1
|
Tarp K, Christiansen R, Bilberg R, Borkner S, Dalsgaard C, Folker MP, Nielsen AS. Nonuse of Blended Web-Based and Face-To-Face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder: Qualitative Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e45471. [PMID: 38349711 PMCID: PMC10900073 DOI: 10.2196/45471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of digital technologies for health care has been the focus of social studies, which have concentrated on the digital divide between individuals who use technology and those who do not-with the latter often being considered as individuals with shortcomings. In Denmark, 91% of the population have computers and 97 out of 100 families have internet access, indicating that lack of access to technology is not the primary reason for nonuse. Although previous studies have primarily focused on participants' perspectives of using internet-based treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD), no study has investigated individuals' reasons to prefer face-to-face treatment over blended face-to-face and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT) for AUD among treatment-seeking populations. OBJECTIVE The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate the nonuse of bCBT among patients with AUD. Specifically, this study aims to explore patients' reasons for choosing not to receive treatment via this format. METHODS This study was conducted among Danish patients with AUD who were enrolled in the study "Blending internet treatment into conventional face-to-face treatment for alcohol use disorder (Blend-A)" but had not used bCBT. The participant group consisted of 11 patients with AUD: 3 women and 8 men. The age range of the participants was 29-78 years (mean 59 years). Individual semistructured interviews were conducted using cell phones to gather participants' reasons for not choosing bCBT. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Five authors performed the analysis in 3 steps: (1) two authors read the transcripts and coded themes from their immediate impression of the material, (2) one author provided feedback, which was used to group overlapping themes together or create new themes that better reflected the content, and (3) the remaining two authors provided feedback on the analysis to improve its structure, readability, and relevance to the research aim. RESULTS We found that the participants had various reasons for choosing face-to-face treatment over bCBT; these reasons were more related to personal matters and lesser to digital health literacy. We identified 4 themes related to personal matters for choosing face-to-face treatment over bCBT: (1) patients' need for attending sessions in person, (2) preference for verbal communication, (3) desire for immediate feedback, and (4) feeling more empowered and motivated with face-to-face sessions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides valuable insight into participants' perspectives on blended therapy for AUD and highlights the importance of considering personal factors when designing digital health interventions. Our study indicates that most of the participants choose not to use bCBT for AUD because they perceive such treatment formats as impersonal. Instead, they prefer direct communication with the therapist, including the ability to express and comprehend facial expressions and body language. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s12888-021-03122-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Tarp
- Research Unit of Digital Psychiatry, Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit of Digital Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Regina Christiansen
- Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Psychiatric University Hospital - University Function, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Randi Bilberg
- Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Psychiatric University Hospital - University Function, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department for Finance and Planning, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Simone Borkner
- Research Unit of Digital Psychiatry, Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Caroline Dalsgaard
- Research Unit of Digital Psychiatry, Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marie Paldam Folker
- Research Unit of Digital Psychiatry, Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anette Søgaard Nielsen
- Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Psychiatric University Hospital - University Function, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Brain Research Inter-Disciplinary Guided Excellence (BRIDGE), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kushniruk A, Morken IM, Storm M, Husebø AML. Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2023; 10:e39391. [PMID: 36745492 PMCID: PMC9941902 DOI: 10.2196/39391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs; eg, heart failure [HF] and colorectal cancer [CRC]), eHealth interventions could meet their posthospital discharge needs and strengthen their ability to self-manage. However, inconclusive evidence exists regarding how to design eHealth services to meet the complex needs of patients. To foster patient acceptability and ensure the successful development and implementation of eHealth solutions, it is beneficial to include different stakeholders (ie, patients and health care professionals) in the design and development phase of such services. The involvement of different stakeholders could contribute to ensuring feasible, acceptable, and usable solutions and that eHealth services are developed in response to users' supportive care needs when transitioning to home after hospitalization. This study is the first step of a larger complex intervention study aimed at meeting the postdischarge needs of 2 NCD populations. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the perspectives of patients with HF and CRC and health care professionals on patient self-management needs following hospital discharge and investigate how a future nurse-assisted eHealth service could be best designed to foster patient acceptability, support self-management, and smooth the transition from hospital to home. METHODS A qualitative, explorative, and descriptive approach was used. We conducted 38 semistructured interviews with 10 patients with HF, 9 patients surgically treated for CRC with curative intent, 6 registered nurses recruited as nurse navigators of a planned eHealth service, and 13 general practitioners experienced in HF and CRC treatment and follow-up care. Patients were recruited conveniently from HF and CRC outpatient clinics, and the nurses were recruited from the cardiology and gastro-surgical departments at a university hospital in the southwest of Norway. The general practitioners were recruited from primary care in surrounding municipalities. Semistructured interview guides were used for data collection, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS In total, 3 main themes were derived from the data analysis: expecting information, reassurance, and guidance when using eHealth for HF and CRC self-management; expecting eHealth to be comprehensible, supportive, and knowledge promoting; and recognizing both the advantages and disadvantages of eHealth for HF and CRC self-management. The data generated from this interview study depicted the diverse needs for self-management support of patients with CRC and HF after hospital discharge. In addition, valuable suggestions were identified regarding the design and content of the eHealth service. However, participants described both possible advantages and disadvantages of a remote eHealth service. