Prospective trial of high-dose chemotherapy followed by infusions of peripheral blood stem cells and dose-escalated donor lymphocytes for relapsed leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Prevention and Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapse after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents the only curative option. Progress has been made in the last two decades in the pre-transplant induction therapies, supportive care, selection of donors and conditioning regimens that allowed to extend the HSCT to a larger number of patients, including those aged over 65 years and/or lacking an HLA-identical donor. Furthermore, improvements in the prophylaxis of the graft-versus-host disease and of infection have dramatically reduced transplant-related mortality. The relapse of AML remains the major reason for transplant failure affecting almost 40-50% of the patients. From 10 to 15 years ago to date, treatment options for AML relapsing after HSCT were limited to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and donor leukocyte infusions (DLI). Nowadays, novel agents and targeted therapies have enriched the therapeutic landscape. Moreover, very recently, the therapeutic landscape has been enriched by manipulated cellular products (CAR-T, CAR-CIK, CAR-NK). In light of these new perspectives, careful monitoring of minimal-residual disease (MRD) and prompt application of pre-emptive strategies in the post-transplant setting have become imperative. Herein, we review the current state of the art on monitoring, prevention and treatment of relapse of AML after HSCT with particular attention on novel agents and future directions.

Improved outcome in AML relapse after allogeneic transplant with high-intensity chemotherapy followed by 2nd allogeneic stem cell transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) remains a major therapeutic challenge. While patients with longer remission after initial alloSCT are recommended to receive cell therapy (CT) such as 2^ndalloSCT or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), survival for patients who relapse within 6 months of alloSCT has been dismal. We evaluated the outcomes of AML relapse after alloSCT to assess the impact of different treatments on long-term survival. One hundred and seventy-two patients with AML underwent alloSCT at the Penn State Cancer Institute from January 2014 to August 2019. Sixty-nine patients relapsed (median age, 60 years; range, 10-75). Of these, 4 patients underwent 2^ndalloSCT, and 26 received DLI. One-year overall survival (OS) in all cases was 20.3% (95% CI: 11.8-30.4%). Patients with ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2 at relapse showed a better 1-year OS than those with PS 3-4. Median OS for patients who received chemotherapy only or chemotherapy with CT was 74 or 173.5 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Relapsed patients receiving conventional re-induction chemotherapy were categorized as the high-intensity chemotherapy (H) group, while those receiving treatments such as hypomethylating agents or targeted agents were categorized as the low-intensity chemotherapy (L) group. The H group showed a better 1-year OS compared with the L group. Patients who received H + CT showed a better 1-year OS of 52.9% than the other 3 groups (p < 0.001). Even for patients with post-alloSCT remission duration of less than 6 months, the statistical significance was preserved. Factors including age, donor source at 1^stalloSCT, time to relapse, blast counts, PS at relapse, and treatment type after post-alloSCT relapse were used for a multivariate analysis, and matched or mismatched related donor and H + CT after alloSCT were identified as independent factors associated with OS. These findings support the use of H + CT as the treatment option of choice for AML patients who relapse after alloSCT when feasible.

Myeloid Sarcoma after Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Successful Consolidation Treatment Approaches in Two Patients

Myeloid sarcoma is an extramedullary (EM) manifestation (i.e., manifestation outside the bone marrow) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); it is assumed to be relatively uncommon and can be the only manifestation of leukemia relapse after allogenic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). An EM sarcoma can manifest in any part of the body, although preferentially manifesting in immunological sanctuary sites as a single or multiple tumors. The development of myeloid sarcoma after allo-SCT is associated with certain cytogenetic abnormalities, developing of graft versus host disease (GVHD), and treatment with donor lymphocytes infusion (DLI). It is believed that posttransplant myeloid sarcomas develop because the EM sites evade immune surveillance. We present two patients with EM myeloid sarcoma in the breast and epipharynx, respectively, as the only manifestation of leukemia relapse. Both patients were treated with a combination of local and systemic therapy, with successfully longtime disease-free survival. Based on these two case reports, we give an updated review of the literature and discuss the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of EM sarcoma as the only manifestation of AML relapse after allo-SCT. There are no standard guidelines for the treatment of myeloid sarcomas in allotransplant recipients. In our opinion, the treatment of these patients needs to be individualized and should include local treatment (i.e., radiotherapy) combined with systemic therapy (i.e., chemotherapy, immunotherapy, DLI, or retransplantation). The treatment has to consider both the need for sufficient antileukemic efficiency versus the risk of severe complications due to cumulative toxicity.

High-dose cytarabine as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia--is more better or more of the same?

