1
|
Coombs GS, Rios-Monterrosa JL, Lai S, Dai Q, Goll AC, Ketterer MR, Valdes MF, Uche N, Benjamin IJ, Wallrath LL. Modulation of muscle redox and protein aggregation rescues lethality caused by mutant lamins. Redox Biol 2021; 48:102196. [PMID: 34872044 PMCID: PMC8646998 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.102196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in the human LMNA gene cause a collection of diseases called laminopathies, which includes muscular dystrophy and dilated cardiomyopathy. The LMNA gene encodes lamins, filamentous proteins that form a meshwork on the inner side of the nuclear envelope. How mutant lamins cause muscle disease is not well understood, and treatment options are currently limited. To understand the pathological functions of mutant lamins so that therapies can be developed, we generated new Drosophila models and human iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes. In the Drosophila models, muscle-specific expression of the mutant lamins caused nuclear envelope defects, cytoplasmic protein aggregation, activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 redox pathway, and reductive stress. These defects reduced larval motility and caused death at the pupal stage. Patient-derived cardiomyocytes expressing mutant lamins showed nuclear envelope deformations. The Drosophila models allowed for genetic and pharmacological manipulations at the organismal level. Genetic interventions to increase autophagy, decrease Nrf2/Keap1 signaling, or lower reducing equivalents partially suppressed the lethality caused by mutant lamins. Moreover, treatment of flies with pamoic acid, a compound that inhibits the NADPH-producing malic enzyme, partially suppressed lethality. Taken together, these studies have identified multiple new factors as potential therapeutic targets for LMNA-associated muscular dystrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary S Coombs
- Biology Department, Waldorf University, Forest City, IA, USA
| | | | - Shuping Lai
- Cardiovascular Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Qiang Dai
- Cardiovascular Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Ashley C Goll
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Margaret R Ketterer
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Maria F Valdes
- Biology Department, Waldorf University, Forest City, IA, USA
| | - Nnamdi Uche
- Cardiovascular Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WO, USA
| | - Ivor J Benjamin
- Cardiovascular Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Lori L Wallrath
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Viret C, Duclaux-Loras R, Nancey S, Rozières A, Faure M. Selective Autophagy Receptors in Antiviral Defense. Trends Microbiol 2021; 29:798-810. [PMID: 33678557 DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Autophagy ensures the degradation of cytosolic substrates by the lysosomal pathway. Cargoes destined to be eliminated are confined within double-membrane vesicles called autophagosomes, prior to fusion with endolysosomal vacuoles. Autophagy receptors selectively interact with cargoes and route them to elongating autophagic membranes, a process referred to as selective autophagy. Besides contributing to cell homeostasis, selective autophagy constitutes an important cell-autonomous defense mechanism against viruses. We review observations related to selective autophagy receptor engagement during host cell responses to virus infection. We examine the distinct roles of autophagy receptors in antiviral autophagy, consider the strategies viruses have evolved to escape or oppose such restrictions, and delineate the contributions of selective autophagy to the tailoring of antiviral innate responses. Finally, we mention some open and emerging questions in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Viret
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team Autophagy Infection Immunity, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, F-69007, Lyon, France
| | - Rémi Duclaux-Loras
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team Autophagy Infection Immunity, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, F-69007, Lyon, France; Department of Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Femme-Mère-Enfant Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Stéphane Nancey
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team Autophagy Infection Immunity, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, F-69007, Lyon, France; Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Aurore Rozières
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team Autophagy Infection Immunity, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, F-69007, Lyon, France
| | - Mathias Faure
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team Autophagy Infection Immunity, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, F-69007, Lyon, France; Equipe Labellisée par la Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, FRM, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Molecular mechanisms of selective autophagy in Drosophila. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2020; 354:63-105. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
4
|
Nigg JC, Falk BW. Diaphorina citri densovirus is a persistently infecting virus with a hybrid genome organization and unique transcription strategy. J Gen Virol 2019; 101:226-239. [PMID: 31855134 DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.001371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diaphorina citri densovirus (DcDV) is an ambisense densovirus with a 5071 nt genome. Phylogenetic analysis places DcDV in an intermediate position between those in the Ambidensovirus and Iteradensovirus genera, a finding that is consistent with the observation that DcDV possesses an Iteradensoviris-like non-structural (NS) protein-gene cassette, but a capsid-protein (VP) gene cassette resembling those of other ambisense densoviruses. DcDV is maternally transmitted to 100 % of the progeny of infected female Diaphorina citri, and the progeny of infected females carry DcDV as a persistent infection without outward phenotypic effects. We were unable to infect naïve individuals by oral inoculation, however low levels of transient viral replication are detected following intrathoracic injection of DcDV virions into uninfected D. citri insects. Transcript mapping indicates that DcDV produces one transcript each from the NS and VP gene cassettes and that these transcripts are polyadenylated at internal sites to produce a ~2.2 kb transcript encoding the NS proteins and a ~2.4 kb transcript encoding the VP proteins. Additionally, we found that transcriptional readthrough leads to the production of longer non-canonical transcripts from both genomic strands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared C Nigg
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Drosophila immunity against natural and nonnatural viral pathogens. Virology 2019; 540:165-171. [PMID: 31928998 DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is extensively used as a model species for molecular biology and genetics. It is also widely studied for its innate immune system to expand our understanding of immune host defenses against numerous pathogens. More precisely, studies using both natural and nonnatural Drosophila pathogens have provided a better perspective of viral infection strategies and immunity processes than any other invertebrate. This has made significant advances in identifying and characterizing the innate immune mechanisms by which hosts can combat viral pathogens. However, in-depth studies on antiviral immunity are still lacking due in part to the narrow research focus on the evolution and conservation of antiviral strategies to combat infections caused by both natural and nonnatural viruses. In this review, we will cover three major areas. First, we will describe the well-characterized antiviral immune mechanisms in Drosophila. Second, we will survey the specific pathways induced by natural viruses that have been studied in Drosophila. Finally, we will discuss the pathways activated by nonnatural viruses, drawing comparisons to natural viruses and giving an unprecedented insight into the virus community of Drosophila that is necessary to understand the evolutionary and immune context needed to develop Drosophila as a model for virus research.
