Chemopreventive drug treatment in subjects with genetic predisposition to cancer: prescriber liability and healthcare disparities

Are we ready for the challenge of implementing risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention?

BACKGROUND

Increased knowledge of breast cancer risk factors provides opportunities to shift from a one-size-fits-all screening programme to a personalised approach, where screening and prevention is based on a woman's risk of developing breast cancer. However, potential implementation of this new paradigm could present considerable challenges which the present review aims to explore.

METHODS

Bibliographic databases were searched to identify studies evaluating potential implications of the implementation of personalised risk-based screening and primary prevention for breast cancer. Identified themes were evaluated using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 5699 unique publications, of which 59 were selected for inclusion. Significant changes in policy and practice are warranted. The organisation of breast cancer screening spans several healthcare delivery systems and clinical settings. Feasibility of implementation depends on how healthcare is funded and arranged, and potentially varies between countries. Piloting risk assessment and prevention counselling in primary care settings has highlighted implications relating to the need for extensive additional training on risk (communication) and prevention, impact on workflow, and professionals' personal discomfort breaching the topic with women. Additionally, gaps in risk estimation, psychological, ethical and legal consequences will need to be addressed.

CONCLUSION

The present review identified considerable unresolved issues and challenges. Potential implementation will require a more complex framework, in which a country's healthcare regulations, resources, and preferences related to screening and prevention services are taken into account. However, with the insights gained from the present overview, countries expecting to implement risk-based screening and prevention can start to inventory and address the issues that were identified.

Polymorphisms in NAT2 gene and atherosclerosis in an Algerian population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The etiology of atherosclerosis is multifactorial. Genetic and environmental factors are involved in the development of atherosclerosis. Human arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) is an important metabolizing enzyme that exhibits genetic polymorphisms and modifies individual response and/or toxicity to many xenobiotics. We undertook this study to investigate the NAT2 polymorphisms in patients with atherosclerosis.

METHODS

Genotyping for NAT2 alleles was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment-length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) in 285 Algerian patients with atherosclerosis and 286 controls.

RESULTS

There was no association between NAT2 polymorphisms and atherosclerosis risk. However, the haplotype NAT2(*)5F decreased susceptibility to the disease (p = 0.005, OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.37-0.84). The frequency of the slow acetylator phenotype was approximately 50% in both cases and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that NAT2 polymorphisms may not be involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

Legal pressures and incentives for personalized medicine

Legal liability has the potential to be a powerful driver pushing implementation of personalized medicine. Individuals injured by adverse drug effects are increasingly likely to bring lawsuits alleging that they have a polymorphism or biomarker conferring susceptibility to the drug that should have been identified and used to alter their drug treatment. Likely targets of such lawsuits include drug manufacturers, third party payors, physicians and pharmacists, of which physicians are most at risk of substantial liability.