Compliance With Guideline Statements for Urethral Catheterization in an Iranian Teaching Hospital

Healthcare workers' compliance with the catheter associated urinary tract infection prevention guidelines: an observational study in Yemen

BACKGROUND

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is a global problem but it can be prevented with the appropriate implementation of evidence-based guidelines. This study was conducted to assess the level of compliance of healthcare workers with the catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention guidelines during the insertion of a urinary catheter.

METHODS

An observational study using a descriptive cross-sectional design was conducted at Sana'a City hospitals, Yemen. All the nurses and physicians from the governmental, teaching, and private hospitals were eligible to participate in the study. The data collection was performed through convenience sampling from March 2020 to December 2020, using a structured observational checklist prepared specifically for this study.

RESULTS

The majority of the urinary catheter insertions were performed by nurses. There were no written policy or procedures for an urinary catheter insertion and no in-service education or training departments in the majority of the hospitals. The overall mean score of compliance was 7.31 of 10. About 71% of the healthcare workers had a high or acceptable level of compliance and 29% had an unsafe level of compliance. Compliance was low for maintaining aseptic technique throughout the insertion procedure, using a single use packet of lubricant jelly, performing hand hygiene immediately before insertion, and securing the urinary catheter once inserted. Factors affecting the healthcare workers compliance were gender, the working ward/unit of the healthcare workers, the availability of a written policy/procedure and a department or unit for in-service education.

CONCLUSION

Yemeni healthcare workers' overall compliance was acceptable but it was unsafe in several critical measures. There is an urgent need for developing, implementing, and monitoring national guidelines and institutional policy and procedures for catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention. Periodical in-service education and training programs and adequate access to the necessary materials and supplies are paramount.

Clinical audit on indications and technique of male urethral catheterization in emergency department of a tertiary care hospital

Urethral catheterization (UC) is a common procedure done in the Emergency Department of a hospital. The main indications for a UC are relieving acute urinary retention and bladder outlet obstruction. This cross-sectional audit was carried out between July 2019 to February 2020, in the Emergency Department (ED). All male patients aged 18 years and above, in whom UC was performed, were included in the audit. A total of 81 male patients were surveyed. Although, sterilized technique was maintained by using sterile gloves and pyodine but hand hygiene (sterilization or hand wash) was not performed before the procedure 80% of times. CDC hand hygiene guidelines were distributed to promote hand hygiene.

What do we already know about this topic ? The Lippincott guidelines are considered gold standard which includes hand hygiene as an important element of urinary catheterization UC. The CDC Center of Disease Control CDC promotes the use of mandatory gloves and generous hand sanitizing before procedures.

How does your research contribute to the field For continuous improvement and patient focused practice, we must audit the technique of nursing staff, doctors and health care assistants who are involved in insertion and ordering of catheters to provide quality health care and avoid unnecessary catheterization [1]. The aim of this study was to audit the appropriateness of usage of urinary catheters by the healthcare staff and, their technique of insertion and indications for urinary catheterization.

What are your research's implications towards theory, practice, or policy? Hand hygiene is an important element of patient care. If done properly it can prevent several hospital-acquired infections. Heathcare facilities must audit their staff on regular basis and provide refreshers and promote the use of proper hand hygiene before urinary catheterization.

International Continence Society white paper on ethical considerations in older adults with urinary incontinence

Urinary incontinence is a common problem among older adults that is often complicated by many nuanced ethical considerations. Unfortunately, there is a lack of guidance for healthcare professionals on how to navigate such concerns. This International Continence Society white paper aims to provide healthcare professionals with an ethical framework to promote best care practices in the care of older adults with urinary incontinence.

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection: why do not we control this adverse event?

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors related to the occurrence of urinary tract infection associated with urinary catheter use.

METHOD

A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study carried out by analyzing the electronic medical records of patients admitted to an intensive care unit of a high-complexity hospital from July 2016 to June 2017. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed by descriptive and analytical analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence density of urinary tract infection related to urinary catheter use was 4.8 per 1000 catheters/day, the majority (80.6%) with no indication for catheter use, and there was no prescription for insertion and/or maintenance in 86.7%. The mean time between catheter insertion and infection diagnosis was 11.3 ± 6.3 days (6 to 28 days). Statistically significant factors (p < 0.001) related to urinary infection linked to catheter use were hospitalization time in the unit (16.7 ± 9 days), catheter permanence time (12.7 ± 6.9 days), and the use of antimicrobials in the intensive care unit (8.6 ± 6.3 days).

CONCLUSION

The association of indication absence and the record of the need for maintenance possibly potentiated the occurrence of urinary tract infection associated to catheter use.

PREVENTION OF CATHETER-ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION: WHAT IS THE GAP IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the gap in the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Method: an observational study conducted by an audit of process indicators in relation to the recommendations for preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection during its maintenance and handling. The collection was carried out between July and September of 2017 in an adult intensive care unit located in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The observations were made with the help of a developed instrument for the present study and the data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Results: 451 evaluations were performed related to maintenance of the urinary catheter with a focus on its fixation, the collector bag maintenance, and volume and urinary flow of the drainage system. Regarding clinical practice gaps, inadequate fixation of the urinary catheter and drainage pocket were found, with more than three-quarters of its capacity filled (97.7% and 3.5%, respectively). Regarding the handling of 556 urinary catheters, there was non-conformity in the hygiene of the urethral meatus in 22.9% of the situations, and non-adherence to hands hygiene before and after handling the urinary catheter was 94.2% and 66.5%, respectively (p=0.002). Conclusion: isolated measures had good adherence rates, but prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection should be based on adherence to several measures simultaneously. The prevention gap is in the awareness of health professionals that the recognized prevention measures of catheter - associated urinary tract infection should be adopted collectively in order to guarantee patient and clinical practice safety.