A Comparison between Hybrid and Concomitant Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Equivalence Trial of the Non-Bismuth 10-Day Concomitant and 14-Day Hybrid Therapies for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in High Clarithromycin Resistance Areas

Background and aim: We conducted an equivalence trial of quadruple non-bismuth "concomitant" and "hybrid" regimens for H. pylori eradication in a high clarithromycin resistance area. Methods: There were 321 treatment-naïve H. pylori-positive individuals in this multicenter clinical trial randomized to either the hybrid (esomeprazole 40 mg/bid, amoxicillin 1 g/bid for 7 days, then 7 days esomeprazole 40 mg/bid, amoxicillin 1 g/bid, clarithromycin 500 mg/bid, and metronidazole 500 mg/bid) or the concomitant regimen (all medications given concurrently bid for 10 days). Eradication was tested using histology and/or a 13C-urea breath test. Results: The concomitant regimen had 161 patients (90F/71M, mean 54.5 years, 26.7% smokers, 30.4% ulcer) and the hybrid regimen had 160 (80F/80M, mean 52.8 years, 35.6% smokers, 31.2% ulcer). The regimens were equivalent, by intention to treat 85% and 81.8%, (p = 0.5), and per protocol analysis 91.8% and 87.8%, (p = 0.3), respectively. The eradication rate by resistance, between concomitant and hybrid regimens, was in susceptible strains (97% and 97%, p = 0.6), clarithromycin single-resistant strains (86% and 90%, p = 0.9), metronidazole single-resistant strains (96% and 81%, p = 0.1), and dual-resistant strains (70% and 53%, p = 0.5). The side effects were comparable, except for diarrhea being more frequent in the concomitant regimen. Conclusions: A 14-day hybrid regimen is equivalent to a 10-day concomitant regimen currently used in high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance areas. Both regimens are well tolerated and safe.

Non-inferiority of reverse hybrid regimen versus standard concomitant regimen for H. pylori eradication in a randomized-controlled trial

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is strongly related to peptic ulcer disease, chronic gastritis, and gastric malignancies. Therefore, H. pylori eradication is necessary in these cases. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of 14-day reverse hybrid therapy with standard 14-day concomitant regimen for H. pylori eradication in Iran.

Methods

Of the 317 patients with dyspepsia and H. pylori infection enrolled in the study, 153 and 164 patients were randomly assigned to reverse hybrid and concomitant groups, respectively. The reverse hybrid regimen containing pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole was taken every 12 hours in the first 7 days, however, Clarithromycin and Metronidazole were discontinued within the next 7 days. Patients in the concomitant group also received the same drugs for 14-day. Eradication confirmation tests were used 8 weeks after the end of treatments.

Results

A crowd of 281 patients continued the trial until the end. H. pylori eradication rates based on intention to treat analysis were 71.2% (109/153) and 83.5% (137/164) in reverse hybrid and concomitant groups, respectively (P = 0.007). By the per-protocol analysis, rates of eradication were 85.8% (109/127) and 89% (137/154), respectively (P = 0.428). Severe side effects were few in both groups. More side effects were observed in concomitant group (p < 0.001), however, the severity of side effects was not statistically different between the two regimens (P = 0.314). Reverse hybrid regimen was better tolerated (98% vs. 91.5%, P = 0.009).

Conclusion

Both 14-day reverse hybrid and concomitant regimens have a fair response rate in Iran.

Effects of 14-days bismuth- and tetracycline-containing quadruple therapy with concomitant regimen for the first line Helicobacterpylori eradication

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has infected about 50% of the world's population and it is the main cause for peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma and even a major cause for gastric MALT lymphoma.

Methods

This study was performed in Mazandaran, Sari, situated in North of Iran. Three-hundred and twenty-eight adult patients with endoscopically approved gastric or duodenal ulcers or erosions and H. pylori infection were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive either 14 days PABT (Pantoprazole 40 mg, Amoxicillin 1 g, Bismuth 425 mg (all twice daily) and Tetracycline 500 mg four times a day) and PACM (Pantoprazole 40 mg, Amoxicillin 1g, Clarithromycin 500 mg, and Metronidazole 500 mg, all twice daily). To evaluate H. pylori eradication, fecal H. pylori antigen test was performed 8 weeks after treatment.

Results

The eradication rates were 94.51% in the PABT and 91.46% in PACM group based on the intention to treat analysis. Moreover, the eradication rates were 95.58% and 92.72% according to per-protocol analysis, respectively. Also, both groups had very low rates of severe side effects.

Conclusion

Regarding the ideal eradication rates achieved by both treatment groups and the low rates of severe side effects, both treatment protocols can be prescribed for H. pylori eradication in North of Iran.

Efficacy of 14-day concomitant quadruple therapy and 14-day high-dose dual therapy on H. pylori eradication

Aim

We compared the efficacy of two different regimens for H. pylori eradication in areas with high antibiotic resistance.

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a gram-negative bacillus that has a strong association with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. Different regimens with varying degrees of effectiveness have been used for H. pylori eradication.

