Testing predictions of the double-strand break repair model relating to crossing over in Mammalian cells

New and old ways to control meiotic recombination

The unique segregation of homologs, rather than sister chromatids, at the first meiotic division requires the formation of crossovers (COs) between homologs by meiotic recombination in most species. Crossovers do not form at random along chromosomes. Rather, their formation is carefully controlled, both at the stage of formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that can initiate COs and during the repair of these DSBs. Here, we review control of DSB formation and two recently recognized controls of DSB repair: CO homeostasis and CO invariance. Crossover homeostasis maintains a constant number of COs per cell when the total number of DSBs in a cell is experimentally or stochastically reduced. Crossover invariance maintains a constant CO density (COs per kb of DNA) across much of the genome despite strong DSB hotspots in some intervals. These recently uncovered phenomena show that CO control is even more complex than previously suspected.

The Red Queen theory of recombination hotspots

Recombination hotspots are small chromosomal regions, where meiotic crossover events happen with high frequency. Recombination is initiated by a double-strand break (DSB) that requires the intervention of the molecular repair mechanism. The DSB repair mechanism may result in the exchange of homologous chromosomes (crossover) and the conversion of the allelic sequence that breaks into the one that does not break (biased gene conversion). Biased gene conversion results in a transmission advantage for the allele that does not break, thus preventing recombination and rendering recombination hotspots transient. How is it possible that recombination hotspots persist over evolutionary time (maintaining the average chromosomal crossover rate) when they are self-destructive? This fundamental question is known as the recombination hotspot paradox and has attracted much attention in recent years. Yet, that attention has not translated into a fully satisfactory answer. No existing model adequately explains all aspects of the recombination hotspot paradox. Here, we formulate an intragenomic conflict model resulting in Red Queen dynamics that fully accounts for all empirical observations regarding the molecular mechanisms of recombination hotspots, the nonrandom targeting of the recombination machinery to hotspots and the evolutionary dynamics of hotspot turnover.

Cruciform-forming inverted repeats appear to have mediated many of the microinversions that distinguish the human and chimpanzee genomes

Submicroscopic inversions have contributed significantly to the genomic divergence between humans and chimpanzees over evolutionary time. Those microinversions which are flanked by segmental duplications (SDs) are presumed to have originated via non-allelic homologous recombination between SDs arranged in inverted orientation. However, the nature of the mechanisms underlying those inversions which are not flanked by SDs remains unclear. We have investigated 35 such inversions, ranging in size from 51-nt to 22056-nt, with the goal of characterizing the DNA sequences in the breakpoint-flanking regions. Using the macaque genome as an outgroup, we determined the lineage specificity of these inversions and noted that the majority (N = 31; 89%) were associated with deletions (of length between 1-nt and 6754-nt) immediately adjacent to one or both inversion breakpoints. Overrepresentations of both direct and inverted repeats, >or= 6-nt in length and capable of non-B DNA structure formation, were noted in the vicinity of breakpoint junctions suggesting that these repeats could have contributed to double strand breakage. Inverted repeats capable of cruciform structure formation were also found to be a common feature of the inversion breakpoint-flanking regions, consistent with these inversions having originated through the resolution of Holliday junction-like cruciforms. Sequences capable of non-B DNA structure formation have previously been implicated in promoting gross deletions and translocations causing human genetic disease. We conclude that non-B DNA forming sequences may also have promoted the occurrence of mutations in an evolutionary context, giving rise to at least some of the inversion/deletions which now serve to distinguish the human and chimpanzee genomes.

Analysis of spontaneous gene conversion tracts within and between mammalian chromosomes

In the present study, we report the first characterization of gene conversion tract length, continuity and fidelity for pathways of gene targeting, ectopic and intrachromosomal homologous recombination using the same locus and mammalian somatic cell type. In this isogenic cell system, the vast majority of recombinants (>97%) are generated by homologous recombination and display a high degree of fidelity in the gene conversion process. Individual gene conversion tracts are highly likely to involve single, independent recombination events and proceed through a heteroduplex DNA intermediate. In all recombination pathways, gene conversion tracts are long, extending up to approximately 2 kb. Most gene conversion tracts are continuous in favor of donor region sequences, but in a small fraction of recombinants (15%), discontinuous gene conversion tracts are observed. In most cases, the recombination donor sequence is unaltered, although in two cases of intrachromosomal recombination, both recombination donor and recipient sequences bear gene conversion tracts. Overall, gene conversion events are similar, both qualitatively and quantitatively, for homologous recombination within and between mammalian chromosomes.

Interchromosomal crossover in human cells is associated with long gene conversion tracts

Crossovers have rarely been observed in specific association with interchromosomal gene conversion in mammalian cells. In this investigation two isogenic human B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, TI-112 and TSCER2, were used to select for I-SceI-induced gene conversions that restored function at the selectable thymidine kinase locus. Additionally, a haplotype linkage analysis methodology enabled the rigorous detection of all crossover-associated convertants, whether or not they exhibited loss of heterozygosity. This methodology also permitted characterization of conversion tract length and structure. In TI-112, gene conversion tracts were required to be complex in tract structure and at least 7.0 kb in order to be selectable. The results demonstrated that 85% (39/46) of TI-112 convertants extended more than 11.2 kb and 48% also exhibited a crossover, suggesting a mechanistic link between long tracts and crossover. In contrast, continuous tracts as short as 98 bp are selectable in TSCER2, although selectable gene conversion tracts could include a wide range of lengths. Indeed, only 16% (14/95) of TSCER2 convertants were crossover associated, further suggesting a link between long tracts and crossover. Overall, these results demonstrate that gene conversion tracts can be long in human cells and that crossovers are observable when long tracts are recoverable.

Analysis of one-sided marker segregation patterns resulting from mammalian gene targeting

The double-strand break repair (DSBR) model is currently accepted as the paradigm for acts of double-strand break (DSB) repair that lead to crossing over between homologous sequences. The DSBR model predicts that asymmetric heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) will form on both sides of the DSB (two-sided events; 5:3/5:3 segregation). In contrast, in yeast and mammalian cells, a considerable fraction of recombinants are one sided: they display full conversion (6:2 segregation) or half-conversion (5:3 segregation) on one side of the DSB together with normal 4:4 segregation on the other side of the DSB. Two mechanisms have been proposed to account for these observations: (i) hDNA formation is restricted to one side of the DSB or the other, and (ii) recombination is initially two sided, but hDNA repair directed by Holliday junction cuts restores normal 4:4 segregation on that side of the DSB in which the mismatch is closest to the cut junction initiating repair. In this study, we exploited a well-characterized gene-targeting assay to test the predictions that these mechanisms make with respect to the frequency of recombinants displaying 4:4 marker segregation on one side of the DSB. Unexpectedly, the results do not support the predictions of either mechanism. We propose a derivation of mechanism (ii) in which the nicks arising from Holliday junction cleavage are not equivalent with respect to directing repair of adjacent hDNA, possibly as a result of asynchronous cleavage of the DSBR intermediate.