Differential contributions of histone H3 and H4 residues to heterochromatin structure

Understanding and Simulating the Dynamics of a Polymer-Like Chromatin

Chromatin modeling enables the characterization of chromatin architecture at a resolution so far unachievable with experimental techniques. Polymer models fill our knowledge gap on a wide range of structures, from chromatin loops to nuclear compartments. Many physical properties already known for polymers can thus explain the dynamics of chromatin. With molecular simulations, it is possible to probe an ensemble of conformations, which attest to the variability observed in individual cells and the general behavior of a population of cells. In this review, we describe universal characteristics of polymers that chromatin carries. We introduce how these characteristics can be assessed with polymer simulations while also addressing specific aspects of chromatin and its environment. Finally, we give examples of plant chromatin models that, despite their paucity, augur well for the future of polymer simulations to plant chromosome biology.

A screen for histone mutations that affect quiescence in S. cerevisiae

Quiescence or G0 is a reversible state in which cells cease division but retain the ability to resume proliferation. Quiescence occurs in all organisms and is essential for stem cell maintenance and tissue renewal. It is also related to chronological lifespan (CLS)-the survival of postmitotic quiescent cells (Q cells) over time-and thus contributes to longevity. Important questions remain regarding the mechanisms that control entry into quiescence, maintenance of quiescence and re-entry of Q cells into the cell cycle. S. cerevisiae has emerged as an excellent organism in which to address these questions because of the ease in which Q cells can be isolated. Following entry into G0, yeast cells remain viable for an extended period and can re-enter the cell cycle when exposed to growth-promoting signals. Histone acetylation is lost during the formation of Q cells and chromatin becomes highly condensed. This unique chromatin landscape regulates quiescence-specific transcriptional repression and has been linked to the formation and maintenance of Q cells. To ask whether other chromatin features regulate quiescence, we conducted two comprehensive screens of histone H3 and H4 mutants and identified mutants that show either altered quiescence entry or CLS. Examination of several quiescence entry mutants found that none of the mutants retain histone acetylation in Q cells but show differences in chromatin condensation. A comparison of H3 and H4 mutants with altered CLS to those with altered quiescence entry found that chromatin plays both overlapping and independent roles in the continuum of the quiescence program.

Measuring the buffering capacity of gene silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Gene silencing, once established, is stably maintained for several generations. Despite the high fidelity of the inheritance of the silent state, individual components of silenced chromatin are in constant flux. Models suggest that silent loci can tolerate fluctuations in Sir proteins and histone acetylation levels, but the level of tolerance is unknown. To understand the quantitative relationships between H4K16 acetylation, Sir proteins, and silencing, we developed assays to quantitatively alter a H4K16 acetylation mimic allele and Sir protein levels and measure the effects of these changes on silencing. Our data suggest that a two- to threefold change in levels of histone marks and specific Sir proteins affects the stability of the silent state of a large chromatin domain.

Gene silencing in budding yeast is mediated by Sir protein binding to unacetylated nucleosomes to form a chromatin structure that inhibits transcription. Transcriptional silencing is characterized by the high-fidelity transmission of the silent state. Despite its relative stability, the constituent parts of the silent state are in constant flux, giving rise to a model that silent loci can tolerate such fluctuations without functional consequences. However, the level of tolerance is unknown, and we developed methods to measure the threshold of histone acetylation that causes the silent chromatin state to switch to the active state as well as to measure the levels of the enzymes and structural proteins necessary for silencing. We show that loss of silencing required 50 to 75% acetyl-mimic histones, though the precise levels were influenced by silencer strength and upstream activating sequence (UAS) enhancer/promoter strength. Measurements of repressor protein levels necessary for silencing showed that reducing SIR4 gene dosage two- to threefold significantly weakened silencing, though reducing the gene copy numbers for Sir2 or Sir3 to the same extent did not significantly affect silencing suggesting that Sir4 was a limiting component in gene silencing. Calculations suggest that a mere twofold reduction in the ability of acetyltransferases to acetylate nucleosomes across a large array of nucleosomes may be sufficient to generate a transcriptionally silent domain.

Tau Stabilizes Chromatin Compaction

An extensive body of literature suggested a possible role of the microtubule-associated protein Tau in chromatin functions and/or organization in neuronal, non-neuronal, and cancer cells. How Tau functions in these processes remains elusive. Here we report that Tau expression in breast cancer cell lines causes resistance to the anti-cancer effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors, by preventing histone deacetylase inhibitor-inducible gene expression and remodeling of chromatin structure. We identify Tau as a protein recognizing and binding to core histone when H3 and H4 are devoid of any post-translational modifications or acetylated H4 that increases the Tau's affinity. Consistent with chromatin structure alterations in neurons found in frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Tau mutations did not prevent histone deacetylase-inhibitor-induced higher chromatin structure remodeling by suppressing Tau binding to histones. In addition, we demonstrate that the interaction between Tau and histones prevents further histone H3 post-translational modifications induced by histone deacetylase-inhibitor treatment by maintaining a more compact chromatin structure. Altogether, these results highlight a new cellular role for Tau as a chromatin reader, which opens new therapeutic avenues to exploit Tau biology in neuronal and cancer cells.

