1
|
Tissue-specific enhancer repression through molecular integration of cell signaling inputs. PLoS Genet 2017; 13:e1006718. [PMID: 28394894 PMCID: PMC5402979 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Drosophila leg morphogenesis occurs under the control of a relatively well-known genetic cascade, which mobilizes both cell signaling pathways and tissue-specific transcription factors. However, their cross-regulatory interactions, deployed to refine leg patterning, remain poorly characterized at the gene expression level. Within the genetically interacting landscape that governs limb development, the bric-à-brac2 (bab2) gene is required for distal leg segmentation. We have previously shown that the Distal-less (Dll) homeodomain and Rotund (Rn) zinc-finger activating transcription factors control limb-specific bab2 expression by binding directly a single critical leg/antennal enhancer (LAE) within the bric-à-brac locus. By genetic and molecular analyses, we show here that the EGFR-responsive C15 homeodomain and the Notch-regulated Bowl zinc-finger transcription factors also interact directly with the LAE enhancer as a repressive duo. The appendage patterning gene bab2 is the first identified direct target of the Bowl repressor, an Odd-skipped/Osr family member. Moreover, we show that C15 acts on LAE activity independently of its regular partner, the Aristaless homeoprotein. Instead, we find that C15 interacts physically with the Dll activator through contacts between their homeodomain and binds competitively with Dll to adjacent cognate sites on LAE, adding potential new layers of regulation by C15. Lastly, we show that C15 and Bowl activities regulate also rn expression. Our findings shed light on how the concerted action of two transcriptional repressors, in response to cell signaling inputs, shapes and refines gene expression along the limb proximo-distal axis in a timely manner. Limb morphogenesis is controlled by a well-known genetic cascade, mobilizing both cell signaling and tissue-specific transcription factors (TFs). However, how their concerted action refines gene expression remains to be deciphered. It is thus crucial to understand how cell signaling inputs are integrated by transcriptional “enhancers”. The Drosophila leg provides a good paradigm to dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying gene regulation. Here, we used the bric-a-brac2 (bab2) gene as a model to study the integrated regulation of patterning genes implicated in tarsal segmentation. bab2 expression in the leg primordium is dynamic and complex, going from initial broad distal expression to precisely positioned tarsal rings. By genetic and molecular analyses, we show here that the cell signaling-responding TFs C15 and Bowl interact directly with the limb-specific bab2 enhancer as a repressive duo. Moreover, C15 acts independently of its partner Aristaless through physical interaction with the Dll activator. We propose that Dll induces early circular bab2 expression pattern, then EGFR signaling-induced C15 in the distalmost cells competes with Dll for LAE binding and resolves bab2 pattern as a ring. Taken together our data shed light on how the concerted action of a quartet of transcription factors reshapes gene expression during limb proximo-distal axis development.
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeung K, Boija A, Karlsson E, Holmqvist PH, Tsatskis Y, Nisoli I, Yap D, Lorzadeh A, Moksa M, Hirst M, Aparicio S, Fanto M, Stenberg P, Mannervik M, McNeill H. Atrophin controls developmental signaling pathways via interactions with Trithorax-like. eLife 2017; 6:e23084. [PMID: 28327288 PMCID: PMC5409829 DOI: 10.7554/elife.23084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in human Atrophin1, a transcriptional corepressor, cause dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, a neurodegenerative disease. Drosophila Atrophin (Atro) mutants display many phenotypes, including neurodegeneration, segmentation, patterning and planar polarity defects. Despite Atro's critical role in development and disease, relatively little is known about Atro's binding partners and downstream targets. We present the first genomic analysis of Atro using ChIP-seq against endogenous Atro. ChIP-seq identified 1300 potential direct targets of Atro including engrailed, and components of the Dpp and Notch signaling pathways. We show that Atro regulates Dpp and Notch signaling in larval imaginal discs, at least partially via regulation of thickveins and fringe. In addition, bioinformatics analyses, sequential ChIP and coimmunoprecipitation experiments reveal that Atro interacts with the Drosophila GAGA Factor, Trithorax-like (Trl), and they bind to the same loci simultaneously. Phenotypic analyses of Trl and Atro clones suggest that Atro is required to modulate the transcription activation by Trl in larval imaginal discs. Taken together, these data indicate that Atro is a major Trl cofactor that functions to moderate developmental gene transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelvin Yeung
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ann Boija
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Edvin Karlsson
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Division of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI-Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Per-Henrik Holmqvist
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yonit Tsatskis
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ilaria Nisoli
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Damian Yap
- Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alireza Lorzadeh
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Michael Smith Laboratories, Vancouver, Canada
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michelle Moksa
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Michael Smith Laboratories, Vancouver, Canada
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Martin Hirst
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Michael Smith Laboratories, Vancouver, Canada
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Samuel Aparicio
- Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Manolis Fanto
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Per Stenberg
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Division of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI-Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mattias Mannervik
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helen McNeill
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mannervik M. Control of Drosophila embryo patterning by transcriptional co-regulators. Exp Cell Res 2013; 321:47-57. [PMID: 24157250 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2013] [Revised: 10/10/2013] [Accepted: 10/14/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
