Suppression and Contrast Normalization in Motion Processing

Weighted power summation and contrast normalization mechanisms account for short-latency eye movements to motion and disparity of sine-wave gratings and broadband visual stimuli in humans

In this paper, we show that the model we proposed earlier to account for the disparity vergence eye movements (disparity vergence responses, or DVRs) in response to horizontal and vertical disparity steps of white noise visual stimuli also provides an excellent description of the short-latency ocular following responses (OFRs) to broadband stimuli in the visual motion domain. In addition, we reanalyzed the data and applied the model to several earlier studies that used sine-wave gratings (single or a combination of two or three gratings) and white noise stimuli. The model provides a very good account of all of these data. The model postulates that the short-latency eye movements-OFRs and DVRs-can be accounted for by the operation of two factors: an excitatory drive, determined by a weighted sum of contributions of stimulus Fourier components, scaled by a global contrast normalization mechanism. The output of the operation of these two factors is then nonlinearly scaled by the total contrast of the stimulus. Despite different roles of disparity (horizontal and vertical) and motion signals in visual scene analyses, the earliest processing stages of these different signals appear to be very similar.

Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses

Two-frame kinematograms have been extensively used to study motion perception in human vision. Measurements of the direction-discrimination performance limits (Dmax) have been the primary subject of such studies, whereas surprisingly little research has asked how the variability in the spatial frequency content of individual frames affects motion processing. Here, we used two-frame one-dimensional vertical pink noise kinematograms, in which images in both frames were bandpass filtered, with the central spatial frequency of the filter manipulated independently for each image. To avoid spatial aliasing, there was no actual leftward-rightward shift of the image: instead, the phases of all Fourier components of the second image were shifted by ±¼ wavelength with respect to those of the first. We recorded ocular-following responses (OFRs) and perceptual direction discrimination in human subjects. OFRs were in the direction of the Fourier components' shift and showed a smooth decline in amplitude, well fit by Gaussian functions, as the difference between the central spatial frequencies of the first and second images increased. In sharp contrast, 100% correct perceptual direction-discrimination performance was observed when the difference between the central spatial frequencies of the first and second images was small, deteriorating rapidly to chance when increased further. Perceptual dependencies moved closer to the OFR ones when subjects were allowed to grade the strength of perceived motion. Response asymmetries common for perceptual judgments and the OFRs suggest that they rely on the same early visual processing mechanisms. The OFR data were quantitatively well described by a model which combined two factors: (1) an excitatory drive determined by a power law sum of stimulus Fourier components' contributions, scaled by (2) a contrast normalization mechanism. Thus, in addition to traditional studies relying on perceptual reports, the OFRs represent a valuable behavioral tool for studying early motion processing on a fine scale.

Center-surround velocity-based segmentation: Speed, eccentricity, and timing of visual stimuli interact to determine interocular dominance

We used a novel method to capture the spatial dominance pattern of competing motion fields at rivalry onset. When rivaling velocities were different, the participants reported center-surround segmentation: The slower stimuli often dominated in the center while faster motion persisted along the borders. The size of the central static/slow field scaled with the stimulus size. The central dominance was time-locked to the static stimulus onset but was disrupted if the dynamic stimulus was presented later. We then used the same stimuli as masks in an interocular suppression paradigm. The local suppression strengths were probed with targets at different eccentricities. Consistent with the center-surround segmentation, target speed and location interacted with mask velocities. Specifically, suppression power of the slower masks was nonhomogenous with eccentricity, providing a potential explanation for center-surround velocity-based segmentation. This interaction of speed, eccentricity, and timing has implications for motion processing and interocular suppression. The influence of different masks on which target features get suppressed predicts that some "unconscious effects" are not generalizable across masks and, thus, need to be replicated under various masking conditions.

Short-latency ocular-following responses: Weighted nonlinear summation predicts the outcome of a competition between two sine wave gratings moving in opposite directions

We recorded horizontal ocular-following responses to pairs of superimposed vertical sine wave gratings moving in opposite directions in human subjects. This configuration elicits a nonlinear interaction: when the relative contrast of the gratings is changed, the response transitions abruptly between the responses elicited by either grating alone. We explore this interaction in pairs of gratings that differ in spatial and temporal frequency and show that all cases can be described as a weighted sum of the responses to each grating presented alone, where the weights are a nonlinear function of stimulus contrast: a nonlinear weighed summation model. The weights depended on the spatial and temporal frequency of the component grating. In many cases the dominant component was not the one that produced the strongest response when presented alone, implying that the neuronal circuits assigning weights precede the stages at which motor responses to visual motion are generated. When the stimulus area was reduced, the relationship between spatial frequency and weight shifted to higher frequencies. This finding may reflect a contribution from surround suppression. The nonlinear interaction is strongest when the two components have similar spatial frequencies, suggesting that the nonlinearity may reflect interactions within single spatial frequency channels. This framework can be extended to stimuli composed of more than two components: our model was able to predict the responses to stimuli composed of three gratings. That this relatively simple model successfully captures the ocular-following responses over a wide range of spatial/temporal frequency and contrast parameters suggests that these interactions reflect a simple mechanism.