Rtf1-mediated eukaryotic site-specific replication termination

Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rtf2 is important for replication fork barrier activity of RTS1 via splicing of Rtf1

Arrested replication forks, when restarted by homologous recombination, result in error-prone DNA syntheses and non-allelic homologous recombination. Fission yeast RTS1 is a model fork barrier used to probe mechanisms of recombination-dependent restart. RTS1 barrier activity is entirely dependent on the DNA binding protein Rtf1 and partially dependent on a second protein, Rtf2. Human RTF2 was recently implicated in fork restart, leading us to examine fission yeast Rtf2's role in more detail. In agreement with previous studies, we observe reduced barrier activity upon rtf2 deletion. However, we identified Rtf2 to be physically associated with mRNA processing and splicing factors and rtf2 deletion to cause increased intron retention. One of the most affected introns resided in the rtf1 transcript. Using an intronless rtf1, we observed no reduction in RFB activity in the absence of Rtf2. Thus, Rtf2 is essential for correct rtf1 splicing to allow optimal RTS1 barrier activity.

Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers Associated with Mycelial Growth (at 15, 20, and 25°C), Mefenoxam Resistance, and Mating Type in Phytophthora infestans

Phenotypic diversity among individuals defines the potential for evolutionary selection in a species. Phytophthora infestans epidemics are generally thought to be favored by moderate to low temperatures, but temperatures in many locations worldwide are expected to rise as a result of global climate change. Thus, we investigated variation among individuals of P. infestans for relative growth at different temperatures. Isolates of P. infestans came from three collections: (i) individual genotypes recently dominant in the United States, (ii) recently collected individuals from Central Mexico, and (iii) progeny of a recent sexual recombination event in the northeastern United States. In general, these isolates had optimal mycelial growth rates at 15 or 20°C. However, two individuals from Central Mexico grew better at higher temperatures than did most others and two individuals grew relatively less at higher temperatures than did most others. The isolates were also assessed for mefenoxam sensitivity and mating type. Each collection contained individuals of diverse sensitivities to mefenoxam and individuals of the A1 and A2 mating type. We then searched for genomic regions associated with phenotypic diversity using genotyping-by-sequencing. We found one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with variability in mycelial growth at 20°C, two associated with variability in mycelial growth at 25°C, two associated with sensitivity to mefenoxam, and one associated with mating type. Interestingly, the SNPs associated with mefenoxam sensitivity were found in a gene-sparse region, whereas the SNPs associated with growth at the two temperatures and mating type were found both at more gene-dense regions.

The NuA4 acetyltransferase and histone H4 acetylation promote replication recovery after topoisomerase I-poisoning

BACKGROUND

Histone acetylation plays an important role in DNA replication and repair because replicating chromatin is subject to dynamic changes in its structures. However, its precise mechanism remains elusive. In this report, we describe roles of the NuA4 acetyltransferase and histone H4 acetylation in replication fork protection in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

RESULTS

Downregulation of NuA4 subunits renders cells highly sensitive to camptothecin, a compound that induces replication fork breakage. Defects in NuA4 function or mutations in histone H4 acetylation sites lead to impaired recovery of collapsed replication forks and elevated levels of Rad52 DNA repair foci, indicating the role of histone H4 acetylation in DNA replication and fork repair. We also show that Vid21 interacts with the Swi1-Swi3 replication fork protection complex and that Swi1 stabilizes Vid21 and promotes efficient histone H4 acetylation. Furthermore, our genetic analysis demonstrates that loss of Swi1 further sensitizes NuA4 and histone H4 mutant cells to replication fork breakage.

CONCLUSION

Considering that Swi1 plays a critical role in replication fork protection, our results indicate that NuA4 and histone H4 acetylation promote repair of broken DNA replication forks.

