1
|
Rangwala SH, Rudnev DV, Ananiev VV, Oh DH, Asztalos A, Benica B, Borodin EA, Bouk N, Evgeniev VI, Kodali VK, Lotov V, Mozes E, Omelchenko MV, Savkina S, Sukharnikov E, Virothaisakun J, Murphy TD, Pruitt KD, Schneider VA. The NCBI Comparative Genome Viewer (CGV) is an interactive visualization tool for the analysis of whole-genome eukaryotic alignments. PLoS Biol 2024; 22:e3002405. [PMID: 38713717 PMCID: PMC11101090 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
We report a new visualization tool for analysis of whole-genome assembly-assembly alignments, the Comparative Genome Viewer (CGV) (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/cgv/). CGV visualizes pairwise same-species and cross-species alignments provided by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using assembly alignment algorithms developed by us and others. Researchers can examine large structural differences spanning chromosomes, such as inversions or translocations. Users can also navigate to regions of interest, where they can detect and analyze smaller-scale deletions and rearrangements within specific chromosome or gene regions. RefSeq or user-provided gene annotation is displayed where available. CGV currently provides approximately 800 alignments from over 350 animal, plant, and fungal species. CGV and related NCBI viewers are undergoing active development to further meet needs of the research community in comparative genome visualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjida H. Rangwala
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dmitry V. Rudnev
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Victor V. Ananiev
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dong-Ha Oh
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Andrea Asztalos
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Barrett Benica
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Evgeny A. Borodin
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nathan Bouk
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Vladislav I. Evgeniev
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Vamsi K. Kodali
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Vadim Lotov
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Eyal Mozes
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Marina V. Omelchenko
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sofya Savkina
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Ekaterina Sukharnikov
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Joël Virothaisakun
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Terence D. Murphy
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kim D. Pruitt
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Valerie A. Schneider
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wright CJ, Stevens L, Mackintosh A, Lawniczak M, Blaxter M. Comparative genomics reveals the dynamics of chromosome evolution in Lepidoptera. Nat Ecol Evol 2024; 8:777-790. [PMID: 38383850 PMCID: PMC11009112 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02329-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Chromosomes are a central unit of genome organization. One-tenth of all described species on Earth are butterflies and moths, the Lepidoptera, which generally possess 31 chromosomes. However, some species display dramatic variation in chromosome number. Here we analyse 210 chromosomally complete lepidopteran genomes and show that the chromosomes of extant lepidopterans are derived from 32 ancestral linkage groups, which we term Merian elements. Merian elements have remained largely intact through 250 million years of evolution and diversification. Against this stable background, eight lineages have undergone extensive reorganization either through numerous fissions or a combination of fusion and fission events. Outside these lineages, fusions are rare and fissions are rarer still. Fusions often involve small, repeat-rich Merian elements and the sex-linked element. Our results reveal the constraints on genome architecture in Lepidoptera and provide a deeper understanding of chromosomal rearrangements in eukaryotic genome evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lewis Stevens
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Mark Blaxter
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bredeson JV, Mudd AB, Medina-Ruiz S, Mitros T, Smith OK, Miller KE, Lyons JB, Batra SS, Park J, Berkoff KC, Plott C, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Aguirre-Figueroa G, Khokha MK, Lane M, Philipp I, Laslo M, Hanken J, Kerdivel G, Buisine N, Sachs LM, Buchholz DR, Kwon T, Smith-Parker H, Gridi-Papp M, Ryan MJ, Denton RD, Malone JH, Wallingford JB, Straight AF, Heald R, Hockemeyer D, Harland RM, Rokhsar DS. Conserved chromatin and repetitive patterns reveal slow genome evolution in frogs. Nat Commun 2024; 15:579. [PMID: 38233380 PMCID: PMC10794172 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43012-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Frogs are an ecologically diverse and phylogenetically ancient group of anuran amphibians that include important vertebrate cell and developmental model systems, notably the genus Xenopus. Here we report a high-quality reference genome sequence for the western clawed frog, Xenopus tropicalis, along with draft chromosome-scale sequences of three distantly related emerging model frog species, Eleutherodactylus coqui, Engystomops pustulosus, and Hymenochirus boettgeri. Frog chromosomes have remained remarkably stable since the Mesozoic Era, with limited Robertsonian (i.e., arm-preserving) translocations and end-to-end fusions found among the smaller chromosomes. Conservation of synteny includes conservation of centromere locations, marked by centromeric tandem repeats associated with Cenp-a binding surrounded by pericentromeric LINE/L1 elements. This work explores the structure of chromosomes across frogs, using a dense meiotic linkage map for X. tropicalis and chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) data for all species. Abundant satellite repeats occupy the unusually long (~20 megabase) terminal regions of each chromosome that coincide with high rates of recombination. Both embryonic and differentiated cells show reproducible associations of centromeric chromatin and of telomeres, reflecting a Rabl-like configuration. Our comparative analyses reveal 13 conserved ancestral anuran chromosomes from which contemporary frog genomes were constructed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessen V Bredeson
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
- DOE-Joint Genome Institute, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Austin B Mudd
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Sofia Medina-Ruiz
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Therese Mitros
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Owen Kabnick Smith
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Beckman Center 409, Stanford, CA, 94305-5307, USA
| | - Kelly E Miller
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Jessica B Lyons
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Sanjit S Batra
- Computer Science Division, University of California Berkeley, 2626 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Joseph Park
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Kodiak C Berkoff
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Christopher Plott
- HudsonAlpha Genome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35806, USA
| | - Jane Grimwood
- HudsonAlpha Genome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35806, USA
| | - Jeremy Schmutz
- HudsonAlpha Genome Sequencing Center, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35806, USA
| | - Guadalupe Aguirre-Figueroa
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Beckman Center 409, Stanford, CA, 94305-5307, USA
| | - Mustafa K Khokha
- Pediatric Genomics Discovery Program, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Maura Lane
- Pediatric Genomics Discovery Program, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Isabelle Philipp
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Mara Laslo
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - James Hanken
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Gwenneg Kerdivel
- Département Adaptation du Vivant, UMR 7221 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Buisine
- Département Adaptation du Vivant, UMR 7221 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
| | - Laurent M Sachs
- Département Adaptation du Vivant, UMR 7221 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
| | - Daniel R Buchholz
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Taejoon Kwon
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, 44919, Republic of Korea
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan, 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Heidi Smith-Parker
- Department of Integrative Biology, Patterson Labs, 2401 Speedway, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Marcos Gridi-Papp
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA, 95211, USA
| | - Michael J Ryan
- Department of Integrative Biology, Patterson Labs, 2401 Speedway, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Robert D Denton
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Institute of Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, 181 Auditorium Road, Unit 3197, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA
| | - John H Malone
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Institute of Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, 181 Auditorium Road, Unit 3197, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA
| | - John B Wallingford
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Patterson Labs, 2401 Speedway, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Aaron F Straight
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Beckman Center 409, Stanford, CA, 94305-5307, USA
| | - Rebecca Heald
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Dirk Hockemeyer
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
- Innovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
- Chan-Zuckerberg BioHub, 499 Illinois Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Richard M Harland
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Daniel S Rokhsar
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Weill Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
- DOE-Joint Genome Institute, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
- Innovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
- Chan-Zuckerberg BioHub, 499 Illinois Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa, 9040495, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stevens L, Kieninger M, Chan B, Wood JMD, Gonzalez de la Rosa P, Allen J, Blaxter M. The genome of Litomosoides sigmodontis illuminates the origins of Y chromosomes in filarial nematodes. PLoS Genet 2024; 20:e1011116. [PMID: 38227589 PMCID: PMC10817185 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Heteromorphic sex chromosomes are usually thought to have originated from a pair of autosomes that acquired a sex-determining locus and subsequently stopped recombining, leading to degeneration of the sex-limited chromosome. The majority of nematode species lack heteromorphic sex chromosomes and determine sex using an X-chromosome counting mechanism, with males being hemizygous for one or more X chromosomes (XX/X0). Some filarial nematode species, including important parasites of humans, have heteromorphic XX/XY karyotypes. It has been assumed that sex is determined by a Y-linked locus in these species. However, karyotypic analyses suggested that filarial Y chromosomes are derived from the unfused homologue of an autosome involved in an X-autosome fusion event. Here, we generated a chromosome-level reference genome for Litomosoides sigmodontis, a filarial nematode with the ancestral filarial karyotype and sex determination mechanism (XX/X0). By mapping the assembled chromosomes to the rhabditid nematode ancestral linkage (or Nigon) elements, we infer that the ancestral filarial X chromosome was the product of a fusion between NigonX (the ancestrally X-linked element) and NigonD (ancestrally autosomal). In the two filarial lineages with XY systems, there have been two independent X-autosome chromosome fusion events involving different autosomal Nigon elements. In both lineages, the region shared by the neo-X and neo-Y chromosomes is within the ancestrally autosomal portion of the X, confirming that the filarial Y chromosomes are derived from the unfused homologue of the autosome. Sex determination in XY filarial nematodes therefore likely continues to operate via the ancestral X-chromosome counting mechanism, rather than via a Y-linked sex-determining locus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lewis Stevens
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Brian Chan
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Judith Allen
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Blaxter
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berdan EL, Barton NH, Butlin R, Charlesworth B, Faria R, Fragata I, Gilbert KJ, Jay P, Kapun M, Lotterhos KE, Mérot C, Durmaz Mitchell E, Pascual M, Peichel CL, Rafajlović M, Westram AM, Schaeffer SW, Johannesson K, Flatt T. How chromosomal inversions reorient the evolutionary process. J Evol Biol 2023; 36:1761-1782. [PMID: 37942504 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Inversions are structural mutations that reverse the sequence of a chromosome segment and reduce the effective rate of recombination in the heterozygous state. They play a major role in adaptation, as well as in other evolutionary processes such as speciation. Although inversions have been studied since the 1920s, they remain difficult to investigate because the reduced recombination conferred by them strengthens the effects of drift and hitchhiking, which in turn can obscure signatures of selection. Nonetheless, numerous inversions have been found to be under selection. Given recent advances in population genetic theory and empirical study, here we review how different mechanisms of selection affect the evolution of inversions. A key difference between inversions and other mutations, such as single nucleotide variants, is that the fitness of an inversion may be affected by a larger number of frequently interacting processes. This considerably complicates the analysis of the causes underlying the evolution of inversions. We discuss the extent to which these mechanisms can be disentangled, and by which approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Berdan
- Bioinformatics Core, Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nicholas H Barton
- Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Klosterneuburg, Austria
| | - Roger Butlin
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Bioscience, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brian Charlesworth
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rui Faria
- CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Vairão, Portugal
| | - Inês Fragata
- CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute/Animal Biology Department, cE3c - Center for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Paul Jay
- Center for GeoGenetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Kapun
- Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Central Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katie E Lotterhos
- Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Claire Mérot
- UMR 6553 Ecobio, Université de Rennes, OSUR, CNRS, Rennes, France
| | - Esra Durmaz Mitchell
- Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Functional Genomics & Metabolism Research Unit, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Marta Pascual
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catherine L Peichel
- Division of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marina Rafajlović
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Linnaeus Centre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anja M Westram
- Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Klosterneuburg, Austria
- Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
| | - Stephen W Schaeffer
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kerstin Johannesson
- Linnaeus Centre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Tjärnö Marine Laboratory, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Strömstad, Sweden
| | - Thomas Flatt
- Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rangwala SH, Rudnev DV, Ananiev VV, Asztalos A, Benica B, Borodin EA, Bouk N, Evgeniev VI, Kodali VK, Lotov V, Mozes E, Oh DH, Omelchenko MV, Savkina S, Sukharnikov E, Virothaisakun J, Murphy TD, Pruitt KD, Schneider VA. Interactive visualization of whole eukaryote genome alignments using NCBI's Comparative Genome Viewer (CGV). BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.30.564672. [PMID: 38077029 PMCID: PMC10705539 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.30.564672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