Collapse
|
6
|
Olmo RP, Martins NE, Aguiar ERGR, Marques JT, Imler JL. The insect reservoir of biodiversity for viruses and for antiviral mechanisms. AN ACAD BRAS CIENC 2019; 91 Suppl 3:e20190122. [PMID: 31166476 DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201920190122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Insects are the most diverse group of animals. They can be infected by an extraordinary diversity of viruses. Among them, arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) can be transmitted to humans. High-throughput sequencing of small RNAs from insects provides insight into their virome, which may help understand the dynamics of vector borne infectious diseases. Furthermore, investigating the mechanisms that restrict viral infections in insects points to genetic innovations that may inspire novel antiviral strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roenick P Olmo
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nelson Eduardo Martins
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eric Roberto G R Aguiar
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - João T Marques
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Jean-Luc Imler
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martins NE, Olmo RP, Aguiar ERGR, Marques JT, Imler JL. [Insects: An exceptional reservoir for viruses and antiviral genes]. Biol Aujourdhui 2019; 212:101-106. [PMID: 30973139 DOI: 10.1051/jbio/2019008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Insects are the most diverse group of animals. They can be infected by an extraordinary diversity of viruses. Among them, arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) can be transmitted to humans. High-throughput sequencing of small RNAs from insects provides insight on their virome, which may help understand the dynamics of vector borne infectious diseases. Furthermore, investigating the mechanisms that restrict viral infections in insects points to genetic innovations that may inspire novel antiviral strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson Eduardo Martins
- CNRS UPR9022, INSERM U1257, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, 15, rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| | - Roenick Proveti Olmo
- CNRS UPR9022, INSERM U1257, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, 15, rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| | - Eric Roberto Guimarães Rocha Aguiar
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 6627, Av. Antônio Carlos, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil - Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil
| | - João Trindade Marques
- CNRS UPR9022, INSERM U1257, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, 15, rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France - Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 6627, Av. Antônio Carlos, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil
| | - Jean-Luc Imler
- CNRS UPR9022, INSERM U1257, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, 15, rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Richards RI, Robertson SA, Kastner DL. Neurodegenerative diseases have genetic hallmarks of autoinflammatory disease. Hum Mol Genet 2018; 27:R108-R118. [PMID: 29684205 PMCID: PMC6061832 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The notion that one common pathogenic pathway could account for the various clinically distinguishable, typically late-onset neurodegenerative diseases might appear unlikely given the plethora of diverse primary causes of neurodegeneration. On the contrary, an autoinflammatory pathogenic mechanism allows diverse genetic and environmental factors to converge into a common chain of causality. Inflammation has long been known to correlate with neurodegeneration. Until recently this relationship was seen as one of consequence rather than cause-with inflammatory cells and events acting to 'clean up the mess' after neurological injury. This explanation is demonstrably inadequate and it is now clear that inflammation is at the very least, rate-limiting for neurodegeneration (and more likely, a principal underlying cause in most if not all neurodegenerative diseases), protective in its initial acute phase, but pernicious in its latter chronic phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert I Richards
- Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sarah A Robertson
- Robinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Daniel L Kastner
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Swevers L, Liu J, Smagghe G. Defense Mechanisms against Viral Infection in Drosophila: RNAi and Non-RNAi. Viruses 2018; 10:E230. [PMID: 29723993 PMCID: PMC5977223 DOI: 10.3390/v10050230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Revised: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
RNAi is considered a major antiviral defense mechanism in insects, but its relative importance as compared to other antiviral pathways has not been evaluated comprehensively. Here, it is attempted to give an overview of the antiviral defense mechanisms in Drosophila that involve both RNAi and non-RNAi. While RNAi is considered important in most viral infections, many other pathways can exist that confer antiviral resistance. It is noted that very few direct recognition mechanisms of virus infections have been identified in Drosophila and that the activation of immune pathways may be accomplished indirectly through cell damage incurred by viral replication. In several cases, protection against viral infection can be obtained in RNAi mutants by non-RNAi mechanisms, confirming the variability of the RNAi defense mechanism according to the type of infection and the physiological status of the host. This analysis is aimed at more systematically investigating the relative contribution of RNAi in the antiviral response and more specifically, to ask whether RNAi efficiency is affected when other defense mechanisms predominate. While Drosophila can function as a useful model, this issue may be more critical for economically important insects that are either controlled (agricultural pests and vectors of diseases) or protected from parasite infection (beneficial insects as bees) by RNAi products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc Swevers
- Institute of Biosciences & Applications, NCSR "Demokritos", 15341 Athens, Greece.
| | - Jisheng Liu
- School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, 510006 Guangzhou, China.
