ENSAT registry-based randomized clinical trials for adrenocortical carcinoma

Randomized controlled trials and alternative study designs in surgical oncology

Surgery is central to the cure of most solid cancers and an integral part of modern multimodal cancer management for early and advanced stage cancers. Decisions made by surgeons and multidisciplinary team members are based on best available knowledge for the defined clinical situation at hand. While surgery is both an art and a science, good decision-making requires data that are robust, valid, representative and, applicable to most if not all patients with a specific cancer. Such data largely comes from clinical observations and registries, and more preferably from trials conducted with the specific purpose of arriving at new answers. As part of the ESSO core curriculum development an increased focus has been put on the need to enhance research literacy among surgical candidates. As an expansion of the curriculum catalogue list and to enhance the educational value, we here present a set of principles and emerging concepts which applies to surgical oncologist for reading, understanding, planning and contributing to future surgeon-led cancer trials.

"Nothing to lose and the possibility of gaining": a qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of registry-based randomised controlled trials among cancer patients and clinicians

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the "gold standard" for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in clinical research. However, conventional RCTs are typically complex, expensive, and have narrow eligibility criteria, which limits generalisability. Registry-based randomised controlled trials (RRCTs) are an alternative approach that integrates the internal validity of an RCT with the external validity of a clinical registry by recruiting real-world patients and leveraging an existing registry platform for data collection. As RRCT is a novel research design, there has been limited research on the feasibility and acceptability of RRCTs from the patients' and trial team's perspectives. This study aims to explore patients', clinicians', and study coordinators' perspectives towards participation in and conduct of oncology RRCTs in Australia.

METHODS

Thirty-seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 cancer patients, 15 clinicians, and 7 study coordinators. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three overarching themes were identified: (1) enablers and barriers to recruitment and enrolment of patients in RRCTs, (2) experiences of patients participating in RRCTs, and (3) recommendations for the implementation of future RRCTs. For patients, altruism and "trust in the clinician" were key reasons to participate in a RRCT. For clinicians and clinical trial coordinators, the RRCT study design was perceived as "simple and straightforward" but "less exciting" than RCTs. Competition from commercially sponsored RCTs poses challenges for investigator-led RRCTs recruitment, particularly if eligible patient numbers are low. There were limited impacts on patients' treatment experiences and clinicians' clinical workflow given that the RRCTs explored different standards of care. Recommendations to improve the enrolment of patients in RRCTs included generating greater buy-in from clinicians by increasing awareness of RRCTs via education initiatives and broader promotion of the "selling point" of RRCTs and providing monetary compensation to hospitals for enrolling patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst patients, clinicians, and study coordinators were generally supportive of RRCTs, several barriers to effective RRCT implementation in oncology were identified. Developing strategies to increase acceptance of the methodology by clinicians will help enhance the uptake of RRCTs in Australia and internationally.

Ferroptosis Biomarkers for Predicting Prognosis and Immunotherapy Efficacy in Adrenocortical Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have suggested that ferroptosis plays an important regulatory role in cancer cell death. Nonetheless, the potential effects of ferroptosis regulators on the prognosis, the expression of immunomodulatory factors in the tumor microenvironment and on the efficacy of immunotherapy in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) remain largely unknown.

METHODS

Public ACC datasets were used to investigate the relationship between ferroptosis regulators and prognosis and clinical features. A ferroptosis scoring system was established for individual cases of ACC using principal component analysis algorithms. Hub ferroptosis-related genes involved in immunoregulation and immunotherapy efficacy in ACC were further identified.

RESULTS

Twenty ferroptosis regulators were differentially expressed in ACC and 17 ferroptosis regulators were closely related to prognosis in ACC. A ferroptosis scoring system was developed based on ACSL4, FANCD2, and SLC7A1 expression, and the ferroptosis regulators could serve as an independent prognostic factor for ACC. Further analyses indicated that the ferroptosis score integrated with the tumor mutation burden (TMB), and immune-checkpoint gene expression could predict prognosis in ACC. RNA isolation and reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) demonstrated significant differences in the expression levels of ACSL4, FANCD2, and SLC7A1 between ACC and normal tissues. Furthermore, FANCD2 was significantly related to immunotherapy efficacy and prognosis in ACC.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that ferroptosis was significantly associated with prognosis, clinical characteristics, immune-checkpoint gene expression, and tumor microenvironment immune cell infiltration in ACC. The current study provides comprehensive evidence for further research on ferroptosis regulators in ACC and provides new insight into the epigenetic regulation of the antitumor immune response.

The Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Advanced Adrenocortical Cancer Is Increased after the Multidisciplinary Team Evaluation

We aimed to evaluate the role of adrenal multidisciplinary team evaluation (MTE) in affecting the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). We included in a retrospective monocentric study 47 patients with ACC. We divided our cohort into group 1 (without adrenal-MTE discussion, ACC diagnosis from 2004 to 2012, n = 14) and group 2 (diagnosis and beginning of treatments after 2013, all discussed in the adrenal MTE, n = 33). OS was defined by the survival between the first and the last visit, while PFS as the time from the first visit to the progression of the disease. Kaplan−Meier curves were used to compare OS and PFS between Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1stages III−IV (n = 10) presented a shorter median OS than Group 2stages III−IV (25 patients, 4 vs. 31 months, p = 0.023). Likewise, the median PFS was lower in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (2.9 vs. 17.2 months, p < 0.001). The gain in PFS (6 months) was also confirmed in stage III-IV patients (2.9 vs. 8.7 months, respectively, for Group 1 and Group 2, p = 0.02). Group 1 presented a median PFS of 4 months, while the median PFS of Group 2 was 14.7 months (p = 0.128). In conclusion, we found a significant gain in terms of survival in patients after the MTE discussion in 2013. Therefore, ACC patients should be referred to a tertiary center, ideally from the time of diagnosis, to promptly apply all available treatments, according to the single patient’s clinical history and based on multidisciplinary management.

Radiotherapy for Pediatric Adrenocortical Carcinoma – Review of the Literature

•

Radiotherapy (RT) is mostly performed for curative intent, only few cases in palliative setting are reported.

•

The site of RT was predominantly tumor bed, abdominal cavity, and/or metastases.

•

Adjuvant RT has to be discussed—even in the context of TPSs—especially for patients with high risk factors.

•

Evidence regarding RT in in pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma is too limited to give any general recommendation. However, we suggest to consider adjuvant radiotherapy in individual patients with high risk of recurrence.

•

A systematic international study with a common data platform is needed to establish evidence. on the role of RT in the treatment of children with adrenocortical carcinoma and to improve the outcome in this rare disease.

Background and purpose

Pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma (pACC) is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Publications on radiotherapy (RT) are scarce. This review summarizes the current data on RT for pACC and possibly provides first evidence to justify its use in this setting.

Materials and methods

We searched the PubMed and Embase database for manuscripts regarding RT for pACC.

Results

We included 17 manuscripts reporting on 76 patients treated with RT, after screening 2961 references and 269 full articles. In addition, we added data of 4 unreported pACC patients treated by co-authors. All reports based on retrospective data. Median age at first diagnosis was 11.1 years (70% female); 78% of patients presented with hormonal activity. RT was mostly performed for curative intent (78%). 88% of RT were administered during primary therapy. The site of RT was predominantly the local tumor bed (76%). Doses of RT ranged from 15 to 62 Gy (median 50 Gy). Information on target volumes or fractionation were lacking. Median follow-up was 6,9 years and 64% of the patients died of disease, with 33% alive without disease. In 16 of 48 patients with available follow-up data after adjuvant RT (33%) no recurrence was reported and in 3 of 9 patients palliative RT seemed to induce some benefit for the patient.

Conclusions

Our first systematic review on RT for pACC provides too few data for any general recommendation, but adjuvant RT in patients with high risk might be considered. International collaborative studies are urgently needed to establish better evidence on the role of RT in this rare malignancy.

