Novel approaches to anticonvulsant drug discovery

Unraveling the Neural Circuits: Techniques, Opportunities and Challenges in Epilepsy Research

Epilepsy, a prevalent neurological disorder characterized by high morbidity, frequent recurrence, and potential drug resistance, profoundly affects millions of people globally. Understanding the microscopic mechanisms underlying seizures is crucial for effective epilepsy treatment, and a thorough understanding of the intricate neural circuits underlying epilepsy is vital for the development of targeted therapies and the enhancement of clinical outcomes. This review begins with an exploration of the historical evolution of techniques used in studying neural circuits related to epilepsy. It then provides an extensive overview of diverse techniques employed in this domain, discussing their fundamental principles, strengths, limitations, as well as their application. Additionally, the synthesis of multiple techniques to unveil the complexity of neural circuits is summarized. Finally, this review also presents targeted drug therapies associated with epileptic neural circuits. By providing a critical assessment of methodologies used in the study of epileptic neural circuits, this review seeks to enhance the understanding of these techniques, stimulate innovative approaches for unraveling epilepsy's complexities, and ultimately facilitate improved treatment and clinical translation for epilepsy.

Recent advancement in the discovery and development of anti-epileptic biomolecules: An insight into structure activity relationship and Docking

Although there have been many advancements in scientific research and development, the cause of epilepsy still remains an open challenge. In spite of high throughput research in the field of anti-epileptic drugs, efficacy void is still prevalent before the researchers. Researchers have persistently been exploring all the possibilities to curb undesirable side effects of the anti-epileptic drugs or looking for a more substantial approach to diminish or cure epilepsy. The drug development has shown a hope to medicinal chemists and researchers to carry further research by going through a substantial literature survey. This review article attempts to describe the recent developments in the anti-epileptic agents, pertaining to different molecular scaffolds considering their structure-activity relationship, docking studies and their mechanism of actions.

Lessons learned from the discovery of sodium valproate and what has this meant to future drug discovery efforts?

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of the anticonvulsant properties of valproic acid and the development of valproic acid/valproate to market authorization for specific epilepsy types and syndromes, as well as their repurposing for other indications, are illustrative examples of both the strengths and weaknesses of drug development strategies.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes and interprets the development and repurposing history of valproic acid/valproate. The article is based on articles, including original studies and systematic reviews obtained from PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, SCIndeks and Google Scholar databases.

EXPERT OPINION

Random screening and careful observation of the experimental effects of tested substances were crucial for discovering the anticonvulsant effects of valproic acid, while rational drug design and clinical observation strategies led to repurposing valproic acid and valproate for bipolar disorder maintenance treatmentand prevention of migraine attacks. Early planning and feasibility studies of future clinical trials are essential for obtaining marketing authorization of new substances or new indications of old anticonvulsants. Significant progress has been made recently toward understanding, treatment and prevention of hepatotoxicity caused by valproic acid/valproate, making its long-term administration safer. There are ongoing efforts to repurpose valproic acid/valproate for augmentation with antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Anti-Epileptogenic Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs

Generally, the prevalence of epilepsy does not exceed 0.9% of the population and approximately 70% of epilepsy patients may be adequately controlled with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Moreover, status epilepticus (SE) or even a single seizure may produce neurodegeneration within the brain and SE has been recognized as one of acute brain insults leading to acquired epilepsy via the process of epileptogenesis. Two questions thus arise: (1) Are AEDs able to inhibit SE-induced neurodegeneration? and (2) if so, can a probable neuroprotective potential of particular AEDs stop epileptogenesis? An affirmative answer to the second question would practically point to the preventive potential of a given neuroprotective AED following acute brain insults. The available experimental data indicate that diazepam (at low and high doses), gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate and valproate exhibited potent or moderate neuroprotective effects in diverse models of SE in rats. However, only diazepam (at high doses), gabapentin and pregabalin exerted some protective activity against acquired epilepsy (spontaneous seizures). As regards valproate, its effects on spontaneous seizures were equivocal. With isobolography, some supra-additive combinations of AEDs have been delineated against experimental seizures. One of such combinations, levetiracetam + topiramate proved highly synergistic in two models of seizures and this particular combination significantly inhibited epileptogenesis in rats following status SE. Importantly, no neuroprotection was evident. It may be strikingly concluded that there is no correlation between neuroprotection and antiepileptogenesis. Probably, preclinically verified combinations of AEDs may be considered for an anti-epileptogenic therapy.

Mechanisms of epileptogenesis and preclinical approach to antiepileptogenic therapies

The prevalence of epilepsy is estimated 5-10 per 1000 population and around 70% of patients with epilepsy can be sufficiently controlled by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Epileptogenesis is the process responsible for converting normal into an epileptic brain and mechanisms responsible include among others: inflammation, neurodegeneration, neurogenesis, neural reorganization and plasticity. Some AEDs may be antiepileptiogenic (diazepam, eslicarbazepine) but the correlation between neuroprotection and inhibition of epileptogenesis is not evident. Antiepileptogenic activity has been postulated for mTOR ligands, resveratrol and losartan. So far, clinical evidence gives some hope for levetiracetam as an AED inhibiting epileptogenesis in neurosurgical patients. Biomarkers for epileptogenesis are needed for the proper selection of patients for evaluation of potential antiepileptogenic compounds.

Barriers to the use of genetic information for the development of new epilepsy treatments

Genetic analysis is providing new information on the biological basis of epilepsy at a rapid pace; this article identifies factors acting as major barriers to use of these data for therapy development. Disease heterogeneity is a primary obstacle since so many genes can cause or predispose to epilepsy and the clinical presentation of epilepsy is so diverse, thus making it difficult to define the most therapeutically relevant targets. Further, many epilepsy genes affect brain development, an observation that represents a barrier unto itself given the challenge of reversing or preventing genetically mediated alterations of brain pathway formation. Finally, the lack of appropriate models for testing new therapies is also recognized as a fundamental limitation. Overcoming these barriers will be aided by full characterization of the genetic landscape of epilepsy, elucidation of key pathway points for therapeutic intervention and creation of unique experimental models to validate results.

HDAC9 Inhibits Osteoclastogenesis via Mutual Suppression of PPARγ/RANKL Signaling

Recent studies suggest that the class II histone deacetylase (HDAC)9 plays important roles in physiology such as metabolism and immunity. Here, we report that HDAC9 also controls bone turnover by suppressing osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. HDAC9 expression is down-regulated during osteoclastogenesis. Ex vivo osteoclast differentiation is accelerated by HDAC9 deletion but diminished by HDAC9 overexpression. HDAC9 knockout mice exhibit elevated bone resorption and lower bone mass. Bone marrow transplantation reveal that the osteoclastogenic defects are intrinsic to the hematopoietic lineage, because the excessive bone resorption phenotype can be conferred in wild-type (WT) mice receiving HDAC9-null bone marrow, and rescued in HDAC9-null mice receiving WT bone marrow. Mechanistically, HDAC9 forms a negative regulatory loop with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARg) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) signaling. On one hand, PPARγ and nuclear factor κB suppress HDAC9 expression, on the other hand, HDAC9 inhibits PPARγ activity in synergy with silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT)/NCoR corepressors. These findings identify HDAC9 as a novel, important and physiologically relevant modulator of bone remodeling and skeletal homeostasis.