We report a new visualization tool for analysis of whole genome assembly-assembly alignments, the Comparative Genome Viewer (CGV) (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/cgv/). CGV visualizes pairwise same-species and cross-species alignments provided by NCBI using assembly alignment algorithms developed by us and others. Researchers can examine the alignments between the two assemblies using two alternate views: a chromosome ideogram-based view or a 2D genome dotplot. Whole genome alignment views expose large structural differences spanning chromosomes, such as inversions or translocations. Users can also navigate to regions of interest, where they can detect and analyze smaller-scale deletions and rearrangements within specific chromosome or gene regions. RefSeq or user-provided gene annotation is displayed in the ideogram view where available. CGV currently provides approximately 700 alignments from over 300 animal, plant, and fungal species. CGV and related NCBI viewers are undergoing active development to further meet needs of the research community in comparative genome visualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjida H Rangwala
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Dmitry V Rudnev
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Victor V Ananiev
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Andrea Asztalos
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Barrett Benica
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Evgeny A Borodin
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Nathan Bouk
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Vladislav I Evgeniev
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Vamsi K Kodali
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Vadim Lotov
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Eyal Mozes
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Dong-Ha Oh
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Marina V Omelchenko
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Sofya Savkina
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Ekaterina Sukharnikov
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Joël Virothaisakun
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Terence D. Murphy
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Kim D Pruitt
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Valerie A. Schneider
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Torosin NS, Golla TR, Lawlor MA, Cao W, Ellison CE. Mode and Tempo of 3D Genome Evolution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 2022; 39:6750036. [PMID: 36201625 PMCID: PMC9641997 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msac216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Topologically associating domains (TADs) are thought to play an important role in preventing gene misexpression by spatially constraining enhancer-promoter contacts. The deleterious nature of gene misexpression implies that TADs should, therefore, be conserved among related species. Several early studies comparing chromosome conformation between species reported high levels of TAD conservation; however, more recent studies have questioned these results. Furthermore, recent work suggests that TAD reorganization is not associated with extensive changes in gene expression. Here, we investigate the evolutionary conservation of TADs among 11 species of Drosophila. We use Hi-C data to identify TADs in each species and employ a comparative phylogenetic approach to derive empirical estimates of the rate of TAD evolution. Surprisingly, we find that TADs evolve rapidly. However, we also find that the rate of evolution depends on the chromatin state of the TAD, with TADs enriched for developmentally regulated chromatin evolving significantly slower than TADs enriched for broadly expressed, active chromatin. We also find that, after controlling for differences in chromatin state, highly conserved TADs do not exhibit higher levels of gene expression constraint. These results suggest that, in general, most TADs evolve rapidly and their divergence is not associated with widespread changes in gene expression. However, higher levels of evolutionary conservation and gene expression constraints in TADs enriched for developmentally regulated chromatin suggest that these TAD subtypes may be more important for regulating gene expression, likely due to the larger number of long-distance enhancer-promoter contacts associated with developmental genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole S Torosin
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Tirupathi Rao Golla
- LifeCell, Kelambakkam Main Road, Keelakottaiyur, Chennai 600127, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Matthew A Lawlor
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Weihuan Cao
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marchetti M, Piacentini L, Berloco MF, Casale AM, Cappucci U, Pimpinelli S, Fanti L. Cytological heterogeneity of heterochromatin among 10 sequenced Drosophila species. Genetics 2022; 222:iyac119. [PMID: 35946576 PMCID: PMC9526073 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In Drosophila chromosomal rearrangements can be maintained and are associated with karyotypic variability among populations from different geographic localities. The abundance of variability in gene arrangements among chromosomal arms is even greater when comparing more distantly related species and the study of these chromosomal changes has provided insights into the evolutionary history of species in the genus. In addition, the sequencing of genomes of several Drosophila species has offered the opportunity to establish the global pattern of genomic evolution, at both genetic and chromosomal level. The combined approaches of comparative analysis of syntenic blocks and direct physical maps on polytene chromosomes have elucidated changes in the orientation of genomic sequences and the difference between heterochromatic and euchromatic regions. Unfortunately, the centromeric heterochromatic regions cannot be studied using the cytological maps of polytene chromosomes because they are underreplicated and therefore reside in the chromocenter. In Drosophila melanogaster, a cytological map of the heterochromatin has been elaborated using mitotic chromosomes from larval neuroblasts. In the current work, we have expanded on that mapping by producing cytological maps of the mitotic heterochromatin in an additional 10 sequenced Drosophila species. These maps highlight 2 apparently different paths, for the evolution of the pericentric heterochromatin between the subgenera Sophophora and Drosophila. One path leads toward a progressive complexity of the pericentric heterochromatin (Sophophora) and the other toward a progressive simplification (Drosophila). These maps are also useful for a better understanding how karyotypes have been altered by chromosome arm reshuffling during evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcella Marchetti
- Istituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Piacentini
- Istituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Assunta Maria Casale
- Istituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Ugo Cappucci
- Istituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Pimpinelli
- Istituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Fanti
- Istituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meisel RP. Ecology and the evolution of sex chromosomes. J Evol Biol 2022; 35:1601-1618. [PMID: 35950939 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Sex chromosomes are common features of animal genomes, often carrying a sex determination gene responsible for initiating the development of sexually dimorphic traits. The specific chromosome that serves as the sex chromosome differs across taxa as a result of fusions between sex chromosomes and autosomes, along with sex chromosome turnover-autosomes becoming sex chromosomes and sex chromosomes 'reverting' back to autosomes. In addition, the types of genes on sex chromosomes frequently differ from the autosomes, and genes on sex chromosomes often evolve faster than autosomal genes. Sex-specific selection pressures, such as sexual antagonism and sexual selection, are hypothesized to be responsible for sex chromosome turnovers, the unique gene content of sex chromosomes and the accelerated evolutionary rates of genes on sex chromosomes. Sex-specific selection has pronounced effects on sex chromosomes because their sex-biased inheritance can tilt the balance of selection in favour of one sex. Despite the general consensus that sex-specific selection affects sex chromosome evolution, most population genetic models are agnostic as to the specific sources of these sex-specific selection pressures, and many of the details about the effects of sex-specific selection remain unresolved. Here, I review the evidence that ecological factors, including variable selection across heterogeneous environments and conflicts between sexual and natural selection, can be important determinants of sex-specific selection pressures that shape sex chromosome evolution. I also explain how studying the ecology of sex chromosome evolution can help us understand important and unresolved aspects of both sex chromosome evolution and sex-specific selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard P Meisel
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rondón JJ, Moreyra NN, Pisarenco VA, Rozas J, Hurtado J, Hasson E. Evolution of the odorant-binding protein gene family in Drosophila. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.957247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) are encoded by a gene family involved in the perception of olfactory signals in insects. This chemosensory gene family has been advocated as a candidate to mediate host preference and host shifts in insects, although it also participates in other physiological processes. Remarkable differences in the OBP gene repertoire have been described across insect groups, suggesting an accelerated gene turnover rate. The genus Drosophila, is a valuable resource for ecological genomics studies since it comprises groups of ecologically diverse species and there are genome data for many of them. Here, we investigate the molecular evolution of this chemosensory gene family across 19 Drosophila genomes, including the melanogaster and repleta species groups, which are mostly associated with rotting fruit and cacti, respectively. We also compared the OBP repertoire among the closely related species of the repleta group, associated with different subfamilies of Cactaceae that represent disparate chemical challenges for the flies. We found that the gene family size varies widely between species, ranging from 39 to 54 candidate OBPs. Indeed, more than 54% of these genes are organized in clusters and located on chromosomes X, 2, and 5, with a distribution conserved throughout the genus. The family sizes in the repleta group and D. virilis (virilis-repleta radiation) were smaller than in the melanogaster group. We tested alternative evolutionary models for OBP family size and turnover rates based on different ecological scenarios. We found heterogeneous gene turnover rates (GR) in comparisons involving columnar cactus specialists, prickly pear specialists, and fruit dwellers lineages, and signals of rapid molecular evolution compatible with positive selection in specific OBP genes. Taking ours and previous results together, we propose that this chemosensory gene family is involved in host adaptation and hypothesize that the adoption of the cactophilic lifestyle in the repleta group accelerated the evolution of members of the family.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wright D, Schaeffer SW. The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2022; 377:20210206. [PMID: 35694744 PMCID: PMC9189500 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA within chromosomes in the nucleus is non-randomly organized into chromosome territories, compartments and topologically associated domains (TADs). Chromosomal rearrangements have the potential to alter chromatin organization and modify gene expression leading to selection against these structural variants. Drosophila pseudoobscura has a wealth of naturally occurring gene arrangements that were generated by overlapping inversion mutations caused by two chromosomal breaks that rejoin the central region in reverse order. Unlike humans, Drosophila inversion heterozygotes do not have negative effects associated with crossing over during meiosis because males use achiasmate mechanisms for proper segregation, and aberrant recombinant meiotic products generated in females are lost in polar bodies. As a result, Drosophila populations are found to harbour extensive inversion polymorphisms. It is not clear, however, whether chromatin architecture constrains which inversions breakpoints persist in populations. We mapped the breakpoints of seven inversions in D. pseudoobscura to the TAD map to determine if persisting inversion breakpoints are more likely to occur at boundaries between TADs. Our results show that breakpoints occur at TAD boundaries more than expected by chance. Some breakpoints may alter gene expression within TADs supporting the hypothesis that position effects contribute to inversion establishment. This article is part of the theme issue 'Genomic architecture of supergenes: causes and evolutionary consequences'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dynisty Wright
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Stephen W Schaeffer
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bertocchi NÁ, Oliveira TDD, Deprá M, Goñi B, Valente VLS. Interpopulation variation of transposable elements of the hAT superfamily in Drosophila willistoni (Diptera: Drosophilidae): in-situ approach. Genet Mol Biol 2022; 45:e20210287. [PMID: 35297941 PMCID: PMC8961557 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2021-0287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Transposable elements are abundant and dynamic part of the genome, influencing organisms in different ways through their presence or mobilization, or by acting directly on pre- and post-transcriptional regulatory regions. We compared and evaluated the presence, structure, and copy number of three hAT superfamily transposons (hobo, BuT2, and mar) in five strains of Drosophila willistoni species. These D. willistoni strains are of different geographical origins, sampled across the north-south occurrence of this species. We used sequenced clones of the hAT elements in fluorescence in-situ hybridizations in the polytene chromosomes of three strains of D. willistoni. We also analyzed the structural characteristics and number of copies of these hAT elements in the 10 currently available sequenced genomes of the willistoni group. We found that hobo, BuT2, and mar were widely distributed in D. willistoni polytene chromosomes and sequenced genomes of the willistoni group, except for mar, which is restricted to the subgroup willistoni. Furthermore, the elements hobo, BuT2, and mar have different evolutionary histories. The transposon differences among D. willistoni strains, such as variation in the number, structure, and chromosomal distribution of hAT transposons, could reflect the genomic and chromosomal plasticity of D. willistoni species in adapting to highly variable environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Ávila Bertocchi
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Thays Duarte de Oliveira
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Maríndia Deprá
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Beatriz Goñi
- Universidad de la República, Facultad de Ciencias, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Vera Lúcia S Valente
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Simakov O, Bredeson J, Berkoff K, Marletaz F, Mitros T, Schultz DT, O’Connell BL, Dear P, Martinez DE, Steele RE, Green RE, David CN, Rokhsar DS. Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2022; 8:eabi5884. [PMID: 35108053 PMCID: PMC8809688 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi5884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Animal genomes show networks of deeply conserved gene linkages whose phylogenetic scope and chromosomal context remain unclear. Here, we report chromosome-scale conservation of synteny among bilaterians, cnidarians, and sponges and use comparative analysis to reconstruct ancestral chromosomes across major animal groups. Comparisons among diverse metazoans reveal the processes of chromosome evolution that produced contemporary karyotypes from their Precambrian progenitors. On the basis of these findings, we introduce a simple algebraic representation of chromosomal change and use it to establish a unified systematic framework for metazoan chromosome evolution. We find that fusion-with-mixing, a previously unappreciated mode of chromosome change, has played a central role. We find that relicts of several metazoan chromosomal units are preserved in unicellular eukaryotes. These conserved pre-metazoan linkages include the chromosomal unit that encodes the most diverse set of metazoan homeobox genes, suggesting a candidate genomic context for the early diversification of this key gene family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Simakov
