Trunk muscle use during pulling tasks: effects of a lifting belt and footing conditions

Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks

Though biomechanically determined guidelines exist for lifting, existing recommendations for pushing and pulling were developed using a psychophysical approach. The current study aimed to establish objective hand force limits based on the results of a biomechanical assessment of the forces on the lumbar spine during occupational pushing and pulling activities. Sixty-two subjects performed pushing and pulling tasks in a laboratory setting. An electromyography-assisted biomechanical model estimated spinal loads, while hand force and turning torque were measured via hand transducers. Mixed modelling techniques correlated spinal load with hand force or torque throughout a wide range of exposures in order to develop biomechanically determined hand force and torque limits. Exertion type, exertion direction, handle height and their interactions significantly influenced dependent measures of spinal load, hand force and turning torque. The biomechanically determined guidelines presented herein are up to 30% lower than comparable psychophysically derived limits and particularly more protective for straight pushing. Practitioner Summary: This study utilises a biomechanical model to develop objective biomechanically determined push/pull risk limits assessed via hand forces and turning torque. These limits can be up to 30% lower than existing psychophysically determined pushing and pulling recommendations. Practitioners should consider implementing these guidelines in both risk assessment and workplace design moving forward.

Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks

OBJECTIVE

Numerous devices have been designed to support the back during lifting tasks. To improve the utility of such devices, this research explores the use of preparatory muscle activity to classify muscle loading and initiate appropriate device activation. The goal of this study was to determine the earliest time window that enabled accurate load classification during a dynamic lifting task.

METHODS

Nine subjects performed thirty symmetrical lifts, split evenly across three weight conditions (no-weight, 10-lbs and 24-lbs), while low-back muscle activity data was collected. Seven descriptive statistics features were extracted from 100 ms windows of data. A multinomial logistic regression (MLR) classifier was trained and tested, employing leave-one subject out cross-validation, to classify lifted load values. Dimensionality reduction was achieved through feature cross-correlation analysis and greedy feedforward selection. The time of full load support by the subject was defined as load-onset.

RESULTS

Regions of highest average classification accuracy started at 200 ms before until 200 ms after load-onset with average accuracies ranging from 80% (±10%) to 81% (±7%). The average recall for each class ranged from 69-92%.

CONCLUSION

These inter-subject classification results indicate that preparatory muscle activity can be leveraged to identify the intent to lift a weight up to 100 ms prior to load-onset. The high accuracies shown indicate the potential to utilize intent classification for assistive device applications.

SIGNIFICANCE

Active assistive devices, e.g. exoskeletons, could prevent back injury by off-loading low-back muscles. Early intent classification allows more time for actuators to respond and integrate seamlessly with the user.

Can lumbosacral orthoses cause trunk muscle weakness? A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Wearing lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is one of the most common treatments prescribed for conservative management of low back pain. Although the results of randomized controlled trials suggest effectiveness of LSO in reducing pain and disability in these patients, there is a concern that prolonged use of LSO may lead to trunk muscle weakness and atrophy.

PURPOSE

The present review aimed to evaluate available evidence in literature to determine whether LSO results in trunk muscle weakness or atrophy.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Medline (via Ovid) followed by hand search of journals was performed. Prospective studies published in peer-reviewed journals, with full text available in English, investigating the effect of lumbar orthosis on trunk muscle activity, muscle thickness, strength or endurance, spinal force, and intra-abdominal pressure in healthy subjects or in patients with low back pain, were included. Methodological quality of selected studies was assessed by using the modified version of Downs and Black checklist. This research had no funding source, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest-associated biases.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The mean and standard deviation of the quality score was 64±9.7%. Most studies investigating the effect of lumbar orthosis on electromyographic activity (EMG) of trunk muscles demonstrated a decrease or no change in the EMG parameters. A few studies reported increased muscle activity. Lumbosacral orthosis was found to have no effect on muscle strength in some studies, whereas other studies demonstrated increased muscle strength. Only one study, which included ultrasound assessment of trunk muscle stabilizers, suggested reduced thickness of the abdominal muscles and reduced cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscles. Out of eight studies that investigated spinal compression load, the load was reduced in four studies and unchanged in three studies. One study showed that only elastic belts reduced compression force compared to leather and fabric belts and ascribed this reduction to the elastic property of the lumbar support.

