1
|
Dronamraju R, Kerschner JL, Peck SA, Hepperla AJ, Adams AT, Hughes KD, Aslam S, Yoblinski AR, Davis IJ, Mosley AL, Strahl BD. Casein Kinase II Phosphorylation of Spt6 Enforces Transcriptional Fidelity by Maintaining Spn1-Spt6 Interaction. Cell Rep 2019; 25:3476-3489.e5. [PMID: 30566871 PMCID: PMC6347388 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Spt6 is a histone chaperone that associates with RNA polymerase II and deposits nucleosomes in the wake of transcription. Although Spt6 has an essential function in nucleosome deposition, it is not known whether this function is influenced by post-translational modification. Here, we report that casein kinase II (CKII) phosphorylation of Spt6 is required for nucleosome occupancy at the 5′ ends of genes to prevent aberrant antisense transcription and enforce transcriptional directionality. Mechanistically, we show that CKII phosphorylation of Spt6 promotes the interaction of Spt6 with Spn1, a binding partner required for chromatin reassembly and full recruitment of Spt6 to genes. Our study defines a function for CKII phosphorylation in transcription and highlights the importance of post-translational modification in histone chaperone function. Dronamraju et al. show that the N terminus of Spt6 is phosphorylated by casein kinase II, which is required for proper Spt6-Spn1 interaction. CKII phosphorylation of Spt6 is pivotal to maintain nucleosome occupancy at the 5′ ends of genes, suppression of antisense transcription from the 5′ ends, and resistance to genotoxic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghuvar Dronamraju
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jenny L Kerschner
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Sarah A Peck
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Austin J Hepperla
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Alexander T Adams
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Katlyn D Hughes
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Sadia Aslam
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Andrew R Yoblinski
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Ian J Davis
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Amber L Mosley
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Brian D Strahl
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dronamraju R, Hepperla AJ, Shibata Y, Adams AT, Magnuson T, Davis IJ, Strahl BD. Spt6 Association with RNA Polymerase II Directs mRNA Turnover During Transcription. Mol Cell 2019; 70:1054-1066.e4. [PMID: 29932900 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Spt6 is an essential histone chaperone that mediates nucleosome reassembly during gene transcription. Spt6 also associates with RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) via a tandem Src2 homology domain. However, the significance of Spt6-RNAPII interaction is not well understood. Here, we show that Spt6 recruitment to genes and the nucleosome reassembly functions of Spt6 can still occur in the absence of its association with RNAPII. Surprisingly, we found that Spt6-RNAPII association is required for efficient recruitment of the Ccr4-Not de-adenylation complex to transcribed genes for essential degradation of a range of mRNAs, including mRNAs required for cell-cycle progression. These findings reveal an unexpected control mechanism for mRNA turnover during transcription facilitated by a histone chaperone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghuvar Dronamraju
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Austin J Hepperla
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Yoichiro Shibata
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Alexander T Adams
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Terry Magnuson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Genetics, The Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Ian J Davis
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Genetics, The Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Departments of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Brian D Strahl
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malik I, Qiu C, Snavely T, Kaplan CD. Wide-ranging and unexpected consequences of altered Pol II catalytic activity in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:4431-4451. [PMID: 28119420 PMCID: PMC5416818 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Here we employ a set of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) activity mutants to determine the consequences of increased or decreased Pol II catalysis on gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that alteration of Pol II catalytic rate, either fast or slow, leads to decreased Pol II occupancy and apparent reduction in elongation rate in vivo. However, we also find that determination of elongation rate in vivo by chromatin immunoprecipitation can be confounded by the kinetics and conditions of transcriptional shutoff in the assay. We identify promoter and template-specific effects on severity of gene expression defects for both fast and slow Pol II mutants. We show that mRNA half-lives for a reporter gene are increased in both fast and slow Pol II mutant strains and the magnitude of half-life changes correlate both with mutants' growth and reporter expression defects. Finally, we tested a model that altered Pol II activity sensitizes cells to nucleotide depletion. In contrast to model predictions, mutated Pol II retains normal sensitivity to altered nucleotide levels. Our experiments establish a framework for understanding the diversity of transcription defects derived from altered Pol II activity mutants, essential for their use as probes of transcription mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indranil Malik
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | - Chenxi Qiu
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | - Thomas Snavely
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | - Craig D Kaplan
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
High-Resolution Phenotypic Landscape of the RNA Polymerase II Trigger Loop. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1006321. [PMID: 27898685 PMCID: PMC5127505 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The active sites of multisubunit RNA polymerases have a “trigger loop” (TL) that multitasks in substrate selection, catalysis, and translocation. To dissect the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II TL at individual-residue resolution, we quantitatively phenotyped nearly all TL single variants en masse. Three mutant classes, revealed by phenotypes linked to transcription defects or various stresses, have distinct distributions among TL residues. We find that mutations disrupting an intra-TL hydrophobic pocket, proposed to provide a mechanism for substrate-triggered TL folding through destabilization of a catalytically inactive TL state, confer phenotypes consistent with pocket disruption and increased catalysis. Furthermore, allele-specific genetic interactions among TL and TL-proximal domain residues support the contribution of the funnel and bridge helices (BH) to TL dynamics. Our structural genetics approach incorporates structural and phenotypic data for high-resolution dissection of transcription mechanisms and their evolution, and is readily applicable to other essential yeast proteins. Proper regulation of Pol II transcription, the first step of gene expression, is essential for life. Extensive evidence has revealed a widely conserved and dynamic polymerase active site component, termed the Trigger Loop (TL), in balancing transcription rate and fidelity while possibly allowing control of transcription elongation. Coupling high-throughput sequencing with our previously established genetic system, we are able to assess the in vivo phenotypes for almost all possible single substitution Pol II TL mutants in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that mutants in the TL nucleotide interacting and linker regions widely confer dominant and severe growth defects. Clustering of TL mutants’ transcription-related and general stress phenotypes reveals three main classes of TL mutants, including previously identified fast and slow elongating mutants. Comprehensive analyses of the distribution of fast and slow elongation mutants in light of existing Pol II crystal structures reveal critical regions contributing to proper TL dynamics and function. Evidence is presented linking a previously observed hydrophobic pocket to NTP substrate-induced TL closing, the mechanism critical for correct substrates selection and transcription fidelity. Finally, we assess the functional interplay between TL and its proximal domains, and their presumptive roles in the function and evolution of the TL. Utilizing the Pol II TL as a case study, we present a structural genetics approach that reveals insights into a complex, multi-functional, and essential domain in yeast.
Collapse
|