Evidence from basic research for opioid combinations

Neuropeptide oxytocin enhances μ opioid receptor signaling as a positive allosteric modulator

Oxytocin (OT) is a 9-amine neuropeptide that plays an essential role in mammalian labor, lactation, maternal bonding, and social affiliation. OT has been reported to exert an analgesic effect in both humans and animals, and the results of certain animal experiments have shown that the analgesic effect of OT is partially blocked by opioid receptor antagonists. To investigate the relationship between OT and μ opioid receptor (MOR), we evaluated how OT affects MOR in vitro by performing an electrical impedance-based receptor biosensor assay (CellKey™ assay), an intracellular cAMP assay, and a competitive receptor-binding analysis by using cells stably expressing human MOR and OT receptor. In both the CellKey™ assay and the intracellular cAMP assay, OT alone exerted no direct agonistic effect on human MOR, but treatment with 10^-6 M OT markedly enhanced the MOR signaling induced by 10^-6 M endomorphin-1, β-endorphin, morphine, fentanyl, and DAMGO. Moreover, in the competitive receptor-binding assay, 10^-6 M OT did not alter the affinity of endomorphin-1 or morphine for MOR. These results suggest that OT could function as a positive allosteric modulator that regulates the efficacy of MOR signaling, and thus OT might represent a previously unrecognized candidate analgesic agent.

Recent Advances in the Realm of Allosteric Modulators for Opioid Receptors for Future Therapeutics

Opioids, and more specifically μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists such as morphine, have long been clinically used as therapeutics for severe pain states but often come with serious side effects such as addiction and tolerance. Many studies have focused on bringing about analgesia from the MOR with attenuated side effects, but its underlying mechanism is not fully understood. Recently, focus has been geared toward the design and elucidation of the orthosteric site with ligands of various biological profiles and mixed subtype opioid activities and selectivities, but targeting the allosteric site is an area of increasing interest. It has been shown that allosteric modulators play key roles in influencing receptor function such as its tolerance to a ligand and affect downstream pathways. There has been a high variance of chemical structures that provide allosteric modulation at a given receptor, but recent studies and reviews tend to focus on the altered cellular mechanisms instead of providing a more rigorous description of the allosteric ligand's structure-function relationship. In this review, we aim to explore recent developments in the structural motifs that potentiate orthosteric binding and their influences on cellular pathways in an effort to present novel approaches to opioid therapeutic design.

Effect of pretreatment with hydromorphone or buprenorphine on thermal antinociception induced by fentanyl in awake cats

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pretreatment with hydromorphone or buprenorphine on thermal antinociception induced by fentanyl in cats.

METHODS

Seven healthy cats received five different treatments consisting of two drugs. Drug 1 was administered intravenously 1 h before drug 2. Drug 2 was given as an intravenous loading dose followed by an infusion for 4 h. The drug combinations used were: buprenorphine 20 µg/kg followed by fentanyl (BF; 7 μg/kg, 7 μg/kg/h), buprenorphine 20 µg/kg followed by 0.9% saline solution (B), hydromorphone 0.07 mg/kg followed by 0.9% saline solution (H), hydromorphone 0.07 mg/kg followed by fentanyl (HF; 7 μg/kg, 7 μg/kg/h) and 0.9% saline solution followed by fentanyl (F; 7 μg/kg, 7 μg/kg/h). Thermal thresholds were obtained prior to treatment and at predetermined times up to 7 h after drug 1.

RESULTS

Thermal thresholds were significantly higher than baseline in all treatment groups as follows: H from 0.25 to 2.50 h; B from 0.25 to 2.50 h; F from 1.25 to 5.50 h; HF from 0.25 to 5.50 h and BF from 0.25 to 5.25 h. Thermal thresholds were significantly higher in HF and BF than in F treatment before the fentanyl infusion was commenced (from 0.25 to 1.00 h). During the fentanyl infusion thermal thresholds in BF compared with F were lower at 1.75 h and from 2.50 to 3.50 h. After the constant rate infusion of fentanyl was started, thermal thresholds were significantly lower in HF compared with F at one time point (3 h).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pretreatment with buprenorphine did partially inhibit the antinociceptive action of fentanyl. Hydromorphone did inhibit the antinociceptive action of fentanyl at one single time point in cats.

The use of opioids for treatment of cancer pain

INTRODUCTION

Pain is commonly experienced by patients with cancer, particularly those with advanced disease. Alleviating pain is an important goal of cancer treatment. Opioids are the cornerstone of the analgesic treatment.

AREAS COVERED

Pharmacology, characteristics, and use of opioids in clinical practice are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Although the use of opioids is largely accepted as a fundamental step for controlling cancer pain, existing data supporting this statement are poor. All opioids provide analgesia and are effective in controlling cancer pain. New drugs have been developed and experience is accumulating among clinicians. Despite these drugs having different pharmacokinetic and chemical properties, there is no proof that one opioid is better than another one. Thus, the optimum benefit depends on the experience of the users. Clinicians should weight evidence, clinical experience, patient preferences, and treatment costs when choosing the optimal treatment for an individual patient with cancer pain. New opioids with specific receptor activities are under investigation.

Efficacy and safety of dual opioid therapy

There is some evidence for a partial opioid switching or an 'add on' approach to opioid dosing strategies. Preclinical and clinical findings suggest different activation profiles for the stimulation of the mu subtypes, raising the questions about what might occur with combinations of these substances. In the postoperative setting, it seems that the analgesic effect of the combination at equivalent doses is similar to that produced by the individual components, not adding particular advantages. However, adverse effects seem to be reduced with the combination of morphine/oxycodone, when given in doses equianalgesic to individual opioids. The reduction of opioid-induced postoperative adverse effects may have important clinical implications, given that adverse effects may prolong length of stay and hospitalization costs. Thus, in the acute postoperative setting, a reduction of adverse effects may be expected. In chronic pain, information is still in the infancy, but opioid combination therapy may have greater advantages in improving the opioid response. The possibility to clinically translate opioid combinations into practice, as demonstrated in some animal models, depends on a broad number of factors implicated in the pain process. More research is needed to better elucidate these issues in the near future.