CONCLUSION

The present review showed that the changes in outcome measures associated with muscle work demands were inconsistent in their relation to the use of lumbar supports. This review did not find conclusive scientific evidence to suggest that orthosis results in trunk muscle weakness.

Evaluating the physical demands on firefighters using track-type stair descent devices to evacuate mobility-limited occupants from high-rise buildings

The physical demands on firefighting personnel were investigated when using different types of track-type stair descent devices designed for the emergency evacuation of high rise buildings as a function of staircase width and evacuation urgency. Twelve firefighters used five track-type stair descent devices during simulated urgent and non-urgent evacuations. The devices were evaluated under two staircase width conditions (1.12, and 1.32 m), and three devices were also evaluated under a narrower staircase condition (0.91 m). Dependent measures included electromyographic (EMG) data, spine motion, heart rates, Borg Scale ratings, task durations and descent velocities. Stair descent speeds favored the devices that had shorter fore/aft dimensions when moving through the landing. EMG results indicated that there were tradeoffs due to design features, particularly on the landings where the physical demands tended to be greater. On the landings, devices that could be rolled on four wheels reduced the deltoid and bicep activation levels.

POSTURE AND GROUND REACTION FORCE RELATED INFLUENCES ON TAI CHI PUSHING MOVEMENT

The goal of this study was to investigate the differences in ground reaction force during a Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) pushing movement between those with and without TCC experience through a detailed 3D dynamic analysis of the lower extremities. Seven TCC practitioners who had practiced the TCC push-hands movement for 6.0 ± 4.8 years and eight males without any TCC experience were recruited in this study. An eight-camera Expert Vision Eagle motion analysis system and two Kistler force plates were used to collect kinematic data (100 Hz) and the ground reaction force (1000 Hz). About 34 retro-reflective markers were placed on anatomical significant locations that determine embedded axes for segments. Results showed that the angular motions of the knee joint were different between the two groups, both in pattern and magnitude. Compared with the TCC group, the non-TCC group had significantly smaller peak abduction angles at the ankle joint (p < 0.05). The magnitude of the vertical force of the TCC group was greater, whereas the medial and posterior shear forces were smaller. The significant difference in vertical force (p < 0.05) and fraction opponent force of vertical force were found significantly different (p < 0.05) between the two groups. The patterns of the anteroposterior component of the ground reaction force during pushing were different, but those for the other two components were similar. Different lower-limb kinematics and kinetics were found between those with and those without TCC experience during TCC pushing movement and it was also found that the TCC practitioners could generate more effective force transfer than the group with no prior TCC experience. It was further concluded that vertical force plays an important role in a pushing movement, and posterior force exerted from the opponent was absorbed and transformed into anterior force to help the TCC practitioners remain stable.

Are back supports plus education more effective than education alone in promoting recovery from low back pain?: Results from a randomized clinical trial

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a back support plus education versus education alone in promoting recovery from a work-related low back disorder (WR-LBD) while simultaneously considering personal, health, and occupational factors and the impact of occupational factors on recovery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No randomized studies of active industrial workers with low back disorders exist regarding the effectiveness of back supports plus education.

METHODS

A total of 433 actively employed hourly union workers who had a recent diagnosis of a WR-LBD: 1) those who wore a specially designed back support plus received education on back health; and 2) those who received education on back health only. Demographic, health, medical, and occupational factors were obtained through interview or abstraction of computer files; individual ergonomic exposures were measured with a lumbar motion monitor. Outcomes evaluated over a 12-month period included: self-reported measures of back pain, back pain disability level, physical health, mental health, and administrative measures of recurrence, lost work time, and medical care utilization.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the study groups with respect to mental or physical health, low back pain, back pain disability, neurogenic symptoms, lost work time, likelihood of recurrence of an episode of a back disorder, or other administrative measures of healthcare utilization or lost work time. However, significant decreases in low back pain, low back pain disability, neurogenic symptoms, and an increase in physical health were observed over the 12 months of observation in both study groups. The only occupational variable found to influence was plant group whereby service parts operations workers in the back support plus education group experienced a lower likelihood of WR-LBD recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Although there was no overall effect on self-reported recovery or administrative measures or lost work time between the study groups, a back support plus health education may have some value in preventing recurrent WR-LBD in industrial workers who work in psychosocial environments and perform manual material handling tasks similar to those found in parts distribution centers.