Adrenocortical Carcinoma in Childhood: A Systematic Review

Adrenocortical tumors are rare in children. This systematic review summarizes the published evidence on pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) to provide a basis for a better understanding of the disease, investigate new molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and define which patients may benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic approach. We included 137 studies with 3680 ACC patients (~65% female) in our analysis. We found no randomized controlled trials, so this review mainly reflects retrospective data. Due to a specific mutation in the TP53 gene in ~80% of Brazilian patients, that cohort was analyzed separately from series from other countries. Hormone analysis was described in 2569 of the 2874 patients (89%). Most patients were diagnosed with localized disease, whereas 23% had metastasis at primary diagnosis. Only 72% of the patients achieved complete resection. In 334 children (23%), recurrent disease was reported: 81%-local recurrence, 19% (n = 65)-distant metastases at relapse. Patients < 4 years old had a different distribution of tumor stages and hormone activity and better overall survival (p < 0.001). Although therapeutic approaches are typically multimodal, no consensus is available on effective standard treatments for advanced ACC. Thus, knowledge regarding pediatric ACC is still scarce and international prospective studies are needed to implement standardized clinical stratifications and risk-adapted therapeutic strategies.

Impact of postoperative radiotherapy on the outcomes of resected adrenocortical carcinoma-a real-world, population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of postoperative radiotherapy on the outcomes of resected adrenocortical carcinoma in a real-world setting.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Research Plus database was accessed, and patients with resected non-metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma diagnosed 2010-2015 were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank testing were used to examine the impact of postoperative radiotherapy on overall and cancer-specific survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to explore factors associated with overall and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients were included in the final analysis, including 60 patients (20.4%) who received postoperative radiotherapy. Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, individuals who received postoperative radiotherapy have better overall survival (P = 0.002). Multivariable cox regression analysis showed that the following factors were associated with worse overall survival: older age (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03), male sex (HR for female sex versus male sex: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43-0.85), and non-receipt of postoperative radiation therapy (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.38-3.77). Systemic therapy was not associated with differences in overall survival (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.54-1.10). Likewise, the following factors were associated with worse cancer-specific survival: male sex (HR for female sex versus male sex: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.41-0.88), non-receipt of postoperative radiation therapy (HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.27-3.70), and receipt of perioperative systemic therapy (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiotherapy following resection of adrenocortical carcinoma is associated with better overall and cancer-specific survival.

Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Perspectives on Medical Treatment

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. For stage I and II tumors, surgery is a curative option, but even in these cases recurrence is frequent. Practical guidelines advocate a combination of mitotane with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. However, this scheme presents limited efficacy and high toxicity. The use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) and multi-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (mTKI) has modified the approach of multiple malignancies. The expectation of their applicability on advanced adrenocortical carcinoma is high but the role of these new therapies persists unclear. This article provides a short summary of last years' findings targeting outcomes, limitations, and adverse effects of these new therapeutic approaches. The results of recent trials and case series pointed pembrolizumab as the most promising drug among these new therapies. It is the most often used ICI and the one presenting the best results with less related adverse effects when in comparison to the standard treatment with mitotane. Hereafter, the identification of specific molecular biomarkers or immune profiles associated with ICI or mTKI good response will facilitate the selection of candidates for these therapies. So far, microsatellite instability and Lynch Syndrome related germline mutations are suggested as predictive biomarkers of good response. Contrarywise, cortisol secretion has been associated with more aggressive ACC tumors and potentially poor responses to immunotherapy.

The Role of Biomarkers in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy arising from the adrenal cortex often with unexpected biological behavior. It can occur at any age, with two peaks of incidence: in the first and between fifth and seventh decades of life. Although ACC are mostly hormonally active, precursors and metabolites, rather than end products of steroidogenesis are produced by dedifferentiated and immature malignant cells. Distinguishing the etiology of adrenal mass, between benign adenomas, which are quite frequent in general population, and malignant carcinomas with dismal prognosis is often unfeasible. Even after pathohistological analysis, diagnosis of adrenocortical carcinomas is not always straightforward and represents a great challenge for experienced and multidisciplinary expert teams. No single imaging method, hormonal work-up or immunohistochemical labelling can definitively prove the diagnosis of ACC. Over several decades' great efforts have been made in finding novel reliable and available diagnostic and prognostic factors including steroid metabolome profiling or target gene identification. Despite these achievements, the 5-year mortality rate still accounts for approximately 75% to 90%, ACC is frequently diagnosed in advanced stages and therapeutic options are unfortunately limited. Therefore, imperative is to identify new biological markers that can predict patient prognosis and provide new therapeutic options.