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first step in the development of an eHealth service for posthospitalization self-management support for long-term illnesses. It concerns patients' supportive care needs and user requirements of an eHealth service. The findings of this study may add value to the planning and development of eHealth interventions for patients with NCDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.,Research Group for Health and Nursing Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Anne Marie Lunde Husebø
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway.,Research Group for Health and Nursing Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xie Z, Chen J, Or CK. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for eHealth and Its Influencing Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e25959. [PMID: 36103227 PMCID: PMC9520394 DOI: 10.2196/25959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the great potential of eHealth, substantial costs are involved in its implementation, and it is essential to know whether these costs can be justified by its benefits. Such needs have led to an increased interest in measuring the benefits of eHealth, especially using the willingness to pay (WTP) metric as an accurate proxy for consumers’ perceived benefits of eHealth. This offered us an opportunity to systematically review and synthesize evidence from the literature to better understand WTP for eHealth and its influencing factors. Objective This study aimed to provide a systematic review of WTP for eHealth and its influencing factors. Methods This study was performed and reported as per the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, EconLit, and PsycINFO databases were searched from their inception to April 19, 2022. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to calculate WTP values for eHealth (at 2021 US dollar rates) and meta-regression analyses to examine the factors affecting WTP. Results A total of 30 articles representing 35 studies were included in the review. We found that WTP for eHealth varied across studies; when expressed as a 1-time payment, it ranged from US $0.88 to US $191.84, and when expressed as a monthly payment, it ranged from US $5.25 to US $45.64. Meta-regression analyses showed that WTP for eHealth was negatively associated with the percentages of women (β=−.76; P<.001) and positively associated with the percentages of college-educated respondents (β=.63; P<.001) and a country’s gross domestic product per capita (multiples of US $1000; β=.03; P<.001). Compared with eHealth provided through websites, people reported a lower WTP for eHealth provided through asynchronous communication (β=−1.43; P<.001) and a higher WTP for eHealth provided through medical devices (β=.66; P<.001), health apps (β=.25; P=.01), and synchronous communication (β=.58; P<.001). As for the methods used to measure WTP, single-bounded dichotomous choice (β=2.13; P<.001), double-bounded dichotomous choice (β=2.20; P<.001), and payment scale (β=1.11; P<.001) were shown to obtain higher WTP values than the open-ended format. Compared with ex ante evaluations, ex post evaluations were shown to obtain lower WTP values (β=−.37; P<.001). Conclusions WTP for eHealth varied significantly depending on the study population, modality used to provide eHealth, and methods used to measure it. WTP for eHealth was lower among certain population segments, suggesting that these segments may be at a disadvantage in terms of accessing and benefiting from eHealth. We also identified the modalities of eHealth that were highly valued by consumers and offered suggestions for the design of eHealth interventions. In addition, we found that different methods of measuring WTP led to significantly different WTP estimates, highlighting the need to undertake further methodological explorations of approaches to elicit WTP values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenzhen Xie
- Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Jiayin Chen
- Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| | - Calvin Kalun Or
- Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jacob C, Sezgin E, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10:e36284. [PMID: 35318189 PMCID: PMC9121221 DOI: 10.2196/36284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile health (mHealth) tools have emerged as a promising health care technology that may contribute to cost savings, better access to care, and enhanced clinical outcomes; however, it is important to ensure their acceptance and adoption to harness this potential. Patient adoption has been recognized as a key challenge that requires further exploration. Objective The aim of this review was to systematically investigate the literature to understand the factors affecting patients’ adoption of mHealth tools by considering sociotechnical factors (from technical, social, and health perspectives). Methods A structured search was completed following the participants, intervention, comparators, and outcomes framework. We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and SAGE databases for studies published between January 2011 and July 2021 in the English language, yielding 5873 results, of which 147 studies met the inclusion criteria. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook were followed to ensure a systematic process. Extracted data were analyzed using NVivo (QSR International), with thematic analysis and narrative synthesis of emergent themes. Results The technical factors affecting patients’ adoption of mHealth tools were categorized into six key themes, which in turn were divided into 20 subthemes: usefulness, ease of use, data-related, monetary factors, technical issues, and user experience. Health-related factors were categorized into six key themes: the disease or health condition, the care team’s role, health consciousness and literacy, health behavior, relation to other therapies, integration into patient journey, and the patients’ insurance status. Social and personal factors were divided into three key clusters: demographic factors, personal characteristics, and social and cultural aspects; these were divided into 19 subthemes, highlighting the importance of considering these factors when addressing potential barriers to mHealth adoption and how to overcome them. Conclusions This review builds on the growing body of research that investigates patients’ adoption of mHealth services and highlights the complexity of the factors affecting adoption, including personal, social, technical, organizational, and health care aspects. We recommend a more patient-centered approach by ensuring the tools’ fit into the overall patient journey and treatment plan, emphasizing inclusive design, and warranting comprehensive patient education and support. Moreover, empowering and mobilizing clinicians and care teams, addressing ethical data management issues, and focusing on health care policies may facilitate adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Jacob