| | - Guy Smagghe
- Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The power and ease of Drosophila genetics and the medical relevance of mosquito-transmitted viruses have made dipterans important model organisms in antiviral immunology. Studies of virus-host interactions at the molecular and population levels have illuminated determinants of resistance to virus infection. Here, we review the sources and nature of variation in antiviral immunity and virus susceptibility in model dipteran insects, specifically the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and vector mosquitoes of the genera Aedes and Culex. We first discuss antiviral immune mechanisms and describe the virus-specificity of these responses. In the following sections, we review genetic and microbiota-dependent variation in antiviral immunity. In the final sections, we explore less well-studied sources of variation, including abiotic factors, sexual dimorphism, infection history, and endogenous viral elements. We borrow from work on other pathogen types and non-dipteran species when it parallels or complements studies in dipterans. Understanding natural variation in virus-host interactions may lead to the identification of novel restriction factors and immune mechanisms and shed light on the molecular determinants of vector competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Palmer
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Centre for Infection, Evolution and Immunity, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL UK.
| | - Finny S Varghese
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
- Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
| | - Ronald P van Rij
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
- Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mussabekova A, Daeffler L, Imler JL. Innate and intrinsic antiviral immunity in Drosophila. Cell Mol Life Sci 2017; 74:2039-2054. [PMID: 28102430 PMCID: PMC5419870 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-017-2453-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Revised: 12/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has been a valuable model to investigate the genetic mechanisms of innate immunity. Initially focused on the resistance to bacteria and fungi, these studies have been extended to include antiviral immunity over the last decade. Like all living organisms, insects are continually exposed to viruses and have developed efficient defense mechanisms. We review here our current understanding on antiviral host defense in fruit flies. A major antiviral defense in Drosophila is RNA interference, in particular the small interfering (si) RNA pathway. In addition, complex inducible responses and restriction factors contribute to the control of infections. Some of the genes involved in these pathways have been conserved through evolution, highlighting loci that may account for susceptibility to viral infections in humans. Other genes are not conserved and represent species-specific innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assel Mussabekova
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS UPR9022, Université de Strasbourg, 15 rue René Descartes, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Laurent Daeffler
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS UPR9022, Université de Strasbourg, 15 rue René Descartes, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean-Luc Imler
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS UPR9022, Université de Strasbourg, 15 rue René Descartes, 67000, Strasbourg, France
- Faculté des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Strasbourg, 28 rue Goethe, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jacomin AC, Fauvarque MO, Taillebourg E. A functional endosomal pathway is necessary for lysosome biogenesis in Drosophila. BMC Cell Biol 2016; 17:36. [PMID: 27852225 PMCID: PMC5112658 DOI: 10.1186/s12860-016-0115-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lysosomes are the major catabolic compartment within eukaryotic cells, and their biogenesis requires the integration of the biosynthetic and endosomal pathways. Endocytosis and autophagy are the primary inputs of the lysosomal degradation pathway. Endocytosis is specifically needed for the degradation of membrane proteins whereas autophagy is responsible for the degradation of cytoplasmic components. We previously identified the deubiquitinating enzyme UBPY/USP8 as being necessary for lysosomal biogenesis and productive autophagy in Drosophila. Because UBPY/USP8 has been widely described for its function in the endosomal system, we hypothesized that disrupting the endosomal pathway itself may affect the biogenesis of the lysosomes. Results In the present study, we blocked the progression of the endosomal pathway at different levels of maturation of the endosomes by expressing in fat body cells either dsRNAs or dominant negative mutants targeting components of the endosomal machinery: Shibire, Rab4, Rab5, Chmp1 and Rab7. We observed that inhibition of endosomal trafficking at different steps in vivo is systematically associated with defects in lysosome biogenesis, resulting in autophagy flux blockade. Conclusion Our results show that the integrity of the endosomal system is required for lysosome biogenesis and productive autophagy in vivo. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12860-016-0115-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Jacomin
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France.,CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, 17, rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France.,INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France.,Present address: School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Marie-Odile Fauvarque
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France. .,CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, 17, rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France. .,INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France.