Loss of Cohesin Subunit Rec8 Switches Rad51 Mediator Dependence in Resistance to Formaldehyde Toxicity in Ustilago maydis

DNA-protein cross-links (DPCs) are frequently occurring lesions that provoke continual threats to the integrity of the genome by interference with replication and transcription. Reactive aldehydes generated from endogenous metabolic processes or produced in the environment are sources that trigger cross-linking of DNA with associated proteins. DNA repair pathways in place for removing DPCs, or for bypassing them to enable completion of replication, include homologous recombination (HR) and replication fork remodeling (FR) systems. Here, we surveyed a set of mutants defective in known HR and FR components to determine their contribution toward maintaining resistance to chronic formaldehyde (FA) exposure in Ustilago maydis, a fungus that relies on the BRCA2-family member Brh2 as the principal Rad51 mediator in repair of DNA strand breaks. We found that, in addition to Brh2, Rad52 was also vital for resistance to FA. Deleting the gene for Rec8, a kleisin subunit of cohesin, eliminated the requirement for Brh2, but not Rad52, in FA resistance. The Rad51K133R mutant variant that is able to bind DNA but unable to dissociate from it was able to support resistance to FA. These findings suggest a model for DPC repair and tolerance that features a specialized role for Rad52, enabling Rad51 to access DNA in its noncanonical capacity of replication fork protection rather than DNA strand transfer.

Regulation of DNA Replication through Natural Impediments in the Eukaryotic Genome

All living organisms need to duplicate their genetic information while protecting it from unwanted mutations, which can lead to genetic disorders and cancer development. Inaccuracies during DNA replication are the major cause of genomic instability, as replication forks are prone to stalling and collapse, resulting in DNA damage. The presence of exogenous DNA damaging agents as well as endogenous difficult-to-replicate DNA regions containing DNA–protein complexes, repetitive DNA, secondary DNA structures, or transcribing RNA polymerases, increases the risk of genomic instability and thus threatens cell survival. Therefore, understanding the cellular mechanisms required to preserve the genetic information during S phase is of paramount importance. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of how cells cope with these natural impediments in order to prevent DNA damage and genomic instability during DNA replication.

Phosphorylation of CMG helicase and Tof1 is required for programmed fork arrest

Several important physiological transactions, including control of replicative life span (RLS), prevention of collision between replication and transcription, and cellular differentiation, require programmed replication fork arrest (PFA). However, a general mechanism of PFA has remained elusive. We previously showed that the Tof1-Csm3 fork protection complex is essential for PFA by antagonizing the Rrm3 helicase that displaces nonhistone protein barriers that impede fork progression. Here we show that mutations of Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but not other DNA replication factors, greatly reduced PFA at replication fork barriers in the spacer regions of the ribosomal DNA array. A key target of DDK is the mini chromosome maintenance (Mcm) 2-7 complex, which is known to require phosphorylation by DDK to form an active CMG [Cdc45 (cell division cycle gene 45), Mcm2-7, GINS (Go, Ichi, Ni, and San)] helicase. In vivo experiments showed that mutational inactivation of DDK caused release of Tof1 from the chromatin fractions. In vitro binding experiments confirmed that CMG and/or Mcm2-7 had to be phosphorylated for binding to phospho-Tof1-Csm3 but not to its dephosphorylated form. Suppressor mutations that bypass the requirement for Mcm2-7 phosphorylation by DDK restored PFA in the absence of the kinase. Retention of Tof1 in the chromatin fraction and PFA in vivo was promoted by the suppressor mcm5-bob1, which bypassed DDK requirement, indicating that under this condition a kinase other than DDK catalyzed the phosphorylation of Tof1. We propose that phosphorylation regulates the recruitment and retention of Tof1-Csm3 by the replisome and that this complex antagonizes the Rrm3 helicase, thereby promoting PFA, by preserving the integrity of the Fob1-Ter complex.

