Anticoagulation in pregnant women with a bileaflet mechanical cardiac valve replacement

Mechanical Heart Valves, Pregnancy, and Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anticoagulant therapy is essential in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves to prevent valve thrombosis. The risk of bleeding complications in these patients has not gained much attention. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the prevalence of bleeding peri-partum and post-partum in women with mechanical heart valves and also investigate whether bleeding risk differed across anticoagulant regimens or according to delivery mode. The present study was conducted according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies reporting bleeding prevalence in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves receiving anticoagulant therapy were identified through PubMed and Embase on December 08, 2021. Data on bleeding complications, delivery mode, and anticoagulation therapy were extracted. A total of 37 studies were included, reporting 423 bleeding complications in 2,508 pregnancies. A meta-analysis calculated a pooled prevalence of 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-0.18) bleeding episodes per pregnancy across anticoagulant regimens. The combination of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and single VKA therapy showed the lowest risk of bleeding (8 and 12%). Unexpectedly, the highest risk of bleeding was found in women receiving a combination of low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) and VKA (33%) or mono-therapy with LMWH (22%). However, this could be dose related. No difference in bleeding was found between caesarean section versus vaginal delivery (p = 0.08). In conclusion, bleeding episodes are common during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves receiving anticoagulant therapy. A combination of UFH and VKA or VKA monotherapy showed the lowest risk of bleeding.

Pregnancy outcome in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valvesat their first trimester of pregnancy treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or enoxaparin: A randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Pregnancy increases the risks of thromboembolism for the mother and fetus in patients with mechanical heart valves. The results of some studies have indicated that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), in comparison with unfractionated heparin (UFH), leads to a lower incidence rate of thrombocytopenia and a decrease in bleeding. Methods: The present randomized clinical trial involved 31 pregnant women with mechanical heart valves at their first trimester (0-14 weeks) of pregnancy. To perform the study, the patients were divided into two groups, i.e. group A (LMWH group-16 patients) and group B (UFH group-15 patients). The birth weight, mode of delivery, and gestational age at birth as well as the maternal and fetal complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean age of mothers in the UFH and LMWH groups was 32.67±9.11 and 31.50±5.81years, respectively (P value > 0.05). Although the rate of maternal and fetal complications was higher in the UFH group as compared with the LMWH group, the observed difference was not significant (P value > 0.05). Conclusion: LMWH can be regarded as a safer therapy for both the mother and fetus due to its lower number of refill prescriptions and fewer changes in the blood level.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Anticoagulation in Pregnant Women With Mechanical Heart Valves

Background

Anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves during pregnancy is essential to prevent thromboembolic events. Each regimen has drawbacks with regard to maternal or fetal risk.

Objectives

This meta-analysis sought to estimate and compare the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves who received different methods of anticoagulation.

Methods

Studies were identified using a Medline search including all publications up to June 5, 2016. Study inclusion required reporting of maternal death, thromboembolism, and valve failure, and/or fetal spontaneous abortion, death, and congenital defects in pregnant women treated with any of the following: 1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) throughout pregnancy; 2) low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout pregnancy; 3) LMWH for the first trimester, followed by a VKA (LMWH and VKA); or 4) unfractionated heparin for the first trimester, followed by a VKA (UFH and VKA).

Results

A total of 800 pregnancies from 18 publications were included. Composite maternal risk was lowest with VKA (5%), compared with LMWH (16%; ratio of averaged risk [RAR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 7.5), LMWH and VKA (16%; RAR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2 to 7.5), or UFH and VKA (16%; RAR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.5 to 7.1). Composite fetal risk was lowest with LMWH (13%; RAR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.8), compared with VKA (39%), LMWH and VKA (23%), or UFH and VKA (34%). No significant difference in fetal risk was observed between women taking ≤5 mg daily warfarin and those with an LMWH regimen (RAR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.3 to 2.4).

Conclusions

VKA treatment was associated with the lowest risk of adverse maternal outcomes, whereas the use of LMWH throughout pregnancy was associated with the lowest risk of adverse fetal outcomes. Fetal risk was similar between women taking ≤5 mg warfarin daily and women treated with LMWH.

Pregnancy Outcome in Women with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves Treated with Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) or Enoxaparin

OBJECTIVE

This study was carried out to determine the maternal (including thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications) and fetal outcomes (including miscarriage, stillbirth, baby death, and live birth) in women with mechanical heart valves managed with therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus enoxaparin during pregnancy.

METHODS

This is a prospective comparative, nonrandomized study. Pregnant women with mechanical heart valves presenting to high-risk pregnancy unit of Benha University Hospital, Egypt were treated with UFH 15,000 U/12 h versus enoxaparin (Clexane) 1 mg/kg SC/12 h during pregnancy and the results were analyzed.

RESULTS

40 pregnant women were included in the study. In 20 pregnant women, anticoagulation was with UFH, and 20 pregnant women received enoxaparin. One (3 %) thrombotic complication occurred with enoxaparin treatment. Noncompliance or subtherapeutic levels contributed to this outcome in this case. Antenatal hemorrhage occurred in 4 (10 %) and postpartum hemorrhagic complications in 5 (12.5 %) pregnancies. Of the 32 pregnant women who continued after 20 weeks' gestation, 100 % (17/17) of the women taking predominantly UFH had a surviving infant compared with 93 % (14/15) of the women taking primarily enoxaparin (p = 0.25). One intrauterine fetal death occurred in the enoxaparin group. There was no significant difference in the live birth rates between the two groups (p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with therapeutic dose of UFH during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves is associated with a low risk of valve thrombosis and good fetal outcomes, but meticulous monitoring is essential.

Reducing stillbirths: prevention and management of medical disorders and infections during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

An estimated two-thirds of the world's 3.2 million stillbirths occur antenatally, prior to labour, and are often overlooked in policy and programs. Poorly recognised, untreated or inadequately treated maternal infections such as syphilis and malaria, and maternal conditions including hypertensive disorders, are known risk factors for stillbirth.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review of the evidence for 16 antenatal interventions with the potential to prevent stillbirths. We searched a range of sources including PubMed and the Cochrane Library. For interventions with prior Cochrane reviews, we conducted additional meta-analyses including eligible newer randomised controlled trials following the Cochrane protocol. We focused on interventions deliverable at the community level in low-/middle-income countries, where the burden of stillbirths is greatest.

RESULTS

Few of the studies we included reported stillbirth as an outcome; most that did were underpowered to assess this outcome. While Cochrane reviews or meta-analyses were available for many interventions, few focused on stillbirth or perinatal mortality as outcomes, and evidence was frequently conflicting. Several interventions showed clear evidence of impact on stillbirths, including heparin therapy for certain maternal indications; syphilis screening and treatment; and insecticide-treated bed nets for prevention of malaria. Other interventions, such as management of obstetric intrahepatic cholestasis, maternal anti-helminthic treatment, and intermittent preventive treatment of malaria, showed promising impact on stillbirth rates but require confirmatory studies. Several interventions reduced known risk factors for stillbirth (e.g., anti-hypertensive drugs for chronic hypertension), yet failed to show statistically significant impact on stillbirth or perinatal mortality rates. Periodontal disease emerged as a clear risk factor for stillbirth but no interventions have reduced stillbirth rates.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for some newly recognised risk factors for stillbirth, including periodontal disease, suggests the need for large, appropriately designed randomised trials to test whether intervention can minimise these risks and prevent stillbirths. Existing evidence strongly supports infection control measures, including syphilis screening and treatment and malaria prophylaxis in endemic areas, for preventing antepartum stillbirths. These interventions should be incorporated into antenatal care programs based on attributable risks and burden of disease.