Cytarabine is the backbone of most chemotherapeutic regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yet the optimal dose for salvage therapy of refractory or relapsed AML (RR-AML) has not been established. Very high dose single-agent cytarabine at 36 g/m(2) (ARA-36) was previously shown to be effective and tolerable in RR-AML. In this retrospective analysis, we aim to describe the toxicity and efficacy of ARA-36 as salvage therapy for patients with AML who are primary refractory to intensive daunorubicin-containing induction or those relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Fifteen patients, median age 53 years, were included in the analysis. Six patients were treated for induction failure, one had resistant APL, and eight relapsed after alloSCT. Complete remission was achieved in 60% of patients. Surviving patients were followed for a median of 8.5 months. One-year overall survival was 54% (95% CI 30%-86%), and relapse rate from remission (n = 9) was 56%. Grade III/IV pulmonary, infectious, ocular and gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 26%, 20%, 20% and 20% of patients respectively. Salvage therapy with ARA-36 regimen for RR-AML has considerable efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with induction failure or post-transplant relapse. Overall survival in these high-risk patients still remains poor.

New approaches to manipulate minimal residual disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a complex topic that has been studied extensively in hematologic malignancies given its clinical implications related to prognosis. However, methods to monitor and treat MRD, especially after stem cell transplantation, are not well defined and vary in different disease processes. Alternative transplant strategies, such as reduced-intensity conditioning, have altered the way we assess and address MRD after transplantation. Development of new diagnostic tools have allowed for higher sensitivity and specificity of testing. Both targeted chemotherapeutic agents and immunotherapies have been developed to treat MRD in hopes of improving patient outcomes. This article aims to address ways to define and manipulate MRD specifically after stem cell transplantation.

Intentional donor lymphocyte-induced limited acute graft-versus-host disease is essential for long-term survival of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The prognosis of patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic transplantation is poor. We hypothesized that initial disease control by effective cytoreduction, followed by rapid induction of a profound allo-immune response by donor-lymphocyte infusion during the neutropenic phase, is essential for long-term survival. Additional interferon-α was administered when no acute graft-versus-host-disease occurred within 3 weeks after donor-lymphocyte infusion. Overall, 44 patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia were assessed; 26 had relapsed after myeloablative conditioning and 18 after reduced-intensity conditioning. Of these 44 patients, seven were not eligible for cytoreductive treatment because of poor performance status (n=3) or severe graft-versus-host-disease (n=4) at the time of relapse. Patients with smoldering relapses (n=5) received donor-lymphocyte infusion only. Thirty-two patients received cytoreductive treatment, followed by donor-lymphocyte infusion in 22 patients. Reasons for not receiving donor-lymphocyte infusion were chemotherapy-related death (n=1) and chemotherapy-refractory disease (n=9). The 2-year overall survival rate after donor-lymphocyte infusion was 36% (95% confidence-interval: 16-57%). The impact of acute graft-versus-host-disease on survival was calculated with a Cox-regression model including onset of acute graft-versus-host-disease as a time-dependent variable. Development of grade 1-3, but not grade 4, acute graft-versus-host-disease was associated with superior survival as compared to absence of graft-versus-host-disease (hazard ratio 0.22, P=0.03). In conclusion, efficient cytoreduction followed by donor-lymphocyte infusion and subsequent interferon-α leading to limited acute graft-versus-host-disease represents a potentially curative option for patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic transplantation.

Chemotherapy followed by modified donor lymphocyte infusion as a treatment for relapsed acute leukemia after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion: superior outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone and an analysis of prognostic factors

We retrospectively compared the antileukemic effects of chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy followed by modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in 82 patients with relapsed acute leukemia after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) without in vitro T-cell depletion. We also investigated prognostic factors in patients receiving chemotherapy followed by modified DLI. Thirty-two patients received chemotherapy alone, and the remaining 50 patients received chemotherapy followed by modified DLI. In patients receiving chemotherapy followed by modified DLI, complete remission rate was significantly higher (64.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.000), the incidence of relapse was significantly lower (50.0% vs. 100.0%, P = 0.000), and disease-free survival was significantly improved (36.0% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.000) compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after intervention (P = 0.000) and patients receiving chemotherapy followed by modified DLI (P = 0.037) were associated with a lower relapse rate. Furthermore, in patients receiving chemotherapy followed by modified DLI, multivariate analysis demonstrated that chronic GVHD after modified DLI (P = 0.039) and duration of minimal residual disease (MRD) (-) ≥4 months after modified DLI (P = 0.001) were associated with a lower relapse rate. Our study is the first to suggest that chemotherapy followed by modified DLI is associated with stronger antileukemic effects and better survival in relapsed acute leukemia after haploidentical HSCT without in vitro T-cell depletion. Furthermore, our study suggests that lack of chronic GVHD and duration of MRD (-) <4 months after modified DLI are associated with higher relapse rates in patients receiving chemotherapy followed by modified DLI.