Timeless protection of telomeres

The DNA replication machinery encounters problems at numerous genomic regions that are inherently difficult to replicate. These genomic regions include telomeres, which contain repetitive DNA and telomere-binding proteins. If not properly regulated, replication of such genomic regions can result in DNA damage, leading to genomic instability. Studies implicated a role of Timeless-related proteins at difficult-to-replicate genomic regions, including telomeres. However, how these proteins maintain telomeres was elusive. In a recent report, we described the role of Swi1, a Timeless-related protein, in telomere maintenance in fission yeast. We demonstrated that Swi1 is required for proper replication of repeat DNA sequences at telomeres. We also showed that Swi1-deficient cells utilize recombination-based ALT (alternative lengthening of telomeres)-like mechanisms to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. Here, we highlight these findings and present additional data to discuss the role of Swi1^Timeless in telomere protection and ALT prevention.

Functional architecture of the Reb1-Ter complex of Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Reb1 ofSchizosaccharomyces pomberepresents a family of multifunctional proteins that bind to specific terminator sites (Ter) and cause polar termination of transcription catalyzed by RNA polymerase I (pol I) and arrest of replication forks approaching the Ter sites from the opposite direction. However, it remains to be investigated whether the same mechanism causes arrest of both DNA transactions. Here, we present the structure of Reb1 as a complex with a Ter site at a resolution of 2.7 Å. Structure-guided molecular genetic analyses revealed that it has distinct and well-defined DNA binding and transcription termination (TTD) domains. The region of the protein involved in replication termination is distinct from the TTD. Mechanistically, the data support the conclusion that transcription termination is not caused by just high affinity Reb1-Ter protein-DNA interactions. Rather, protein-protein interactions between the TTD with the Rpa12 subunit of RNA pol I seem to be an integral part of the mechanism. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that double mutations in TTD that abolished its interaction with Rpa12 also greatly reduced transcription termination thereby revealing a conduit for functional communications between RNA pol I and the terminator protein.

Polymerase δ replicates both strands after homologous recombination-dependent fork restart

To maintain genetic stability DNA must be replicated only once and replication completed even when individual replication forks are inactivated. Because fork inactivation is common, the passive convergence of an adjacent fork is insufficient to rescue all inactive forks. Thus, eukaryotic cells have evolved homologous recombination-dependent mechanisms to restart persistent inactive forks. Completing DNA synthesis via Homologous Recombination Restarted Replication (HoRReR) ensures cell survival, but at a cost. One such cost is increased mutagenesis caused by HoRReR being more error prone than canonical replication. This increased error rate implies that the HoRReR mechanism is distinct from that of a canonical fork. Here we exploit the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe to demonstrate that a DNA sequence duplicated by HoRReR during S phase is replicated semi-conservatively, but that both the leading and lagging strands are synthesised by DNA polymerase delta.

The DNA-Binding Domain of S. pombe Mrc1 (Claspin) Acts to Enhance Stalling at Replication Barriers

During S-phase replication forks can stall at specific genetic loci. At some loci, the stalling events depend on the replisome components Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi1 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tof1) and Swi3 (S. cerevisiae Csm3) as well as factors that bind DNA in a site-specific manner. Using a new genetic screen we identified Mrc1 (S. cerevisiae Mrc1/metazoan Claspin) as a replisome component involved in replication stalling. Mrc1 is known to form a sub-complex with Swi1 and Swi3 within the replisome and is required for the intra-S phase checkpoint activation. This discovery is surprising as several studies show that S. cerevisiae Mrc1 is not required for replication barrier activity. In contrast, we show that deletion of S. pombe mrc1 leads to an approximately three-fold reduction in barrier activity at several barriers and that Mrc1’s role in replication fork stalling is independent of its role in checkpoint activation. Instead, S. pombe Mrc1 mediated fork stalling requires the presence of a functional copy of its phylogenetically conserved DNA binding domain. Interestingly, this domain is on the sequence level absent from S. cerevisiae Mrc1. Our study indicates that direct interactions between the eukaryotic replisome and the DNA are important for site-specific replication stalling.

