Difference in the gain in the phototransduction cascade between rods and cones in carp

Light wavelength modulates search behavior performance in zebrafish

Visual systems have evolved to discriminate between different wavelengths of light. The ability to perceive color, or specific light wavelengths, is important as color conveys crucial information about both biotic and abiotic features in the environment. Indeed, different wavelengths of light can drive distinct patterns of activity in the vertebrate brain, yet what remains incompletely understood is whether distinct wavelengths can invoke etiologically relevant behavioral changes. To address how specific wavelengths in the visible spectrum modulate behavioral performance, we use larval zebrafish and a stereotypic light-search behavior. Prior work has shown that the cessation of light triggers a transitional light-search behavior, which we use to interrogate wavelength-dependent behavioral modulation. Using 8 narrow spectrum light sources in the visible range, we demonstrate that all wavelengths induce motor parameters consistent with search behavior, yet the magnitude of search behavior is spectrum sensitive and the underlying motor parameters are modulated in distinct patterns across short, medium, and long wavelengths. However, our data also establishes that not all motor features of search are impacted by wavelength. To define how wavelength modulates search performance, we performed additional assays with alternative wavelengths, dual wavelengths, and variable intensity. Last, we also tested blind larvae to resolve which components of wavelength dependent behavioral changes potentially include signaling from non-retinal photoreception. These findings have important implications as organisms can be exposed to varying wavelengths in laboratory and natural settings and therefore impose unique behavioral outputs.

Molecular basis of rod and cone differences

In the vertebrate retina, rods and cones both detect light, but they are different in functional aspects such as light sensitivity and time resolution, for example, and in some of cell biological aspects. For functional aspects, both photoreceptors are known to share a common mechanism, phototransduction cascade, consisting of a series of enzyme reactions to convert a photon-capture signal to an electrical signal. To understand the mechanisms of the functional differences between rods and cones at the molecular level, we compared biochemically each of the reactions in the phototransduction cascade between rods and cones using the cells isolated and purified from carp retina. Although proteins in the cascade are functionally similar between rods and cones, their activities together with their expression levels are mostly different between these photoreceptors. In general, reactions to generate a response are slightly less effective, as a total, in cones than in rods, but each of the reactions for termination and recovery of a response are much more effective in cones. These findings explain lower light sensitivity and briefer light responses in cones than in rods. In addition, our considerations suggest that a Ca²⁺-binding protein, S-modulin or recoverin, has a currently unnoticed role in shaping light responses. With comparison of the expression levels of proteins and/or mRNAs using purified cells, several proteins were found to be specifically or predominantly expressed in cones. These proteins would be of interest for future studies on the difference between rods and cones.

Origins of the phototransduction delay as inferred from stochastic and deterministic simulation of the amplification cascade

PURPOSE

To identify steps of the phototransduction cascade responsible for the delay of the photoresponse.

METHODS

Electrical responses of fish (Carassius) cones and Rana ridibunda frog rods and cones were recorded with a suction pipette technique and as an aspartate-isolated mass receptor potential from isolated perfused retinas. Special attention was paid to sufficiently high temporal resolution (1-ms flash, 700 Hz amplification bandpass). Stochastic simulation of the activation steps from photon absorption to the formation of catalytically active phosphodiesterase (PDE) was performed. In addition, a deterministic mathematical model was fit to the experimental responses. The model included a detailed description of the activation steps of the cascade that enabled identification of the role of individual transduction stages in shaping the initial part of the response.

RESULTS

We found that the apparent delay of the photoresponse gets shorter with increasing stimulus intensity and reaches an asymptotic value of approximately 3 ms in cones and greater than or equal to 10 ms in rods. The result seems paradoxical since it is suggested that the delay occurs in the chain of steps from photon absorption to the formation of active transducin (T*) which in cones is, on average, slower than in rods. Stochastic simulation shows that actually the steps from photon absorption to T* may not contribute perceptibly to the delay. Instead, the delay occurs at the stage that couples the cycle of repetitive activation of T by rhodopsin (R*) with the activation of PDE. These steps include formation of T* (= T _α GTP) out of T _αβγ GTP released from the activation cycle and the subsequent interaction of T* with PDE. This poses a problem. The duration of an average cycle of activation of T in rods is approximately 5 ms and is determined by the frequency of collisions between R* and T in the photoreceptor membrane. The frequency is roughly proportional to the surface packing density of T in the membrane. As the packing density of PDE is approximately 12 times lower than that of T, it could be expected that the rate of the T*-PDE interaction were an order of magnitude slower than that of R* and T. As modeling shows, this is the case in rods. However, the delay in cones is approximately 3 ms which could be achieved only at a T*-PDE interaction time of less than or equal to 5 ms. This means that either the frequency of the collisions of T* and PDE, or the efficiency of collisions, or both in cones are approximately ten times higher than in rods. This may be a challenge to the present model of the molecular organization of the photoreceptor membrane.

CONCLUSIONS

The delay of the photoresponse is mainly set by the rate of interaction of T* with PDE. In cones, the delay is shorter than in rods and, moreover, shorter than the duration of the cycle of repetitive activation of T by R*. This poses a problem for the present model of diffusion interaction of phototransduction proteins in the photoreceptor membrane.

Activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade in retinal cones as inferred from electrophysiology and mathematical modeling

PURPOSE

To experimentally identify and quantify factors responsible for the lower sensitivity of retinal cones compared to rods.

METHODS

Electrical responses of frog rods and fish (Carassius) cones to short flashes of light were recorded using the suction pipette technique. A fast solution changer was used to apply a solution that fixed intracellular Ca2+ concentration at the prestimulus level, thereby disabling Ca2+ feedback, to the outer segment (OS). The results were analyzed with a specially designed mathematical model of phototransduction. The model included all basic processes of activation and quenching of the phototransduction cascade but omitted unnecessary mechanistic details of each step.

RESULTS

Judging from the response versus intensity curves, Carassius cones were two to three orders of magnitude less sensitive than frog rods. There was a large scatter in sensitivity among individual cones, with red-sensitive cones being on average approximately two times less sensitive than green-sensitive ones. The scatter was mostly due to different signal amplification, since the kinetic parameters of the responses among cones were far less variable than sensitivity. We argue that the generally accepted definition of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction cannot be used for comparing amplification in rods and cones, since it depends on an irrelevant factor, that is, the cell's volume. We also show that the routinely used simplified parabolic curve fitting to an initial phase of the response leads to a few-fold underestimate of the amplification. We suggest a new definition of the amplification that only includes molecular parameters of the cascade activation, and show how it can be derived from experimental data. We found that the mathematical model with unrestrained parameters can yield an excellent fit to experimental responses. However, the fits with wildly different sets of parameters can be virtually indistinguishable, and therefore cannot provide meaningful data on underlying mechanisms. Based on results of Ca2+-clamp experiments, we developed an approach to strongly constrain the values of many key parameters that set the time course and sensitivity of the photoresponse (such as the dark turnover rate of cGMP, rates of turnoffs of the photoactivated visual pigment and phosphodiesterase, and kinetics of Ca2+ feedback). We show that applying these constraints to our mathematical model enables accurate determination of the biochemical amplification in phototransduction. It appeared that, contrary to many suggestions, maximum biochemical amplification derived for "best" Carassius cones was as high as in frog rods. On the other hand, all turnoff and recovery reactions in cones proceeded approximately 10 times faster than in rods.

CONCLUSIONS

The main cause of the differing sensitivity of rods and cones is cones' ability to terminate their photoresponse faster.