1
|
Li BZ, Kolodner RD, Putnam CD. Identification of different classes of genome instability suppressor genes through analysis of DNA damage response markers. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2024; 14:jkae064. [PMID: 38526099 PMCID: PMC11152081 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Cellular pathways that detect DNA damage are useful for identifying genes that suppress DNA damage, which can cause genome instability and cancer predisposition syndromes when mutated. We identified 199 high-confidence and 530 low-confidence DNA damage-suppressing (DDS) genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a whole-genome screen for mutations inducing Hug1 expression, a focused screen for mutations inducing Ddc2 foci, and data from previous screens for mutations causing Rad52 foci accumulation and Rnr3 induction. We also identified 286 high-confidence and 394 low-confidence diverse genome instability-suppressing (DGIS) genes through a whole-genome screen for mutations resulting in increased gross chromosomal rearrangements and data from previous screens for mutations causing increased genome instability as assessed in a diversity of genome instability assays. Genes that suppress both pathways (DDS+ DGIS+) prevent or repair DNA replication damage and likely include genes preventing collisions between the replication and transcription machineries. DDS+ DGIS- genes, including many transcription-related genes, likely suppress damage that is normally repaired properly or prevent inappropriate signaling, whereas DDS- DGIS+ genes, like PIF1, do not suppress damage but likely promote its proper, nonmutagenic repair. Thus, induction of DNA damage markers is not a reliable indicator of increased genome instability, and the DDS and DGIS categories define mechanistically distinct groups of genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin-Zhong Li
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA
| | - Richard D Kolodner
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA
- Moores-UCSD Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA
- Institute of Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA
| | - Christopher D Putnam
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lanz MC, Oberly S, Sanford EJ, Sharma S, Chabes A, Smolka MB. Separable roles for Mec1/ATR in genome maintenance, DNA replication, and checkpoint signaling. Genes Dev 2018; 32:822-835. [PMID: 29899143 PMCID: PMC6049512 DOI: 10.1101/gad.308148.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
In this study, Lanz et al. investigated how the Mec1/ATR kinase functions in genome maintenance and replication and, using a novel genetic system to spatially manipulate Mec1 activation and action, show that the ability of Mec1 to suppress genomic instabilities is separate from a novel role in promoting DNA replication. These findings establish that the Mec1/ATR kinase initiates checkpoint signaling, promotes DNA replication, and maintains genetic stability through distinct modes of action. The Mec1/ATR kinase coordinates multiple cellular responses to replication stress. In addition to its canonical role in activating the checkpoint kinase Rad53, Mec1 also plays checkpoint-independent roles in genome maintenance that are not well understood. Here we used a combined genetic–phosphoproteomic approach to manipulate Mec1 activation and globally monitor Mec1 signaling, allowing us to delineate distinct checkpoint-independent modes of Mec1 action. Using cells in which endogenous Mec1 activators were genetically ablated, we found that expression of “free” Mec1 activation domains (MADs) can robustly activate Mec1 and rescue the severe DNA replication and growth defects of these cells back to wild-type levels. However, unlike the activation mediated by endogenous activator proteins, “free” MADs are unable to stimulate Mec1-mediated suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs), revealing that Mec1's role in genome maintenance is separable from a previously unappreciated proreplicative function. Both Mec1's functions in promoting replication and suppressing GCRs are independent of the downstream checkpoint kinases. Additionally, Mec1-dependent GCR suppression seems to require localized Mec1 action at DNA lesions, which correlates with the phosphorylation of activator-proximal substrates involved in homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair. These findings establish that Mec1 initiates checkpoint signaling, promotes DNA replication, and maintains genetic stability through distinct modes of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Charles Lanz
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
| | - Susannah Oberly
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
| | - Ethan James Sanford
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
| | - Sushma Sharma
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics.,Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine (MIMS), Umeå University, Umeå SE 90187, Sweden
| | - Andrei Chabes
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics.,Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine (MIMS), Umeå University, Umeå SE 90187, Sweden
| | - Marcus Bustamante Smolka
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Replication intermediates that escape Dna2 activity are processed by Holliday junction resolvase Yen1. Nat Commun 2016; 7:13157. [PMID: 27779184 PMCID: PMC5093310 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cells have evolved mechanisms to protect, restart and repair perturbed replication forks, allowing full genome duplication, even under replication stress. Interrogating the interplay between nuclease-helicase Dna2 and Holliday junction (HJ) resolvase Yen1, we find the Dna2 helicase activity acts parallel to homologous recombination (HR) in promoting DNA replication and chromosome detachment at mitosis after replication fork stalling. Yen1, but not the HJ resolvases Slx1-Slx4 and Mus81-Mms4, safeguards chromosome segregation by removing replication intermediates that escape Dna2. Post-replicative DNA damage checkpoint activation in Dna2 helicase-defective cells causes terminal G2/M arrest by precluding Yen1-dependent repair, whose activation requires progression into anaphase. These findings explain the exquisite replication stress sensitivity of Dna2 helicase-defective cells, and identify a non-canonical role for Yen1 in the processing of replication intermediates that is distinct from HJ resolution. The involvement of Dna2 helicase activity in completing replication may have implications for DNA2-associated pathologies, including cancer and Seckel syndrome.
