenvatinib (E7080), an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, has inhibitory action on tumor cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis in preclinical models. We evaluated correlations between pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers with patient clinical outcomes in a lenvatinib phase 1 dose-escalation study.

Methods

Plasma angiogenic proteins were evaluated as potential PD biomarkers of response to lenvatinib in a dose-escalation phase 1 study. Lenvatinib was administered to 27 patients by twice-daily dosing in 3-week cycles; 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week of rest until discontinuation. Blood samples for plasma proteins were collected on days 1 (baseline), 8, and 15 of cycle 1, and days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 2. Selected clinical outcomes, including tumor shrinkage and adverse events (AEs), were used for correlative analyses of pharmacokinetic parameters and PD biomarkers.

Results

Tumor shrinkage and changes in PD biomarkers (increased vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha [SDF1α] levels and decreased soluble VEGF receptor 2 [sVEGFR2] levels) significantly correlated with increasing lenvatinib exposure. Observed changes in levels of VEGF, SDF1α, and sVEGFR2 were maintained on day 15 of cycle 1, but returned to baseline during the 1-week rest period, and similar changes were induced by reinstitution of treatment in cycle 2. The worst grades of hypertension, proteinuria, and fatigue were associated with changes in VEGF and HGF at day 8 of cycle 1. Maximum tumor shrinkage was correlated with increased SDF1α levels. Decreased sVEGFR2 level was also correlated with tumor shrinkage and frequency of hypertension, proteinuria, and fatigue. Tumor shrinkage significantly correlated with the worst grade of proteinuria, but not with hypertension or fatigue.

Conclusion

PD biomarker changes observed in plasma angiogenic proteins are correlated with lenvatinib-induced tumor shrinkage and AEs. Our findings warrant further assessment of plasma proteins associated with angiogenesis as potential biomarkers of lenvatinib activity.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00280397 (January 20, 2006).

Evaluation of hypertension and proteinuria as markers of efficacy in antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway is strongly implicated in cancer-related angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic agents such as bevacizumab commonly cause hypertension (HTN) and proteinuria (PTN), which may be biomarkers of response and clinical outcome.

STUDY

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with either bevacizumab or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy at The Christie Hospital from January 2006 to September 2009.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients evaluated, 50 were eligible. Seventeen (34%), 4 (8%), and 3 (6%) patients developed Common Toxicity Criteria (v 3.0) grades 1, 2, and 3 HTN, respectively. Response rates were 42% for patients with grades 0 to 1 HTN compared with 86% for patients with ≥grade 2 HTN (P=0.043). Median overall survival was 21.6 months for patients with grades 0 to 1 HTN and 25.2 months for patients with ≥grade 2 HTN (P=0.270). Twelve patients (24%) developed grade 1 PTN and 4 patients (8%) developed ≥grade 2 PTN. Median overall survival was 23.9 months for patients with grades 0 to 1 PTN and 4.2 months for those with ≥grade 2 PTN (P=0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the utility of PTN as a surrogate marker of outcome in antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Although HTN is predictive of a significantly higher response rate, the development of PTN during treatment with bevacizumab or tyrosine kinase inhibitor portends poorer survival and should be evaluated prospectively.

Predictive factor and antihypertensive usage of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hypertension in kidney cancer patients

Hypertension (HT) is the common adverse event associated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI). The present study was performed to identify the predictive factors of TKI-induced HT and to determine the classes of antihypertensive agents (AHTA) that demonstrate optimal efficacy against this type of HT. The charts of 50 cases of patients that had received VEGFR-TKI treatment were retrospectively examined. The association between patient background and TKI-induced HT, and the effect of administering AHTA were analyzed. High systolic blood pressure at baseline was identified to be a predictive factor for HT. In addition, there was no difference observed between calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARBs) as first-line AHTA for the control of HT. The findings of the present study may aid with predicting the onset of TKI-induced HT, as well as for its management via the primary use of either CCBs or ARBs.