- Department for Neurosciences and Developmental
Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | - Jessen Bredeson
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University
of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Kodiak Berkoff
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University
of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Ferdinand Marletaz
- Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science
and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1, Tancha, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495,
Japan
- Division of Biosciences, University College London,
Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Therese Mitros
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University
of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Darrin T. Schultz
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of
California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
- Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss
Landing, CA 95039, USA
| | - Brendan L. O’Connell
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of
California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Paul Dear
- Mote Research Ltd, Babraham Hall, Babraham, Cambridge
CB2 4AT, UK
| | | | - Robert E. Steele
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of
California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-1700, USA
| | - Richard E. Green
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of
California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Charles N. David
- Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilian University of
Munich, Munich 80539, Germany
| | - Daniel S. Rokhsar
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University
of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
- Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science
and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1, Tancha, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495,
Japan
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, 499 Illinois St., San
Francisco, CA 94158, USA
- U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ranz JM, González PM, Su RN, Bedford SJ, Abreu-Goodger C, Markow T. Multiscale analysis of the randomization limits of the chromosomal gene organization between Lepidoptera and Diptera. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20212183. [PMID: 35042416 PMCID: PMC8767184 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
How chromosome gene organization and gene content evolve among distantly related and structurally malleable genomes remains unresolved. This is particularly the case when considering different insect orders. We have compared the highly contiguous genome assemblies of the lepidopteran Danaus plexippus and the dipteran Drosophila melanogaster, which shared a common ancestor around 290 Ma. The gene content of 23 out of 30 D. plexippus chromosomes was significantly associated with one or two of the six chromosomal elements of the Drosophila genome, denoting common ancestry. Despite the phylogenetic distance, 9.6% of the 1-to-1 orthologues still reside within the same ancestral genome neighbourhood. Furthermore, the comparison D. plexippus-Bombyx mori indicated that the rates of chromosome repatterning are lower in Lepidoptera than in Diptera, although still within the same order of magnitude. Concordantly, 14 developmental gene clusters showed a higher tendency to retain full or partial clustering in D. plexippus, further supporting that the physical association between the SuperHox and NK clusters existed in the ancestral bilaterian. Our results illuminate the scope and limits of the evolution of the gene organization and content of the ancestral chromosomes to the Lepidoptera and Diptera while helping reconstruct portions of the genome in their most recent common ancestor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M. Ranz
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine CA 92647, USA
| | - Pablo M. González
- Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), CINVESTAV, Irapuato GTO 36824, México
| | - Ryan N. Su
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine CA 92647, USA
| | - Sarah J. Bedford
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine CA 92647, USA
| | - Cei Abreu-Goodger
- Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), CINVESTAV, Irapuato GTO 36824, México
| | - Therese Markow
- Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), CINVESTAV, Irapuato GTO 36824, México
- Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Finet C, Kassner VA, Carvalho AB, Chung H, Day JP, Day S, Delaney EK, De Ré FC, Dufour HD, Dupim E, Izumitani HF, Gautério TB, Justen J, Katoh T, Kopp A, Koshikawa S, Longdon B, Loreto EL, Nunes MDS, Raja KKB, Rebeiz M, Ritchie MG, Saakyan G, Sneddon T, Teramoto M, Tyukmaeva V, Vanderlinde T, Wey EE, Werner T, Williams TM, Robe LJ, Toda MJ, Marlétaz F. DrosoPhyla: Resources for Drosophilid Phylogeny and Systematics. Genome Biol Evol 2021; 13:evab179. [PMID: 34343293 PMCID: PMC8382681 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster is a pivotal model for invertebrate development, genetics, physiology, neuroscience, and disease. The whole family Drosophilidae, which contains over 4,400 species, offers a plethora of cases for comparative and evolutionary studies. Despite a long history of phylogenetic inference, many relationships remain unresolved among the genera, subgenera, and species groups in the Drosophilidae. To clarify these relationships, we first developed a set of new genomic markers and assembled a multilocus data set of 17 genes from 704 species of Drosophilidae. We then inferred a species tree with highly supported groups for this family. Additionally, we were able to determine the phylogenetic position of some previously unplaced species. These results establish a new framework for investigating the evolution of traits in fruit flies, as well as valuable resources for systematics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Finet
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Victoria A Kassner
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Antonio B Carvalho
- Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Henry Chung
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, USA
| | - Jonathan P Day
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Day
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Emily K Delaney
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, USA
| | - Francine C De Ré
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Héloïse D Dufour
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Eduardo Dupim
- Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Hiroyuki F Izumitani
- Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Thaísa B Gautério
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Jessa Justen
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Toru Katoh
- Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Artyom Kopp
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, USA
| | - Shigeyuki Koshikawa
- The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Japan
| | - Ben Longdon
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Elgion L Loreto
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Maria D S Nunes
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom
- Centre for Functional Genomics, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom
| | - Komal K B Raja
- Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, USA
| | - Mark Rebeiz
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | - Gayane Saakyan
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, USA
| | - Tanya Sneddon
- School of Biology, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Machiko Teramoto
- The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Japan
| | | | - Thyago Vanderlinde
- Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Emily E Wey
- Department of Biology, University of Dayton, USA
| | - Thomas Werner
- Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, USA
| | | | - Lizandra J Robe
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Masanori J Toda
- Hokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ferdinand Marlétaz
- Centre for Life’s Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gonzalez de la Rosa PM, Thomson M, Trivedi U, Tracey A, Tandonnet S, Blaxter M. A telomere-to-telomere assembly of Oscheius tipulae and the evolution of rhabditid nematode chromosomes. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2021; 11:6026964. [PMID: 33561231 PMCID: PMC8022731 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaa020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Eukaryotic chromosomes have phylogenetic persistence. In many taxa, each chromosome has a single functional centromere with essential roles in spindle attachment and segregation. Fusion and fission can generate chromosomes with no or multiple centromeres, leading to genome instability. Groups with holocentric chromosomes (where centromeric function is distributed along each chromosome) might be expected to show karyotypic instability. This is generally not the case, and in Caenorhabditis elegans, it has been proposed that the role of maintenance of a stable karyotype has been transferred to the meiotic pairing centers, which are found at one end of each chromosome. Here, we explore the phylogenetic stability of nematode chromosomes using a new telomere-to-telomere assembly of the rhabditine nematode Oscheius tipulae generated from nanopore long reads. The 60-Mb O. tipulae genome is resolved into six chromosomal molecules. We find the evidence of specific chromatin diminution at all telomeres. Comparing this chromosomal O. tipulae assembly with chromosomal assemblies of diverse rhabditid nematodes, we identify seven ancestral chromosomal elements (Nigon elements) and present a model for the evolution of nematode chromosomes through rearrangement and fusion of these elements. We identify frequent fusion events involving NigonX, the element associated with the rhabditid X chromosome, and thus sex chromosome-associated gene sets differ markedly between species. Despite the karyotypic stability, gene order within chromosomes defined by Nigon elements is not conserved. Our model for nematode chromosome evolution provides a platform for investigation of the tensions between local genome rearrangement and karyotypic evolution in generating extant genome architectures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marian Thomson
- Edinburgh Genomics, School of Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
| | - Urmi Trivedi
- Edinburgh Genomics, School of Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
| | - Alan Tracey
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Sophie Tandonnet
- Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP 05508-090, Brazil
| | - Mark Blaxter
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chakraborty M, Chang CH, Khost DE, Vedanayagam J, Adrion JR, Liao Y, Montooth KL, Meiklejohn CD, Larracuente AM, Emerson JJ. Evolution of genome structure in the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genome Res 2021; 31:380-396. [PMID: 33563718 PMCID: PMC7919458 DOI: 10.1101/gr.263442.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The rapid evolution of repetitive DNA sequences, including satellite DNA, tandem duplications, and transposable elements, underlies phenotypic evolution and contributes to hybrid incompatibilities between species. However, repetitive genomic regions are fragmented and misassembled in most contemporary genome assemblies. We generated highly contiguous de novo reference genomes for the Drosophila simulans species complex (D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia), which speciated ∼250,000 yr ago. Our assemblies are comparable in contiguity and accuracy to the current D. melanogaster genome, allowing us to directly compare repetitive sequences between these four species. We find that at least 15% of the D. simulans complex species genomes fail to align uniquely to D. melanogaster owing to structural divergence-twice the number of single-nucleotide substitutions. We also find rapid turnover of satellite DNA and extensive structural divergence in heterochromatic regions, whereas the euchromatic gene content is mostly conserved. Despite the overall preservation of gene synteny, euchromatin in each species has been shaped by clade- and species-specific inversions, transposable elements, expansions and contractions of satellite and tRNA tandem arrays, and gene duplications. We also find rapid divergence among Y-linked genes, including copy number variation and recent gene duplications from autosomes. Our assemblies provide a valuable resource for studying genome evolution and its consequences for phenotypic evolution in these genetic model species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahul Chakraborty
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| | - Ching-Ho Chang
- Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
| | - Danielle E Khost
- Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
- FAS Informatics and Scientific Applications, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
| | - Jeffrey Vedanayagam
- Department of Developmental Biology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Adrion
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
| | - Yi Liao
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| | - Kristi L Montooth
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68502, USA
| | - Colin D Meiklejohn
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68502, USA
| | | | - J J Emerson
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Evolutionary Dynamics of the Pericentromeric Heterochromatin in Drosophila virilis and Related Species. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12020175. [PMID: 33513919 PMCID: PMC7911463 DOI: 10.3390/genes12020175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pericentromeric heterochromatin in Drosophila generally consists of repetitive DNA, forming the environment associated with gene silencing. Despite the expanding knowledge of the impact of transposable elements (TEs) on the host genome, little is known about the evolution of pericentromeric heterochromatin, its structural composition, and age. During the evolution of the Drosophilidae, hundreds of genes have become embedded within pericentromeric regions yet retained activity. We investigated a pericentromeric heterochromatin fragment found in D. virilis and related species, describing the evolution of genes in this region and the age of TE invasion. Regardless of the heterochromatic environment, the amino acid composition of the genes is under purifying selection. However, the selective pressure affects parts of genes in varying degrees, resulting in expansion of gene introns due to TEs invasion. According to the divergence of TEs, the pericentromeric heterochromatin of the species of virilis group began to form more than 20 million years ago by invasions of retroelements, miniature inverted repeat transposable elements (MITEs), and Helitrons. Importantly, invasions into the heterochromatin continue to occur by TEs that fall under the scope of piRNA silencing. Thus, the pericentromeric heterochromatin, in spite of its ability to induce silencing, has the means for being dynamic, incorporating the regions of active transcription.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster, a small dipteran of African origin, represents one of the best-studied model organisms. Early work in this system has uniquely shed light on the basic principles of genetics and resulted in a versatile collection of genetic tools that allow to uncover mechanistic links between genotype and phenotype. Moreover, given its worldwide distribution in diverse habitats and its moderate genome-size, Drosophila has proven very powerful for population genetics inference and was one of the first eukaryotes whose genome was fully sequenced. In this book chapter, we provide a brief historical overview of research in Drosophila and then focus on recent advances during the genomic era. After describing different types and sources of genomic data, we discuss mechanisms of neutral evolution including the demographic history of Drosophila and the effects of recombination and biased gene conversion. Then, we review recent advances in detecting genome-wide signals of selection, such as soft and hard selective sweeps. We further provide a brief introduction to background selection, selection of noncoding DNA and codon usage and focus on the role of structural variants, such as transposable elements and chromosomal inversions, during the adaptive process. Finally, we discuss how genomic data helps to dissect neutral and adaptive evolutionary mechanisms that shape genetic and phenotypic variation in natural populations along environmental gradients. In summary, this book chapter serves as a starting point to Drosophila population genomics and provides an introduction to the system and an overview to data sources, important population genetic concepts and recent advances in the field.