| | - Emmanuel Taillebourg
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France. .,CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, 17, rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France. .,INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martins N, Imler JL, Meignin C. Discovery of novel targets for antivirals: learning from flies. Curr Opin Virol 2016; 20:64-70. [PMID: 27657660 DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2016.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Developing antiviral drugs is challenging due to the small number of targets in viruses, and the rapid evolution of viral genes. Animals have evolved a number of efficient antiviral defence mechanisms, which can serve as a source of inspiration for novel therapies. The genetically tractable insect Drosophila belongs to the most diverse group of animals. Genetic and transcriptomic analyses have recently identified Drosophila genes encoding viral restriction factors. Some of them represent evolutionary novelties and their characterization may provide hints for the design of directly acting antivirals. In addition, functional screens revealed conserved host factors required for efficient viral translation, such as the ribosomal protein RACK1 and the release factor Pelo. These proteins are promising candidates for host-targeted antivirals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson Martins
- CNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean-Luc Imler
- CNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Faculté des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Carine Meignin
- CNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Faculté des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cao C, Magwire MM, Bayer F, Jiggins FM. A Polymorphism in the Processing Body Component Ge-1 Controls Resistance to a Naturally Occurring Rhabdovirus in Drosophila. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005387. [PMID: 26799957 PMCID: PMC4723093 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 12/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Hosts encounter an ever-changing array of pathogens, so there is continual selection for novel ways to resist infection. A powerful way to understand how hosts evolve resistance is to identify the genes that cause variation in susceptibility to infection. Using high-resolution genetic mapping we have identified a naturally occurring polymorphism in a gene called Ge-1 that makes Drosophila melanogaster highly resistant to its natural pathogen Drosophila melanogaster sigma virus (DMelSV). By modifying the sequence of the gene in transgenic flies, we identified a 26 amino acid deletion in the serine-rich linker region of Ge-1 that is causing the resistance. Knocking down the expression of the susceptible allele leads to a decrease in viral titre in infected flies, indicating that Ge-1 is an existing restriction factor whose antiviral effects have been increased by the deletion. Ge-1 plays a central role in RNA degradation and the formation of processing bodies (P bodies). A key effector in antiviral immunity, the RNAi induced silencing complex (RISC), localises to P bodies, but we found that Ge-1-based resistance is not dependent on the small interfering RNA (siRNA) pathway. However, we found that Decapping protein 1 (DCP1) protects flies against sigma virus. This protein interacts with Ge-1 and commits mRNA for degradation by removing the 5’ cap, suggesting that resistance may rely on this RNA degradation pathway. The serine-rich linker domain of Ge-1 has experienced strong selection during the evolution of Drosophila, suggesting that this gene may be under long-term selection by viruses. These findings demonstrate that studying naturally occurring polymorphisms that increase resistance to infections enables us to identify novel forms of antiviral defence, and support a pattern of major effect polymorphisms controlling resistance to viruses in Drosophila. Hosts and their pathogens are engaged in a never-ending arms race, and hosts must continually evolve new defences to protect themselves from infection. In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster we show that virus resistance can evolve through a single mutation. In flies that are highly resistant to a naturally occurring virus called sigma virus we identified a deletion in the protein-coding region of a gene called Ge-1. We experimentally confirmed that this was the cause of resistance by deleting this region in transgenic flies. Furthermore, we show that even the susceptible allele of Ge-1 helps protect flies against the virus, suggesting that this mutation has made an existing antiviral defence more effective. Ge-1 plays a central role in RNA degradation in regions of the cytoplasm called P bodies, and our results suggest that this pathway has been recruited during evolution to protect D. melanogaster against sigma virus. The protein domain that contains the deletion has experienced strong selection during its evolution, suggesting that it may be involved in an ongoing arms race with viruses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Cao
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Michael M. Magwire
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Florian Bayer
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Francis M. Jiggins
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jacomin AC, Bescond A, Soleilhac E, Gallet B, Schoehn G, Fauvarque MO, Taillebourg E. The Deubiquitinating Enzyme UBPY Is Required for Lysosomal Biogenesis and Productive Autophagy in Drosophila. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143078. [PMID: 26571504 PMCID: PMC4646453 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Autophagy is a catabolic process that delivers cytoplasmic components to the lysosomes. Protein modification by ubiquitination is involved in this pathway: it regulates the stability of autophagy regulators such as BECLIN-1 and it also functions as a tag targeting specific substrates to autophagosomes. In order to identify deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) involved in autophagy, we have performed a genetic screen in the Drosophila larval fat body. This screen identified Uch-L3, Usp45, Usp12 and Ubpy. In this paper, we show that Ubpy loss of function results in the accumulation of autophagosomes due to a blockade of the autophagy flux. Furthermore, analysis by electron and confocal microscopy of Ubpy-depleted fat body cells revealed altered lysosomal morphology, indicating that Ubpy inactivation affects lysosomal maintenance and/or biogenesis. Lastly, we have shown that shRNA mediated inactivation of UBPY in HeLa cells affects autophagy in a different way: in UBPY-depleted HeLa cells autophagy is deregulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Jacomin
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France; CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, F-38054, Grenoble, France; INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France
| | - Amandine Bescond
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France; CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, F-38054, Grenoble, France; INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France
| | - Emmanuelle Soleilhac
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France; CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, F-38054, Grenoble, France; INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France
| | - Benoît Gallet
- Université Grenoble Alpes, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France; CNRS, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France; CEA, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
| | - Guy Schoehn