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Emre Sezgin
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.,NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez
- Innovative Management Practice Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Ivory
- Innovative Management Practice Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morken IM, Storm M, Søreide JA, Urstad KH, Karlsen B, Husebø AML. Posthospitalization Follow-Up of Patients With Heart Failure Using eHealth Solutions: Restricted Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e32946. [PMID: 35166680 PMCID: PMC8889479 DOI: 10.2196/32946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome with high incidence rates, a substantial symptom and treatment burden, and a significant risk of readmission within 30 days after hospitalization. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the significance of using eHealth interventions to follow up on the care needs of patients with HF to support self-care, increase quality of life (QoL), and reduce readmission rates during the transition between hospital and home. OBJECTIVE The aims of this review are to summarize research on the content and delivery modes of HF posthospitalization eHealth interventions, explore patient adherence to the interventions, and examine the effects on the patient outcomes of self-care, QoL, and readmissions. METHODS A restricted systematic review study design was used. Literature searches and reviews followed the (PRISMA-S) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension checklist, and the CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2020. The review process involved 3 groups of researchers working in pairs. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the included studies' methodological quality. A thematic analysis method was used to analyze data extracted from the studies. RESULTS A total of 18 studies were examined in this review. The studies were published between 2015 and 2019, with 56% (10/18) of them published in the United States. Of the 18 studies, 16 (89%) were randomized controlled trials, and 14 (78%) recruited patients upon hospital discharge to eHealth interventions lasting from 14 days to 12 months. The studies involved structured telephone calls, interactive voice response, and telemonitoring and included elements of patient education, counseling, social and emotional support, and self-monitoring of symptoms and vital signs. Of the 18 studies, 11 (61%) provided information on patient adherence, and the adherence levels were 72%-99%. When used for posthospitalization follow-up of patients with HF, eHealth interventions can positively affect QoL, whereas its impact is less evident for self-care and readmissions. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that patients with HF should receive prompt follow-up after hospitalization and eHealth interventions have the potential to improve these patients' QoL. Patient adherence in eHealth follow-up trials shows promise for successful future interventions and adherence research. Further studies are warranted to examine the effects of eHealth interventions on self-care and readmissions among patients with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group for Nursing and Health Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Anne Marie Lunde Husebø
- Research Group for Nursing and Health Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Dam PJ, Caney D, Turner RC, Griffin P, Dwyer M, Prior S. Telehealth experiences of vulnerable clients living in Tasmania. Aust J Rural Health 2022; 30:188-196. [PMID: 35076149 PMCID: PMC9304290 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To understand the experiences of vulnerable clients who used telehealth during the Coronavirus pandemic. Design The study employed a qualitative enquiry, utilising semi‐structured interviews lasting 30‐60 minutes with a thematic analysis approach to explore factors influencing client experience with telehealth. Setting A wide range of locations across Tasmania, Australia. Participants Twelve participants who were considered to be vulnerable on a number of domains, including: health and human wellbeing factors, social risk factors, functional limitations, and individual behavioural factors. Interventions The provision of telehealth consultations to vulnerable clients. Main outcome measures Four global themes were discovered: i) Telehealth saves time, money and energy; ii) User friendly technology facilitates care; iii) Rapport and confidentiality helps clients to feel safe; and iv) Fit for purpose telehealth provides a quality service. Results The discovered themes entailed the major finding that most participants were satisfied with the overall quality of the telehealth service they received and the convenience of this service. Concerns were raised regarding the limitations around social interaction, physical examination, and access to fit‐for‐purpose telehealth devices. Conclusion This research with vulnerable clients, from Tasmania, supports the evidence that the utilisation of telehealth allows more convenient access to care. To optimise the service, however, concerns regarding the desire for social interaction, appropriate physical examination, and access to fit‐for‐purpose telehealth devices will need to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diane Caney
- Department of Communities Hobart TAS Australia
| | - Richard C. Turner
- Hobart Clinical School University of Tasmania ‐ Tasmanian School of Medicine Hobart TAS Australia
| | - Phoebe Griffin
- University of Tasmania ‐ Tasmanian School of Medicine Launceston TAS Australia
| | - Mitchell Dwyer
- University of Tasmania, School of Nursing Burnie TAS Australia
| | - Sarah Prior