Recombination occurs within minutes of replication blockage by RTS1 producing restarted forks that are prone to collapse

The completion of genome duplication during the cell cycle is threatened by the presence of replication fork barriers (RFBs). Following collision with a RFB, replication proteins can dissociate from the stalled fork (fork collapse) rendering it incapable of further DNA synthesis unless recombination intervenes to restart replication. We use time-lapse microscopy and genetic assays to show that recombination is initiated within ∼ 10 min of replication fork blockage at a site-specific barrier in fission yeast, leading to a restarted fork within ∼ 60 min, which is only prevented/curtailed by the arrival of the opposing replication fork. The restarted fork is susceptible to further collapse causing hyper-recombination downstream of the barrier. Surprisingly, in our system fork restart is unnecessary for maintaining cell viability. Seemingly, the risk of failing to complete replication prior to mitosis is sufficient to warrant the induction of recombination even though it can cause deleterious genetic change.

Analyzing the Response to Dysfunction Replication Forks Using the RTS1 Barrier System in Fission Yeast

The study of how eukaryotic cells overcome problems associated with dysfunctional DNA replication forks is assisted by experimental systems that allow site-specific replication fork arrest. Here we provide protocols for the use of the fission yeast RTS1 replication fork barrier. The RTS1 barrier is a directional, or polar, replication fork barrier that evolved to ensure directional replication of the fission yeast mating-type locus. We have moved the 859 bp RTS1 sequence to another locus in the genome and demonstrated that it arrests replication forks in a dysfunctional confirmation and that replication is restarted within ~20 min by the action of homologous recombination. We describe here the barrier constructs currently available, the methods by which we regulate the activity of the barrier, how to synchronize cells for analysis of replication intermediates by 2D gel electrophoresis, and the use of a replication slippage assay to measure fork fidelity.

The extent of error-prone replication restart by homologous recombination is controlled by Exo1 and checkpoint proteins

Genetic instability, a hallmark of cancer, can occur when the replication machinery encounters a barrier. The intra-S-phase checkpoint maintains stalled replication forks in a replication-competent configuration by phosphorylating replisome components and DNA repair proteins to prevent forks from catastrophically collapsing. Here, we report a novel function of the core Schizosaccharomyces pombe checkpoint sensor kinase, Rad3 (an ATR orthologue), that is independent of Chk1 and Cds1 (a CHK2 orthologue); Rad3^ATR regulates the association of recombination factors with collapsed forks, thus limiting their genetic instability. We further reveal antagonistic roles for Rad3^ATR and the 9-1-1 clamp – Rad3^ATR restrains MRN- and Exo1-dependent resection, whereas the 9-1-1 complex promotes Exo1 activity. Interestingly, the MRN complex, but not its nuclease activity, promotes resection and the subsequent association of recombination factors at collapsed forks. The biological significance of this regulation is revealed by the observation that Rad3^ATR prevents Exo1-dependent genome instability upstream of a collapsed fork without affecting the efficiency of recombination-mediated replication restart. We propose that the interplay between Rad3^ATR and the 9-1-1 clamp functions to fine-tune the balance between the need for the recovery of replication through recombination and the risk of increased genome instability.

Role of DNA replication in establishment and propagation of epigenetic states of chromatin

DNA replication is the fundamental process of duplication of the genetic information that is vital for survival of all living cells. The basic mechanistic steps of replication initiation, elongation and termination are conserved among bacteria, lower eukaryotes, like yeast and metazoans. However, the details of the mechanisms are different. Furthermore, there is a close coordination between chromatin assembly pathways and various components of replication machinery whereby DNA replication is coupled to "chromatin replication" during cell cycle. Thereby, various epigenetic modifications associated with different states of gene expression in differentiated cells and the related chromatin structures are faithfully propagated during the cell division through tight coupling with the DNA replication machinery. Several examples are found in lower eukaryotes like budding yeast and fission yeast with close parallels in metazoans.