- Université Grenoble Alpes, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France; CNRS, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France; CEA, IBS, F-38044, Grenoble, France
| | - Marie-Odile Fauvarque
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France; CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, F-38054, Grenoble, France; INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France
- * E-mail: (ET); (MOF)
| | - Emmanuel Taillebourg
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, F-38041, Grenoble, France; CEA-DSV-iRTSV-BGE-Gen&Chem, F-38054, Grenoble, France; INSERM, U1038, F-38054, Grenoble, France
- * E-mail: (ET); (MOF)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jain A, Rusten TE, Katheder N, Elvenes J, Bruun JA, Sjøttem E, Lamark T, Johansen T. p62/Sequestosome-1, Autophagy-related Gene 8, and Autophagy in Drosophila Are Regulated by Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-related Factor 2 (NRF2), Independent of Transcription Factor TFEB. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:14945-62. [PMID: 25931115 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.656116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The selective autophagy receptor p62/sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) interacts directly with LC3 and is involved in oxidative stress signaling in two ways in mammals. First, p62 is transcriptionally induced upon oxidative stress by the NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) by direct binding to an antioxidant response element in the p62 promoter. Second, p62 accumulation, occurring when autophagy is impaired, leads to increased p62 binding to the NRF2 inhibitor KEAP1, resulting in reduced proteasomal turnover of NRF2. This gives chronic oxidative stress signaling through a feed forward loop. Here, we show that the Drosophila p62/SQSTM1 orthologue, Ref(2)P, interacts directly with DmAtg8a via an LC3-interacting region motif, supporting a role for Ref(2)P in selective autophagy. The ref(2)P promoter also contains a functional antioxidant response element that is directly bound by the NRF2 orthologue, CncC, which can induce ref(2)P expression along with the oxidative stress-associated gene gstD1. However, distinct from the situation in mammals, Ref(2)P does not interact directly with DmKeap1 via a KEAP1-interacting region motif; nor does ectopically expressed Ref(2)P or autophagy deficiency activate the oxidative stress response. Instead, DmAtg8a interacts directly with DmKeap1, and DmKeap1 is removed upon programmed autophagy in Drosophila gut cells. Strikingly, CncC induced increased Atg8a levels and autophagy independent of TFEB/MitF in fat body and larval gut tissues. Thus, these results extend the intimate relationship between oxidative stress-sensing NRF2/CncC transcription factors and autophagy and suggest that NRF2/CncC may regulate autophagic activity in other organisms too.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Jain
- From the Molecular Cancer Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway and
| | - Tor Erik Rusten
- the Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, 0379 Oslo, Norway
| | - Nadja Katheder
- the Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, 0379 Oslo, Norway
| | - Julianne Elvenes
- From the Molecular Cancer Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway and
| | - Jack-Ansgar Bruun
- From the Molecular Cancer Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway and
| | - Eva Sjøttem
- From the Molecular Cancer Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway and
| | - Trond Lamark
- From the Molecular Cancer Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway and
| | - Terje Johansen
- From the Molecular Cancer Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway and
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huntingtin functions as a scaffold for selective macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol 2015; 17:262-75. [PMID: 25686248 PMCID: PMC4344873 DOI: 10.1038/ncb3101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 297] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Selective macroautophagy is an important protective mechanism against diverse cellular stresses. In contrast to the well-characterized starvation-induced autophagy, the regulation of selective autophagy is largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that Huntingtin, the Huntington’s disease gene product, functions as a scaffold protein for selective macroautophagy but it is dispensable for nonselective macroautophagy. In Drosophila, Huntingtin genetically interacts with autophagy pathway components. In mammalian cells, Huntingtin physically interacts with the autophagy cargo receptor p62 to facilitate its association with the integral autophagosome component LC3 and with lysine-63-linked ubiquitin-modified substrates. Maximal activation of selective autophagy during stress is attained by the ability of Huntingtin to bind ULK1, a kinase that initiates autophagy, which releases ULK1 from negative regulation via mTOR. Our data uncover an important physiological function of Huntingtin and provide a missing link in the activation of selective macroautophagy in metazoans.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lamiable O, Imler JL. Induced antiviral innate immunity in Drosophila. Curr Opin Microbiol 2014; 20:62-8. [PMID: 24907422 DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2014] [Revised: 05/03/2014] [Accepted: 05/11/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Immunity to viral infections in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster involves both RNA interference and additional induced responses. The latter include not only cellular mechanisms such as programmed cell death and autophagy, but also the induction of a large set of genes, some of which contribute to the control of viral replication and resistance to infection. This induced response to infection is complex and involves both virus-specific and cell-type specific mechanisms. We review here recent developments, from the sensing of viral infection to the induction of signaling pathways and production of antiviral effector molecules. Our current understanding, although still partial, validates the Drosophila model of antiviral induced immunity for insect pests and disease vectors, as well as for mammals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Lamiable
- CNRS-UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, 15 rue Descartes, F-67084 Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean-Luc Imler
- CNRS-UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, 15 rue Descartes, F-67084 Strasbourg, France; Faculté des Sciences de la Vie, Université de Strasbourg, 28 rue Goethe, F-67083 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xu J, Cherry S. Viruses and antiviral immunity in Drosophila. DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY 2014; 42:67-84. [PMID: 23680639 PMCID: PMC3826445 DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2013] [Revised: 04/26/2013] [Accepted: 05/02/2013] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Viral pathogens present many challenges to organisms, driving the evolution of a myriad of antiviral strategies to combat infections. A wide variety of viruses infect invertebrates, including both natural pathogens that are insect-restricted, and viruses that are transmitted to vertebrates. Studies using the powerful tools in the model organism Drosophila have expanded our understanding of antiviral defenses against diverse viruses. In this review, we will cover three major areas. First, we will describe the tools used to study viruses in Drosophila. Second, we will survey the major viruses that have been studied in Drosophila. And lastly, we will discuss the well-characterized mechanisms that are active against these diverse pathogens, focusing on non-RNAi mediated antiviral mechanisms. Antiviral RNAi is discussed in another paper in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Xu
- Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moy RH, Cherry S. Antimicrobial autophagy: a conserved innate immune response in Drosophila. J Innate Immun 2013; 5:444-55. [PMID: 23689401 DOI: 10.1159/000350326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2012] [Accepted: 03/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Autophagy is a highly conserved degradative pathway that has rapidly emerged as a critical component of immunity and host defense. Studies have implicated autophagy genes in restricting the replication of a diverse array of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses and protozoans. However, in most cases, the in vivo role of antimicrobial autophagy against pathogens has been undefined. Drosophila provides a genetically tractable model system that can be easily adapted to study autophagy in innate immunity, and recent studies in flies have demonstrated that autophagy is an essential antimicrobial response against bacteria and viruses in vivo. These findings reveal striking conservation of antimicrobial autophagy between flies and mammals, and in particular, the role of pathogen-associated pattern recognition in triggering this response. This review discusses our current understanding of antimicrobial autophagy in Drosophila and its potential relevance to human immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan H Moy
- Department of Microbiology, Penn Genome Frontiers Institute, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Westra ER, Swarts DC, Staals RHJ, Jore MM, Brouns SJJ, van der Oost J. The CRISPRs, they are a-changin': how prokaryotes generate adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Genet 2013; 46:311-39. [PMID: 23145983 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
All organisms need to continuously adapt to changes in their environment. Through horizontal gene transfer, bacteria and archaea can rapidly acquire new traits that may contribute to their survival. However, because new DNA may also cause damage, removal of imported DNA and protection against selfish invading DNA elements are also important. Hence, there should be a delicate balance between DNA uptake and DNA degradation. Here, we describe prokaryotic antiviral defense systems, such as receptor masking or mutagenesis, blocking of phage DNA injection, restriction/modification, and abortive infection. The main focus of this review is on CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas (CRISPR-associated), a prokaryotic adaptive immune system. Since its recent discovery, our biochemical understanding of this defense system has made a major leap forward. Three highly diverse CRISPR/Cas types exist that display major structural and functional differences in their mode of generating resistance against invading nucleic acids. Because several excellent recent reviews cover all CRISPR subtypes, we mainly focus on a detailed description of the type I-E CRISPR/Cas system of the model bacterium Escherichia coli K12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edze R Westra
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dong X, Levine B. Autophagy and viruses: adversaries or allies? J Innate Immun 2013; 5:480-93. [PMID: 23391695 DOI: 10.1159/000346388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2012] [Accepted: 12/07/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The autophagy pathway is an essential component of host defense against viral infection, orchestrating pathogen degradation (xenophagy), innate immune signaling, and certain aspects of adaptive immunity. Single autophagy proteins or cassettes of the core autophagy machinery can also function as antiviral factors independently of the canonical autophagy pathway. Moreover, to survive and propagate within the host, viruses have evolved a variety of strategies to evade autophagic attack and manipulate the autophagy machinery for their own benefit. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the antiviral and proviral roles of autophagy and previously unappreciated autophagy-independent functions of autophagy-related genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaonan Dong
- Center for Autophagy Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Longdon B, Jiggins FM. Vertically transmitted viral endosymbionts of insects: do sigma viruses walk alone? Proc Biol Sci 2012; 279:3889-98. [PMID: 22859592 PMCID: PMC3427579 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2012] [Accepted: 07/06/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Insects are host to a wide range of vertically transmitted bacterial endosymbionts, but we know relatively little about their viral counterparts. Here, we discuss the vertically transmitted viral endosymbionts of insects, firstly examining the diversity of this group, and then focusing on the well-studied sigma viruses that infect dipterans. Despite limited sampling, evidence suggests that vertically transmitted viruses may be common in insects. Unlike bacteria, viruses can be transmitted through sperm and eggs, a trait that allows them to rapidly spread through host populations even when infection is costly to the host. Work on Drosophila melanogaster has shown that sigma viruses and their hosts are engaged in a coevolutionary arms race, in which the spread of resistance genes in the host population is followed by the spread of viral genotypes that can overcome host resistance. In the long-term, associations between sigma viruses and their hosts are unstable, and the viruses persist by occasionally switching to new host species. It therefore seems likely that viral endosymbionts have major impacts on the evolution and ecology of insects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Longdon
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Sequestosome 1 (p62/SQSTM1) is a multifunctional adapter protein implicated in selective autophagy, cell signaling pathways, and tumorigenesis. RECENT ADVANCES Recent evidence has revealed that p62/SQSTM1 has a critical role in an oxidative stress response pathway by its direct interaction with the ubiquitin ligase adaptor Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), which results in constitutive activation of the transcription factor NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2). CRITICAL ISSUES Both NRF2 and KEAP1 are frequently mutated in cancer. The findings just cited uncover a link between p62/SQSTM1, autophagy, and the KEAP1-NRF2 stress response pathway in tumorigenesis and shed light on the interplay between autophagy and cancer. FUTURE DIRECTIONS Here, we review the mechanisms by which p62/SQSTM1 implements its multiple roles in the regulation of tumorigenesis with emphasis on the KEAP1-NRF2 stress response signaling pathway. Uncovering the molecular mechanisms of p62/SQSTM1 function in oxidative stress signaling might contribute to elucidating its role in tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis P Nezis
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
