Beyond Motor Noise: Considering Other Causes of Impaired Reinforcement Learning in Cerebellar Patients

Reinforcement Motor Learning After Cerebellar Damage Is Related to State Estimation

Recent work showed that individuals with cerebellar degeneration could leverage intact reinforcement learning (RL) to alter their movement. However, there was marked inter-individual variability in learning, and the factors underlying it were unclear. Cerebellum-dependent sensory prediction may contribute to RL in motor contexts by enhancing body state estimates, which are necessary to solve the credit-assignment problem. The objective of this study was to test the relationship between the predictive component of state estimation and RL in individuals with cerebellar degeneration. Individuals with cerebellar degeneration and neurotypical control participants completed two tasks: an RL task that required them to alter the angle of reaching movements and a state estimation task that tested the somatosensory perception of active and passive movement. The state estimation task permitted the calculation of the active benefit shown by each participant, which is thought to reflect the cerebellum-dependent predictive component of state estimation. We found that the cerebellar and control groups showed similar magnitudes of learning with reinforcement and active benefit on average, but there was substantial variability across individuals. Using multiple regression, we assessed potential predictors of RL. Our analysis included active benefit, somatosensory acuity, clinical ataxia severity, movement variability, movement speed, and age. We found a significant relationship in which greater active benefit predicted better learning with reinforcement in the cerebellar, but not the control group. No other variables showed significant relationships with learning. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that the integrity of sensory prediction is a strong predictor of RL after cerebellar damage.

Non-invasive stimulation of the human striatum disrupts reinforcement learning of motor skills

Reinforcement feedback can improve motor learning, but the underlying brain mechanisms remain underexplored. In particular, the causal contribution of specific patterns of oscillatory activity within the human striatum is unknown. To address this question, we exploited a recently developed non-invasive deep brain stimulation technique called transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) during reinforcement motor learning with concurrent neuroimaging, in a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind study. Striatal tTIS applied at 80 Hz, but not at 20 Hz, abolished the benefits of reinforcement on motor learning. This effect was related to a selective modulation of neural activity within the striatum. Moreover, 80 Hz, but not 20 Hz, tTIS increased the neuromodulatory influence of the striatum on frontal areas involved in reinforcement motor learning. These results show that tTIS can non-invasively and selectively modulate a striatal mechanism involved in reinforcement learning, expanding our tools for the study of causal relationships between deep brain structures and human behaviour.

Neural correlates of prediction error in patients with schizophrenia: evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis

Abnormal processes of learning from prediction errors, i.e. the discrepancies between expectations and outcomes, are thought to underlie motivational impairments in schizophrenia. Although dopaminergic abnormalities in the mesocorticolimbic reward circuit have been found in patients with schizophrenia, the pathway through which prediction error signals are processed in schizophrenia has yet to be elucidated. To determine the neural correlates of prediction error processing in schizophrenia, we conducted a meta-analysis of whole-brain neuroimaging studies that investigated prediction error signal processing in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. A total of 14 studies (324 schizophrenia patients and 348 healthy controls) using the reinforcement learning paradigm were included. Our meta-analysis showed that, relative to healthy controls, schizophrenia patients showed increased activity in the precentral gyrus and middle frontal gyrus and reduced activity in the mesolimbic circuit, including the striatum, thalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, superior temporal gyrus, and cerebellum, when processing prediction errors. We also found hyperactivity in frontal areas and hypoactivity in mesolimbic areas when encoding prediction error signals in schizophrenia patients, potentially indicating abnormal dopamine signaling of reward prediction error and suggesting failure to represent the value of alternative responses during prediction error learning and decision making.

Reward timing matters in motor learning

Reward timing, that is, the delay after which reward is delivered following an action is known to strongly influence reinforcement learning. Here, we asked if reward timing could also modulate how people learn and consolidate new motor skills. In 60 healthy participants, we found that delaying reward delivery by a few seconds influenced motor learning. Indeed, training with a short reward delay (1 s) induced continuous improvements in performance, whereas a long reward delay (6 s) led to initially high learning rates that were followed by an early plateau in the learning curve and a lower performance at the end of training. Participants who learned the skill with a long reward delay also exhibited reduced overnight memory consolidation. Overall, our data show that reward timing affects the dynamics and consolidation of motor learning, a finding that could be exploited in future rehabilitation programs.

Reward boosts reinforcement-based motor learning

Besides relying heavily on sensory and reinforcement feedback, motor skill learning may also depend on the level of motivation experienced during training. Yet, how motivation by reward modulates motor learning remains unclear. In 90 healthy subjects, we investigated the net effect of motivation by reward on motor learning while controlling for the sensory and reinforcement feedback received by the participants. Reward improved motor skill learning beyond performance-based reinforcement feedback. Importantly, the beneficial effect of reward involved a specific potentiation of reinforcement-related adjustments in motor commands, which concerned primarily the most relevant motor component for task success and persisted on the following day in the absence of reward. We propose that the long-lasting effects of motivation on motor learning may entail a form of associative learning resulting from the repetitive pairing of the reinforcement feedback and reward during training, a mechanism that may be exploited in future rehabilitation protocols.