Machado MF, Muela HCS, Costa-Hong VA, Panerai RB, Yassuda MS, Moraes NC, Memória CM, Bor-Seng-Shu E, Nitrini R, Bortolotto LA, Nogueira RDC. Measurement of resistance-area product by transcranial Doppler: An alternative tool for cognitive screening in hypertensive on drug treatment?
CEREBRAL CIRCULATION - COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR 2023;
5:100191. [PMID:
38046105 PMCID:
PMC10692755 DOI:
10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100191]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction
Arterial hypertrophy and remodeling are adaptive responses present in systemic arterial hypertension that can result in silent ischemia and neurodegeneration, compromising brain connections and cognitive performance (CP). However, CP is affected differently over time, so traditional screening methods may become less sensitive in assessing certain cognitive domains. The study aimed to evaluate whether cerebrovascular hemodynamic parameters can serve as a tool for cognitive screening in hypertensive without clinically manifest cognitive decline.
Methods
Participants were allocated into groups: non-hypertensive (n = 30) [group 1], hypertensive with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg (n = 54) [group 2] and hypertensive with SBP ≥ 140 or DBP ≥ 90 (n = 31) [group 3]. Measurements of blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity were obtained from digital plethysmography and transcranial Doppler. For the cognitive assessment, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a broad neuropsychological battery were applied.
Results
Patients in groups 2 and 3 show no significant differences in most of the clinical-epidemiological variables or pulsatility index (p = 0.361), however compared to group 1 and 2, patients in group 3 had greater resistance-area product [RAP] (1.7 [±0.7] vs. 1.2 [±0.2], p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between RAP, episodic memory (r = -0.277, p = 0.004) and cognitive processing speed (r = -0.319, p = 0.001).
Conclusion
RAP reflects the real cerebrovascular resistance, regardless of the direct action of antihypertensive on the microcirculation, and seems to be a potential alternative tool for cognitive screening in hypertensive.
Collapse