Extramedullary relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an easily overlooked but significant pattern of relapse

Acute myeloid leukemia may manifest as myeloid sarcoma in a variety of extramedullary (EM) tissues at diagnosis or at relapse. Although EM relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) has been considered to be rare, recent studies have suggested that it occurs in 5% to 12% of patients who receive alloSCT, accounting for 7% to 46% of total relapses. The incidence of EM relapse after immunomodulation (eg, donor lymphocyte infusion) or a second SCT is even higher. Moreover, patients with EM relapse are more likely to have had preceding acute graft-versus-host disease or chronic graft-versus-host disease relative to those with bone marrow relapse. Collectively, these observations suggest that the preferential occurrence of the graft-versus-leukemia effect underlies the pathogenesis of EM relapse. Establishing an early diagnosis of EM relapse has been challenging because of the immense diversity in the relapse sites; however, recent studies have suggested the usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in the detection of EM relapse. As a treatment for EM relapse, a combination of local and systemic therapy should be considered, because local therapy alone often results in subsequent systemic relapse. The prognosis for patients who develop EM relapse after SCT remains poor but is slightly better than that after bone marrow relapse. In addition to an early diagnosis with new modalities, clinical studies using new agents that may offer systemic activity while preserving the graft-versus-leukemia effect are warranted as part of an effort to improve the clinical outcome.

Clinical options after failure of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies

Disease recurrence is the single most common cause of death after allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Disease status and chemosensitivity at the time of transplantation, as well as the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), are factors known to influence the risk of relapse post-HSCT. Both acute and chronic GVHD have been associated with decreased relapse rates; however, owing to toxicity, overall survival is not consistently improved in these patients. Furthermore, there is a transient period of immunodeficiency after HSCT, which may permit residual malignant cells to proliferate early in the post-transplant course, before the donor immune system can establish a graft-versus-tumor response. Patients who fail an initial HSCT have an extremely poor outcome; therefore, maneuvers to prevent, identify and treat recurrent disease as early as possible in these situations are necessary. Strategies to distinguish graft-versus-tumor from GVHD, to enhance both general and disease-specific immune reconstitution after transplantation, and to increase donor-mediated anti-host immune reactions are being investigated in clinical trials. Single agent nontoxic post-HSCT chemotherapy, cellular therapies and second allogeneic HSCT using reduced intensity regimens are among the modalities under investigation.

New advances in leukaemia immunotherapy by the use of Chimeric Artificial Antigen Receptors (CARs): state of the art and perspectives for the near future

Leukaemia immunotherapy represents a fascinating and promising field of translational research, particularly as an integrative approach of bone marrow transplantation. Adoptive immunotherapy by the use of donor-derived expanded leukaemia-specific T cells has showed some kind of clinical response, but the major advance is nowadays represented by gene manipulation of donor immune cells, so that they acquire strict specificity towards the tumour target and potent lytic activity, followed by significant proliferation, increased survival and possibly anti-tumour memory state. This is achieved by gene insertion of Chimeric T-cell Antigen Receptors (CARs), which are artificial molecules containing antibody-derived fragments (to bind the specific target), joined with potent signalling T-Cell Receptor (TCR)-derived domains that activate the manipulated cells. This review will discuss the main application of this approach particularly focusing on the paediatric setting, raising advantages and disadvantages and discussing relevant perspectives of use in the nearest future.

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy consists of approaches that modify the host immune system, and/or the utilization of components of the immune system, as cancer treatment. During the past 25 years, 17 immunologic products have received regulatory approval based on anticancer activity as single agents and/or in combination with chemotherapy. These include the nonspecific immune stimulants BCG and levamisole; the cytokines interferon-α and interleukin-2; the monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab; the radiolabeled antibodies Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I-131 tositumomab; the immunotoxins denileukin diftitox and gemtuzumab ozogamicin; nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplants with donor lymphocyte infusions; and the anti-prostate cancer cell-based therapy sipuleucel-T. All but two of these products are still regularly used to treat various B- and T-cell malignancies, and numerous solid tumors, including breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma, kidney, glioblastoma, bladder, and head and neck. Positive randomized trials have recently been reported for idiotype vaccines in lymphoma and a peptide vaccine in melanoma. The anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilumumab, which blocks regulatory T-cells, is expected to receive regulatory approval in the near future, based on a randomized trial in melanoma. As the fourth modality of cancer treatment, biotherapy/immunotherapy is an increasingly important component of the anticancer armamentarium.