The replication fork: understanding the eukaryotic replication machinery and the challenges to genome duplication

Eukaryotic cells must accurately and efficiently duplicate their genomes during each round of the cell cycle. Multiple linear chromosomes, an abundance of regulatory elements, and chromosome packaging are all challenges that the eukaryotic DNA replication machinery must successfully overcome. The replication machinery, the “replisome” complex, is composed of many specialized proteins with functions in supporting replication by DNA polymerases. Efficient replisome progression relies on tight coordination between the various factors of the replisome. Further, replisome progression must occur on less than ideal templates at various genomic loci. Here, we describe the functions of the major replisome components, as well as some of the obstacles to efficient DNA replication that the replisome confronts. Together, this review summarizes current understanding of the vastly complicated task of replicating eukaryotic DNA.

Establishment of a replication fork barrier following induction of DNA binding in mammalian cells

Understanding the mechanisms that lead to replication fork blocks (RFB) and the means to bypass them is important given the threat that they represent for genome stability if inappropriately handled. Here, to study this issue in mammals, we use integrated arrays of the LacO and/or TetO as a tractable system to follow in time a process in an individual cell and at a single locus. Importantly, we show that induction of the binding by LacI and TetR proteins, and not the presence of the repeats, is key to form the RFB. We find that the binding of the proteins to the arrays during replication causes a prolonged persistence of replication foci at the site. This, in turn, induces a local DNA damage repair (DDR) response, with the recruitment of proteins involved in double-strand break (DSB) repair such as TOPBP1 and 53BP1, and the phosphorylation of H2AX. Furthermore, the appearance of micronuclei and DNA bridges after mitosis is consistent with an incomplete replication. We discuss how the many DNA binding proteins encountered during replication can be dealt with and the consequences of incomplete replication. Future studies exploiting this type of system should help analyze how an RFB, along with bypass mechanisms, are controlled in order to maintain genome integrity.

The PAF complex and Prf1/Rtf1 delineate distinct Cdk9-dependent pathways regulating transcription elongation in fission yeast

Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (Cdk9) promotes elongation by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), mRNA processing, and co-transcriptional histone modification. Cdk9 phosphorylates multiple targets, including the conserved RNAPII elongation factor Spt5 and RNAPII itself, but how these different modifications mediate Cdk9 functions is not known. Here we describe two Cdk9-dependent pathways in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe that involve distinct targets and elicit distinct biological outcomes. Phosphorylation of Spt5 by Cdk9 creates a direct binding site for Prf1/Rtf1, a transcription regulator with functional and physical links to the Polymerase Associated Factor (PAF) complex. PAF association with chromatin is also dependent on Cdk9 but involves alternate phosphoacceptor targets. Prf1 and PAF are biochemically separate in cell extracts, and genetic analyses show that Prf1 and PAF are functionally distinct and exert opposing effects on the RNAPII elongation complex. We propose that this opposition constitutes a Cdk9 auto-regulatory mechanism, such that a positive effect on elongation, driven by the PAF pathway, is kept in check by a negative effect of Prf1/Rtf1 and downstream mono-ubiquitylation of histone H2B. Thus, optimal RNAPII elongation may require balanced action of functionally distinct Cdk9 pathways.

Telomeres and viruses: common themes of genome maintenance

Genome maintenance mechanisms actively suppress genetic instability associated with cancer and aging. Some viruses provoke genetic instability by subverting the host's control of genome maintenance. Viruses have their own specialized strategies for genome maintenance, which can mimic and modify host cell processes. Here, we review some of the common features of genome maintenance utilized by viruses and host chromosomes, with a particular focus on terminal repeat (TR) elements. The TRs of cellular chromosomes, better known as telomeres, have well-established roles in cellular chromosome stability. Cellular telomeres are themselves maintained by viral-like mechanisms, including self-propagation by reverse transcription, recombination, and retrotransposition. Viral TR elements, like cellular telomeres, are essential for viral genome stability and propagation. We review the structure and function of viral repeat elements and discuss how they may share telomere-like structures and genome protection functions. We consider how viral infections modulate telomere regulatory factors for viral repurposing and can alter normal host telomere structure and chromosome stability. Understanding the common strategies of viral and cellular genome maintenance may provide new insights into viral-host interactions and the mechanisms driving genetic instability in cancer.