- University of Tasmania ‐ Tasmanian School of Medicine Burnie TAS Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Faujdar DS, Singh T, Kaur M, Sahay S, Kumar R. Stakeholders' Perceptions of the Implementation of a Patient-Centric Digital Health Application for Primary Healthcare in India. Healthc Inform Res 2021; 27:315-324. [PMID: 34788912 PMCID: PMC8654332 DOI: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health systems are shifting from traditional methods of healthcare delivery to delivery using digital applications. This change was introduced at a primary care centre in Chandigarh, India that served a marginalised population. After establishing the digital health system, we explored stakeholders' perceptions regarding its implementation. METHODS Ethnographic methods were used to explore stakeholders' perceptions regarding the implementation of the Integrated Health Information System for Primary Health Care (IHIS4PHC), which was developed as a patient-centric digital health application. Data were collected using focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Participatory observations were made of day-to-day activities including outpatient visits, outreach field visits, and methods of health practice. The collected information was analysed using thematic coding. RESULTS Healthcare workers highlighted that working with the digital health system was initially arduous, but they later realised its usefulness, as the digital system made it easier to search records and generate reports, rapidly providing evidence to make decisions. Auxiliary nurse midwives reported that recording information on computers saved time when generating reports; however, systematic and mandatory data entry made recording tedious. Staff were apprehensive about the use of computer-based data for monitoring their work performance. Patients appreciated that their previous records were now available on the computer for easy retrieval. CONCLUSIONS The usefulness of the digital health application was appreciated by various primary healthcare stakeholders. Barriers persisted due to perceived needs for flexibility in delivering healthcare services, and apprehensions continued because of increased transparency, accountability, and dependence on computers and digital technicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharamjeet Singh Faujdar
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Tarundeep Singh
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Manmeet Kaur
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sundeep Sahay
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rajesh Kumar
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Many telemedicine interventions fail to be implemented in medical care with non-use and discontinued use by patients being among the major reasons. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of barriers associated with non-use and discontinued use of telemedicine. An electronic search was conducted in Pubmed in October 2019 and updated in November 2020, followed by a hand search in the beginning of 2021. All potential articles were screened by two independent reviewers based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A qualitative content analysis according to Mayring was carried out. The topics 'intervention', 'context of use' and 'user' were chosen as overarching themes. Out of 1377 potentially relevant articles, 73 were included. User-related barriers were mentioned in most of the analysed studies, followed by barriers related to the intervention. The analysis provides the basis for overcoming non-use issues in telemedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Eh Schwarz
- Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Terp R, Kayser L, Lindhardt T. Older Patients' Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2021; 8:e27005. [PMID: 33988512 PMCID: PMC8164121 DOI: 10.2196/27005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnutrition is prevalent in older patients, which is associated with severe consequences such as a decline in functional status, increased risk of readmission, and increased mortality. A tablet-based eHealth solution (Food'n'Go) was recently developed and introduced at our clinic to support older patients' involvement in nutritional interventions during their hospitalization, thereby enhancing their awareness and motivation for choosing the right food to obtain sufficient calorie and protein intake. To reap the full benefits from the eHealth solution, the technology should be introduced and accompanied by support that targets the end users' competence level and needs. OBJECTIVE In this study, we aimed to explore older patients' readiness (ie, competence, preferences, and attitudes) toward the use of information and communication technology (ICT), and to identify the factors that may act as barriers or facilitators for their engagement with health technology. METHODS A descriptive and explorative study was performed using triangulation of data derived from semistructured interviews and questionnaires (based on the Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology [READHY] instrument). Older hospitalized patients (age ≥65 years; N=25) were included from two hospitals in Denmark. RESULTS The majority (16/25, 64%) of the older patients (median age 81 years) were users of ICT. The qualitative findings revealed that their experiences of benefits related to the use of ICT facilitated usage. Barriers for use of ICT were health-related challenges, limited digital literacy, and low self-efficacy related to ICT use due to age-related prejudices by their relatives and themselves. The qualitative findings were also reflected in the low median scores on the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) READHY scales within dimensions addressing the user's knowledge and skills (eHLQ1:1.8; eHLQ3: 2.0), and the user experience (eHLQ6: 2.0; eHLQ7: 1.5). CONCLUSIONS Older patients are potential users of ICT, but experience a variety of barriers for using eHealth. When introducing older patients to eHealth, it is important to emphasize the possible benefits, and to offer support targeting their knowledge, skills, and motivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Terp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Lars Kayser
