Clinical Practice Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia: response to letter from Otsuka Ltd

Tolvaptan for the treatment of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD)

The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD), the commonest cause of hyponatraemia, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Tolvaptan, an oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, leads through aquaresis to an increase in serum sodium concentration and is the only medication licenced in Europe for the treatment of euvolaemic hyponatraemia. Randomised controlled trials have shown that tolvaptan is highly efficacious in correcting SIAD-related hyponatraemia. Real-world data have confirmed the marked efficacy of tolvaptan, but they have also reported a high risk of overly rapid sodium increase in patients with a very low baseline serum sodium. The lower the baseline serum sodium, the higher the tolvaptan-induced correction rate occurs. Therefore, a lower starting tolvaptan dose of 7.5 mg has been evaluated in small cohort studies, demonstrating its efficacy, but it still remains unclear as to whether it can reduce the risk of overcorrection. Most international guidelines, except for the European ones, recommend tolvaptan as second-line treatment for SIAD after fluid restriction. However, the risk of unduly rapid sodium correction in combination with its high cost have limited its routine use. Prospective controlled studies are warranted to evaluate whether tolvaptan-related sodium increase can improve patient-related clinical outcomes, such as mortality and length of hospital stay in the acute setting or neurocognitive symptoms and quality of life in the chronic setting. In addition, the potential role of a low tolvaptan starting dose needs to be further explored. Until then, tolvaptan should mainly be used as second-line treatment for SIAD, especially when there is a clinical need for prompt restoration of normonatraemia. Tolvaptan should be used with specialist input according to a structured clinical pathway, including rigorous monitoring of electrolyte and fluid balance and, if needed, implementation of appropriate measures to prevent, or when necessary reverse, overly rapid hyponatraemia correction.

[Hyponatremia in emergency admissions - often dangerous]

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in clinical practice and associated with increased morbidity and mortality, independent of underlying disease. Untreated acute hyponatremia can cause substantial morbidity and mortality as a result of osmotically induced cerebral edema whilst over rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia can cause serious neurologic impairment and death resulting from osmotic demyelination. Still hyponatremia is often neglected and insufficiently addressed, most likely due to limited understanding of its pathophysiological mechanisms. Being familiar with only few basic principles of body fluid regulation may be a worthwhile investment into the clinical career and save patients' lives.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyponatremia: Compilation of the Guidelines

Hyponatremia is a common water balance disorder that often poses a diagnostic or therapeutic challenge. Therefore, guidelines were developed by professional organizations, one from within the United States (2013) and one from within Europe (2014). This review discusses the diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia, comparing the two guidelines and highlighting recent developments. Diagnostically, the initial step is to differentiate hypotonic from nonhypotonic hyponatremia. Hypotonic hyponatremia is further differentiated on the basis of urine osmolality, urine sodium level, and volume status. Recently identified parameters, including fractional uric acid excretion and plasma copeptin concentration, may further improve the diagnostic approach. The treatment for hyponatremia is chosen on the basis of duration and symptoms. For acute or severely symptomatic hyponatremia, both guidelines adopted the approach of giving a bolus of hypertonic saline. Although fluid restriction remains the first-line treatment for most forms of chronic hyponatremia, therapy to increase renal free water excretion is often necessary. Vasopressin receptor antagonists, urea, and loop diuretics serve this purpose, but received different recommendations in the two guidelines. Such discrepancies may relate to different interpretations of the limited evidence or differences in guideline methodology. Nevertheless, the development of guidelines has been important in advancing this evolving field.

Prognosis of patients with severe hyponatraemia is related not only to hyponatraemia but also to comorbidities and to medical management: results of an observational retrospective study

Background

The true cause of death in severe hyponatraemic patients remains controversial. The present study aimed to analyse the relationship between comorbidity, medical management and prognosis in severe hyponatraemic patients.

Methods

Medical records of all patients hospitalised in our institution in 2012 with a plasma sodium ≤120 mmol/l were retrospectively analysed.

Results

One hundred forty-seven of 64 723 adult patients (0.2 %) were identified with severe hyponatraemia. In-hospital mortality rate was 24.5 and 50.3 % after a median follow-up of 431 days. Patients with plasma sodium <110 mmol/l had less comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2.2 ± 1.9 vs. 4.0 ± 3.1 (plasma sodium 110–115 mmol/l) and 4.2 ± 3.1 (plasma sodium 116–120 mmol/l); P = .02)) and a small trend for less mortality, respectively 40.0, 51.2 and 52.3 % (P = .64). At discharge, nonsurvivors and survivors had similar plasma sodium with 58.3 % of nonsurvivors being normonatraemic. Urine analysis was performed in 74.2 % of cases and associated with lower in-hospital mortality (20.2 % vs. 36.8 %, P = .05). In multivariate Cox analysis, mortality was significantly associated with plasma sodium normalisation (HR 0.35, P < 0.001), urine analysis (HR 0.48, P = .01), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR 1.23, P < .001) and serum albumin (HR 0.88, P < .001).

Conclusion

Mortality in severe hyponatraemia appears mainly due to comorbidities although the latter are potentiated by hyponatraemia itself and its management thereby exacerbating the risk of death.

[Hyponatremia and tolvaptan : what is the situation 5 years after approval?]

The diuretic tolvaptan has been approved for more than 5 years for the indications of euvolemic hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) secretion. In recent years many patients have been treated with tolvaptan and many physicians could gather practical experience. Other countries, such as the USA had already gained greater experience, also in the indications for hypervolemic hyponatremia. After approval was granted more than 5000 patients worldwide were included in the so-called hyponatremia register and 22 active centers in Germany with 317 patients participated. Although some details from this now concluded register have been published, the final publication of the multinational post-authorization safety study on tolvaptan in the treatment of SIADH has not yet been published. In the years 2012 and 2013 two warning letters were issued on tolvaptan. The first letter warned of the risk of a faster increase in serum sodium using tolvaptan and provided detailed information on how the risk of osmotic demeyelination can be minimized. So far only one proven case of osmotic demelination syndrome (ODS) is known; however, this occurred following incorrect use of tolvaptan in a monotherapy. The second warning letter provided information on the potential risk (reversible) of liver damage by tolvaptan, which resulted from the TEMPO 3:4 study. In this study tolvaptan was used in a higher dosage for therapy of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Although the European renal best practice (ERBP) guidelines from 2014 did not recommend tolvaptan for the indications of SIADH, other guidelines came to different conclusions. In summary, 5 years after the approval of tolvaptan there is still no consensus. At the current time many questions still remain unanswered. Initiation of therapy with tolvaptan remains reserved for experienced physicians in hospitals. Treatment must be adapted on the basis of a clinical estimation of the individual situation of each patient.