Discovery of positive allosteric modulators and silent allosteric modulators of the μ-opioid receptor

μ-Opioid receptors are among the most studied G protein-coupled receptors because of the therapeutic value of agonists, such as morphine, that are used to treat chronic pain. However, these drugs have significant side effects, such as respiratory suppression, constipation, allodynia, tolerance, and dependence, as well as abuse potential. Efforts to fine tune pain control while alleviating the side effects of drugs, both physiological and psychological, have led to the development of a wide variety of structurally diverse agonist ligands for the μ-opioid receptor, as well as compounds that target κ- and δ-opioid receptors. In recent years, the identification of allosteric ligands for some G protein-coupled receptors has provided breakthroughs in obtaining receptor subtype-selectivity that can reduce the overall side effect profiles of a potential drug. However, positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) can also have the specific advantage of only modulating the activity of the receptor when the orthosteric agonist occupies the receptor, thus maintaining spatial and temporal control of receptor signaling in vivo. This second advantage of allosteric modulators may yield breakthroughs in opioid receptor research and could lead to drugs with improved side-effect profiles or fewer tolerance and dependence issues compared with orthosteric opioid receptor agonists. Here, we describe the discovery and characterization of μ-opioid receptor PAMs and silent allosteric modulators, identified from high-throughput screening using a β-arrestin-recruitment assay.

Oxycodone combined with opioid receptor antagonists: efficacy and safety

INTRODUCTION

A mu receptor antagonist combined with oxycodone (OXY) may improve pain control, reduce physical tolerance and withdrawal, minimizing opioid-related bowel dysfunction and act as an abuse deterrent.

AREAS COVERED

The authors cover the use of OXY plus ultra-low-dose naltrexone for analgesia and the use of sustained-release OXY plus sustained-release naloxone to reduce the opioid bowel syndrome. The authors briefly describe the use of sustained-release OXY and naltrexone pellets as a drug abuse deterrent formulation. Combinations of ultra-low-dose naltrexone plus OXY have been in separate trials involved in patients with chronic pain from osteoarthritis and idiopathic low back pain. High attrition and marginal differences between ultra-low-dose naltrexone plus OXY and OXY led to discontinuation of development. Prolonged-release (PR) naloxone combined with PR OXY demonstrates a consistent reduction in opioid-related bowel dysfunction in multiple randomized controlled trials. However, gastrointestinal side effects, including diarrhea, were increased in several trials with the combination compared with PR OXY alone. Analgesia appeared to be maintained although non-inferiority to PR OXY is not formally established. There were flaws to trial design and safety monitoring. Naltrexone has been combined with OXY in individual pellets encased in a capsule. This combination has been reported in a Phase II trial and is presently undergoing Phase III studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the lack of efficacy the combination of altered low-dose naltrexone with oxycodone should cease in development. The combination of sustained release oxycodone plus naloxone reduces constipation with a consistent benefit. Safety has been suboptimally evaluated which is a concern. Although the drug is commercially available in several countries, ongoing safety monitoring particularly high doses would be important.

A comparison of the antinociceptive and temperature responses to morphine and fentanyl derivatives in rats

In addition to producing antinociception, opioids exert profound effects on body temperature. This study aimed at comparing antinociceptive and hyperthermic responses between two groups of μ-opioid receptor agonists: fentanyl (4-anilinopiperidine-type) and morphine (phenanthrene-type) derivatives in rats. Analgesic activity was assessed by tail immersion test and the body temperature by insertion of a thermometer probe into the colon. Fentanyl (F), (±)-cis-3-methyl fentanyl (CM), (±)-cis-3-carbomethoxy fentanyl (C), (±)trans-3-carbomethoxy fentanyl (T) and (±)-cis-3 butyl fentanyl (B) produced dose-dependent increase in antinociception and hyperthermia. The relative order of analgesic potency was: CM(11.27)>F(1)>C(0.35)≥T(0.11)≥B(0.056). Similar to this, the relative order of hyperthermic potency was: CM(8.43)>F(1)>C(0.46)≥T(0.11)≥B(0.076). Morphine (M), oxycodone (O), thebacon (T) and 6,14-ethenomorphinan-7-methanol, 4,5-epoxy-6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-α,α,17-trimethyl-, (5α,7α) (E) also produced dose-dependent increase in antinociception and hyperthermia. Among morphine derivatives the relative order of analgesic potency was: E(56)>O(5)≥T(2.6)>M(1), and similar to this, the relative order of hyperthermic potency was: E(37)>O(3)≥T(2.3)>M(1). Morphine (phenanthrene-type) and fentanyl (4-anilinopiperidine-type) derivatives produced hyperthermia in rats at doses about 2 times lower, and 6-11 times higher, than their median antinociceptive doses, respectively. This study is first to identify difference between these two classes of opioid drugs in their potencies in producing hyperthermia. Further studies are needed to clarify the significance of these findings.

A facile synthesis for novel loperamide analogs as potential μ opioid receptor agonists

A facile synthesis for novel loperamide analogs as potential μ opioid receptors is described. The synthetic procedure for compound 5, which contains two 4-phenyl piperidine scaffolds, was optimized, and this compound was synthesized in excellent yield. We also describe a mild and highly efficient protocol for the synthesis of compounds 6 and 7.