Risk assessment of sepsis through measurement of proAVP (copeptin): a secondary analysis of the TRIAGE study

Serum copeptin, lactate, and shock index as predictors of morbidity and mortality in shocked acutely poisoned patients

BACKGROUND

Poisoning-induced shock is a serious medical emergency with a high mortality rate. Hospitalized poisoned individuals experience multiple adverse cardiovascular events that could progress to cardiac arrest. This study was designed to compare the prognostic role of the admission shock index and plasma copeptin level in shocked poisoned patients and to evaluate their associations with initial patients' characteristics and outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study on acutely poisoned adult patients.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of all patients was 27.05 ± 10.99 years and most of the patients were females (n = 27, 66%). Pesticides were the most common type of poisoning (n = 18, 44%), followed by cardiovascular drugs (n = 12, 29.3%). Eleven (26.8%) patients died during the hospital stay length. The initial serum copeptin level and shock index could predict organ dysfunction indexed by sequential organ assessment score (SOFA) with area under the curve (AUCs) of 0.862 and 0.755, respectively. Initial serum copeptin and lactate levels, SOFA score, and their combination can strongly differentiate between survivors and non-survivors with an AUC of 0.944, 0.885, and 0.959, and 0.994, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the shock index, serum lactate level, and SOFA score may help in risk stratifying patients and predicting outcomes in critically ill patients with poisoning-induced shock. Copeptin is superior to the shock index in predicting mortality among the studied patients. However, a combination of SOFA score, serum copeptin level, and serum lactate level can develop a more predominant prediction for overall clinical outcomes in these patients.

Association of copeptin levels with patient prognosis and survival in sepsis syndromes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sepsis syndromes are a major burden in the ICU with very high mortality. Vasopressin and copeptin are released in response to hypovolemia and have shown potential significance in diagnosing sepsis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the levels of copeptin in patients with sepsis syndromes and evaluate its relation with patient prognosis and mortality.

METHODS

Four databases were searched for literature published from inception to the 8th of November 2022. Original research articles where copeptin was measured in sepsis patients and compared with controls were included. Data extraction and synthesis: study characteristics, levels of copeptin in the participants, and copeptin assay description were extracted. Levels of copeptin in patients were pooled and compared with controls in terms of the standard mean difference (SMD) generated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met the selection criteria. Copeptin levels were significantly higher in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock as compared to controls [(SMD: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.81-2.16, P<0.0001), (SMD: 1.94, 95% CI: 0.34-3.54, P=0.02), and (SMD: 2.17, 95% CI: 0.68-3.66, P=0.004), respectively]. The highest copeptin levels were noted in septic shock patients. The admission copeptin levels were significantly lower in survivors as compared to nonsurvivors (SMD: -1.73; 95% CI: -2.41 to -1.06, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Copeptin was significantly elevated in sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Survivors had a significantly lower copeptin during admission. Copeptin offered an excellent predictability to predict 1-month mortality. Measuring the copeptin in sepsis patients can aid treating physicians to foresee patients' prognosis.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023

OBJECTIVES

To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome, and pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock.

DESIGN

Shortly after publication of the most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, the Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, convened virtually and iteratively developed the article and recommendations, which represents an update from the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities.

METHODS

Each task force member submitted five research questions on any sepsis-related subject. Committee members then independently ranked their top three priorities from the list generated. The highest rated clinical and basic science questions were developed into the current article.

RESULTS

A total of 81 questions were submitted. After merging similar questions, there were 34 clinical and ten basic science research questions submitted for voting. The five top clinical priorities were as follows: 1) what is the best strategy for screening and identification of patients with sepsis, and can predictive modeling assist in real-time recognition of sepsis? 2) what causes organ injury and dysfunction in sepsis, how should it be defined, and how can it be detected? 3) how should fluid resuscitation be individualized initially and beyond? 4) what is the best vasopressor approach for treating the different phases of septic shock? and 5) can a personalized/precision medicine approach identify optimal therapies to improve patient outcomes? The five top basic science priorities were as follows: 1) How can we improve animal models so that they more closely resemble sepsis in humans? 2) What outcome variables maximize correlations between human sepsis and animal models and are therefore most appropriate to use in both? 3) How does sepsis affect the brain, and how do sepsis-induced brain alterations contribute to organ dysfunction? How does sepsis affect interactions between neural, endocrine, and immune systems? 4) How does the microbiome affect sepsis pathobiology? 5) How do genetics and epigenetics influence the development of sepsis, the course of sepsis and the response to treatments for sepsis?

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge advances in multiple clinical domains have been incorporated in progressive iterations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, allowing for evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of sepsis. However, the strength of existing evidence is modest with significant knowledge gaps and mortality from sepsis remains high. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.

Very elevated serum copeptin concentrations occur in a subset of healthy children in the minutes after phlebotomy

OBJECTIVES

Although AVP and its surrogate, copeptin, are mainly regulated by osmotic and volume stimuli, their secretion is also elicited by stress and growth hormone (GH) stimulating agents. The aim of this report is to describe unusual patterns of copeptin response in a subset of children undergoing GH stimulation tests (GH-ST).

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of a cohort of 93 healthy short children with no polydipsia, polyuria or fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, undergoing GH-ST with intravenous arginine, insulin, oral clonidine, or L-Dopa/carbidopa in various combinations. Serum copeptin concentrations were measured 1-3 min after phlebotomy (0 min) and at 60, 90, 120 min during GH-ST.

RESULTS

In 85 subjects (normal response group, NRG) serum copeptin concentrations increased from a 0 min median of 9 pmol/L (IQR 6, 11.5) (all values ≤21) to a median peak between 60 and 120 min of 22 (IQR15, 38) pmol/L, which varied depending on the stimulating agent. Conversely, in the eight outliers, copeptin concentrations decreased gradually from a median of 154 (IQR 61, 439) pmol/L (all ≥40 pmol/L) to values as low as 14 % of the basal value, by 120 min. Test-associated anxiety was described in 17 subjects in the NRG (20 %) and five of the outliers (63 %).

CONCLUSIONS

A distinctive pattern of very elevated serum copeptin concentrations occurred in 9 % of children undergoing GH-ST, similar to reports in previous pediatric studies. Etiology may include pain or stress of phlebotomy. This phenomenon should be recognized for proper interpretation of copeptin values in children.

Attuali applicazioni della determinazione dei livelli plasmatici di copeptina in contesti non-endocrinologici

Copeptina (CT-proAVP) rappresenta l’affidabile marker di secrezione dell’arginin-vasopressina (AVP) e nella pratica clinica endocrinologica viene impiegata per la diagnosi differenziale della sindrome poliurica-polidipsica. Negli ultimi anni, tuttavia, sono state indagate applicazioni alternative di tale glicopeptide in setting differenti. In questa rassegna sono esaminate, in particolare, le sue più interessanti proposte di utilizzo in ambito cardiovascolare, infettivologico e nefrologico.