Methods

The current randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomly assigned 217 patients who had indications for H. pylori eradication therapy to two groups. One group were administered concomitant quadruple therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 gr, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg every 12 hours) for 14 days, and the second group received 14 days of high-dose dual therapy, consisting of esomeprazole 40 mg BID and amoxicillin 1g TDS. H. pylori eradication was assessed eight weeks after the end of treatment.

Results

H. pylori eradication rates by PP analysis for 14 days concomitant quadruple therapy and high-dose dual therapy were 88.6% (95% CI, 80.3-92.8) and 82.2% (95% CI, 74.8-89.5), respectively (p = 0.19). According to intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rates were 81.6% (95% CI, 74.5-88.6) and 80.6% (95% CI, 73-88.1), respectively (p = 0.58). Overall drug side effects were 20.8% in high-dose dual therapy and 49.6% in concomitant quadruple therapy (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Fourteen days concomitant quadruple therapy can be considered as a relatively acceptable regimen for H. pylori eradication in areas with high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance. It seems that high-dose dual therapy could be a promising alternative regimen in these areas.

Comparative efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy, bismuth-based quadruple therapy and non-bismuth quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: a network meta-analysis

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with the development of multiple diseases. The eradication rate of H. pylori has gradually decreased, suggesting the need to discover more effective therapies. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of first-line treatments including high-dose dual therapy (HDDT), bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT), sequential therapy (ST), concomitant therapy (CT) and hybrid therapy (HT) by network meta-analysis (NMA). A comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, was performed from their inception to 1 September 2019. A network analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing first-line therapies were carried out using Stata 14.0 and Revman 5.2. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting non-Asian studies. Finally, 41 RCTs with 14 119 patients were included. The NMA showed that, in terms of eradication rate, ST for 10 days (ST-10) was significantly lower than CT for 10 or 14 days (CT ≥ 10). Sensitivity analysis among the Asian population showed that ST-10 denoted the lowest effectiveness among the interventions. The ranking results based on probability showed that HDDT ranked first for the eradication rate. As for adverse events, HDDT was significantly less than BQT and CT regardless of duration, while BQT for 14 days represented higher adverse events than ST, HT and CT ≥ 10. HDDT ranked first among the therapies. In conclusion, HDDT for 14 days appeared to be the most optimal first-line therapy for H. pylori among the Asian population with comparable efficacy and compliance but causing fewer adverse events.

Randomised clinical trial comparing concomitant and hybrid therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study was to compare concomitant and hybrid therapy in the first line eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia, in which clarithromycin resistance is above 20%. The secondary objective of the study was to determine and compare compliance and adverse events rate between these therapeutic protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an open-label, randomised clinical trial 140 patients total with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to either concomitant (esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, twice daily for 14 days) or hybrid (esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily during 14 days with adding metronidazole 500 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, in the last 7 days,) treatment group.

RESULTS

Eradication rates for concomitant group and hybrid therapy group were 84.1% (58/69) and 83.1% (59/71) respectively in the intention-to-treat analysis and 96.7% (58/60) and 95.2% (59/62) in per-protocol analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups (ITT analysis: P = 0.878; PP analysis: P = 0.675). Adverse events were more frequent in the concomitant group (33.3% vs 18.3%, P = 0.043). There was no difference among groups regarding compliance rate.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid therapy has similar eradication rate as concomitant therapy, with lower adverse events rate. In the era of increasing antibiotic resistance, eradication regime with less antibiotic's usage, as hybrid therapy, should be reasonable first line treatment choice for H. pylori infection. Clinical Trials, gov: NCT03572777.

Management of antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection: current perspective in Iran

Helicobacter pylori is a common gastric bacterial pathogen implicated in the pathogenesis of many digestive tract disorders. H. pylori infection prevalence has been reported alarmingly in Iran. A plethora of studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficiency of first-line and second-line eradication attempts in patients diagnosed with H. pylori infections in Iran. The present study, was evaluated the efficacy of first-line and second-line therapy in H. pylori infections in Iran. We aimed to consider the literature review of the various library and electronic databases (Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar) until 2020. The frequency of bacterial resistance to tetracycline, ampicillin, trimethoprim, erythromycin, ofloxacin, and metronidazolewas found to be high in Iran, while the most effective antibiotics were clarithromycin, rifampin, rifampicin, tetracycline, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and azithromycin. The therapeutic choice for H. pylori eradication in Iran could be quadruple therapy using two antibiotics amoxicillin and metronidazole/clarithromycin for the first-line regimen, and a combination of furazolidone plus tetracycline/amoxicillin and bismuth plus proton pump inhibitor for the second-line regimen. Due to increased antibiotic resistance in our region, empirical therapy must be replaced by more targeted treatment based on antimicrobial drug resistance profiles obtained from patients. Although we limited our investigation on the H. pylori eradication regimens in Iran, the results can be generalized to any region as long as the patterns of resistance are the same.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Is Not Associated With Future Clostridium difficile Infection

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is associated with many gastrointestinal disorders, including gastric cancer, and consensus guidelines recommend eradication after detection. There is a theoretical, yet uninvestigated, concern that HP treatment could increase the risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Using the data from a large cohort of patients with HP, we investigated whether HP eradication is associated with CDI.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study within the Veterans Health Administration on 38,535 patients (median age 61.8 years; 91.8% men) with detected HP between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2018 was conducted. Primary outcome was a positive laboratory test for CDI within 3 months of HP detection. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the following: patient demographics, previous CDI, recent hospitalization, and whether the patient received HP eradication therapy (by antibiotic and regimen, and including proton pump therapy). Secondary analysis of those treated evaluated whether eradication of HP was associated with CDI.