Collapse
|
20
|
Torosin NS, Anand A, Golla TR, Cao W, Ellison CE. 3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group. PLoS Genet 2020; 16:e1009229. [PMID: 33284803 PMCID: PMC7746282 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Topologically associating domains, or TADs, are functional units that organize chromosomes into 3D structures of interacting chromatin. TADs play an important role in regulating gene expression by constraining enhancer-promoter contacts and there is evidence that deletion of TAD boundaries leads to aberrant expression of neighboring genes. While the mechanisms of TAD formation have been well-studied, current knowledge on the patterns of TAD evolution across species is limited. Due to the integral role TADs play in gene regulation, their structure and organization is expected to be conserved during evolution. However, more recent research suggests that TAD structures diverge relatively rapidly. We use Hi-C chromosome conformation capture to measure evolutionary conservation of whole TADs and TAD boundary elements between D. melanogaster and D. triauraria, two early-branching species from the melanogaster species group which diverged ∼15 million years ago. We find that the majority of TADs have been reorganized since the common ancestor of D. melanogaster and D. triauraria, via a combination of chromosomal rearrangements and gain/loss of TAD boundaries. TAD reorganization between these two species is associated with a localized effect on gene expression, near the site of disruption. By separating TADs into subtypes based on their chromatin state, we find that different subtypes are evolving under different evolutionary forces. TADs enriched for broadly expressed, transcriptionally active genes are evolving rapidly, potentially due to positive selection, whereas TADs enriched for developmentally-regulated genes remain conserved, presumably due to their importance in restricting gene-regulatory element interactions. These results provide novel insight into the evolutionary dynamics of TADs and help to reconcile contradictory reports related to the evolutionary conservation of TADs and whether changes in TAD structure affect gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole S. Torosin
- Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| | - Aparna Anand
- Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| | - Tirupathi Rao Golla
- Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| | - Weihuan Cao
- Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| | - Christopher E. Ellison
- Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
A phylogenomic study of Steganinae fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae): strong gene tree heterogeneity and evidence for monophyly. BMC Evol Biol 2020; 20:141. [PMID: 33138771 PMCID: PMC7607883 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-01703-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Drosophilidae family is traditionally divided into two subfamilies: Drosophilinae and Steganinae. This division is based on morphological characters, and the two subfamilies have been treated as monophyletic in most of the literature, but some molecular phylogenies have suggested Steganinae to be paraphyletic. To test the paraphyletic-Steganinae hypothesis, here, we used genomic sequences of eight Drosophilidae (three Steganinae and five Drosophilinae) and two Ephydridae (outgroup) species and inferred the phylogeny for the group based on a dataset of 1,028 orthologous genes present in all species (> 1,000,000 bp). This dataset includes three genera that broke the monophyly of the subfamilies in previous works. To investigate possible biases introduced by small sample sizes and automatic gene annotation, we used the same methods to infer species trees from a set of 10 manually annotated genes that are commonly used in phylogenetics. RESULTS Most of the 1,028 gene trees depicted Steganinae as paraphyletic with distinct topologies, but the most common topology depicted it as monophyletic (43.7% of the gene trees). Despite the high levels of gene tree heterogeneity observed, species tree inference in ASTRAL, in PhyloNet, and with the concatenation approach strongly supported the monophyly of both subfamilies for the 1,028-gene dataset. However, when using the concatenation approach to infer a species tree from the smaller set of 10 genes, we recovered Steganinae as a paraphyletic group. The pattern of gene tree heterogeneity was asymmetrical and thus could not be explained solely by incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). CONCLUSIONS Steganinae was clearly a monophyletic group in the dataset that we analyzed. In addition to ILS, gene tree discordance was possibly the result of introgression, suggesting complex branching processes during the early evolution of Drosophilidae with short speciation intervals and gene flow. Our study highlights the importance of genomic data in elucidating contentious phylogenetic relationships and suggests that phylogenetic inference for drosophilids based on small molecular datasets should be performed cautiously. Finally, we suggest an approach for the correction and cleaning of BUSCO-derived genomic datasets that will be useful to other researchers planning to use this tool for phylogenomic studies.
Collapse
|
22
|
Funikov SY, Rezvykh AP, Kulikova DA, Zelentsova ES, Protsenko LA, Chuvakova LN, Tyukmaeva VI, Arkhipova IR, Evgen'ev MB. Adaptation of gene loci to heterochromatin in the course of Drosophila evolution is associated with insulator proteins. Sci Rep 2020; 10:11893. [PMID: 32681087 PMCID: PMC7368049 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68879-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Pericentromeric heterochromatin is generally composed of repetitive DNA forming a transcriptionally repressive environment. Dozens of genes were embedded into pericentromeric heterochromatin during evolution of Drosophilidae lineage while retaining activity. However, factors that contribute to insusceptibility of gene loci to transcriptional silencing remain unknown. Here, we find that the promoter region of genes that can be embedded in both euchromatin and heterochromatin exhibits a conserved structure throughout the Drosophila phylogeny and carries motifs for binding of certain chromatin remodeling factors, including insulator proteins. Using ChIP-seq data, we demonstrate that evolutionary gene relocation between euchromatin and pericentric heterochromatin occurred with preservation of sites of insulation of BEAF-32 in evolutionarily distant species, i.e. D. melanogaster and D. virilis. Moreover, promoters of virtually all protein-coding genes located in heterochromatin in D. melanogaster are enriched with insulator proteins BEAF-32, GAF and dCTCF. Applying RNA-seq of a BEAF-32 mutant, we show that the impairment of BEAF-32 function has a complex effect on gene expression in D. melanogaster, affecting even those genes that lack BEAF-32 association in their promoters. We propose that conserved intrinsic properties of genes, such as sites of insulation near the promoter regions, may contribute to adaptation of genes to the heterochromatic environment and, hence, facilitate the evolutionary relocation of genes loci between euchromatin and heterochromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Yu Funikov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Alexander P Rezvykh
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.,Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - Dina A Kulikova
- Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena S Zelentsova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Lyudmila A Protsenko
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.,Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - Lyubov N Chuvakova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Venera I Tyukmaeva
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Irina R Arkhipova
- Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, USA
| | - Michael B Evgen'ev
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ostevik KL, Samuk K, Rieseberg LH. Ancestral Reconstruction of Karyotypes Reveals an Exceptional Rate of Nonrandom Chromosomal Evolution in Sunflower. Genetics 2020; 214:1031-1045. [PMID: 32033968 PMCID: PMC7153943 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Mapping the chromosomal rearrangements between species can inform our understanding of genome evolution, reproductive isolation, and speciation. Here, we present a novel algorithm for identifying regions of synteny in pairs of genetic maps, which is implemented in the accompanying R package syntR. The syntR algorithm performs as well as previous ad hoc methods while being systematic, repeatable, and applicable to mapping chromosomal rearrangements in any group of species. In addition, we present a systematic survey of chromosomal rearrangements in the annual sunflowers, which is a group known for extreme karyotypic diversity. We build high-density genetic maps for two subspecies of the prairie sunflower, Helianthus petiolaris ssp. petiolaris and H. petiolaris ssp. fallax Using syntR, we identify blocks of synteny between these two subspecies and previously published high-density genetic maps. We reconstruct ancestral karyotypes for annual sunflowers using those synteny blocks and conservatively estimate that there have been 7.9 chromosomal rearrangements per million years, a high rate of chromosomal evolution. Although the rate of inversion is even higher than the rate of translocation in this group, we further find that every extant karyotype is distinguished by between one and three translocations involving only 8 of the 17 chromosomes. This nonrandom exchange suggests that specific chromosomes are prone to translocation and may thus contribute disproportionately to widespread hybrid sterility in sunflowers. These data deepen our understanding of chromosome evolution and confirm that Helianthus has an exceptional rate of chromosomal rearrangement that may facilitate similarly rapid diversification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate L Ostevik
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27701
- Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Kieran Samuk
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27701
| | - Loren H Rieseberg
- Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The physical connections established by recombination are normally sufficient to ensure proper chromosome segregation during female Meiosis I. However, nonexchange chromosomes (such as the Muller F element or "dot" chromosome in D. melanogaster) can still segregate accurately because they remain connected by heterochromatic tethers. A recent study examined female meiosis in the closely related species D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and found a nearly twofold difference in the mean distance the obligately nonexchange dot chromosomes were separated during Prometaphase. That study proposed two speculative hypotheses for this difference, the first being the amount of heterochromatin in each species, and the second being the species' differing tolerance for common inversions in natural populations. We tested these hypotheses by examining female meiosis in 12 additional Drosophila species. While neither hypothesis had significant support, we did see 10-fold variation in dot chromosome sizes, and fivefold variation in the frequency of chromosomes out on the spindle, which were both significantly correlated with chromosome separation distances. In addition to demonstrating that heterochromatin abundance changes chromosome behavior, this implies that the duration of Prometaphase chromosome movements must be proportional to the size of the F element in these species. Additionally, we examined D. willistoni, a species that lacks a free dot chromosome. We observed that chromosomes still moved out on the meiotic spindle, and the F element was always positioned closest to the spindle poles. This result is consistent with models where one role of the dot chromosomes is to help organize the meiotic spindle.