Hypertension due to antiangiogenic cancer therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: understanding and managing a new syndrome

Novel antiangiogenic cancer therapies, particularly agents that block vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling, have improved outcomes in patients with cancers and are now used as first-line therapies for some tumours. However, with VEGF inhibitors (VEGFIs) are new complications, particularly hypertension. VEGFI-induced hypertension is a dose-dependent phenomenon due to on-target effects rather than off-target effects. Increased blood pressure occurs in almost 100% of patients who take VEGFIs, with a subset who develop severe hypertension. Molecular mechanisms underlying VEGFI-induced hypertension are unclear, but endothelial dysfunction and increased vascular resistance, due to impaired nitric oxide signalling, reduced prostacyclin production, endothelin-1 (ET-1) upregulation, oxidative stress, and rarefaction have been implicated. Treatment of hypertension should be aimed at reducing the risk of short-term morbidity associated with hypertension while maintaining effective dosing of antiangiogenic therapy for optimal cancer treatment. Although specific guidelines are not yet available for the management of VEGFI-induced hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are commonly used. Severe hypertension might require reduction of VEGFI dosing, or in some cases, interruption of treatment. As more potent VEGFIs are developed and as more cancer patients are treated with VEGFIs, the burden of hypertension toxicity will increase. This will be further compounded as the use of antiangiogenic drugs broadens to include older patients and those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Here we focus on VEGF as a target for antiangiogenesis and how this affects increased blood pressure. Putative mechanisms underlying VEGFI-induced hypertension are highlighted and therapeutic strategies to manage such hypertension are discussed.

Measures of biosimilarity in monoclonal antibodies in oncology: the case of bevacizumab

Biosimilars have been available on the European market since 2006 and experience with their use is increasing. The next wave of biopharmaceuticals that are about to lose patent protection consists of more-complicated products, including many monoclonal antibodies. Guidance has been released on the particulars of a biosimilarity exercise involving these products. Considerable challenges exist to establish biosimilarity for anticancer products. An especially challenging product is bevacizumab (Avastin(®)). On the basis of data available for the innovator product (bevacizumab) we will discuss strengths and weaknesses of preclinical and clinical models and explore the application of novel endpoints to the biosimilar comparability exercise.

Angiogenesis-related agents in esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. The majority of the patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and many with early stage disease will develop recurrent disease.

AREAS COVERED

Angiogenesis is essential to the progress and aggressiveness of solid malignancies. Success of anti-angiogenic therapy in colorectal, lung and breast cancers is a proof of principle. Thus far, evidence for benefit from anti-angiogenic therapy in esophageal cancer is lacking. Several Phase II trials with different agents have provided mixed results and the only Phase III trial in the esophageal and gastric cancer failed to show that these agents improve overall survival (OS). However, lack of observed benefit could be due to the challenges specific to the management of esophageal cancers as well as issues with the design of clinical trials for anti-angiogenic therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

An understanding of the biology of the esophageal cancer and its management is essential to the development of anti-angiogenic therapy in this disease. This article reviews the management of esophageal cancer and elaborates on the challenges in the development of anti-angiogenic therapy in esophageal cancer. At the end, strategies are proposed for successful development of anti-angiogenic therapy in esophageal cancer.

Anti-angiogenic drug discovery: lessons from the past and thoughts for the future

INTRODUCTION

Since the pioneering work of Judah Folkman, the discovery of bevacizumab has introduced the use of anti-angiogenic agents as a new modality for the treatment of cancer. Currently, hundreds of clinical trials involving anti-angiogenic agents, targeting different elements of the tumour angiogenesis pathway, are underway. However, thus far, the benefits of anti-angiogenic therapy in unselected patient populations are often marginal with harmful side effects.

AREAS COVERED

This article presents a detailed discussion of the lessons learnt from the use of bevacizumab and other VEGF pathway inhibitors in the clinical setting. Specifically, this article provides a review of the literature on anti-VEGF agents and other angiogenesis inhibitors used in pre-clinical and clinical trials for cancer treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Future anti-angiogenic drug design centres on multiple protein targets and combinations including: growth factors, hypoxia-inducible factor and tumour endothelial cell markers unique to the tumour vasculature. Furthermore, treatment dosing, scheduling and combination with radiation and chemotherapy require further investigation, as does the potential of treating early disease, and the development of biomarkers which accurately predict response to therapy. These are essential for the future development of these drugs with individualised therapy likely to be the ultimate goal.