The selectivity and specificity of autophagy in Drosophila. Cells 2012; 1:248-62. [PMID: 24710475 PMCID: PMC3901107 DOI: 10.3390/cells1030248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2012] [Revised: 06/19/2012] [Accepted: 06/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Autophagy is a process of cellular self-degradation and is a major pathway for elimination of cytoplasmic material by the lysosomes. Autophagy is responsible for the degradation of damaged organelles and protein aggregates and therefore plays a significant role in cellular homeostasis. Despite the initial belief that autophagy is a nonselective bulk process, there is growing evidence during the last years that sequestration and degradation of cellular material by autophagy can be accomplished in a selective and specific manner. Given the role of autophagy and selective autophagy in several disease related processes such as tumorigenesis, neurodegeneration and infections, it is very important to dissect the molecular mechanisms of selective autophagy, in the context of the system and the organism. An excellent genetically tractable model organism to study autophagy is Drosophila, which appears to have a highly conserved autophagic machinery compared with mammals. However, the mechanisms of selective autophagy in Drosophila have been largely unexplored. The aim of this review is to summarize recent discoveries about the selectivity of autophagy in Drosophila.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ballinger MJ, Bruenn JA, Taylor DJ. Phylogeny, integration and expression of sigma virus-like genes in Drosophila. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2012; 65:251-8. [PMID: 22750113 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2012] [Revised: 06/07/2012] [Accepted: 06/14/2012] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The recent and surprising discovery of widespread NIRVs (non-retroviral integrated RNA viruses) has highlighted the importance of genomic interactions between non-retroviral RNA viruses and their eukaryotic hosts. Among the viruses with integrated representatives are the rhabdoviruses, a family of negative sense single-stranded RNA viruses. We identify sigma virus-like NIRVs of Drosophila spp. that represent unique cases where NIRVs are closely related to exogenous RNA viruses in a model host organism. We have used a combination of bioinformatics and laboratory methods to explore the evolution and expression of sigma virus-like NIRVs in Drosophila. Recent integrations in Drosophila provide a promising experimental system to study functionality of NIRVs. Moreover, the genomic architecture of recent NIRVs provides an unusual evolutionary window on the integration mechanism. For example, we found that a sigma virus-like polymerase associated protein (P) gene appears to have been integrated by template switching of the blastopia-like LTR retrotransposon. The sigma virus P-like NIRV is present in multiple retroelement fused open reading frames on the X and 3R chromosomes of Drosophila yakuba - the X-linked copy is transcribed to produce an RNA product in adult flies. We present the first account of sigma virus-like NIRVs and the first example of NIRV expression in a model animal system, and therefore provide a platform for further study of the possible functions of NIRVs in animal hosts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Ballinger
- Department of Biological Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Taillebourg E, Gregoire I, Viargues P, Jacomin AC, Thevenon D, Faure M, Fauvarque MO. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP36 controls selective autophagy activation by ubiquitinated proteins. Autophagy 2012; 8:767-79. [PMID: 22622177 DOI: 10.4161/auto.19381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Initially described as a nonspecific degradation process induced upon starvation, autophagy is now known also to be involved in the degradation of specific ubiquitinated substrates such as mitochondria, bacteria and aggregated proteins, ensuring crucial functions in cell physiology and immunity. We report here that the deubiquitinating enzyme USP36 controls selective autophagy activation in Drosophila and in human cells. We show that dUsp36 loss of function autonomously inhibits cell growth while activating autophagy. Despite the phenotypic similarity, dUSP36 is not part of the TOR signaling pathway. Autophagy induced by dUsp36 loss of function depends on p62/SQSTM1, an adaptor for delivering cargo marked by polyubiquitin to autophagosomes. Consistent with p62 requirement, dUsp36 mutant cells display nuclear aggregates of ubiquitinated proteins, including Histone H2B, and cytoplasmic ubiquitinated proteins; the latter are eliminated by autophagy. Importantly, USP36 function in p62-dependent selective autophagy is conserved in human cells. Our work identifies a novel, crucial role for a deubiquitinating enzyme in selective autophagy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Taillebourg
- CEA/Institut de Recherches en Technologies et Sciences pour le Vivant, Laboratoire de Biologie à Grande Echelle, Grenoble, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nezis IP. Selective autophagy in Drosophila. Int J Cell Biol 2012; 2012:146767. [PMID: 22567011 PMCID: PMC3332208 DOI: 10.1155/2012/146767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2011] [Revised: 02/01/2012] [Accepted: 02/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process of cellular self-eating and is a major pathway for degradation of cytoplasmic material by the lysosomal machinery. Autophagy functions as a cellular response in nutrient starvation, but it is also associated with the removal of protein aggregates and damaged organelles and therefore plays an important role in the quality control of proteins and organelles. Although it was initially believed that autophagy occurs randomly in the cell, during the last years, there is growing evidence that sequestration and degradation of cytoplasmic material by autophagy can be selective. Given the important role of autophagy and selective autophagy in several disease-related processes such as neurodegeneration, infections, and tumorigenesis, it is important to understand the molecular mechanisms of selective autophagy, especially at the organismal level. Drosophila is an excellent genetically modifiable model organism exhibiting high conservation in the autophagic machinery. However, the regulation and mechanisms of selective autophagy in Drosophila have been largely unexplored. In this paper, I will present an overview of the current knowledge about selective autophagy in Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis P. Nezis
- Department of Biochemistry, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- Laboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Biological Applications and Technologies, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Manipulation or capitulation: virus interactions with autophagy. Microbes Infect 2011; 14:126-39. [PMID: 22051604 PMCID: PMC3264745 DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2011] [Revised: 09/26/2011] [Accepted: 09/27/2011] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Autophagy is a homeostatic process that functions to balance cellular metabolism and promote cell survival during stressful conditions by delivering cytoplasmic components for lysosomal degradation and subsequent recycling. During viral infection, autophagy can act as a surveillance mechanism that delivers viral antigens to the endosomal/lysosomal compartments that are enriched in immune sensors. Additionally, activated immune sensors can signal to activate autophagy. To evade this antiviral activity, many viruses elaborate functions to block the autophagy pathway at a variety of steps. Alternatively, some viruses actively subvert autophagy for their own benefit. Manipulated autophagy has been proposed to facilitate nearly every stage of the viral lifecycle in direct and indirect ways. In this review, we synthesize the extensive literature on virus–autophagy interactions, emphasizing the role of autophagy in antiviral immunity and the mechanisms by which viruses subvert autophagy for their own benefit.