Collapse
|
25
|
Renschler G, Richard G, Valsecchi CIK, Toscano S, Arrigoni L, Ramírez F, Akhtar A. Hi-C guided assemblies reveal conserved regulatory topologies on X and autosomes despite extensive genome shuffling. Genes Dev 2019; 33:1591-1612. [PMID: 31601616 PMCID: PMC6824461 DOI: 10.1101/gad.328971.119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In this study, Renschler et al. set out to analyze the impact of genomic rearrangements on genome topology using the Drosophila genus and X chromosome dosage compensation as a model. The authors developed a scaffolding algorithm and generated chromosome-length assemblies from Hi-C data for studying genome topology in three distantly related Drosophila species. Their data provides unique insights into genome topology evolution. RA Genome rearrangements that occur during evolution impose major challenges on regulatory mechanisms that rely on three-dimensional genome architecture. Here, we developed a scaffolding algorithm and generated chromosome-length assemblies from Hi-C data for studying genome topology in three distantly related Drosophila species. We observe extensive genome shuffling between these species with one synteny breakpoint after approximately every six genes. A/B compartments, a set of large gene-dense topologically associating domains (TADs), and spatial contacts between high-affinity sites (HAS) located on the X chromosome are maintained over 40 million years, indicating architectural conservation at various hierarchies. Evolutionary conserved genes cluster in the vicinity of HAS, while HAS locations appear evolutionarily flexible, thus uncoupling functional requirement of dosage compensation from individual positions on the linear X chromosome. Therefore, 3D architecture is preserved even in scenarios of thousands of rearrangements highlighting its relevance for essential processes such as dosage compensation of the X chromosome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Renschler
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gautier Richard
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,IGEPP, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, Université Rennes, 35600 Le Rheu, France
| | | | - Sarah Toscano
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Laura Arrigoni
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Fidel Ramírez
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Asifa Akhtar
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bracewell R, Chatla K, Nalley MJ, Bachtrog D. Dynamic turnover of centromeres drives karyotype evolution in Drosophila. eLife 2019; 8:e49002. [PMID: 31524597 PMCID: PMC6795482 DOI: 10.7554/elife.49002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Centromeres are the basic unit for chromosome inheritance, but their evolutionary dynamics is poorly understood. We generate high-quality reference genomes for multiple Drosophila obscura group species to reconstruct karyotype evolution. All chromosomes in this lineage were ancestrally telocentric and the creation of metacentric chromosomes in some species was driven by de novo seeding of new centromeres at ancestrally gene-rich regions, independently of chromosomal rearrangements. The emergence of centromeres resulted in a drastic size increase due to repeat accumulation, and dozens of genes previously located in euchromatin are now embedded in pericentromeric heterochromatin. Metacentric chromosomes secondarily became telocentric in the pseudoobscura subgroup through centromere repositioning and a pericentric inversion. The former (peri)centric sequences left behind shrunk dramatically in size after their inactivation, yet contain remnants of their evolutionary past, including increased repeat-content and heterochromatic environment. Centromere movements are accompanied by rapid turnover of the major satellite DNA detected in (peri)centromeric regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Bracewell
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Kamalakar Chatla
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Matthew J Nalley
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Doris Bachtrog
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Connallon T, Olito C, Dutoit L, Papoli H, Ruzicka F, Yong L. Local adaptation and the evolution of inversions on sex chromosomes and autosomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2019; 373:rstb.2017.0423. [PMID: 30150221 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Spatially varying selection with gene flow can favour the evolution of inversions that bind locally adapted alleles together, facilitate local adaptation and ultimately drive genomic divergence between species. Several studies have shown that the rates of spread and establishment of new inversions capturing locally adaptive alleles depend on a suite of evolutionary factors, including the strength of selection for local adaptation, rates of gene flow and recombination, and the deleterious mutation load carried by inversions. Because the balance of these factors is expected to differ between X (or Z) chromosomes and autosomes, opportunities for inversion evolution are likely to systematically differ between these genomic regions, though such scenarios have not been formally modelled. Here, we consider the evolutionary dynamics of X-linked and autosomal inversions in populations evolving at a balance between migration and local selection. We identify three factors that lead to asymmetric rates of X-linked and autosome inversion establishment: (1) sex-biased migration, (2) dominance of locally adapted alleles and (3) chromosome-specific deleterious mutation loads. This theory predicts an elevated rate of fixation, and depressed opportunities for polymorphism, for X-linked inversions. Our survey of data on the genomic distribution of polymorphic and fixed inversions supports both theoretical predictions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Connallon
- School of Biological Sciences, and Centre for Geometric Biology, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 Victoria, Australia
| | - Colin Olito
- School of Biological Sciences, and Centre for Geometric Biology, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden
| | - Ludovic Dutoit
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 9054 Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Homa Papoli
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Filip Ruzicka
- Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Lengxob Yong
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The chromosomes of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): detailed photographic polytene chromosomal maps and in situ hybridization data. Mol Genet Genomics 2019; 294:1535-1546. [PMID: 31346719 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-019-01595-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The spotted wing drosophila, D. suzukii, is a serious agricultural pest attacking a variety of soft fruits and vegetables. Although originating from East Asia it has recently invaded America and Europe raising major concern about its expansion potential and the consequent economic losses. Since cytogenetic information on the species is scarce, we report here the mitotic karyotype and detailed photographic maps of the salivary gland polytene chromosomes of D. suzukii. The mitotic metaphase complement contains three pairs of autosomes, one of which is dot-like, and one pair of heteromorphic (XX/XY) sex chromosomes. The salivary gland polytene complement consists of five long polytene arms, representing the two metacentric autosomes and the acrocentric X chromosome, and one very short polytene element, which corresponds to the dot-like autosome. Banding pattern as well as the most characteristic features and prominent landmarks of each polytene chromosome arm are presented and discussed. Furthermore, twelve gene markers have been mapped on the polytene chromosomes of D. suzukii by in situ hybridization. Their distribution pattern was found quite similar to that of D. melanogaster revealing conservation of synteny although the relative position within each chromosome arm for most of the genes differed significantly between D. suzukii and D. melanogaster. The chromosome information presented here is suitable for comparative cytogenetic studies and phylogenetic exploration, while it could also facilitate the assembly of the genome sequence and support the development of genetic tools for species-specific and environment-friendly biological control applications such as the sterile insect technique.
Collapse
|
29
|
Karageorgiou C, Gámez-Visairas V, Tarrío R, Rodríguez-Trelles F. Long-read based assembly and synteny analysis of a reference Drosophila subobscura genome reveals signatures of structural evolution driven by inversions recombination-suppression effects. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:223. [PMID: 30885123 PMCID: PMC6423853 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5590-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drosophila subobscura has long been a central model in evolutionary genetics. Presently, its use is hindered by the lack of a reference genome. To bridge this gap, here we used PacBio long-read technology, together with the available wealth of genetic marker information, to assemble and annotate a high-quality nuclear and complete mitochondrial genome for the species. With the obtained assembly, we performed the first synteny analysis of genome structure evolution in the subobscura subgroup. RESULTS We generated a highly-contiguous ~ 129 Mb-long nuclear genome, consisting of six pseudochromosomes corresponding to the six chromosomes of a female haploid set, and a complete 15,764 bp-long mitogenome, and provide an account of their numbers and distributions of codifying and repetitive content. All 12 identified paracentric inversion differences in the subobscura subgroup would have originated by chromosomal breakage and repair, with some associated duplications, but no evidence of direct gene disruptions by the breakpoints. Between lineages, inversion fixation rates were 10 times higher in continental D. subobscura than in the two small oceanic-island endemics D. guanche and D. madeirensis. Within D. subobscura, we found contrasting ratios of chromosomal divergence to polymorphism between the A sex chromosome and the autosomes. CONCLUSIONS We present the first high-quality, long-read sequencing of a D. subobscura genome. Our findings generally support genome structure evolution in this species being driven indirectly, through the inversions' recombination-suppression effects in maintaining sets of adaptive alleles together in the face of gene flow. The resources developed will serve to further establish the subobscura subgroup as model for comparative genomics and evolutionary indicator of global change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charikleia Karageorgiou
- Grup de Genòmica, Bioinformàtica i Biologia Evolutiva (GGBE), Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor Gámez-Visairas
- Grup de Genòmica, Bioinformàtica i Biologia Evolutiva (GGBE), Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Tarrío
- Grup de Genòmica, Bioinformàtica i Biologia Evolutiva (GGBE), Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
- Grup de Genòmica, Bioinformàtica i Biologia Evolutiva (GGBE), Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fuller ZL, Koury SA, Phadnis N, Schaeffer SW. How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: Case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species Drosophila persimilis. Mol Ecol 2019; 28:1283-1301. [PMID: 30402909 PMCID: PMC6475473 DOI: 10.1111/mec.14923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Revised: 09/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The gene arrangements of Drosophila have played a prominent role in the history of evolutionary biology from the original quantification of genetic diversity to current studies of the mechanisms for the origin and establishment of new inversion mutations within populations and their subsequent fixation between species supporting reproductive barriers. This review examines the genetic causes and consequences of inversions as recombination suppressors and the role that recombination suppression plays in establishing inversions in populations as they are involved in adaptation within heterogeneous environments. This often results in the formation of clines of gene arrangement frequencies among populations. Recombination suppression leads to the differentiation of the gene arrangements which may accelerate the accumulation of fixed genetic differences among populations. If these fixed mutations cause incompatibilities, then inversions pose important reproductive barriers between species. This review uses the evolution of inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis as a case study for how inversions originate, establish and contribute to the evolution of reproductive isolation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary L. Fuller
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 208 Erwin W. Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802-5301
| | - Spencer A. Koury
- Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
| | - Nitin Phadnis
- Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
| | - Stephen W. Schaeffer
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 208 Erwin W. Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802-5301
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
The Drosophila Dot Chromosome: Where Genes Flourish Amidst Repeats. Genetics 2019; 210:757-772. [PMID: 30401762 PMCID: PMC6218221 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The F element of the Drosophila karyotype (the fourth chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster) is often referred to as the "dot chromosome" because of its appearance in a metaphase chromosome spread. This chromosome is distinct from other Drosophila autosomes in possessing both a high level of repetitious sequences (in particular, remnants of transposable elements) and a gene density similar to that found in the other chromosome arms, ∼80 genes distributed throughout its 1.3-Mb "long arm." The dot chromosome is notorious for its lack of recombination and is often neglected as a consequence. This and other features suggest that the F element is packaged as heterochromatin throughout. F element genes have distinct characteristics (e.g, low codon bias, and larger size due both to larger introns and an increased number of exons), but exhibit expression levels comparable to genes found in euchromatin. Mapping experiments show the presence of appropriate chromatin modifications for the formation of DNaseI hypersensitive sites and transcript initiation at the 5' ends of active genes, but, in most cases, high levels of heterochromatin proteins are observed over the body of these genes. These various features raise many interesting questions about the relationships of chromatin structures with gene and chromosome function. The apparent evolution of the F element as an autosome from an ancestral sex chromosome also raises intriguing questions. The findings argue that the F element is a unique chromosome that occupies its own space in the nucleus. Further study of the F element should provide new insights into chromosome structure and function.
