1
|
Analysing the Impact of Climate Change on Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Laguna del Sauce (Uruguay) Using the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing Data. REMOTE SENSING 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/rs13102014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Assessing how climate change will affect hydrological ecosystem services (HES) provision is necessary for long-term planning and requires local comprehensive climate information. In this study, we used SWAT to evaluate the impacts on four HES, natural hazard protection, erosion control regulation and water supply and flow regulation for the Laguna del Sauce catchment in Uruguay. We used downscaled CMIP-5 global climate models for Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5 projections. We calibrated and validated our SWAT model for the periods 2005–2009 and 2010–2013 based on remote sensed ET data. Monthly NSE and R2 values for calibration and validation were 0.74, 0.64 and 0.79, 0.84, respectively. Our results suggest that climate change will likely negatively affect the water resources of the Laguna del Sauce catchment, especially in the RCP 8.5 scenario. In all RCP scenarios, the catchment is likely to experience a wetting trend, higher temperatures, seasonality shifts and an increase in extreme precipitation events, particularly in frequency and magnitude. This will likely affect water quality provision through runoff and sediment yield inputs, reducing the erosion control HES and likely aggravating eutrophication. Although the amount of water will increase, changes to the hydrological cycle might jeopardize the stability of freshwater supplies and HES on which many people in the south-eastern region of Uruguay depend. Despite streamflow monitoring capacities need to be enhanced to reduce the uncertainty of model results, our findings provide valuable insights for water resources planning in the study area. Hence, water management and monitoring capacities need to be enhanced to reduce the potential negative climate change impacts on HES. The methodological approach presented here, based on satellite ET data can be replicated and adapted to any other place in the world since we employed open-access software and remote sensing data for all the phases of hydrological modelling and HES provision assessment.
Collapse
|
3
|
Guswa AJ, Hall B, Cheng C, Thompson JR. Co-designed Land-use Scenarios and their Implications for Storm Runoff and Streamflow in New England. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2020; 66:785-800. [PMID: 32743676 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01342-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Landscape and climate changes have the potential to create or exacerbate problems with stormwater management, high flows, and flooding. In New England, four plausible land-use scenarios were co-developed with stakeholders to give insight to the effects on ecosystem services of different trajectories of socio-economic connectedness and natural resource innovation. With respect to water, the service of greatest interest to New England stakeholders is the reduction of stormwater and flooding. To assess the effects of these land-use scenarios, we applied the Soil and Water Assessment Tool to two watersheds under two climates. Differences in land use had minimal effects on the water balance but did affect high flows and the contribution of storm runoff to streamflow. For most scenarios, the effect on high flows was small. For one scenario-envisioned to have global socio-economic connectedness and low levels of natural resource innovation-growth in impervious areas increased the annual maximum daily flow by 10%, similar to the 5-15% increase attributable to climate change. Under modest population growth, land-use decisions have little effect on storm runoff and high flows; however, for the two scenarios characterized by global socio-economic connectedness, differences in choices regarding land use and impervious area have a large impact on the potential for flooding. Results also indicate a potential interaction between climate and land use with a shift to more high flows resulting from heavy rains than from snowmelt. These results can help inform land use and development, especially when combined with assessments of effects on other ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Guswa
- Picker Engineering Program, Smith College, 100 Green Street, Northampton, MA, 01063, USA.
| | - Brian Hall
- Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, MA, 01366, USA
| | - Chingwen Cheng
- The Design School, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dietl GP. Conservation palaeobiology and the shape of things to come. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2019; 374:20190294. [PMID: 31679496 PMCID: PMC6863490 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Conservation decision-making is a forward-looking process that involves choices among alternative images of how the future will unfold. Scenarios, easily understood as stories about plausible futures, are emerging as a powerful approach used by the conservation community to define a range of socio-ecological futures when standard, predictive modelling approaches to decision-making are inappropriate, providing a framework for making robust decisions under uncertainties. Conservation palaeobiologists can help the conservation community imagine the future. The utility of the past centres on orienting us to the present-grounding the future in the realm of what is plausible-by providing context against which to think about future scenarios, which may help stakeholders and decision-makers to develop a new mental map of a conservation problem, inspiring our intentions and moving us purposefully toward a desirable tomorrow. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The past is a foreign country: how much can the fossil record actually inform conservation?'