RESULTS

Among 38,535 patients, 28,818 (74.8%) were treated for HP and 284 (0.74%) developed CDI. In multivariable analysis, prominent factors included hospital discharge within 12 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-3.77) and 4 weeks (OR 3.46; 95% CI: 2.18-5.48), P < 0.001, and previous CDI (OR 12.5; 95% CI: 9.21-17.0, P < 0.001). Treatment of HP was not associated with future CDI. In secondary analysis of those treated, confirmation of eradication was not associated with future CDI (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 0.67-3.29).

DISCUSSION

In a large study of US patients with HP, we demonstrate that neither treatment nor eradication of HP is associated with CDI. Previous C. difficile infection and recent hospital discharge, established risk factors for CDI, are strongly associated. These findings suggest that treatment should be continued to be prescribed when HP is detected (http://links.lww.com/AJG/B507).

Fourth-generation quinolones in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of fourth-generation quinolones for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

Major literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for relevant articles published prior to February 2018. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials that examined the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapies and included fourth-generation quinolones in the experimental arm. Subgroup analyses by regions and different types of fourth-generation quinolones were also performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies including a total of 2198 patients were assessed. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed that the eradication rate of therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones was significantly lower than that of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis [75.4% vs 81.8%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.661; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.447-0.977; P = 0.038]. This analysis also showed that the eradication rate of the therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones was inferior to that of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones by per-protocol analysis (79.1% vs 84.7%; OR = 0.663; 95%CI: 0.433-1.016; P = 0.059). Moreover, the occurrence of side effects was significantly different between the control and experimental groups by ITT analysis (30.6% vs 19.5%; OR = 1.874; 95%CI: 1.120-3.137; P = 0.017). The sub-analyses also showed significant differences in moxifloxacin therapies vs other fourth-generation quinolone therapies (84.3% vs 71.9%) and in Asian vs European groups (76.7% vs 89.1%).

CONCLUSION

Therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones achieved a poor eradication rate in the treatment of H. pylori infection. Such regimens might be useful as a rescue treatment based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Different antibiotics should be chosen in different regions.

Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in Iran: A Review

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the most common bacterial infections, affecting almost half of the world’s population. It is associated with peptic ulcer disease, gastric adenocarcinoma, and lymphoma. In Iran, the prevalence of H. pylori infection has been reported to be between 36% and 90% in different geographic regions.

Several studies have assessed the efficacy of different therapeutic options for firstline and second-line H. pylori eradication in Iran; however, the results are conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a review to evaluate different studies in order to select the best options and to provide recommendations for H. pylori eradication in Iran. Accordingly, we searched through PubMed to obtain relevant randomized clinical trials published in English language up to June 2017.

According to our study, among first-line eradication regimens, bismuth-based furazolidone- or clarithromycin-containing quadruple therapies, hybrid regimen, and concomitant therapy seem to be appropriate options. Also, 10- or 14-day clarithromycin-containing triple therapy can be used if local H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin is known to be less than 15%.

For second-line H. pylori eradication, bismuth-based quadruple therapies and 14-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy can be used, provided that antibiotics other than those used in the first-line regimen are used. Third-line H. pylori eradication regimens have not been addressed in Iranian studies. However, most guidelines recommend treatment according to the results of culture and susceptibility testing.

Although we limited our investigation to H. pylori eradication regimens in Iran, the results are transferrable to any region as long as the patterns of antibiotic resistance are the same.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection 2017

This review summarizes important studies regarding Helicobacter pylori therapy published from April 2016 to April 2017. The main themes that emerge involve studies assessing the efficacy of bismuth and nonbismuth quadruple regimens. While in recent years, much of the emphasis on the use of bismuth has focussed on its utility in a second-line setting, an increasing number of studies this year have shown excellent efficacy in first-line therapy. The efficacy of bismuth as a second-line after sequential and concomitant therapy was particularly noteworthy. Antibiotic resistance was more intensely studied this year than for a long time, and definite trends are presented regarding an increase in resistance, including the fact that clarithromycin resistance in particular is now at a level where the continued use of clarithromycin triple therapy first-line as a mainstream treatment is not recommended. Another exciting trend to emerge this year is the utility of vonoprazan as an alternative to PPI therapy, especially in resistant and difficult-to-treat groups.