Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump is useful to facilitate percutaneous coronary interventions: images from rescue cases

The role of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes and the interference with anemia

The role played by glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) has continuously evolved until the most recent Guidelines whereby they were stepped down from class I to class II recommendation for treating acute coronary syndromes (ACS). GPI compete with a wider use of ADP inhibitors and novel anticoagulant drugs although GPI use has greatly narrowed. However, GPI may still have a role. Several criteria were proposed to define post-PCI anemia which is strictly related to bleeding and transfusion. In ACS, it should be important to define anemia in comparative terms versus baseline levels: ≥ 15% of red blood cell decrease should be a practical cut-off value. If one wishes to concentrate on hemoglobin (Hb), a≥2g/dl Hb decrease from baseline should be considered. It is important to recognize post-PCI anemia in the setting of ACS. There are sub-populations exposed to short-term hemorrhagic and/or long-term ischemic risks. Ischemic and hemorrhagic risks need to be carefully evaluated along with thrombocytopenia and its prognostic significance in order to put all these blood and rheological parameters into a clinically oriented perspective on which therapeutical decisions should be based. Definition of high risk procedures (complexity, angiographic characteristics and patient's risk profile, regardless whether STEMI or NSTEMI) may help selecting GPI. There are positive elements in GPI use: efficacy, rapid onset and reversibility of action, absence of pharmacogenomic variability, pharmacoeconomic considerations and the possibility of intracoronary administration. All these elements should be evaluated when selecting these agents for therapeutics.

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump improves the clinical outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left ventricular dysfunction patients

Severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) are often associated with a higher mortality. The efficacy and safety of the preoperative prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion is not well established. 416 consecutive patients with severe LV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤35%) undergoing isolated OPCAB were enrolled in a retrospective observational study. 191 patients was enrolled in the IABP group; the remaining 225 patients was in control group. A total of 129 pairs of patients were propensity-score matched. No significant differences in demographic and preoperative risk factors were found between the two groups. The postoperative 30-day mortality occurred more frequently in the control group compared with the IABP group (8.5% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.02). There was a significant reduction of low cardiac output syndrome in the IABP group compared with the control group (14% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.04). Prolonged mechanical ventilation (≥48 h) occurred more frequently in the control group (34.9% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.02). IABP also decreased the postoperative length of stay. Preoperative IABP was associated with a lower 30-day mortality, suggesting that it is effective in patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing OPCAB.

Prognostic significance of post percutaneous coronary intervention thrombocytopenia

Several definitions of post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) thrombocytopenia (TC) were formulated. Recent studies demonstrated that a relative drop in platelet count ≥ 25% is the most appropriate criterion. By this definition a population is detected that is exposed not only to increased risk of hemorrhagic complications but also to increased risk of ischemic events, which may appear a paradox. In patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI, several conditions might be associated with TC: cardiopulmonary by-pass and the presence of extra corporeal membrane oxygenators, intra aortic balloon pump (IABP), cardiogenic shock, thrombolytic drugs and anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs. Several studies demonstrated that TC and ischemic outcomes are related although it is unclear whether this is a direct relationship or TC is just a secondary effect of another cryptic protagonist. It is suggested that further investigations determine whether there is a real link between TC, a probably well defined covariate, and ischemic outcomes or whether IABP is the joining link between these two variables and whose presence needs in any case be considered in multivariable statistics. Post-PCI TC could be only a secondary effect of IABP use. On turn, the prolonged use of heparin necessarily accompanying the use of IABP, and producing a paradoxical pro-thrombotic TC, might also be implicated.