The influence of recovery duration after heavy resistance exercise on sprint cycling performance

Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance

Background/objective

This study assessed the influence of rest interval duration after tuck jumps on 10-s Wingate outcomes and countermovement jump height.

Methods

Eighteen resistance trained individuals (males: n = 10, 21.3 ± 3.6 years; females: n = 8, 22.1 ± 2.2 years) volunteered to participate in four sessions: familiarization, 3-min rest interval with no jumps (CON), and two randomized experimental sessions with a rest interval of either 1-min (ER1) or 5-min (ER5) after a series of tuck jumps. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height was assessed at baseline (PRE) and after (POST) the CON, ER1, and ER5 conditions, and 10-s Wingate cycling testing. Wingate relative peak power (RPP) and mean peak power (RMP) were measured. Separate mixed-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance assessed changes across conditions and sex for the Wingate variables and conditions, sex, and time for CMJ height at an alpha of p ≤ 0.05.

Results

RPP and RMP were significantly greater than CON for ER1 by 0.92 ± 0.23 W kg-1 and 0.41 ± 0.14 W kg-1, respectively, and ER5 by 0.77 ± 0.23 W kg-1 and 0.36 ± 0.10 W kg-1, respectively. ER1 and ER5 RPP and RMP were similar (p > 0.05). For CMJ height, there was only a main effect for sex as males jumped higher than females by 31.3 % (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Performing tuck jumps prior to anaerobic exercise may increase performance for up to 5-min.

Effects of work-matched supramaximal intermittent vs. submaximal constant-workload warm-up on all-out effort power output at the end of 2 minutes of maximal cycling

We tested the hypothesis that work-matched supramaximal intermittent warm-up improves final-sprint power output to a greater degree than submaximal constant-intensity warm-up during the last 30 s of a 120-s supramaximal exercise simulating the final sprint during sports events lasting approximately 2 min. Ten male middle-distance runners performed a 120-s supramaximal cycling exercise consisting of 90 s of constant-workload cycling at a workload corresponding to 110% maximal oxygen uptake (VO_2max) followed by 30 s of maximal-effort cycling. This exercise was preceded by 1) no warm-up (Control), 2) a constant-workload cycling warm-up at a workload of 60%VO_2max for 6 min and 40 s, or 3) a supramaximal intermittent cycling warm-up for 6 min and 40 s consisting of 5 sets of 65 s of cycling at a workload of 46%VO_2max + 15 s of supramaximal cycling at a workload of 120%VO_2max. By design, total work was matched between the two warm-up conditions. Supramaximal intermittent and submaximal constant-workload warm-ups similarly increased 5-s peak (590 ± 191 vs. 604 ± 215W, P = 0.41) and 30-s mean (495 ± 137 vs. 503 ± 154W, P = 0.48) power output during the final 30-s maximal-effort cycling as compared to the no warm-up condition (5-s peak: 471 ± 165W; 30-s mean: 398 ± 117W). VO₂ during the 120-s supramaximal cycling was similarly increased by the two warm-ups as compared to no-warm up (P ≤ 0.05). These findings show that work-matched supramaximal intermittent and submaximal constant-workload warm-ups improve final sprint (∼30 s) performance to similar extents during the late stage of a 120-s supramaximal exercise bout.

Warm-Up Strategies for Sport and Exercise: Mechanisms and Applications

It is widely accepted that warming-up prior to exercise is vital for the attainment of optimum performance. Both passive and active warm-up can evoke temperature, metabolic, neural and psychology-related effects, including increased anaerobic metabolism, elevated oxygen uptake kinetics and post-activation potentiation. Passive warm-up can increase body temperature without depleting energy substrate stores, as occurs during the physical activity associated with active warm-up. While the use of passive warm-up alone is not commonplace, the idea of utilizing passive warming techniques to maintain elevated core and muscle temperature throughout the transition phase (the period between completion of the warm-up and the start of the event) is gaining in popularity. Active warm-up induces greater metabolic changes, leading to increased preparedness for a subsequent exercise task. Until recently, only modest scientific evidence was available supporting the effectiveness of pre-competition warm-ups, with early studies often containing relatively few participants and focusing mostly on physiological rather than performance-related changes. External issues faced by athletes pre-competition, including access to equipment and the length of the transition/marshalling phase, have also frequently been overlooked. Consequently, warm-up strategies have continued to develop largely on a trial-and-error basis, utilizing coach and athlete experiences rather than scientific evidence. However, over the past decade or so, new research has emerged, providing greater insight into how and why warm-up influences subsequent performance. This review identifies potential physiological mechanisms underpinning warm-ups and how they can affect subsequent exercise performance, and provides recommendations for warm-up strategy design for specific individual and team sports.