Nabavizadeh M, Shokouhi MM, Kheirandish M, Sahebi S, Sadatshojaee N, Abbaszadegan A. A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (SHIRAZ, IRAN) 2021;
22:193-197. [PMID:
34514067 PMCID:
PMC8417540 DOI:
10.30476/dentjods.2020.84776.1100]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Statement of the Problem:
The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process.
Purpose:
This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with
two common rotary systems, including ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Switzerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland).
Materials and Method:
In this in vitro study, Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, ProTaper,
and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers’ instructions. The debris were collected into pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was
calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level.
Results:
Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with ProTaper and RaCe (p< 0.05). The differences between the ProTaper and RaCe rotary
systems were not statistically significant (p= 0.752).
Conclusion:
Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than ProTaper and RaCe.
Collapse