DNA replication stress drives genome instability and cancer. Here, Ölmezer and colleagues show that the helicase activity of multifunctional enzyme Dna2 suppresses dead-end replication structures that impair chromosome segregation if not removed by Holliday junction resolvase Yen1 in yeast.
Collapse
|
4
|
Silva S, Altmannova V, Luke-Glaser S, Henriksen P, Gallina I, Yang X, Choudhary C, Luke B, Krejci L, Lisby M. Mte1 interacts with Mph1 and promotes crossover recombination and telomere maintenance. Genes Dev 2016; 30:700-17. [PMID: 26966248 PMCID: PMC4803055 DOI: 10.1101/gad.276204.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Mph1 is a member of the conserved FANCM family of DNA motor proteins that play key roles in genome maintenance processes underlying Fanconi anemia, a cancer predisposition syndrome in humans. Here, we identify Mte1 as a novel interactor of the Mph1 helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In vitro, Mte1 (Mph1-associated telomere maintenance protein 1) binds directly to DNA with a preference for branched molecules such as D loops and fork structures. In addition, Mte1 stimulates the helicase and fork regression activities of Mph1 while inhibiting the ability of Mph1 to dissociate recombination intermediates. Deletion of MTE1 reduces crossover recombination and suppresses the sensitivity of mph1Δ mutant cells to replication stress. Mph1 and Mte1 interdependently colocalize at DNA damage-induced foci and dysfunctional telomeres, and MTE1 deletion results in elongated telomeres. Taken together, our data indicate that Mte1 plays a role in regulation of crossover recombination, response to replication stress, and telomere maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Silva
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | | | | | - Peter Henriksen
- The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Irene Gallina
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Xuejiao Yang
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Chunaram Choudhary
- The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Brian Luke
- Institute of Molecular Biology gGmbH (IMB), 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - Lumir Krejci
- Department of Biology, Masaryk University, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic; National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Masaryk University, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic; International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, CZ-656 91 Brno, Czech Republic; Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, CZ-656 91 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Lisby
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Torres NP, Ho B, Brown GW. High-throughput fluorescence microscopic analysis of protein abundance and localization in budding yeast. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2016; 51:110-9. [PMID: 26893079 DOI: 10.3109/10409238.2016.1145185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Proteins directly carry out and regulate cellular functions. As a result, changes in protein levels within a cell directly influence cellular processes. Similarly, it is intuitive that the intracellular localization of proteins is a key component of their functionality. Optimal activity is achieved by a combination of protein concentration, co-compartmentalization with substrates, co-factors and regulators and sequestration from deleterious locales. The proteome within a cell is highly dynamic and changes in response to different environmental conditions. High-throughput microscopic analysis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has afforded proteome-wide views of protein organization in living cells, and of how protein abundance and location is regulated and remodeled in response to stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikko P Torres
- a Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada
| | - Brandon Ho
- a Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada
| | - Grant W Brown
- a Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada
| |
Collapse
|