Can a new behaviorally oriented training process to improve lifting technique prevent occupationally related back injuries due to lifting?

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree to which a new behavior-based lift training program (LiftTrainer; Ascension Technology, Burlington, VT) could reduce the incidence of low back disorder in distribution center jobs that require repetitive lifting.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Most studies show programs aimed at training lifting techniques to be ineffective in preventing low back disorders, which may be due to their conceptual rather than behavioral learning approach.

METHODS

A total of 2144 employees in 19 distribution centers were randomized into either the LiftTrainer program or a video control group. In the LiftTrainer program, participants were individually trained in up to 5, 30-minute sessions while instrumented with motion capture sensors to quantify the L5/S1 moments. Twelve months following the initial training, injury data were obtained from company records.

RESULTS

Survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier) indicated that there was no difference in injury rates between the 2 training groups. Likewise, there was no difference in the turnover rates. However, those with a low (<30 Nm) average twisting moment at the end of the first session experienced a significantly (P < 0.005) lower rate of low back disorder than controls.

CONCLUSIONS

While overall the LiftTrainer program was not effective, those with twisting moments below 30 Nm reported fewer injuries, suggesting a shift in focus for "safe" lifting programs.

Designing ergonomic interventions for EMS workers, Part I: transporting patients down the stairs

The objective of the current work was to test ergonomic interventions aimed at reducing the magnitude of trunk muscle exertions in firefighters/paramedics (FFPs) providing emergency medical services (EMS) when transporting patients down the stairs. The interventions, developed using focus groups, were a footstrap to prevent the patient from sliding down on the backboard, a change in the handle configuration on the stairchair, and 2 devices, the "backboard wheeler" and a tank tread-like device (descent control system, DCS) for a stretcher, that change the backboard and stretcher carrying tasks into rolling and sliding tasks. Eleven two-person teams transported a 75 kg dummy with each intervention and its corresponding control condition down a flight of steps. Surface electromyographic (EMG) data were collected from 8 trunk muscles from each participant. Results showed that the backboard footstrap reduced the erector spinae (ERS) activity for the FFP in the "leader" role by 15 percent, on average. The change in handle configuration on the stairchair had no effect on the variables measured. The backboard wheeler reduced the ERS activity bilaterally in the FFP in the leader role and unilaterally for the FFP in the "follower" role, by 28 and 24 percent, respectively. The DCS reduced the 90th percentile ERS activity for both FFPs from 26 to 16 percent MVC, but increased the latissimus dorsi activity in the follower from 11 to 15 percent MVC. The DCS was the only intervention tested that resulted in a reduced rating of perceived exertion relative to the corresponding control condition. In summary, the hypotheses that the proposed interventions could reduce trunk muscle loading were supported for 3 of the 4 transport interventions tested.

Lumbosacral orthoses reduce trunk muscle activity in a postural control task

Biomechanical modeling estimated that trunk muscle activity during various tasks could be reduced by 1-14% without the loss of spine stability when a lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is worn [Cholewicki, J., 2004. The effects of lumbosacral orthoses on spine stability: what changes in EMG can be expected? Journal of Orthopedic Research 22, 1150-1155]. The present study experimentally tested these theoretical predictions in an unstable sitting task. This task required subjects to balance on a seat supported by a plastic hemisphere (slashed circle=30cm) and placed on a force plate that tracked the center of pressure (CoP). The average CoP velocity quantified subjects' performance. Healthy subjects (12 males, 11 females) balanced for 20s in 3 trials performed with and without the LSO in random order. EMG was recorded bilaterally from rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), thoracic (TES) and lumbar erector spinae (LES), and expressed as the % of maximum voluntary activation (%MVA). There was no difference in the balance performance with and without the LSO (p=0.13). However, EMG averaged across the trials was significantly lower in the LSO, as compared to the No LSO condition, for TES (5.8+/-3.2 vs. 6.4+/-3.7%MVA, p=0.02) and LES (3.7+/-1.5 vs. 5.9+/-3.9%MVA, p=0.01). No significant differences were present in the abdominal muscle activity. These results agree with earlier spine modeling simulations, which predicted the greatest reduction in muscle activity due to LSO to occur in TES and LES. It was hypothesized that such a reduction in muscle co-contraction could benefit patients with low back pain, who exhibit elevated muscular activity during postural tasks such as walking, standing and sitting.