Collapse
|
32
|
The molecular characterization of fixed inversions breakpoints unveils the ancestral character of the Drosophila guanche chromosomal arrangements. Sci Rep 2019; 9:1706. [PMID: 30737415 PMCID: PMC6368638 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37121-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytological studies revealed that the number of chromosomes and their organization varies across species. The increasing availability of whole genome sequences of multiple species across specific phylogenies has confirmed and greatly extended these cytological observations. In the Drosophila genus, the ancestral karyotype consists of five rod-like acrocentric chromosomes (Muller elements A to E) and one dot-like chromosome (element F), each exhibiting a generally conserved gene content. Chromosomal fusions and paracentric inversions are thus the major contributors, respectively, to chromosome number variation among species and to gene order variation within chromosomal element. The subobscura cluster of Drosophila consists in three species that retain the genus ancestral karyotype and differ by a reduced number of fixed inversions. Here, we have used cytological information and the D. guanche genome sequence to identify and molecularly characterize the breakpoints of inversions that became fixed since the D. guanche-D. subobscura split. Our results have led us to propose a modified version of the D. guanche cytological map of its X chromosome, and to establish that (i) most inversions became fixed in the D. subobscura lineage and (ii) the order in which the four X chromosome overlapping inversions occurred and became fixed.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ruzzante L, Reijnders MJ, Waterhouse RM. Of Genes and Genomes: Mosquito Evolution and Diversity. Trends Parasitol 2019; 35:32-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
34
|
Reis M, Vieira CP, Lata R, Posnien N, Vieira J. Origin and Consequences of Chromosomal Inversions in the virilis Group of Drosophila. Genome Biol Evol 2018; 10:3152-3166. [PMID: 30376068 PMCID: PMC6278893 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evy239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In Drosophila, large variations in rearrangement rate have been reported among different lineages and among Muller’s elements. Nevertheless, the mechanisms that are involved in the generation of inversions, their increase in frequency, as well as their impact on the genome are not completely understood. This is in part due to the lack of comparative studies on species distantly related to Drosophila melanogaster. Therefore, we sequenced and assembled the genomes of two species of the virilis phylad (Drosophila novamexicana [15010-1031.00] and Drosophila americana [SF12]), which are diverging from D. melanogaster for more than 40 Myr. Based on these data, we identified the precise location of six novel inversion breakpoints. A molecular characterization provided clear evidence that DAIBAM (a miniature inverted–repeat transposable element) was involved in the generation of eight out of the nine inversions identified. In contrast to what has been previously reported for D. melanogaster and close relatives, ectopic recombination is thus the prevalent mechanism of generating inversions in species of the virilis phylad. Using pool-sequencing data for three populations of D. americana, we also show that common polymorphic inversions create a high degree of genetic differentiation between populations for chromosomes X, 4, and 5 over large physical distances. We did not find statistically significant differences in expression levels between D. americana (SF12) and D. novamexicana (15010-1031.00) strains for the three genes surveyed (CG9588, Fig 4, and fab1) flanking three inversion breakpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micael Reis
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Portugal.,Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Universidade do Porto, Portugal.,Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institut für Zoologie und Anthropologie, Abteilung für Entwicklungsbiologie, GZMB Ernst-Caspari-Haus, Universität Göttingen, Germany
| | - Cristina P Vieira
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Portugal.,Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Universidade do Porto, Portugal
| | - Rodrigo Lata
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Portugal.,Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Universidade do Porto, Portugal
| | - Nico Posnien
- Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institut für Zoologie und Anthropologie, Abteilung für Entwicklungsbiologie, GZMB Ernst-Caspari-Haus, Universität Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jorge Vieira
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Portugal.,Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Universidade do Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Scott Chialvo CH, White BE, Reed LK, Dyer KA. A phylogenetic examination of host use evolution in the quinaria and testacea groups of Drosophila. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2018; 130:233-243. [PMID: 30366088 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Adaptive radiations provide an opportunity to examine complex evolutionary processes such as ecological specialization and speciation. While a well-resolved phylogenetic hypothesis is critical to completing such studies, the rapid rates of evolution in these groups can impede phylogenetic studies. Here we study the quinaria and testacea species groups of the immigrans-tripunctata radiation of Drosophila, which represent a recent adaptive radiation and are a developing model system for ecological genetics. We were especially interested in understanding host use evolution in these species. In order to infer a phylogenetic hypothesis for this group we sampled loci from both the nuclear genome and the mitochondrial DNA to develop a dataset of 43 protein-coding loci for these two groups along with their close relatives in the immigrans-tripunctata radiation. We used this dataset to examine their evolutionary relationships along with the evolution of feeding behavior. Our analysis recovers strong support for the monophyly of the testacea but not the quinaria group. Results from our ancestral state reconstruction analysis suggests that the ancestor of the testacea and quinaria groups exhibited mushroom-feeding. Within the quinaria group, we infer that transition to vegetative feeding occurred twice, and that this transition did not coincide with a genome-wide change in the rate of protein evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare H Scott Chialvo
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
| | - Brooke E White
- Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Laura K Reed
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
| | - Kelly A Dyer
- Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schaeffer SW. Muller "Elements" in Drosophila: How the Search for the Genetic Basis for Speciation Led to the Birth of Comparative Genomics. Genetics 2018; 210:3-13. [PMID: 30166445 PMCID: PMC6116959 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The concept of synteny, or conservation of genes on the same chromosome, traces its origins to the early days of Drosophila genetics. This discovery emerged from comparisons of linkage maps from different species of Drosophila with the goal of understanding the process of speciation. H. J. Muller published a landmark article entitled Bearings of the "Drosophila" work on systematics, where he synthesized genetic and physical map data and proposed a model of speciation and chromosomal gene content conservation. These models have withstood the test of time with the advent of molecular genetic analysis from protein to genome level variation. Muller's ideas provide a framework to begin to answer questions about the evolutionary forces that shape the structure of the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen W Schaeffer
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802-5301
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cheng C, Kirkpatrick M. Inversions are bigger on the X chromosome. Mol Ecol 2018; 28:1238-1245. [PMID: 30059177 DOI: 10.1111/mec.14819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
In many insects, X-linked inversions fix at a higher rate and are much less polymorphic than autosomal inversions. Here, we report that in Drosophila, X-linked inversions also capture 67% more genes. We estimated the number of genes captured through an approximate Bayesian computational analysis of gene orders in nine species of Drosophila. X-linked inversions fixed with a significantly larger gene content. Further, X-linked inversions of intermediate size enjoy highest fixation rate, while the fixation rate of autosomal inversions decreases with size. A less detailed analysis in Anopheles suggests a similar pattern holds in mosquitoes. We develop a population genetic model that assumes the fitness effects of inversions scale with the number of genes captured. We show that the same conditions that lead to a higher fixation rate also produce a larger size for inversions on the X.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changde Cheng
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
| | - Mark Kirkpatrick
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Eitel M, Francis WR, Varoqueaux F, Daraspe J, Osigus HJ, Krebs S, Vargas S, Blum H, Williams GA, Schierwater B, Wörheide G. Comparative genomics and the nature of placozoan species. PLoS Biol 2018; 16:e2005359. [PMID: 30063702 PMCID: PMC6067683 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Placozoans are a phylum of nonbilaterian marine animals currently represented by a single described species, Trichoplax adhaerens, Schulze 1883. Placozoans arguably show the simplest animal morphology, which is identical among isolates collected worldwide, despite an apparently sizeable genetic diversity within the phylum. Here, we use a comparative genomics approach for a deeper appreciation of the structure and causes of the deeply diverging lineages in the Placozoa. We generated a high-quality draft genome of the genetic lineage H13 isolated from Hong Kong and compared it to the distantly related T. adhaerens. We uncovered substantial structural differences between the two genomes that point to a deep genomic separation and provide support that adaptation by gene duplication is likely a crucial mechanism in placozoan speciation. We further provide genetic evidence for reproductively isolated species and suggest a genus-level difference of H13 to T. adhaerens, justifying the designation of H13 as a new species, Hoilungia hongkongensis nov. gen., nov. spec., now the second described placozoan species and the first in a new genus. Our multilevel comparative genomics approach is, therefore, likely to prove valuable for species distinctions in other cryptic microscopic animal groups that lack diagnostic morphological characters, such as some nematodes, copepods, rotifers, or mites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Eitel
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Institut für Tierökologie und Zellbiologie, Ecology and Evolution, Hannover, Germany
| | - Warren R. Francis
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Frédérique Varoqueaux
- Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Daraspe
- Electron Microscopy Facility, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Jürgen Osigus
- Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Institut für Tierökologie und Zellbiologie, Ecology and Evolution, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefan Krebs
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Sergio Vargas
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Blum
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Gray A. Williams
- The Swire Institute of Marine Science and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Bernd Schierwater
- Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Institut für Tierökologie und Zellbiologie, Ecology and Evolution, Hannover, Germany
- Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics and Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America
- Department of Ecology & Evolution, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Gert Wörheide
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Paleontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB)–Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kazama Y, Hirano T, Abe T, Matsunaga S. Chromosomal Rearrangement: From Induction by Heavy-Ion Irradiation to in Vivo Engineering by Genome Editing. CYTOLOGIA 2018. [DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.83.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Kazama
- Mutation Genomics Team, Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN
| | - Tomonari Hirano
- Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki
- Ion Beam Breeding Team, Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN
| | - Tomoko Abe
- Ion Beam Breeding Team, Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN
| | - Sachihiro Matsunaga
- Department of Applied Biological Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Artemov GN, Bondarenko SM, Naumenko AN, Stegniy VN, Sharakhova MV, Sharakhov IV. Partial-arm translocations in evolution of malaria mosquitoes revealed by high-coverage physical mapping of the Anopheles atroparvus genome. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:278. [PMID: 29688842 PMCID: PMC5914054 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4663-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria mosquitoes have had a remarkable stability in the number of chromosomes in their karyotype (2n = 6) during 100 million years of evolution. Moreover, autosomal arms were assumed to maintain their integrity even if their associations with each other changed via whole-arm translocations. Here we use high-coverage comparative physical genome mapping of three Anopheles species to test the extent of evolutionary conservation of chromosomal arms in malaria mosquitoes. Results In this study, we developed a physical genome map for Anopheles atroparvus, one of the dominant malaria vectors in Europe. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of DNA probes with the ovarian nurse cell polytene chromosomes and synteny comparison, we anchored 56 genomic scaffolds to the An. atroparvus chromosomes. The obtained physical map represents 89.6% of the An. atroparvus genome. This genome has the second highest mapping coverage among Anophelinae assemblies after An. albimanus, which has 98.2% of the genome assigned to its chromosomes. A comparison of the An. atroparvus, An. albimanus, and An. gambiae genomes identified partial-arm translocations between the autosomal arms that break down the integrity of chromosome elements in evolution affecting the structure of the genetic material in the pericentromeric regions. Unlike An. atroparvus and An. albimanus, all chromosome elements of An. gambiae are fully syntenic with chromosome elements of the putative ancestral Anopheles karyotype. We also detected nonrandom distribution of large conserved synteny blocks and confirmed a higher rate of inversion fixation in the X chromosome compared with autosomes. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the power of physical mapping for understanding the genome evolution in malaria mosquitoes. The results indicate that syntenic relationships among chromosome elements of Anopheles species have not been fully preserved because of multiple partial-arm translocations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4663-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gleb N Artemov
- Laboratory of Ecology, Genetics and Environmental Protection, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russia
| | - Semen M Bondarenko
- Laboratory of Ecology, Genetics and Environmental Protection, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russia
| | - Anastasia N Naumenko
- Department of Entomology, Fralin Life Science Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 360 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
| | - Vladimir N Stegniy
- Laboratory of Ecology, Genetics and Environmental Protection, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russia
| | - Maria V Sharakhova
- Laboratory of Ecology, Genetics and Environmental Protection, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russia. .,Department of Entomology, Fralin Life Science Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 360 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
| | - Igor V Sharakhov
- Laboratory of Ecology, Genetics and Environmental Protection, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russia. .,Department of Entomology, Fralin Life Science Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 360 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wiegmann BM, Richards S. Genomes of Diptera. CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE 2018; 25:116-124. [PMID: 29602357 DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Diptera (true flies) are among the most diverse holometabolan insect orders and were the first eukaryotic order to have a representative genome fully sequenced. 110 fly species have publically available genome assemblies and many hundreds of population-level genomes have been generated in the model organisms Drosophila melanogaster and the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Comparative genomics carried out in a phylogenetic context is illuminating many aspects of fly biology, providing unprecedented insight into variability in genome structure, gene content, genetic mechanisms, and rates and patterns of evolution in genes, populations, and species. Despite the rich availability of genomic resources in flies, there remain many fly lineages to which new genome sequencing efforts should be directed. Such efforts would be most valuable in fly families or clades that exhibit multiple origins of key fly behaviors such as blood feeding, phytophagy, parasitism, pollination, and mycophagy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Wiegmann
- Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.
| | - Stephen Richards
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77006, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zakharenko LP, Ivannikov AV, Ignatenko OM, Zakharov IK. Search for Canonical P Element in Genomes of Drosophilinae Subfamily Species. RUSS J GENET+ 2018. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795418010131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
43
|
Fuller ZL, Haynes GD, Richards S, Schaeffer SW. Genomics of natural populations: Evolutionary forces that establish and maintain gene arrangements inDrosophila pseudoobscura. Mol Ecol 2017; 26:6539-6562. [DOI: 10.1111/mec.14381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary L. Fuller
- Department of Biology; 208 Erwin W. Mueller Laboratory; The Pennsylvania State University; University Park PA USA
| | - Gwilym D. Haynes
- Department of Biology; 208 Erwin W. Mueller Laboratory; The Pennsylvania State University; University Park PA USA
| | - Stephen Richards
- Human Genome Sequencing Center; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston TX USA
| | - Stephen W. Schaeffer
- Department of Biology; 208 Erwin W. Mueller Laboratory; The Pennsylvania State University; University Park PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Reconstructing Yeasts Phylogenies and Ancestors from Whole Genome Data. Sci Rep 2017; 7:15209. [PMID: 29123238 PMCID: PMC5680185 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15484-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Phylogenetic studies aim to discover evolutionary relationships and histories. These studies are based on similarities of morphological characters and molecular sequences. Currently, widely accepted phylogenetic approaches are based on multiple sequence alignments, which analyze shared gene datasets and concatenate/coalesce these results to a final phylogeny with maximum support. However, these approaches still have limitations, and often have conflicting results with each other. Reconstructing ancestral genomes helps us understand mechanisms and corresponding consequences of evolution. Most existing genome level phylogeny and ancestor reconstruction methods can only process simplified real genome datasets or simulated datasets with identical genome content, unique genome markers, and limited types of evolutionary events. Here, we provide an alternative way to resolve phylogenetic problems based on analyses of real genome data. We use phylogenetic signals from all types of genome level evolutionary events, and overcome the conflicting issues existing in traditional phylogenetic approaches. Further, we build an automated computational pipeline to reconstruct phylogenies and ancestral genomes for two high-resolution real yeast genome datasets. Comparison results with recent studies and publications show that we reconstruct very accurate and robust phylogenies and ancestors. Finally, we identify and analyze the conserved syntenic blocks among reconstructed ancestral genomes and present yeast species.