Epigenetic Regulatory Dynamics in Models of Methamphetamine-Use Disorder

Methamphetamine (METH)-use disorder (MUD) is a very serious, potentially lethal, biopsychosocial disease. Exposure to METH causes long-term changes to brain regions involved in reward processing and motivation, leading vulnerable individuals to engage in pathological drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior that can remain a lifelong struggle. It is crucial to elucidate underlying mechanisms by which exposure to METH leads to molecular neuroadaptive changes at transcriptional and translational levels. Changes in gene expression are controlled by post-translational modifications via chromatin remodeling. This review article focuses on the brain-region specific combinatorial or distinct epigenetic modifications that lead to METH-induced changes in gene expression.

Histone Tail Conformations: A Fuzzy Affair with DNA

The core histone tails are critical in chromatin structure and signaling. Studies over the past several decades have provided a wealth of information on the histone tails and their interaction with chromatin factors. However, the conformation of the histone tails in a chromatin relevant context has remained elusive. Only recently has enough evidence emerged to start to build a structural model of the tails in the context of nucleosomes and nucleosome arrays. Here, we review these studies and propose that the histone tails adopt a high-affinity fuzzy complex with DNA, characterized by robust but dynamic association. Furthermore, we discuss how these DNA-bound conformational ensembles promote distinct chromatin structure and signaling, and that their fuzzy nature is important in transitioning between functional states.

CAF-1 and Rtt101p function within the replication-coupled chromatin assembly network to promote H4 K16ac, preventing ectopic silencing

Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is achieved by a network of alternate pathways containing different chromatin assembly factors and histone-modifying enzymes that coordinate deposition of nucleosomes at the replication fork. Here we describe the organization of a CAF-1-dependent pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that regulates acetylation of histone H4 K16. We demonstrate factors that function in this CAF-1-dependent pathway are important for preventing establishment of silenced states at inappropriate genomic sites using a crippled HMR locus as a model, while factors specific to other assembly pathways do not. This CAF-1-dependent pathway required the cullin Rtt101p, but was functionally distinct from an alternate pathway involving Rtt101p-dependent ubiquitination of histone H3 and the chromatin assembly factor Rtt106p. A major implication from this work is that cells have the inherent ability to create different chromatin modification patterns during DNA replication via differential processing and deposition of histones by distinct chromatin assembly pathways within the network.

HDAC superfamily promoters acetylation is differentially regulated by modafinil and methamphetamine in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex

Dysregulation of histone deacetylases (HDAC) has been proposed as a potential contributor to aberrant transcriptional profiles that can lead to changes in cognitive functions. It is known that METH negatively impacts the prefrontal cortex (PFC) leading to cognitive decline and addiction whereas modafinil enhances cognition and has a low abuse liability. We investigated if modafinil (90 mg/kg) and methamphetmine (METH) (1 mg/kg) may differentially influence the acetylation status of histones 3 and 4 (H3ac and H4ac) at proximal promoters of class I, II, III, and IV HDACs. We found that METH produced broader acetylation effects in comparison with modafinil in the medial PFC. For single dose, METH affected H4ac by increasing its acetylation at class I Hdac1 and class IIb Hdac10, decreasing it at class IIa Hdac4 and Hdac5. Modafinil increased H3ac and decreased H4ac of Hdac7. For mRNA, single-dose METH increased Hdac4 and modafinil increased Hdac7 expression. For repeated treatments (4 d after daily injections over 7 d), we found specific effects only for METH. We found that METH increased H4ac in class IIa Hdac4 and Hdac5 and decreased H3/H4ac at class I Hdac1, Hdac2, and Hdac8. At the mRNA level, repeated METH increased Hdac4 and decreased Hdac2. Class III and IV HDACs were only responsive to repeated treatments, where METH affected the H3/H4ac status of Sirt2, Sirt3, Sirt7, and Hdac11. Our results suggest that HDAC targets linked to the effects of modafinil and METH may be related to the cognitive-enhancing vs cognitive-impairing effects of these psychostimulants.

