Preoperative blood pressure targets and effect on hemodynamics in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pheochromocytoma resection and construction of a nomogram to predict perioperative hemodynamic instability

BACKGROUND

Despite recent improvements in perioperative outcomes after pheochromocytoma resection, hemodynamic instability (HI) remained of high concern. The emergence of robot-assisted surgery may bring different results to pheochromocytoma surgery. The purposes of this study were to investigate whether robot-assisted retroperitoneal pheochromocytoma resection promotes hemodynamic instability compared with laparoscopic retroperitoneal pheochromocytoma resection and construct a nomogram to predict perioperative hemodynamic instability.

METHODS

The clinical data of 221 patients who underwent pheochromocytoma resection were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mode of operation. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine the independent risk factors of perioperative hemodynamic instability and to construct a visual prediction model. The final model was visualized via a nomogram.

RESULTS

124 (56.1 %) out of 221 patients experienced HI. The variables that were eventually included in the model were tumor size (OR1.363(1.143-1.646), P < 0.001), abnormal blood glucose (OR3.381(1.534-7.903), P = 0.003), preoperative SBP(OR1.04(1.014-1.067),P = 0.002), robot-assisted surgery(OR0.241(0.108-0.513),P < 0.001), and catecholamines(OR4.567(2.424-8.834),P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed the area under curve was 0.816(95 %CI 0.761-0.871).

CONCLUSION

We developed a nomogram for successful prediction of perioperative hemodynamics based on five independent risk factors. Clinicians can leverage this easy-to-use nomogram to perform personalized risk predictions for HI and develop preventive interventions to improve patient safety and surgical outcomes.

Diagnosis and Management of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: A Guide for the Clinician

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to provide a practical approach for clinicians regarding the diagnosis and management of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs).

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed was carried out using key words, including pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, treatment, diagnosis, screening, and management. The discussion of diagnosis and management of PPGL is based on the evidence available from prospective studies when available and mostly from cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and expert consensus.

RESULTS

PPGL are neuroendocrine tumors arising from the chromaffin cells of adrenal medulla and sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia, respectively. PPGL can be localized or metastatic, and they may secrete catecholamines, causing a variety of symptoms and potentially catastrophic and lethal complications if left untreated. The rarity of these tumors along with heterogeneous clinical presentation often poses challenges for the diagnosis and management. PPGL can be associated with several familial syndromes which are important to recognize.

CONCLUSION

The last few years have witnessed an exponential growth in the knowledge around PPGL. This review aims at providing a comprehensive discussion of current concepts for clinicians regarding clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, and management strategies for PPGL.

Abandonment of intravenous volume expansion after preoperative receipt of α-blockers in patients with adrenal pheochromocytoma was not an independent risk factor for intraoperative hemodynamic instability

Background

There is no consensus on whether intravenous rehydration must be added after preoperative phenoxybenzamine (PXB) administration for pheochromocytoma. The aim of this study is to investigate whether abandonment of intravenous volume expansion after PXB administration is associated with intraoperative hemodynamic instability.

Methods

83 Patients with pheochromocytoma received surgical treatment in the Department of Urology, Handan First Hospital, between October 2014 and July 2022. All patients were subclassified into either the hemodynamic stability group (HS group) or the hemodynamic instability group (HU group) according to whether intraoperative hemodynamic instability occurred, with 51 cases in HS group and 32 cases in HU group. Differences in data between the two groups were examined, and the risk factors for intraoperative hemodynamic instability were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

The results of the analysis showed no statistically significant differences in age, sex, location of the tumor, surgical method, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m², blood and urine catecholamine test results, preoperative oral PXB followed by combined intravenous volume expansion, proportion of patients with hypertension or diabetes mellitus or coronary heart disease between the two groups (P>0.05). The size of the tumor in the HS group was smaller than that in the HU group (5.3 ± 1.9 cm vs 6.2 ± 2.4 cm P=0.010). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that abandonment of intravenous volume expansion after preoperative receipt of α-blockers in patients with adrenal pheochromocytoma was not an independent risk factor for intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Only the tumor size (P=0.025) was an independent risk factor for intraoperative hemodynamic instability.

Conclusion

The purpose of general preoperative intravenous fluid expansion is to prevent hypotension after the tumor has been resected. In the current study, we indicated that preoperative management of pheochromocytomas using the α-blocker PXB in combination with intravenous volume expansion does not further reduce the risk of intraoperative hemodynamic instability or postoperative complications compared with oral PXB alone. Therefore, our study supports preoperative management of pheochromocytoma with a single α-blocker, PXB, as sufficient.