Collapse
|
45
|
Mandrioli M, Zambonini G, Manicardi GC. Comparative Gene Mapping as a Tool to Understand the Evolution of Pest Crop Insect Chromosomes. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18091919. [PMID: 28880213 PMCID: PMC5618568 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18091919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The extent of the conservation of synteny and gene order in aphids has been previously investigated only by comparing a small subset of linkage groups between the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum and a few other aphid species. Here we compared the localization of eight A. pisum scaffolds (covering more than 5 Mb and 83 genes) in respect to the Drosophila melanogaster Muller elements identifying orthologous loci spanning all the four A. pisum chromosomes. Comparison of the genetic maps revealed a conserved synteny across different loci suggesting that the study of the fruit fly Muller elements could favour the identification of chromosomal markers useful for the study of chromosomal rearrangements in aphids. A. pisum is the first aphid species to have its genome sequenced and the finding that there are several chromosomal regions in synteny between Diptera and Hemiptera indicates that the genomic tools developed in A. pisum will be broadly useful not only for the study of other aphids but also for other insect species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Mandrioli
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41125, Italy.
| | - Giada Zambonini
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41125, Italy.
| | - Gian Carlo Manicardi
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41125, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Leung W, Shaffer CD, Chen EJ, Quisenberry TJ, Ko K, Braverman JM, Giarla TC, Mortimer NT, Reed LK, Smith ST, Robic S, McCartha SR, Perry DR, Prescod LM, Sheppard ZA, Saville KJ, McClish A, Morlock EA, Sochor VR, Stanton B, Veysey-White IC, Revie D, Jimenez LA, Palomino JJ, Patao MD, Patao SM, Himelblau ET, Campbell JD, Hertz AL, McEvilly MF, Wagner AR, Youngblom J, Bedi B, Bettincourt J, Duso E, Her M, Hilton W, House S, Karimi M, Kumimoto K, Lee R, Lopez D, Odisho G, Prasad R, Robbins HL, Sandhu T, Selfridge T, Tsukashima K, Yosif H, Kokan NP, Britt L, Zoellner A, Spana EP, Chlebina BT, Chong I, Friedman H, Mammo DA, Ng CL, Nikam VS, Schwartz NU, Xu TQ, Burg MG, Batten SM, Corbeill LM, Enoch E, Ensign JJ, Franks ME, Haiker B, Ingles JA, Kirkland LD, Lorenz-Guertin JM, Matthews J, Mittig CM, Monsma N, Olson KJ, Perez-Aragon G, Ramic A, Ramirez JR, Scheiber C, Schneider PA, Schultz DE, Simon M, Spencer E, Wernette AC, Wykle ME, Zavala-Arellano E, McDonald MJ, Ostby K, Wendland P, DiAngelo JR, Ceasrine AM, Cox AH, Docherty JEB, Gingras RM, Grieb SM, Pavia MJ, Personius CL, Polak GL, Beach DL, Cerritos HL, Horansky EA, Sharif KA, Moran R, Parrish S, Bickford K, Bland J, Broussard J, Campbell K, Deibel KE, Forka R, Lemke MC, Nelson MB, O'Keeffe C, Ramey SM, Schmidt L, Villegas P, Jones CJ, Christ SL, Mamari S, Rinaldi AS, Stity G, Hark AT, Scheuerman M, Silver Key SC, McRae BD, Haberman AS, Asinof S, Carrington H, Drumm K, Embry T, McGuire R, Miller-Foreman D, Rosen S, Safa N, Schultz D, Segal M, Shevin Y, Svoronos P, Vuong T, Skuse G, Paetkau DW, Bridgman RK, Brown CM, Carroll AR, Gifford FM, Gillespie JB, Herman SE, Holtcamp KL, Host MA, Hussey G, Kramer DM, Lawrence JQ, Martin MM, Niemiec EN, O'Reilly AP, Pahl OA, Quintana G, Rettie EAS, Richardson TL, Rodriguez AE, Rodriguez MO, Schiraldi L, Smith JJ, Sugrue KF, Suriano LJ, Takach KE, Vasquez AM, Velez X, Villafuerte EJ, Vives LT, Zellmer VR, Hauke J, Hauser CR, Barker K, Cannon L, Parsamian P, Parsons S, Wichman Z, Bazinet CW, Johnson DE, Bangura A, Black JA, Chevee V, Einsteen SA, Hilton SK, Kollmer M, Nadendla R, Stamm J, Fafara-Thompson AE, Gygi AM, Ogawa EE, Van Camp M, Kocsisova Z, Leatherman JL, Modahl CM, Rubin MR, Apiz-Saab SS, Arias-Mejias SM, Carrion-Ortiz CF, Claudio-Vazquez PN, Espada-Green DM, Feliciano-Camacho M, Gonzalez-Bonilla KM, Taboas-Arroyo M, Vargas-Franco D, Montañez-Gonzalez R, Perez-Otero J, Rivera-Burgos M, Rivera-Rosario FJ, Eisler HL, Alexander J, Begley SK, Gabbard D, Allen RJ, Aung WY, Barshop WD, Boozalis A, Chu VP, Davis JS, Duggal RN, Franklin R, Gavinski K, Gebreyesus H, Gong HZ, Greenstein RA, Guo AD, Hanson C, Homa KE, Hsu SC, Huang Y, Huo L, Jacobs S, Jia S, Jung KL, Wai-Chee Kong S, Kroll MR, Lee BM, Lee PF, Levine KM, Li AS, Liu C, Liu MM, Lousararian AP, Lowery PB, Mallya AP, Marcus JE, Ng PC, Nguyen HP, Patel R, Precht H, Rastogi S, Sarezky JM, Schefkind A, Schultz MB, Shen D, Skorupa T, Spies NC, Stancu G, Vivian Tsang HM, Turski AL, Venkat R, Waldman LE, Wang K, Wang T, Wei JW, Wu DY, Xiong DD, Yu J, Zhou K, McNeil GP, Fernandez RW, Menzies PG, Gu T, Buhler J, Mardis ER, Elgin SCR. Retrotransposons Are the Major Contributors to the Expansion of the Drosophila ananassae Muller F Element. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2017; 7:2439-2460. [PMID: 28667019 PMCID: PMC5555453 DOI: 10.1534/g3.117.040907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The discordance between genome size and the complexity of eukaryotes can partly be attributed to differences in repeat density. The Muller F element (∼5.2 Mb) is the smallest chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster, but it is substantially larger (>18.7 Mb) in D. ananassae To identify the major contributors to the expansion of the F element and to assess their impact, we improved the genome sequence and annotated the genes in a 1.4-Mb region of the D. ananassae F element, and a 1.7-Mb region from the D element for comparison. We find that transposons (particularly LTR and LINE retrotransposons) are major contributors to this expansion (78.6%), while Wolbachia sequences integrated into the D. ananassae genome are minor contributors (0.02%). Both D. melanogaster and D. ananassae F-element genes exhibit distinct characteristics compared to D-element genes (e.g., larger coding spans, larger introns, more coding exons, and lower codon bias), but these differences are exaggerated in D. ananassae Compared to D. melanogaster, the codon bias observed in D. ananassae F-element genes can primarily be attributed to mutational biases instead of selection. The 5' ends of F-element genes in both species are enriched in dimethylation of lysine 4 on histone 3 (H3K4me2), while the coding spans are enriched in H3K9me2. Despite differences in repeat density and gene characteristics, D. ananassae F-element genes show a similar range of expression levels compared to genes in euchromatic domains. This study improves our understanding of how transposons can affect genome size and how genes can function within highly repetitive domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilson Leung
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | | | - Elizabeth J Chen
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | | | - Kevin Ko
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - John M Braverman
- Department of Biology, Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA 19131
| | | | - Nathan T Mortimer
- School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790
| | - Laura K Reed
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401
| | - Sheryl T Smith
- Department of Biology, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA 19038
| | - Srebrenka Robic
- Department of Biology, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, GA 30030
| | | | | | | | | | - Ken J Saville
- Department of Biology, Albion College, Albion, MI 49224
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dennis Revie
- Department of Biology, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
| | - Luis A Jimenez
- Department of Biology, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
| | - Jennifer J Palomino
- Department of Biology, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
| | - Melissa D Patao
- Department of Biology, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
| | - Shane M Patao
- Department of Biology, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
| | - Edward T Himelblau
- Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
| | - Jaclyn D Campbell
- Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
| | - Alexandra L Hertz
- Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
| | - Maddison F McEvilly
- Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
| | - Allison R Wagner
- Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
| | - James Youngblom
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Baljit Bedi
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Jeffery Bettincourt
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Erin Duso
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Maiye Her
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - William Hilton
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Samantha House
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Masud Karimi
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Kevin Kumimoto
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Rebekah Lee
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Darryl Lopez
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - George Odisho
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Ricky Prasad
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Holly Lyn Robbins
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Tanveer Sandhu
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Tracy Selfridge
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Kara Tsukashima
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Hani Yosif
- Department of Biology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382
| | - Nighat P Kokan
- Department of Natural Sciences, Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee, WI 53217
| | - Latia Britt
- Department of Natural Sciences, Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee, WI 53217
| | - Alycia Zoellner
- Department of Natural Sciences, Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee, WI 53217
| | - Eric P Spana
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Ben T Chlebina
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Insun Chong
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | | | - Danny A Mammo
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Chun L Ng
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | | | | | - Thomas Q Xu
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Martin G Burg
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Spencer M Batten
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Lindsay M Corbeill
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Erica Enoch
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Jesse J Ensign
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Mary E Franks
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Breanna Haiker
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Judith A Ingles
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Lyndsay D Kirkland
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Joshua M Lorenz-Guertin
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Jordan Matthews
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Cody M Mittig
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Nicholaus Monsma
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Katherine J Olson
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Guillermo Perez-Aragon
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Alen Ramic
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Jordan R Ramirez
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Christopher Scheiber
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Patrick A Schneider
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Devon E Schultz
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Matthew Simon
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Eric Spencer
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Adam C Wernette
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Maxine E Wykle
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Elizabeth Zavala-Arellano
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Mitchell J McDonald
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Kristine Ostby
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | - Peter Wendland
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences and Cell and Molecular Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401
| | | | | | - Amanda H Cox
- Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549
| | | | | | | | - Michael J Pavia
- Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549
| | | | | | - Dale L Beach
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Longwood University, Farmville, VA 23909
| | - Heaven L Cerritos
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Longwood University, Farmville, VA 23909
| | - Edward A Horansky
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Longwood University, Farmville, VA 23909
| | - Karim A Sharif
- Department of Biology, Massasoit Community College, Brockton, MA 02302
| | - Ryan Moran
- Department of Biology, Massasoit Community College, Brockton, MA 02302
| | - Susan Parrish
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | | | - Jennifer Bland
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | | | - Kerry Campbell
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | | | - Richard Forka
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | - Monika C Lemke
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | - Marlee B Nelson
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | | | - S Mariel Ramey
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | - Luke Schmidt
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | - Paola Villegas
- Department of Biology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157
| | | | - Stephanie L Christ
- Department of Biological Sciences, Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA 18018
| | - Sami Mamari
- Department of Biological Sciences, Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA 18018
| | - Adam S Rinaldi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA 18018
| | - Ghazal Stity
- Department of Biological Sciences, Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA 18018
| | - Amy T Hark
- Department of Biology, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA 18104
| | - Mark Scheuerman
- Department of Biology, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA 18104
| | - S Catherine Silver Key
- Department of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707
| | - Briana D McRae
- Department of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707
| | | | - Sam Asinof
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | | | - Kelly Drumm
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | - Terrance Embry
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | | | | | - Stella Rosen
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | - Nadia Safa
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | - Darrin Schultz
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | - Matt Segal
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | - Yakov Shevin
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | | | - Tam Vuong
- Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074
| | - Gary Skuse
- Thomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623
| | - Don W Paetkau
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | | | - Alicia R Carroll
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | | | - Susan E Herman
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Misha A Host
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | - Gabrielle Hussey
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Joan Q Lawrence
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Ellen N Niemiec
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Olivia A Pahl
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | | | | | | | - Mona O Rodriguez
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | - Laura Schiraldi
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | - Joanna J Smith
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | - Kelsey F Sugrue
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Kaitlyn E Takach
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Ximena Velez
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Laura T Vives
- Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556
| | | | - Jeanette Hauke