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tove Lindhardt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sarradon-Eck A, Bouchez T, Auroy L, Schuers M, Darmon D. Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9:e21795. [PMID: 33661123 PMCID: PMC7974757 DOI: 10.2196/21795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth) apps are a potential means of empowering patients, especially in the case of multimorbidity, which complicates patients' care needs. Previous studies have shown that general practitioners (GPs) have both expectations and concerns regarding patients' use of mHealth apps that could impact their willingness to recommend the apps to patients. OBJECTIVE The aim of this qualitative study is to investigate French GPs' attitudes toward the prescription of mHealth apps or devices aimed toward patients by analyzing GPs' perceptions and expectations of mHealth technologies. METHODS A total of 36 GPs were interviewed individually (n=20) or in a discussion group (n=16). All participants were in private practice. A qualitative analysis of each interview and focus group was conducted using grounded theory analysis. RESULTS Considering the value assigned to mHealth apps by participants and their willingness or resistance to prescribe them, 3 groups were defined based on the attitudes or positions adopted by GPs: digital engagement (favorable attitude; mHealth apps are perceived as additional resources and complementary tools that facilitate the medical work, the follow-up care, and the monitoring of patients; and apps increase patients' compliance and empowerment); patient protection (related to the management of patient care and fear of risks for patients, concerns about patient data privacy and security, doubt about the usefulness for empowering patients, standardization of the medical decision process, overmedicalization, risks for individual freedom, and increasing social inequalities in health); doctor protection (fear of additional tasks and burden, doubt about the actionability of patient-gathered health data, risk for medical liability, dehumanization of the patient-doctor relationship, fear of increased drug prescription, and commodification of patient data). CONCLUSIONS A deep understanding of both the expectations and fears of GPs is essential to motivate them to recommend mHealth apps to their patients. The results of this study show the need to provide appropriate education and training to enhance GPs' digital skills. Certification of the apps by an independent authority should be encouraged to reassure physicians about ethical and data security issues. Our results highlight the need to overcome technical issues such as interoperability between data collection and medical records to limit the disruption of medical work because of data flow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Sarradon-Eck
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France.,Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CanBios UMR1252, Marseille, France
| | | | - Lola Auroy
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Sciences Po Grenoble, Pacte, Grenoble, France
| | - Matthieu Schuers
- Department of General Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.,INSERM, U1142, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances en e-Santé (LIMICS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - David Darmon
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France.,Université Côte d'Azur, Rétines, Healthy, DERMG, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Freilich J, Nilsson GH, Ekstedt M, Flink M. "Standing on common ground" - a qualitative study of self-management support for patients with multimorbidity in primary health care. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:233. [PMID: 33203401 PMCID: PMC7670978 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01290-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimorbidity, the co-existence of two or more chronic conditions in an individual, is present in most patients over 65 years. Primary health care (PHC) is uniquely positioned to provide the holistic and continual care recommended for this group of patients, including support for self-management. The aim of this study was to explore professionals', patients', and family caregivers' perspectives on how PHC professionals should support self-management in patients with multimorbidity. This study also includes experiences of using telemedicine to support self-management. METHODS A mixed qualitative method was used to explore regular self-management support and telemedicine as a tool to support self-management. A total of 42 participants (20 physicians, 3 registered nurses, 12 patients, and 7 family caregivers) were interviewed using focus group interviews (PHC professionals), pair interviews (patients and family caregivers), and individual interviews (registered nurses, patients, and family caregivers). The study was performed in urban areas in central Sweden and rural areas in southern Sweden between April 2018 and October 2019. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS The main theme that emerged was "Standing on common ground enables individualized support." To achieve such support, professionals needed to understand their own views on who bears the primary responsibility for patients' self-management, as well as patients' self-management abilities, needs, and perspectives. Personal continuity and trustful relationships facilitated this understanding. The findings also indicated that professionals should be accessible for patients with multimorbidity, function as knowledge translators (help patients understand their symptoms and how the symptoms correlated with diseases), and coordinate between levels of care. Telemedicine supported continual monitoring and facilitated patient access to PHC professionals. CONCLUSION Through personal continuity and patient-centered consultations, professionals could collaborate with patients to individualize self-management support. For some patients, this means that PHC professionals are in control and monitor symptoms. For others, PHC professionals play a less controlling role, empowering patients' self-management. Development and improvement of eHealth tools for patients with multimorbidity should focus on improving the ability to set mutual goals, strengthening patients' inner motivation, and including multiple caregivers to enhance information-sharing and care coordination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Freilich
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Gunnar H Nilsson
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mirjam Ekstedt
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden
| | - Maria Flink