A combination of broadly expressed transcriptional activators and spatially restricted repressors are used to pattern embryos into cells of different fate. Transcriptional co-regulators are essential mediators of transcription factor function, and contribute to selective transcriptional responses in embryo development. A two step mechanism of transcriptional regulation is discussed, where remodeling of chromatin is initially required, followed by stimulation of recruitment or release of RNA polymerase from the promoter. Transcriptional co-regulators are essential for both of these steps. In particular, most co-activators are associated with histone acetylation and co-repressors with histone deacetylation. In the early Drosophila embryo, genome-wide studies have shown that the CBP co-activator has a preference for associating with some transcription factors and regulatory regions. The Groucho, CtBP, Ebi, Atrophin and Brakeless co-repressors are selectively used to limit zygotic gene expression. New findings are summarized which show that different co-repressors are often utilized by a single repressor, that the context in which a co-repressor is recruited to DNA can affect its activity, and that co-regulators may switch from co-repressors to co-activators and vice versa. The possibility that co-regulator activity is regulated and plays an instructive role in development is discussed as well. This review highlights how findings in Drosophila embryos have contributed to the understanding of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes as well as to mechanisms of animal embryo patterning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Mannervik
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Arrheniuslaboratories E3, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Defective proventriculus specifies the ocellar region in the Drosophila head. Dev Biol 2011; 356:598-607. [PMID: 21722630 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2010] [Revised: 05/31/2011] [Accepted: 06/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A pair of the Drosophila eye-antennal disc gives rise to four distinct organs (eyes, antennae, maxillary palps, and ocelli) and surrounding head cuticle. Developmental processes of this imaginal disc provide an excellent model system to study the mechanism of regional specification and subsequent organogenesis. The dorsal head capsule (vertex) of adult Drosophila is divided into three morphologically distinct subdomains: ocellar, frons, and orbital. The homeobox gene orthodenticle (otd) is required for head vertex development, and mutations that reduce or abolish otd expression in the vertex primordium lead to ocelliless flies. The homeodomain-containing transcriptional repressor Engrailed (En) is also involved in ocellar specification, and the En expression is completely lost in otd mutants. However, the molecular mechanism of ocellar specification remains elusive. Here, we provide evidence that the homeobox gene defective proventriculus (dve) is a downstream effector of Otd, and also that the repressor activity of Dve is required for en activation through a relief-of-repression mechanism. Furthermore, the Dve activity is involved in repression of the frons identity in an incoherent feedforward loop of Otd and Dve.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang L, Tsai CC. Atrophin proteins: an overview of a new class of nuclear receptor corepressors. NUCLEAR RECEPTOR SIGNALING 2008; 6:e009. [PMID: 19043594 PMCID: PMC2586093 DOI: 10.1621/nrs.06009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2008] [Accepted: 09/22/2008] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The normal development and physiological functions of multicellular organisms are regulated by complex gene transcriptional networks that include myriad transcription factors, their associating coregulators, and multiple chromatin-modifying factors. Aberrant gene transcriptional regulation resulting from mutations among these elements often leads to developmental defects and diseases. This review article concentrates on the Atrophin family proteins, including vertebrate Atrophin-1 (ATN1), vertebrate arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide repeats protein (RERE), and Drosophila Atrophin (Atro), which we recently identified as nuclear receptor corepressors. Disruption of Atrophin-mediated pathways causes multiple developmental defects in mouse, zebrafish, and Drosophila, while an aberrant form of ATN1 and altered expression levels of RERE are associated with neurodegenerative disease and cancer in humans, respectively. We here provide an overview of current knowledge about these Atrophin proteins. We hope that this information on Atrophin proteins may help stimulate fresh ideas about how this newly identified class of nuclear receptor corepressors aids specific nuclear receptors and other transcriptional factors in regulating gene transcription, manifesting physiological effects, and causing diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Haecker A, Qi D, Lilja T, Moussian B, Andrioli LP, Luschnig S, Mannervik M. Drosophila brakeless interacts with atrophin and is required for tailless-mediated transcriptional repression in early embryos. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e145. [PMID: 17503969 PMCID: PMC1868043 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2006] [Accepted: 03/26/2007] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Complex gene expression patterns in animal development are generated by the interplay of transcriptional activators and repressors at cis-regulatory DNA modules (CRMs). How repressors work is not well understood, but often involves interactions with co-repressors. We isolated mutations in the brakeless gene in a screen for maternal factors affecting segmentation of the Drosophila embryo. Brakeless, also known as Scribbler, or Master of thickveins, is a nuclear protein of unknown function. In brakeless embryos, we noted an expanded expression pattern of the Krüppel (Kr) and knirps (kni) genes. We found that Tailless-mediated repression of kni expression is impaired in brakeless mutants. Tailless and Brakeless bind each other in vitro and interact genetically. Brakeless is recruited to the Kr and kni CRMs, and represses transcription when tethered to DNA. This suggests that Brakeless is a novel co-repressor. Orphan nuclear receptors of the Tailless type also interact with Atrophin co-repressors. We show that both Drosophila and human Brakeless and Atrophin interact in vitro, and propose that they act together as a co-repressor complex in many developmental contexts. We discuss the possibility that human Brakeless homologs may influence the toxicity of polyglutamine-expanded Atrophin-1, which causes the human neurodegenerative disease dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Haecker
- Developmental Biology, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dai Qi
- Developmental Biology, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Lilja
- Developmental Biology, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bernard Moussian
- Abteilung Genetik, Max-Planck Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Luiz Paulo Andrioli
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Stefan Luschnig
- Abteilung Genetik, Max-Planck Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mattias Mannervik
- Developmental Biology, Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|