- Department of Biology, Simmons College, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Charles R Hauser
- Bioinformatics Program, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX 78704
| | - Karolyn Barker
- Bioinformatics Program, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX 78704
| | - Laurie Cannon
- Bioinformatics Program, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX 78704
| | | | - Samantha Parsons
- Bioinformatics Program, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX 78704
| | | | | | - Diana E Johnson
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Abubakarr Bangura
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Jordan A Black
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Victoria Chevee
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Sarah A Einsteen
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Sarah K Hilton
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Max Kollmer
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Rahul Nadendla
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
| | - Joyce Stamm
- Department of Biology, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722
| | | | - Amber M Gygi
- Department of Biology, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722
| | - Emmy E Ogawa
- Department of Biology, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722
| | - Matt Van Camp
- Department of Biology, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722
| | - Zuzana Kocsisova
- Department of Biology, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722
| | - Judith L Leatherman
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639
| | - Cassie M Modahl
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639
| | - Michael R Rubin
- Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Cayey, Cayey, PR 00736
| | - Susana S Apiz-Saab
- Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Cayey, Cayey, PR 00736
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joseph Perez-Otero
- Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Cayey, Cayey, PR 00736
| | | | | | - Heather L Eisler
- Department of Biology, University of the Cumberlands, Williamsburg, KY 40769
| | - Jackie Alexander
- Department of Biology, University of the Cumberlands, Williamsburg, KY 40769
| | - Samatha K Begley
- Department of Biology, University of the Cumberlands, Williamsburg, KY 40769
| | - Deana Gabbard
- Department of Biology, University of the Cumberlands, Williamsburg, KY 40769
| | - Robert J Allen
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Wint Yan Aung
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - William D Barshop
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Amanda Boozalis
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Vanessa P Chu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Jeremy S Davis
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Ryan N Duggal
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Robert Franklin
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Katherine Gavinski
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Heran Gebreyesus
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Henry Z Gong
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Rachel A Greenstein
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Averill D Guo
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Casey Hanson
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Kaitlin E Homa
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Simon C Hsu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Lucy Huo
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Sarah Jacobs
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Sasha Jia
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Kyle L Jung
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Sarah Wai-Chee Kong
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Matthew R Kroll
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Brandon M Lee
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Paul F Lee
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Kevin M Levine
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Amy S Li
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Chengyu Liu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Max Mian Liu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Adam P Lousararian
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Peter B Lowery
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Allyson P Mallya
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Joseph E Marcus
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Patrick C Ng
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Hien P Nguyen
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Ruchik Patel
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Hashini Precht
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Suchita Rastogi
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Jonathan M Sarezky
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Adam Schefkind
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Michael B Schultz
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Delia Shen
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Tara Skorupa
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Nicholas C Spies
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Gabriel Stancu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | | | - Alice L Turski
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Rohit Venkat
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Leah E Waldman
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Kaidi Wang
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Tracy Wang
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Jeffrey W Wei
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Dennis Y Wu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - David D Xiong
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Jack Yu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Karen Zhou
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Gerard P McNeil
- Department of Biology, York College / CUNY, Jamaica, NY 11451
| | | | | | - Tingting Gu
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Jeremy Buhler
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Elaine R Mardis
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108
| | - Sarah C R Elgin
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Drosopoulou E, Pantelidou C, Gariou-Papalexiou A, Augustinos AA, Chartomatsidou T, Kyritsis GA, Bourtzis K, Mavragani-Tsipidou P, Zacharopoulou A. The chromosomes and the mitogenome of Ceratitis fasciventris (Diptera: Tephritidae): two genetic approaches towards the Ceratitis FAR species complex resolution. Sci Rep 2017; 7:4877. [PMID: 28687799 PMCID: PMC5501848 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05132-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Ceratitis fasciventris is a serious agricultural pest of the Tephritidae family that belongs to the African Ceratitis FAR species complex. Species limits within the FAR complex are obscure and multidisciplinary approaches have attempted to resolve phylogenetic relationships among its members. These studies support the existence of at least three additional species in the complex, C. anonnae, C. rosa and C. quilicii, while they indicate the presence of two structured populations (F1 and F2) within the C. fasciventris species. In the present study we present the mitotic karyotype, polytene chromosome maps, in situ hybridization data and the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of an F2 population of C. fasciventris. This is the first polytene chromosome map and complete mitogenome of a member of the FAR complex and only the second reported for the Ceratitis genus. Both polytene chromosomes and mitochondrial sequence could provide valuable information and be used as reference for comparative analysis among the members of the complex towards the clarification of their phylogenetic relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Drosopoulou
- Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Christina Pantelidou
- Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Antonios A Augustinos
- Department of Biology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.,Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Seibersdorf, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatiana Chartomatsidou
- Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios A Kyritsis
- Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Seibersdorf, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kostas Bourtzis
- Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Seibersdorf, Vienna, Austria
| | - Penelope Mavragani-Tsipidou
- Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gandara ACP, Torres A, Bahia AC, Oliveira PL, Schama R. Evolutionary origin and function of NOX4-art, an arthropod specific NADPH oxidase. BMC Evol Biol 2017; 17:92. [PMID: 28356077 PMCID: PMC5372347 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0940-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NADPH oxidases (NOX) are ROS producing enzymes that perform essential roles in cell physiology, including cell signaling and antimicrobial defense. This gene family is present in most eukaryotes, suggesting a common ancestor. To date, only a limited number of phylogenetic studies of metazoan NOXes have been performed, with few arthropod genes. In arthropods, only NOX5 and DUOX genes have been found and a gene called NOXm was found in mosquitoes but its origin and function has not been examined. In this study, we analyzed the evolution of this gene family in arthropods. A thorough search of genomes and transcriptomes was performed enabling us to browse most branches of arthropod phylogeny. RESULTS We have found that the subfamilies NOX5 and DUOX are present in all arthropod groups. We also show that a NOX gene, closely related to NOX4 and previously found only in mosquitoes (NOXm), can also be found in other taxonomic groups, leading us to rename it as NOX4-art. Although the accessory protein p22-phox, essential for NOX1-4 activation, was not found in any of the arthropods studied, NOX4-art of Aedes aegypti encodes an active protein that produces H2O2. Although NOX4-art has been lost in a number of arthropod lineages, it has all the domains and many signature residues and motifs necessary for ROS production and, when silenced, H2O2 production is considerably diminished in A. aegypti cells. CONCLUSIONS Combining all bioinformatic analyses and laboratory work we have reached interesting conclusions regarding arthropod NOX gene family evolution. NOX5 and DUOX are present in all arthropod lineages but it seems that a NOX2-like gene was lost in the ancestral lineage leading to Ecdysozoa. The NOX4-art gene originated from a NOX4-like ancestor and is functional. Although no p22-phox was observed in arthropods, there was no evidence of neo-functionalization and this gene probably produces H2O2 as in other metazoan NOX4 genes. Although functional and present in the genomes of many species, NOX4-art was lost in a number of arthropod lineages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Caroline Paiva Gandara
- Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - André Torres
- Laboratório de Biologia Computacional e Sistemas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ana Cristina Bahia
- Instituto de Biofísica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Pedro L Oliveira
- Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular - INCT-EM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Renata Schama
- Laboratório de Biologia Computacional e Sistemas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. .,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular - INCT-EM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ayala D, Acevedo P, Pombi M, Dia I, Boccolini D, Costantini C, Simard F, Fontenille D. Chromosome inversions and ecological plasticity in the main African malaria mosquitoes. Evolution 2017; 71:686-701. [PMID: 28071788 DOI: 10.1111/evo.13176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Chromosome inversions have fascinated the scientific community, mainly because of their role in the rapid adaption of different taxa to changing environments. However, the ecological traits linked to chromosome inversions have been poorly studied. Here, we investigated the roles played by 23 chromosome inversions in the adaptation of the four major African malaria mosquitoes to local environments in Africa. We studied their distribution patterns by using spatially explicit modeling and characterized the ecogeographical determinants of each inversion range. We then performed hierarchical clustering and constrained ordination analyses to assess the spatial and ecological similarities among inversions. Our results show that most inversions are environmentally structured, suggesting that they are actively involved in processes of local adaptation. Some inversions exhibited similar geographical patterns and ecological requirements among the four mosquito species, providing evidence for parallel evolution. Conversely, common inversion polymorphisms between sibling species displayed divergent ecological patterns, suggesting that they might have a different adaptive role in each species. These results are in agreement with the finding that chromosomal inversions play a role in Anopheles ecotypic adaptation. This study establishes a strong ecological basis for future genome-based analyses to elucidate the genetic mechanisms of local adaptation in these four mosquitoes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Ayala
- UMR 224 MIVEGEC/ESV, IRD, Montpellier, 34394, France.,CIRMF, BP 769, Franceville, Gabon
| | - Pelayo Acevedo
- SaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ciudad Real, 13005, Spain
| | - Marco Pombi
- Sezione di Parassitologia, Dipartimento di Scienze di Sanità Pubblica, Università di Roma "La Sapienza,", Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - Ibrahima Dia
- Medical Entomology Unit, Institut Pasteur de Dakar, BP 220, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Daniela Boccolini
- Department MIPI, Unit Vector-Borne Diseases and International Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, 00161, Italy
| | | | | | - Didier Fontenille
- UMR 224 MIVEGEC/ESV, IRD, Montpellier, 34394, France.,Current Address: Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, BP 983, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Orengo DJ, Puerma E, Papaceit M, Segarra C, Aguadé M. Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura. Chromosome Res 2017; 25:145-154. [PMID: 28078516 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-016-9549-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The comparative analysis of genetic and physical maps as well as of whole genome sequences had revealed that in the Drosophila genus, most structural rearrangements occurred within chromosomal elements as a result of paracentric inversions. Genome sequence comparison would seem the best method to estimate rates of chromosomal evolution, but the high-quality reference genomes required for this endeavor are still scanty. Here, we have obtained dense physical maps for Muller elements A, C, and E of Drosophila subobscura, a species with an extensively studied rich and adaptive chromosomal polymorphism. These maps are based on 462 markers: 115, 236, and 111 markers for elements A, C, and E, respectively. The availability of these dense maps will facilitate genome assembly and will thus greatly contribute to obtaining a good reference genome, which is a required step for D. subobscura to attain the model species status. The comparative analysis of these physical maps and those obtained from the D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster genomes allowed us to infer the number of fixed inversions and chromosomal evolutionary rates for each pairwise comparison. For all three elements, rates inferred from the more closely related species were higher than those inferred from the more distantly related species, which together with results of relative-rate tests point to an acceleration in the D. subobscura lineage at least for elements A and E.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorcas J Orengo
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Puerma
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Papaceit
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Segarra
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Aguadé
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|