Cytokine-induced killer cells for cell therapy of acute myeloid leukemia: improvement of their immune activity by expression of CD33-specific chimeric receptors

BACKGROUND

Cytokine-induced killer cells are ex vivo-expanded cells with potent antitumor activity. The infusion of cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is well tolerated, but limited clinical responses have been observed. To improve their effector functions against acute myeloid leukemia, we genetically modified cytokine-induced killer cells with chimeric receptors specific for the CD33 myeloid antigen.

DESIGN AND METHODS

SFG-retroviral vectors coding for anti-CD33-ζ and anti-CD33-CD28-OX40-ζ chimeric receptors were used to transduce cytokine-induced killer cells. Transduced cells were characterized in vitro for their ability to lyse leukemic targets (4-hour (51)chromium-release and 6-day co-cultures assays on human stromal mesenchymal cells), to proliferate ((3)H-thymidine-incorporation assay) and to secrete cytokines (flow cytomix assay) after contact with acute myeloid leukemia cells. Their activity against normal CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells was evaluated by analyzing the colony-forming unit capacity after co-incubation.

RESULTS

Cytokine-induced killer cells were efficiently transduced with the anti-CD33 chimeric receptors, maintaining their native phenotype and functions and acquiring potent cytotoxicity (up to 80% lysis after 4-hour incubation) against different acute myeloid leukemia targets, as also confirmed in long-term killing experiments. Moreover, introduction of the anti-CD33 chimeric receptors was accompanied by prominent CD33-specific proliferative activity, with the release of high levels of immunostimulatory cytokines. The presence of CD28-OX40 in chimeric receptor endodomain was associated with a significant amelioration of the anti-leukemic activity of cytokine-induced killer cells. Importantly, even though the cytokine-induced killer cells transduced with anti-CD33 chimeric receptors showed toxicity against normal hematopoietic CD34(+) progenitor cells, residual clonogenic activity was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that anti-CD33 chimeric receptors strongly enhance anti-leukemic cytokine-induced killer cell functions, suggesting that cytokine-induced killer cells transduced with these molecules might represent a promising optimized tool for acute myeloid leukemia immunotherapy.

Preemptive alloimmune intervention in high-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients guided by minimal residual disease level before stem cell transplantation

Relapse of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains the main cause of treatment failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). A high level of minimal residual disease (MRD) before alloSCT has been shown to predict these relapses. Patients at risk might benefit from a preemptive alloimmune intervention. In this first prospective, MRD-guided intervention study, 48 patients were stratified according to pre-SCT MRD level. Eighteen children with MRD level >or=1 x 10(-4) were eligible for intervention, consisting of early cyclosporine A tapering followed by consecutive, incremental donor lymphocyte infusions (n=1-4). The intervention was associated with graft versus host disease >or=grade II in only 23% of patients. Event-free survival in the intervention group was 19%. However, in contrast with the usual early recurrence of leukemia, relapses were delayed up to 3 years after SCT. In addition, several relapses presented at unusual extramedullary sites suggesting that the immune intervention may have altered the pattern of leukemia recurrence. In 8 out of 11 evaluable patients, relapse was preceded by MRD recurrence (median 9 weeks, range 0-30). We conclude that in children with high-risk ALL, immunotherapy-based regimens after SCT are feasible and may need to be further intensified to achieve total eradication of residual leukemic cells.

Donor lymphocyte infusions for acute myeloid leukaemia

The success of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in treating chronic myeloid leukaemia that had recurred after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation provided direct evidence for the existence of an immunologically mediated graft-vs-leukaemia effect and led to the development of non-myeloablative transplantation. For patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), DLI has been less effective, both as a result of its rapid growth kinetics and its decreased susceptibility to alloimmune-mediated effects. This chapter reviews the historical experience with DLI for AML, both as treatment for and prophylaxis of relapse. New approaches aimed at improving the efficacy of DLI are discussed, including administration of chemotherapy prior to DLI, use of immunomodulatory cytokines to bolster the cytotoxic effector response, priming of donor lymphocytes to recipient tumour antigens ex vivo, and infusions of alloreactive natural killer cells.

Disease relapse after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Risk factors and treatment

Disease relapse is the commonest cause of treatment failure after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Adoptive immunotherapy based on donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) has a prominent role in the management of disease recurrence. Although the highest remission rates are achieved in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), encouraging results have also been reported in chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. However, the experience of DLI in CML is not necessarily applicable to the management of lymphoproliferative diseases because of the heterogeneity of the conditioning regimens used in chronic lymphoid malignancies. We will review the role of DLI for different disease types in the context of conventional and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. The factors influencing response and graft-versus-host disease as well as the optimal cell dose will be discussed. Finally, we will describe the main avenues currently being explored to improve the selectivity and efficacy of DLI.