Initial force and postural adaptations when pushing and pulling on floor surfaces with good and reduced resistance to slipping

The objective of the present study was to determine whether differences in the frictional properties of a floor surface may affect the kinematics and kinetics of pushing and pulling. Eight male participants were required to push and pull a four-wheeled trolley over two level surfaces, on which were mounted floor coverings with good (safety floor) and reduced (standard floor) frictional properties. A psychophysical approach was used to determine the initial maximum acceptable horizontal force required to move the trolley over a short distance (3 m). Three-dimensional (3D) hand and ground reaction forces and 3D postures were measured during initial force exertions. The results showed that psychophysically derived measures of initial horizontal force and horizontal components of hand forces did not differ significantly between floor surfaces. Despite the ability to exert similar forces, the measured maximum coefficient of friction varied according to floor surface. These changes reflected significant alterations in vertical and horizontal components of ground reaction and vertical hand forces, suggesting that participants had maximized the frictional properties available to them. Postures also changed as a consequence of floor surface, with significant changes occurring in knee flexion and trunk extension. This study has shown that handlers involved in the pushing and pulling of trolleys are capable of adjusting posture and the direction of hand and foot forces in order to compensate for reduced levels of floor friction. This has particular relevance when assessing the musculoskeletal loads imposed on the handler and the likely mechanisms of injury resulting from variations in floor conditions when workers undertake pushing and pulling tasks in the workplace.

Effect of a Back Belt on Reaching Postures

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the effect of a back belt on reach actions.

SUBJECTS

Sixteen undergraduate college students (8 male students, 8 female students) ranging in age from 18 to 22 years. Thirteen subjects were included in the final analysis.

SETTING

The Department of Psychology at Miami University, Oxford, Ohio

METHODS

Using a well-established set of procedures developed in our laboratory for studying reaching, seated adult participants reached for and retrieved an object placed at various distances from them. Reach distances included values both closer than and farther than each subject's maximum seated reach. The reach task had 2 conditions: picking up and retrieving a small block and skewering and retrieving a small bead with a needle. For each task condition, each subject either wore the belt or did not use a belt.

RESULTS

Results indicate that when subjects wore the belt while reaching, they tended to have initial transition points (sitting to nonsitting) closer to their bodies than while not wearing the belt. That is, for a distant object, subjects were more likely to raise their bodies out of the chair rather than perform an extreme seated reach, possibly acting to preserve a greater margin of safety.

CONCLUSIONS

The back belt consistently modified reaching postures by limiting extreme ranges of motion during a task that required enhanced stability. Furthermore, the methodology and analysis presented in this article when applied to chiropractic will allow us to begin thoughtful investigation of the effects of chiropractic adjustments on postural transitions and margin of safety.

Mechanical loading of the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling activities

The objective of this study was to quantify the mechanical load on the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling in combination with three task constraints: the use of one or two hands, three cart weights, and two handle heights. The second objective was to explore the relation between the initial and sustained exerted forces and the mechanical load on the low back and shoulders. Detailed biomechanical models of the low back and shoulder joint were used to estimate mechanical loading. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE) the effects were quantified for exerted push/pull forces, net moments at the low back and shoulders, compressive and shear forces at the low back, and compressive forces at the glenohumeral joint. The results of this study appeared to be useful to estimate ergonomics consequences of interventions in the working constraints during pushing and pulling. Cart weight as well as handle height had a considerable effect on the mechanical load and it is recommended to maintain low cart weights and to push or pull at shoulder height. Initial and sustained exerted forces were not highly correlated with the mechanical load at the low back and shoulders within the studied range of the exerted forces.

Lower torso muscle activation patterns for high-magnitude static exertions: gender differences and the effects of twisting

STUDY DESIGN

Surface electromyographic signals were collected from 14 lower torso muscles while participants resisted high-magnitude static trunk moments applied in a variety of directions.

