Markers for perioperative myocardial ischemia: what both interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons need to know

Evaluation of Melatonin Therapy in Patients with Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the effect of melatonin therapy on patients with myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) and explore the influencing factors.

Background

Although preclinical studies have shown that melatonin can alleviate MIRI, its protective effect on MIRI in patients remains controversial.

Methods

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. The primary outcome was cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], left ventricular end-diastolic volume [LVEDV], and left ventricular end-systolic volume [LVESV]) and myocardial infarct parameters (total left ventricular mass and infarct size).

Results

We included nine randomized controlled clinical trials with 631 subjects. Our results showed that melatonin had no significant effects on the primary outcome, but subgroup analyses indicated that when melatonin was administered by intravenous and intracoronary injection at the early stage of myocardial ischemia, LVEF was improved (<3.5 h; standardized mean difference [SMD]:0.50; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.94; P = 0.03) and the infarct size was reduced (<2.5 h, SMD: −0.86; 95% CI: −1.51 to −0.22; P = 0.01), whereas when melatonin was injected at the late stage of myocardial ischemia (≥3.5 h or 2.5 h), the results were the opposite. Furthermore, melatonin intervention reduced the level of cardiac injury markers, inflammatory cytokines, oxidation factors, and increased the level of antioxidant factors (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results indicated that the cardioprotective function of melatonin for MIRI was influenced by the route and timing regimen of melatonin administration; the mechanism of which may be associated with the production of inflammatory cytokines, the balance of oxidation, and antioxidant factors.

N-acetylcysteine use among patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background

Cardiac surgeries are complex procedures aiming to re-establish coronary flow and correct valvular defects. Oxidative stress, caused by inflammation and ischemia-reperfusion injury, is associated with these procedures, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) acts as an antioxidant by replenishing the glutathione stores, and emerging evidence suggests that NAC may reduce the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the addition of NAC to a standard of care among adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

We searched four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS) from inception to October 2018 and the grey literaure for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of NAC on pre-defined outcomes including mortality, acute renal insufficiency (ARI), acute cardiac insufficiency (ACI), hospital length of stay (HLoS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICULoS), arrhythmia and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Reviewers independently screened potentially eligible articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias among eligible articles. We used the GRADE approach to rate the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome.

Results

Twenty-nine RCTs including 2,486 participants proved eligible. Low to moderate certainty evidence demonstrated that the addition of NAC resulted in a non-statistically significant reduction in mortality (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.71; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.40 to 1.25), ARI (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.09), ACI (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.38), HLoS (Mean Difference (MD) 0.21; 95% CI -0.64 to 0.23), ICULoS (MD -0.04; 95% CI -0.29 to 0.20), arrhythmia (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.20), and AMI (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.48).

Limitations

Among eligible trials, we observed heterogeneity in the population and interventions including patients with and without kidney dysfunction and interventions that differed in route of administration, dosage, and duration of treatment. This observed heterogeneity was not explained by our subgroup analyses.

Conclusions

The addition of NAC during cardiac surgery did not result in a statistically significant reduction in clinical outcomes. A large randomized placebo-controlled multi-centre trial is needed to determine whether NAC reduces mortality.

Registration

PROSPERO CRD42018091191.

Urinary Titin Is Increased in Patients After Cardiac Surgery

Background: Few non-invasive biomarkers have been used to detect myocardial injury in patients with heart diseases. Recently, the N-terminal fragment (N-titin) of titin, a giant sarcomeric protein, which is involved in muscular passive tension and viscoelasticity, has been reported to detect muscle damage in patients with cardiomyopathy as well as in patients with skeletal muscle dystrophy and in healthy volunteers with endurance exercise. In the present study, we evaluated whether urinary N-titin is changed during a perioperative period and whether its increase reflects myocardial damage.

Materials and Methods: In 18 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, blood and urine samples were obtained before and after surgery. We measured the urinary levels of N-titin with a highly sensitive ELISA system.

Results: Urinary N-titin to creatinine (N-titin/Cr) was significantly increased in all patients postoperatively (43.3 ± 39.5 pmol/mg/dL on the day of operation) and remained significantly high for at least 4 days postoperatively. Urinary N-titin/Cr was positively correlated with serum cardiac troponin T (r = 0.36, p = 0.0006, n = 90) but not creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB). We also found that urinary N-titin/Cr in patients after a coronary artery bypass grafting operation was higher by day 2 postoperatively than in patients following open cardiac surgeries.

Conclusion: The cleaved N-titin was significantly increased in urine after cardiac surgery. Urinary N-titin may be useful for detecting the risk of latent postoperative cardiac damage.

Kardiale Labordiagnostik – State-of-the-Art 2007

Biomarkers have gained increasing significance in clinical cardiology during the last two decades. Laboratory parameters play an important role as risk markers for coronary events in primary and secondary prevention, in the diagnosis of acute myocardial necrosis and heart failure as well as in the management of patients with heart valve diseases. The development of novel biochemical markers has also led to new insights in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes and heart failure. This review summarizes the state of the art of cardiac biomarkers suitable for routine use.