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory P. Dietl
- Paleontological Research Institution, 1259 Trumansburg Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
- Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Qiu J, Carpenter SR, Booth EG, Motew M, Zipper SC, Kucharik CJ, Chen X, Loheide SP, Seifert J, Turner MG. Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018; 28:119-134. [PMID: 28944518 DOI: 10.1002/eap.1633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 08/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Sustaining food production, water quality, soil retention, flood, and climate regulation in agricultural landscapes is a pressing global challenge given accelerating environmental changes. Scenarios are stories about plausible futures, and scenarios can be integrated with biophysical simulation models to explore quantitatively how the future might unfold. However, few studies have incorporated a wide range of drivers (e.g., climate, land-use, management, population, human diet) in spatially explicit, process-based models to investigate spatial-temporal dynamics and relationships of a portfolio of ecosystem services. Here, we simulated nine ecosystem services (three provisioning and six regulating services) at 220 × 220 m from 2010 to 2070 under four contrasting scenarios in the 1,345-km2 Yahara Watershed (Wisconsin, USA) using Agro-IBIS, a dynamic model of terrestrial ecosystem processes, biogeochemistry, water, and energy balance. We asked (1) How does ecosystem service supply vary among alternative future scenarios? (2) Where on the landscape is the provision of ecosystem services most susceptible to future social-ecological changes? (3) Among alternative future scenarios, are relationships (i.e., trade-offs, synergies) among food production, water, and biogeochemical services consistent over time? Our results showed that food production varied substantially with future land-use choices and management, and its trade-offs with water quality and soil retention persisted under most scenarios. However, pathways to mitigate or even reverse such trade-offs through technological advances and sustainable agricultural practices were apparent. Consistent relationships among regulating services were identified across scenarios (e.g., trade-offs of freshwater supply vs. flood and climate regulation, and synergies among water quality, soil retention, and climate regulation), suggesting opportunities and challenges to sustaining these services. In particular, proactive land-use changes and management may buffer water quality against undesirable future climate changes, but changing climate may overwhelm management efforts to sustain freshwater supply and flood regulation. Spatially, changes in ecosystem services were heterogeneous across the landscape, underscoring the power of local actions and fine-scale management. Our research highlights the value of embracing spatial and temporal perspectives in managing ecosystem services and their complex interactions, and provides a system-level understanding for achieving sustainability of the food-water-climate nexus in agricultural landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangxiao Qiu
- Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
- School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, 33314, USA
| | - Stephen R Carpenter
- Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Eric G Booth
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
- Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Melissa Motew
- Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Samuel C Zipper
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Christopher J Kucharik
- Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
- Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Xi Chen
- Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
- Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221, USA
| | - Steven P Loheide
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Jenny Seifert
- Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Monica G Turner
- Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thompson JR, Lambert KF, Foster DR, Broadbent EN, Blumstein M, Almeyda Zambrano AM, Fan Y. The consequences of four land‐use scenarios for forest ecosystems and the services they provide. Ecosphere 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R. Thompson
- Harvard Forest Harvard University 324 North Main Street Petersham Massachusetts 01366 USA
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Smithsonian Institution 1500 Remount Road Front Royal Virginia 22360 USA
| | - Kathleen F. Lambert
- Harvard Forest Harvard University 324 North Main Street Petersham Massachusetts 01366 USA
| | - David R. Foster
- Harvard Forest Harvard University 324 North Main Street Petersham Massachusetts 01366 USA
| | - Eben N. Broadbent
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Smithsonian Institution 1500 Remount Road Front Royal Virginia 22360 USA
| | - Meghan Blumstein
- Harvard Forest Harvard University 324 North Main Street Petersham Massachusetts 01366 USA
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Smithsonian Institution 1500 Remount Road Front Royal Virginia 22360 USA