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Social work in healthcare, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jurkeviciute M, van Velsen L, Eriksson H, Lifvergren S, Trimarchi PD, Andin U, Svensson J. Identifying the Value of an eHealth Intervention Aimed at Cognitive Impairments: Observational Study in Different Contexts and Service Models. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17720. [PMID: 33064089 PMCID: PMC7600009 DOI: 10.2196/17720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Value is one of the central concepts in health care, but it is vague within the field of summative eHealth evaluations. Moreover, the role of context in explaining the value is underexplored, and there is no explicit framework guiding the evaluation of the value of eHealth interventions. Hence, different studies conceptualize and operationalize value in different ways, ranging from measuring outcomes such as clinical efficacy or behavior change of patients or professionals to measuring the perceptions of various stakeholders or in economic terms. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study is to identify contextual factors that determine similarities and differences in the value of an eHealth intervention between two contexts. We also aim to reflect on and contribute to the discussion about the specification, assessment, and relativity of the "value" concept in the evaluation of eHealth interventions. METHODS The study concerned a 6-month eHealth intervention targeted at elderly patients (n=107) diagnosed with cognitive impairment in Italy and Sweden. The intervention introduced a case manager role and an eHealth platform to provide remote monitoring and coaching services to the patients. A model for evaluating the value of eHealth interventions was designed as monetary and nonmonetary benefits and sacrifices, based on the value conceptualizations in eHealth and marketing literature. The data was collected using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the clock drawing test, and the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients and health care professionals. Monetary data was collected from the health care and technology providers. RESULTS The value of an eHealth intervention applied to similar types of populations but differed in different contexts. In Sweden, patients improved cognitive performance (MMSE mean 0.85, SD 1.62, P<.001), reduced anxiety (EQ-5D-5L mean 0.16, SD 0.54, P=.046), perceived their health better (EQ-5D-5L VAS scale mean 2.6, SD 9.7, P=.035), and both patients and health care professionals were satisfied with the care. However, the Swedish service model demonstrated an increased cost, higher workload for health care professionals, and the intervention was not cost-efficient. In Italy, the patients were satisfied with the care received, and the health care professionals felt empowered and had an acceptable workload. Moreover, the intervention was cost-effective. However, clinical efficacy and quality of life improvements have not been observed. We identified 6 factors that influence the value of eHealth intervention in a particular context: (1) service delivery design of the intervention (process of delivery), (2) organizational setup of the intervention (ie, organizational structure and professionals involved), (3) cost of different treatments, (4) hourly rates of staff for delivering the intervention, (5) lifestyle habits of the population (eg, how physically active they were in their daily life and if they were living alone or with family), and (6) local preferences on the quality of patient care. CONCLUSIONS Value in the assessments of eHealth interventions need to be considered beyond economic terms, perceptions, or behavior changes. To obtain a holistic view of the value created, it needs to be operationalized into monetary and nonmonetary outcomes, categorizing these into benefits and sacrifices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Jurkeviciute
- Centre for Healthcare Improvement, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lex van Velsen
- eHealth Group, Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Henrik Eriksson
- Centre for Healthcare Improvement, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Svante Lifvergren
- Centre for Healthcare Improvement, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Skaraborg Hospital Group, Lidköping, Sweden
| | | | - Ulla Andin
- Skaraborg Hospital Group, Lidköping, Sweden
| | - Johan Svensson
- Skaraborg Hospital Group, Lidköping, Sweden
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Suarez-Giron M, Garmendia O, Lugo V, Ruiz C, Salord N, Alsina X, Farré R, Montserrat JM, Torres M. Mobile health application to support CPAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea: design, feasibility and perspectives. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6:00220-2019. [PMID: 32055630 PMCID: PMC7008136 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00220-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Current continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices can be monitored remotely; however, in-person visits are kept for clinical follow-up in order to promote CPAP use and resolve potential side-effects. Mobile health is a promising way to provide remote and easy clinical control for CPAP follow-up and support. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance by obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients and healthcare professionals of a newly designed mobile app (Appnea-Q) to promote clinical control through a self-monitoring tool for patients with CPAP supervised by sleep professionals. Methods Appnea-Q incorporates a simple follow-up questionnaire with automated responses, together with frequent problems and lifestyle recommendations sections. Feasibility, acceptance and usefulness were assessed. First, an internal validation was performed during outpatient CPAP follow-up visits with sleep professionals from various sleep units. Second, an external validation was performed in a subgroup of 15 patients at home. Results Most patients (n=75) considered the app useful and were willing to use it and recommend it (72-88%). Up to 64.87% agreed on its capacity to reduce hospital visits. Appnea-Q was rated as acceptable (79.37±19.29) by the system usability score. Sleep professionals (n=30) concurred on its usefulness for OSA patient follow-up, particularly during the first month of CPAP therapy. The external validation showed its feasibility among 11 out of 15 patients and their data were received accordingly on the professionals' web platform. Conclusions According to our validation process, and the viewpoints of the patients and professionals, our new mobile app is a feasible and well-received tool for personal OSA management. Future clinical trials should substantiate its performance and cost-effectiveness in the clinical arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Suarez-Giron
- Laboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Onintza Garmendia
- Laboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.,These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Vera Lugo
- Laboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Concepción Ruiz
- Laboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neus Salord
- Sleep Unit, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Respiratory Medicine Section, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Alsina
- Dept of Pneumology and Respiratory Allergy, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramón Farré
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.,Unitat de Biofísica i Bioenginyeria, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Montserrat
- Laboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres
- Laboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Holt KA, Karnoe A, Overgaard D, Nielsen SE, Kayser L, Røder ME, From G. Differences in the Level of Electronic Health Literacy Between Users and Nonusers of Digital Health Services: An Exploratory Survey of a Group of Medical Outpatients. Interact J Med Res 2019; 8:e8423. [PMID: 30950809 PMCID: PMC6473204 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.8423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digitalization of health services ensures greater availability of services and improved contact to health professionals. To ensure high user adoption rates, we need to understand the indicators of use and nonuse. Traditionally, these have included classic sociodemographic variables such as age, sex, and educational level. Electronic health literacy (eHL) describes knowledge, skills, and experiences in the interaction with digital health services and technology. With our recent introduction of 2 new multidimensional instruments to measure eHL, the eHL questionnaire (eHLQ) and the eHL assessment (eHLA) toolkit, eHL provides a multifaceted approach to understand use and nonuse of digital health solutions in detail. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate how users and nonusers of digital services differ with respect to eHL, in a group of patients with regular contact to a hospital outpatient clinic. Furthermore, to examine how usage and nonusage, and eHL levels are associated with factors such as age, sex, educational level, and self-rated health. METHODS Outpatients were asked to fill out a survey comprising items about usage of digital services, including digital contact to general practitioner (GP) and communication via the national health portal sundhed.dk, the eHLQ, and the eHLA toolkit, as well as items on age, sex, education, and self-rated health. In total, 246 patients completed the survey. A Mann-Whitney test was used to test for differences between users and nonusers of digital services. Correlation tests described correlations between eHL scales (eHEALSs) and age, education, and self-rated health. A significance level of .0071 was used to reject the null hypothesis in relation to the eHEALSs and usage of digital services. RESULTS In total, 95.1% (234/246) of the participants used their personal digital ID (NemID), 57.7% (142/246) were in contact with their GPs electronically, and 54.0% (133/246) had used the national health portal (sundhed.dk) within the last 3 months. There were no differences between users and nonusers of sundhed.dk with respect to age, sex, educational level, and self-rated health. Users of NemID scored higher than nonusers in 6 of the 7 dimensions of eHLQ, the only one which did not differ was dimension 2: Understanding of health concepts and language. Sundhed.dk users had a higher score in all of the 7 dimensions except for dimension 4: Feel safe and in control. The eHLA toolkit showed that users of sundhed.dk and NemID had higher levels of eHL with regard to tools 2, 5, 6, and 7. Furthermore, users of sundhed.dk had higher levels of eHL with regard to tools 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS Information about patients' eHL may provide clinicians an understanding of patients' reasons for not using digital health services, better than sociodemographic data or self-rated health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamila Adellund Holt
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Astrid Karnoe
- Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorthe Overgaard
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Sidse Edith Nielsen
- Medical Department, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Kayser
- Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Einar Røder
- Medical Department, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Gustav From
- Medical Department, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mangin D, Parascandalo J, Khudoyarova O, Agarwal G, Bismah V, Orr S. Multimorbidity, eHealth and implications for equity: a cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives on eHealth. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e023731. [PMID: 30760515 PMCID: PMC6377536 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is increasing awareness of the burden of medical care experienced by those with multimorbidity. There is also increasing interest and activity in engaging patients with chronic disease in technology-based health-related activities ('eHealth') in family practice. Little is known about patients' access to, and interest in eHealth, in particular those with a higher burden of care associated with multimorbidity. We examined access and attitudes towards eHealth among patients attending family medicine clinics with a focus on older adults and those with polypharmacy as a marker for multimorbidity. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey of consecutive adult patients attending consultations with family physicians in the McMaster University Sentinel and Information Collaboration practice-based research network. We used univariate and multivariate analyses for quantitative data, and thematic analysis for free text responses. SETTING Primary care clinics. PARTICIPANTS 693 patients participated (response rate 70%). INCLUSION CRITERIA Attending primary care clinic. EXCLUSIONS Too ill to complete survey, cannot speak English. RESULTS The majority of participants reported access to the internet at home, although this decreased with age. Participants 70 years and older were less comfortable using the internet compared with participants under 70. Univariate analyses showed age, multimorbidity, home internet access, comfort using the internet, privacy concerns and self-rated health all predicted significantly less interest in eHealth. In the multivariate analysis, home internet access and multimorbidity were significant predictors of disinterest in eHealth. Privacy and loss of relational connection were themes in the qualitative analysis. CONCLUSION There is a significant negative association between multimorbidity and interest in eHealth. This is independent of age, computer use and comfort with using the internet. These findings have important implications, particularly the potential to further increase health inequity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dee Mangin
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Gina Agarwal
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sherrie Orr