OBJECTIVES

To obtain a description of muscle activations in response to large moment magnitudes and axial twisting, including levels of agonistic and antagonistic muscle cocontraction. To assess differences in lower torso muscle activation patterns associated with gender and trial repetition.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Back pain is associated with mechanical loads in the back. Biomechanical modeling of these loads is facilitated by knowledge of typical muscle activation patterns. Previous efforts in obtaining such data have often limited their scope to low-magnitude exertions or relatively simple scenarios.

METHODS

Eight male and eight female participants, matched by height and mass, performed static exertions in an apparatus that immobilized their lower body while the activation levels of seven bilateral torso muscles were measured using surface electromyography. Activation patterns were analyzed to assess differences resulting from a variety of factors.

RESULTS

No significant differences in activation patterns were found between genders or repetitions, but moment magnitude and direction elicited substantial differential responses. Good repeatability was found between trial repetitions, as indicated by intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.65). Significant synergistic muscle coactivation, large intersubject variability (mean coefficient of variation 82.2%), and consistent levels of antagonism ranging from 10% to 30% maximum voluntary exertions were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals of different genders, but similar anthropometry, have comparable muscular reactions to complex torso loads, suggesting similar motor control strategies. Future spine models should consider that the variability in muscle recruitment patterns is larger between subjects than within subjects. High-magnitude exertions, especially those with moment loads in more than one plane, require most muscles to be active (>5%) and moderate levels of antagonism.

A functional subdivision of hip, abdominal, and back muscles during asymmetric lifting

STUDY DESIGN

An experimental study of muscle recruitment patterns during asymmetric lifting in healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate muscle recruitment patterns during asymmetric lifting, representing a common daily living activity, to determine whether systematic differences exist between functioning of the local and global muscle systems.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The normal function of the local muscle system is to provide sufficient segmental stability to the spine. The global muscle system provides general trunk stabilization and enables the static and dynamic work necessary for daily living and sports activities. Current knowledge about these two muscle groups appears to be specifically derived from anatomic findings and experiments conducted under artificial circumstances. To the authors' knowledge, the recruitment patterns of both muscle groups have not been investigated in daily living activities.

METHODS

Twenty-nine healthy individuals performed different variants of asymmetric lifting activities. Electromyographic data were collected from seven hip, abdominal, and back muscle pairs. In addition, trunk kinematics were measured by means of an ultrasonic movement analysis system.

RESULTS

The left and right obliquus internus, rectus femoris, and multifidus showed symmetric co-contraction in all variants of activities. In contrast, significant left/right differences were observed in the external oblique, gluteus maximus, iliocostalis lumborum pars thoracis, and latissimus dorsi.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show a symmetric activation of the local muscles during the performance of low-load, asymmetric lifting tasks, which suggests that these muscles play a stabilizing role during these manoeuvres. The global muscles, however, hand show asymmetric patterns of activation during the same tasks, supporting their role as global stabilizers and prime movers.

The effect of lumbar back support tension on trunk muscle activity

OBJECTIVE

Assess the effect of different controlled lumbar back support tightness levels on trunk muscle activity.

DESIGN

Two-way repeated measure design assessing lumbar back support tension and submaximal trunk extension moments on trunk muscle electromyographic activity.

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical studies on lumbar back supports often use electromyography (EMG) to assess the affect on trunk muscle activity. However, the lumbar back support may alter the electromyographic signal by changing the electrode-muscle distance.

METHODS

Subjects performed trunk extensions at three static submaximal extension moment levels (25%, 50% and 75% MVC) while stabilized at the hips and shoulders, with the back support tensioned to three different tightness levels (44.5, 66.7 and 89.0 N) as well as a no-back support condition.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis failed to find a significant effect (P</=0.05) of lumbar back support tension on the average normalized EMG across the 10 trunk muscles sampled.

CONCLUSIONS

For static experimental tasks, as long as electrodes are protected from direct contact with the back support, studies assessing the effect of lumbar back supports on the trunk muscles via EMG during static tasks are not subject to confounding due to differences in tensions across subjects. RelevanceThe results of this study suggest that variable tensions from previous studies for static exertions with lumbar back supports do not significantly alter the pick-up volume of protected electrodes.