Lsd1 and lsd2 control programmed replication fork pauses and imprinting in fission yeast

In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a chromosomal imprinting event controls the asymmetric pattern of mating-type switching. The orientation of DNA replication at the mating-type locus is instrumental in this process. However, the factors leading to imprinting are not fully identified and the mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we show that the replication fork pause at the mat1 locus (MPS1), essential for imprint formation, depends on the lysine-specific demethylase Lsd1. We demonstrate that either Lsd1 or Lsd2 amine oxidase activity is required for these processes, working upstream of the imprinting factors Swi1 and Swi3 (homologs of mammalian Timeless and Tipin, respectively). We also show that the Lsd1/2 complex controls the replication fork terminators, within the rDNA repeats. These findings reveal a role for the Lsd1/2 demethylases in controlling polar replication fork progression, imprint formation, and subsequent asymmetric cell divisions.

Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection

The eukaryotic cell replicates its chromosomal DNA with almost absolute fidelity in the course of every cell cycle. This accomplishment is remarkable considering that the conditions for DNA replication are rarely ideal. The replication machinery encounters a variety of obstacles on the chromosome, including damaged template DNA. In addition, a number of chromosome regions are considered to be difficult to replicate owing to DNA secondary structures and DNA binding proteins required for various transactions on the chromosome. Under these conditions, replication forks stall or break, posing grave threats to genomic integrity. How does the cell combat such stressful conditions during DNA replication? The replication fork protection complex (FPC) may help answer this question. Recent studies have demonstrated that the FPC is required for the smooth passage of replication forks at difficult-to-replicate genomic regions and plays a critical role in coordinating multiple genome maintenance processes at the replication fork.

Recovery of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination is error-prone

Homologous recombination is a universal mechanism that allows repair of DNA and provides support for DNA replication. Homologous recombination is therefore a major pathway that suppresses non-homology-mediated genome instability. Here, we report that recovery of impeded replication forks by homologous recombination is error-prone. Using a fork-arrest-based assay in fission yeast, we demonstrate that a single collapsed fork can cause mutations and large-scale genomic changes, including deletions and translocations. Fork-arrest-induced gross chromosomal rearrangements are mediated by inappropriate ectopic recombination events at the site of collapsed forks. Inverted repeats near the site of fork collapse stimulate large-scale genomic changes up to 1,500 times over spontaneous events. We also show that the high accuracy of DNA replication during S-phase is impaired by impediments to fork progression, since fork-arrest-induced mutation is due to erroneous DNA synthesis during recovery of replication forks. The mutations caused are small insertions/duplications between short tandem repeats (micro-homology) indicative of replication slippage. Our data establish that collapsed forks, but not stalled forks, recovered by homologous recombination are prone to replication slippage. The inaccuracy of DNA synthesis does not rely on PCNA ubiquitination or trans-lesion-synthesis DNA polymerases, and it is not counteracted by mismatch repair. We propose that deletions/insertions, mediated by micro-homology, leading to copy number variations during replication stress may arise by progression of error-prone replication forks restarted by homologous recombination.