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kayser L, Rossen S, Karnoe A, Elsworth G, Vibe-Petersen J, Christensen JF, Ried-Larsen M, Osborne RH. Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals' Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e10377. [PMID: 30747717 PMCID: PMC6404640 DOI: 10.2196/10377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing digitization of health care services with enhanced access to fast internet connections, along with wide use of smartphones, offers the opportunity to get health advice or treatment remotely. For service providers, it is important to consider how consumers can take full advantage of available services and how this can create an enabling environment. However, it is important to consider the digital context and the attributes of current and future users, such as their readiness (ie, knowledge, skills, and attitudes, including trust and motivation). Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate how the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) combined with selected dimensions from the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) can be used together as an instrument to characterize an individual’s level of health technology readiness and explore how the generated data can be used to create health technology readiness profiles of potential users of health technologies and digital health services. Methods We administered the instrument and sociodemographic questions to a population of 305 patients with a recent cancer diagnosis referred to rehabilitation in a setting that plans to introduce various technologies to assist the individuals. We evaluated properties of the Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) instrument using confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity analysis, and exploratory factor analysis. To identify different health technology readiness profiles in the population, we further analyzed the data using hierarchical and k-means cluster analysis. Results The confirmatory factor analysis found a suitable fit for the 13 factors with only 1 cross-loading of 1 item between 2 dimensions. The convergent and discriminant validity analysis revealed many factor correlations, suggesting that, in this population, a more parsimonious model might be achieved. Exploratory factor analysis pointed to 5 to 6 constructs based on aggregates of the existing dimensions. The results were not satisfactory, so we performed an 8-factor confirmatory factor analysis, resulting in a good fit with only 1 item cross-loading between 2 dimensions. Cluster analysis showed that data from the READHY instrument can be clustered to create meaningful health technology readiness profiles of users. Conclusions The 13 dimensions from heiQ, HLQ, and eHLQ can be used in combination to describe a user’s health technology readiness level and degree of enablement. Further studies in other populations are needed to understand whether the associations between dimensions are consistent and the number of dimensions can be reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Kayser
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sine Rossen
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Gerald Elsworth
- Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Jette Vibe-Petersen
- Copenhagen Centre for Cancer and Health, Municipality of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Frank Christensen
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mathias Ried-Larsen
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard H Osborne
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Valentiner LS, Thorsen IK, Kongstad MB, Brinkløv CF, Larsen RT, Karstoft K, Nielsen JS, Pedersen BK, Langberg H, Ried-Larsen M. Effect of ecological momentary assessment, goal-setting and personalized phone-calls on adherence to interval walking training using the InterWalk application among patients with type 2 diabetes-A pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0208181. [PMID: 30629601 PMCID: PMC6328102 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to investigate the feasibility and usability of electronic momentary assessment, goal-setting and personalized phone-calls on adherence to a 12-week self-conducted interval walking training (IWT) program, delivered by the InterWalk smartphone among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS In a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (Denmark, March 2014 to February 2015), patients with T2D (18-80 years with a Body Mass Index of 18 and 40 kg/m2) were randomly allocated to 12 weeks of IWT with (experimental) or without additional support (control). The primary outcome was the difference between groups in accumulated time of interval walking training across 12 weeks. All patients were encouraged to use the InterWalk application to perform IWT for ≥90 minute/week. Patients in the experimental group made individual goals regarding lifestyle change. Once a week inquiries about exercise adherence was made using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA). In case of consistent self-reported non-adherence, the patients would receive a phone-call inquiring about the reason for non-adherence. The control group did not receive additional support. Information about training adherence was assessed objectively. Usability of the EMA was assessed based on response rates and self-reported satisfaction after 12-weeks. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients with T2D (66 years, 65% female, hemoglobin 1Ac 50.3 mmol/mol) where included (n = 18 and n = 19 in experimental and control group, respectively). The retention rate was 83%. The experimental group accumulated [95%CI] 345 [-7, 698] minutes of IWT more than the control group. The response rate for the text-messages was 83% (68% for males and 90% for females). Forty-one percent of the experimental and 25% of the control group were very satisfied with their participation. CONCLUSION The combination inquiry about adherence using EMA, goal-setting with the possibility of follow-up phone calls are considered feasible interventions to attain training adherence when using the InterWalk app during a 12-week period in patients with T2D. Some uncertainty about the effect size of adherence remains. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02089477.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Staun Valentiner
- CopenRehab, Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ida Kær Thorsen
- The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Malte Bue Kongstad
- CopenRehab, Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Fau Brinkløv
- The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen
- CopenRehab, Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian Karstoft
- The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Steen Nielsen
- Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bente Klarlund Pedersen
- The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henning Langberg
- CopenRehab, Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mathias Ried-Larsen
- The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|