Collapse
|
30
|
Wang JH, Valanne S, Rämet M. Drosophila as a model for antiviral immunity. World J Biol Chem 2010; 1:151-9. [PMID: 21541000 PMCID: PMC3083956 DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v1.i5.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2010] [Revised: 05/04/2010] [Accepted: 05/17/2010] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has been successfully used to study numerous biological processes including immune response. Flies are naturally infected with more than twenty RNA viruses making it a valid model organism to study host-pathogen interactions during viral infections. The Drosophila antiviral immunity includes RNA interference, activation of the JAK/STAT and other signaling cascades and other mechanisms such as autophagy and interactions with other microorganisms. Here we review Drosophila as an immunological research model as well as recent advances in the field of Drosophila antiviral immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Huan Wang
- Jing-Huan Wang, Susanna Valanne, Mika Rämet, Institute of Medical Technology, University of Tampere, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a powerful model to study host-pathogen interactions. Most studies so far have focused on extracellular pathogens such as bacteria and fungi. More recently, viruses have come to the front, and RNA interference was shown to play a critical role in the control of viral infections in drosophila. We review here our current knowledge on drosophila viruses. A diverse set of RNA viruses belonging to several families (Rhabdoviridae, Dicistroviridae, Birnaviridae, Reoviridae, Errantiviridae) has been reported in D. melanogaster. By contrast, no DNA virus has been recovered up to now. The drosophila viruses represent powerful tools to study virus-cell interactions in vivo. Analysis of the literature however reveals that for many of them, important gaps exist in our understanding of their replication cycle, genome organization, morphology or pathogenesis. The data obtained in the past few years on antiviral defense mechanisms in drosophila, which point to evolutionary conserved pathways, highlight the potential of the D. melanogaster model to study antiviral innate immunity and to better understand the complex interaction between arthropod-borne viruses and their insect vectors.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ammar ED, Tsai CW, Whitfield AE, Redinbaugh MG, Hogenhout SA. Cellular and molecular aspects of rhabdovirus interactions with insect and plant hosts. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY 2009; 54:447-68. [PMID: 18793103 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The rhabdoviruses form a large family (Rhabdoviridae) whose host ranges include humans, other vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants. There are at least 90 plant-infecting rhabdoviruses, several of which are economically important pathogens of various crops. All definitive plant-infecting and many vertebrate-infecting rhabdoviruses are persistently transmitted by insect vectors, and a few putative plant rhabdoviruses are transmitted by mites. Plant rhabdoviruses replicate in their plant and arthropod hosts, and transmission by vectors is highly specific, with each virus species transmitted by one or a few related insect species, mainly aphids, leafhoppers, or planthoppers. Here, we provide an overview of plant rhabdovirus interactions with their insect hosts and of how these interactions compare with those of vertebrate-infecting viruses and with the Sigma rhabdovirus that infects Drosophila flies. We focus on cellular and molecular aspects of vector/host specificity, transmission barriers, and virus receptors in the vectors. In addition, we briefly discuss recent advances in understanding rhabdovirus-plant interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- El-Desouky Ammar
- Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University-OARDC, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Genetic variation affecting host-parasite interactions: different genes affect different aspects of sigma virus replication and transmission in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2008; 178:2191-9. [PMID: 18430944 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.085449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In natural populations, genetic variation affects resistance to disease. Knowing how much variation exists, and understanding the genetic architecture of this variation, is important for medicine, for agriculture, and for understanding evolutionary processes. To investigate the extent and nature of genetic variation affecting resistance to pathogens, we are studying a tractable model system: Drosophila melanogaster and its natural pathogen the vertically transmitted sigma virus. We show that considerable genetic variation affects transmission of the virus from parent to offspring. However, maternal and paternal transmission of the virus is affected by different genes. Maternal transmission is a simple Mendelian trait: most of the genetic variation is explained by a polymorphism in ref(2)P, a gene already well known to affect resistance to sigma. In contrast, there is considerable genetic variation in paternal transmission that cannot be explained by ref(2)P and is caused by other loci on chromosome 2. Furthermore, we found no genetic correlation between paternal transmission of the virus and resistance to infection by the sigma virus following injection. This suggests that different loci affect viral replication and paternal transmission.
Collapse
|
34
|
Nezis IP, Simonsen A, Sagona AP, Finley K, Gaumer S, Contamine D, Rusten TE, Stenmark H, Brech A. Ref(2)P, the Drosophila melanogaster homologue of mammalian p62, is required for the formation of protein aggregates in adult brain. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 180:1065-71. [PMID: 18347073 PMCID: PMC2290837 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200711108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 300] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
p62 has been proposed to mark ubiquitinated protein bodies for autophagic degradation. We report that the Drosophila melanogaster p62 orthologue, Ref(2)P, is a regulator of protein aggregation in the adult brain. We demonstrate that Ref(2)P localizes to age-induced protein aggregates as well as to aggregates caused by reduced autophagic or proteasomal activity. A similar localization to protein aggregates is also observed in D. melanogaster models of human neurodegenerative diseases. Although atg8a autophagy mutant flies show accumulation of ubiquitin- and Ref(2)P-positive protein aggregates, this is abrogated in atg8a/ref(2)P double mutants. Both the multimerization and ubiquitin binding domains of Ref(2)P are required for aggregate formation in vivo. Our findings reveal a major role for Ref(2)P in the formation of ubiquitin-positive protein aggregates both under physiological conditions and when normal protein turnover is inhibited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis P Nezis
- Department of Biochemistry, Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo and Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|