Timeless preserves telomere length by promoting efficient DNA replication through human telomeres

A variety of telomere protection programs are utilized to preserve telomere structure. However, the complex nature of telomere maintenance remains elusive. The Timeless protein associates with the replication fork and is thought to support efficient progression of the replication fork through natural impediments, including replication fork block sites. However, the mechanism by which Timeless regulates such genomic regions is not understood. Here, we report the role of Timeless in telomere length maintenance. We demonstrate that Timeless depletion leads to telomere shortening in human cells. This length maintenance is independent of telomerase, and Timeless depletion causes increased levels of DNA damage, leading to telomere aberrations. We also show that Timeless is associated with Shelterin components TRF1 and TRF2. Timeless depletion slows telomere replication in vitro, and Timeless-depleted cells fail to maintain TRF1-mediated accumulation of replisome components at telomeric regions. Furthermore, telomere replication undergoes a dramatic delay in Timeless-depleted cells. These results suggest that Timeless functions together with TRF1 to prevent fork collapse at telomere repeat DNA and ensure stable maintenance of telomere length and integrity.

The DNA helicase Pfh1 promotes fork merging at replication termination sites to ensure genome stability

Bidirectionally moving DNA replication forks merge at termination sites composed of accidental or programmed DNA-protein barriers. If merging fails, then regions of unreplicated DNA can result in the breakage of DNA during mitosis, which in turn can give rise to genome instability. Despite its importance, little is known about the mechanisms that promote the final stages of fork merging in eukaryotes. Here we show that the Pif1 family DNA helicase Pfh1 plays a dual role in promoting replication fork termination. First, it facilitates replication past DNA-protein barriers, and second, it promotes the merging of replication forks. A failure of these processes in Pfh1-deficient cells results in aberrant chromosome segregation and heightened genome instability.

Identification of a novel type of spacer element required for imprinting in fission yeast

Asymmetrical segregation of differentiated sister chromatids is thought to be important for cellular differentiation in higher eukaryotes. Similarly, in fission yeast, cellular differentiation involves the asymmetrical segregation of a chromosomal imprint. This imprint has been shown to consist of two ribonucleotides that are incorporated into the DNA during lagging-strand synthesis in response to a replication pause, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Here we present key novel discoveries important for unravelling this process. Our data show that cis-acting sequences within the mat1 cassette mediate pausing of replication forks at the proximity of the imprinting site, and the results suggest that this pause dictates specific priming at the position of imprinting in a sequence-independent manner. Also, we identify a novel type of cis-acting spacer region important for the imprinting process that affects where subsequent primers are put down after the replication fork is released from the pause. Thus, our data suggest that the imprint is formed by ligation of a not-fully-processed Okazaki fragment to the subsequent fragment. The presented work addresses how differentiated sister chromatids are established during DNA replication through the involvement of replication barriers.

The fission yeast rDNA-binding protein Reb1 regulates G1 phase under nutritional stress

Yeast Reb1 and its mammalian ortholog TTF1 are conserved Myb-type DNA-binding proteins that bind to specific sites near the 3'-end of rRNA genes (rDNA). Here, they participate in the termination of transcription driven by RNA polymerase I and block DNA replication forks approaching in the opposite direction. We found that Schizosaccharomyces pombe Reb1 also upregulates transcription of the ste9(+) gene that is required for nitrogen-starvation-induced growth arrest with a G1 DNA content and sexual differentiation. Ste9 activates the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome ('APC/C') in G1, targeting B-cyclin for proteasomal degradation in response to nutritional stress. Reb1 binds in vivo and in vitro to a specific DNA sequence at the promoter of ste9(+), similar to the sequence recognized in the rDNA, and this binding is required for ste9(+) transcriptional activation and G1 arrest. This suggests that Reb1 acts as a link between rDNA metabolism and cell cycle control in response to nutritional stress. In agreement with this new role for Reb1 in the regulation of the G1-S transition, reb1Δ and wee1(ts) mutations are synthetically lethal owing to the inability of these cells to lengthen G1 before entering S phase. Similarly, reb1Δ cdc10(ts) cells are unable to arrest in G1 and die at the semi-permissive temperature.