| | - Angelica M. Almeyda Zambrano
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Smithsonian Institution 1500 Remount Road Front Royal Virginia 22360 USA
| | - Yuanchao Fan
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Smithsonian Institution 1500 Remount Road Front Royal Virginia 22360 USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blank PJ, Williams CL, Sample DW, Meehan TD, Turner MG. Alternative scenarios of bioenergy crop production in an agricultural landscape and implications for bird communities. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2016; 26:42-54. [PMID: 27039508 DOI: 10.1890/14-1490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Increased demand and government mandates for bioenergy crops in the United States could require a large allocation of agricultural land to bioenergy feedstock production and substantially alter current landscape patterns. Incorporating bioenergy landscape design into land-use decision making could help maximize benefits and minimize trade-offs among alternative land uses. We developed spatially explicit landscape scenarios of increased bioenergy crop production in an 80-km radius agricultural landscape centered on a potential biomass-processing energy facility and evaluated the consequences of each scenario for bird communities. Our scenarios included conversion of existing annual row crops to perennial bioenergy grasslands and conversion of existing grasslands to annual bioenergy row crops. The scenarios explored combinations of four biomass crop types (three potential grassland crops along a gradient of plant diversity and one annual row crop [corn]), three land conversion percentages to bioenergy crops (10%, 20%, or 30% of row crops or grasslands), and three spatial configurations of biomass crop fields (random, clustered near similar field types, or centered on the processing plant), yielding 36 scenarios. For each scenario, we predicted the impact on four bird community metrics: species richness, total bird density, species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) density, and SGCN hotspots (SGCN birds/ha ≥ 2). Bird community metrics consistently increased with conversion of row crops to bioenergy grasslands and consistently decreased with conversion of grasslands to bioenergy row crops. Spatial arrangement of bioenergy fields had strong effects on the bird community and in some cases was more influential than the amount converted to bioenergy crops. Clustering grasslands had a stronger positive influence on the bird community than locating grasslands near the central plant or at random. Expansion of bioenergy grasslands onto marginal agricultural lands will likely benefit grassland bird populations, and bioenergy landscapes could be designed to maximize biodiversity benefits while meeting targets for biomass production.
Collapse
|
13
|
Evaluating landscape options for corridor restoration between giant panda reserves. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105086. [PMID: 25133757 PMCID: PMC4136856 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2014] [Accepted: 07/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The establishment of corridors can offset the negative effects of habitat fragmentation by connecting isolated habitat patches. However, the practical value of corridor planning is minimal if corridor identification is not based on reliable quantitative information about species-environment relationships. An example of this need for quantitative information is planning for giant panda conservation. Although the species has been the focus of intense conservation efforts for decades, most corridor projects remain hypothetical due to the lack of reliable quantitative researches at an appropriate spatial scale. In this paper, we evaluated a framework for giant panda forest corridor planning. We linked our field survey data with satellite imagery, and conducted species occupancy modelling to examine the habitat use of giant panda within the potential corridor area. We then conducted least-cost and circuit models to identify potential paths of dispersal across the landscape, and compared the predicted cost under current conditions and alternative conservation management options considered during corridor planning. We found that due to giant panda's association with areas of low elevation and flat terrain, human infrastructures in the same area have resulted in corridor fragmentation. We then identified areas with high potential to function as movement corridors, and our analysis of alternative conservation scenarios showed that both forest/bamboo restoration and automobile tunnel construction would significantly improve the effectiveness of corridor, while residence relocation would not significantly improve corridor effectiveness in comparison with the current condition. The framework has general value in any conservation activities that anticipate improving habitat connectivity in human modified landscapes. Specifically, our study suggested that, in this landscape, automobile tunnels are the best means to remove current barriers to giant panda movements caused by anthropogenic interferences.
Collapse
|