Regulation of replication termination by Reb1 protein-mediated action at a distance

DNA transactions driven by long-range protein-mediated inter- and intrachromosomal interactions have been reported to influence gene expression. Here, we report that site-specific replication termination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is modulated by protein-mediated interactions between pairs of Ter sites located either on the same or on different chromosomes. The dimeric Reb1 protein catalyzes termination and mediates interaction between Ter sites. The Reb1-dependent interactions between two antiparallel Ter sites in cis caused looping out of the intervening DNA in vitro and enhancement of fork arrest in vivo. A Ter site on chromosome 2 interacted pairwise with two Ter sites located on chromosome 1 by chromosome kissing. Mutational inactivation of the major interacting Ter site on chromosome 1 significantly reduced fork arrest at the Ter site on chromosome 2, thereby revealing a cooperative mechanism of control of replication termination.

tRNA-nucleotidyltransferases: highly unusual RNA polymerases with vital functions

tRNA-nucleotidyltransferases are fascinating and unusual RNA polymerases responsible for the synthesis of the nucleotide triplet CCA at the 3'-terminus of tRNAs. As this CCA end represents an essential functional element for aminoacylation and translation, these polymerases (CCA-adding enzymes) are of vital importance in all organisms. With a possible origin of ancient telomerase-like activity, the CCA-adding enzymes obviously emerged twice during evolution, leading to structurally different, but functionally identical enzymes. The evolution as well as the unique polymerization features of these interesting proteins will be discussed in this review.

Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism

Gene amplification plays important roles in the progression of cancer and contributes to acquired drug resistance during treatment. Amplification can initiate via dicentric palindromic chromosome production and subsequent breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. Here we show that, in fission yeast, acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes form by homologous recombination protein-dependent fusion of nearby inverted repeats, and that these fusions occur frequently when replication forks arrest within the inverted repeats. Genetic and molecular analyses suggest that these acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes arise not by previously described mechanisms, but by a replication template exchange mechanism that does not involve a DNA double-strand break. We thus propose an alternative mechanism for the generation of palindromic chromosomes dependent on replication fork arrest at closely spaced inverted repeats.

Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rtf2 mediates site-specific replication termination by inhibiting replication restart

Here, we identify a phylogenetically conserved Schizosaccharomyces pombe factor, named Rtf2, as a key requirement for efficient replication termination at the site-specific replication barrier RTS1. We show that Rtf2, a proliferating cell nuclear antigen-interacting protein, promotes termination at RTS1 by preventing replication restart; in the absence of Rtf2, we observe the establishment of "slow-moving" Srs2-dependent replication forks. Analysis of the pmt3 (SUMO) and rtf2 mutants establishes that pmt3 causes a reduction in RTS1 barrier activity, that rtf2 and pmt3 are nonadditive, and that pmt3 (SUMO) partly suppresses the rtf2-dependent replication restart. Our results are consistent with a model in which Rtf2 stabilizes the replication fork stalled at RTS1 until completion of DNA synthesis by a converging replication fork initiated at a flanking origin.

Random and site-specific replication termination

Bi-directionality is a common feature observed for genomic replication for all three phylogenetic kingdoms: Eubacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes. A consequence of bi-directional replication, where the two replication forks initiated at an origin move away from each other, is that the replication termination will occur at positions away from the origin sequence(s). The replication termination processes are therefore physically and mechanistically dissociated from the replication initiation. The replication machinery is a highly processive complex that in short time copies huge numbers of bases while competing for the DNA substrate with histones, transcription factors, and other DNA-binding proteins. Importantly, the replication machinery generally wins out; meanwhile, when converging forks meet termination occurs, thus preventing over-replication and genetic instability. Very different scenarios for the replication termination processes have been described for the three phylogenetic kingdoms. In eubacterial genomes replication termination is site specific, while in archaea and eukaryotes termination is thought to occur randomly within zones where converging replication forks meet. However, a few site-specific replication barrier elements that mediate replication termination have been described in eukaryotes. This review gives an overview about what is known about replication termination, with a focus on these natural site-specific replication termination sites.