The effects of single-dose injections of modafinil and methamphetamine on epigenetic and functional markers in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex: potential role of dopamine receptors

METH use causes neuroadaptations that negatively impact the prefrontal cortex (PFC) leading to addiction and associated cognitive decline in animals and humans. In contrast, modafinil enhances cognition by increasing PFC function. Accumulated evidence indicates that psychostimulant drugs, including modafinil and METH, regulate gene expression via epigenetic modifications. In this study, we measured the effects of single-dose injections of modafinil and METH on the protein levels of acetylated histone H3 (H3ac) and H4ac, deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2, and of the NMDA subunit GluN1 in the medial PFC (mPFC) of mice euthanized 1 h after drug administration. To test if dopamine (DA) receptors (DRs) participate in the biochemical effects of the two drugs, we injected the D1Rs antagonist, SCH23390, or the D2Rs antagonist, raclopride, 30 min before administration of METH and modafinil. We evaluated each drug effect on glutamate synaptic transmission in D1R-expressing layer V pyramidal neurons. We also measured the enrichment of H3ac and H4ac at the promoters of several genes including DA, NE, orexin, histamine, and glutamate receptors, and their mRNA expression, since they are responsive to chronic modafinil and METH treatment. Acute modafinil and METH injections caused similar effects on total histone acetylation, increasing H3ac and decreasing H4ac, and they also increased HDAC1, HDAC2 and GluN1 protein levels in the mouse mPFC. In addition, the effects of the drugs were prevented by pre-treatment with D1Rs and D2Rs antagonists. Specifically, the changes in H4ac, HDAC2, and GluN1 were responsive to SCH23390, whereas those of H3ac and GluN1 were responsive to raclopride. Whole-cell patch clamp in transgenic BAC-Drd1a-tdTomato mice showed that METH, but not modafinil, induced paired-pulse facilitation of EPSCs, suggesting reduced presynaptic probability of glutamate release onto layer V pyramidal neurons. Analysis of histone 3/4 enrichment at specific promoters revealed: i) distinct effects of the drugs on histone 3 acetylation, with modafinil increasing H3ac at Drd1 and Adra1b promoters, but METH increasing H3ac at Adra1a; ii) distinct effects on histone 4 acetylation enrichment, with modafinil increasing H4ac at the Drd2 promoter and decreasing it at Hrh1, but METH increasing H4ac at Drd1; iii) comparable effects of both psychostimulants, increasing H3ac at Drd2, Hcrtr1, and Hrh1 promoters, decreasing H3ac at Hrh3, increasing H4ac at Hcrtr1, and decreasing H4ac at Hcrtr2, Hrh3, and Grin1 promoters. Interestingly, only METH altered mRNA levels of genes with altered histone acetylation status, inducing increased expression of Drd1a, Adra1a, Hcrtr1, and Hrh1, and decreasing Grin1. Our study suggests that although acute METH and modafinil can both increase DA neurotransmission in the mPFC, there are similar and contrasting epigenetic and transcriptional consequences that may account for their divergent clinical effects.

Repeated methamphetamine and modafinil induce differential cognitive effects and specific histone acetylation and DNA methylation profiles in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex

Methamphetamine (METH) and modafinil are psychostimulants with different long-term cognitive profiles: METH is addictive and leads to cognitive decline, whereas modafinil has little abuse liability and is a cognitive enhancer. Increasing evidence implicates epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation behind the lasting changes that drugs of abuse and other psychotropic compounds induce in the brain, like the control of gene expression by histones 3 and 4 tails acetylation (H3ac and H4ac) and DNA cytosine methylation (5-mC). Mice were treated with a seven-day repeated METH, modafinil or vehicle protocol and evaluated in the novel object recognition (NOR) test or sacrificed 4days after last injection for molecular assays. We evaluated total H3ac, H4ac and 5-mC levels in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), H3ac and H4ac promotor enrichment (ChIP) and mRNA expression (RT-PCR) of neurotransmitter systems involved in arousal, wakefulness and cognitive control, like dopaminergic (Drd1 and Drd2), α-adrenergic (Adra1a and Adra1b), orexinergic (Hcrtr1 and Hcrtr2), histaminergic (Hrh1 and Hrh3) and glutamatergic (AMPA Gria1 and NMDA Grin1) receptors. Repeated METH and modafinil treatment elicited different cognitive outcomes in the NOR test, where modafinil-treated mice performed as controls and METH-treated mice showed impaired recognition memory. METH-treated mice also showed i) decreased levels of total H3ac and H4ac, and increased levels of 5-mC, ii) decreased H3ac enrichment at promoters of Drd2, Hcrtr1/2, Hrh1 and Grin1, and increased H4ac enrichment at Drd1, Hrh1 and Grin1, iii) increased mRNA of Drd1a, Grin1 and Gria1. Modafinil-treated mice shared none of these effects and showed increased H3ac enrichment and mRNA expression at Adra1b. Modafinil and METH showed similar effects linked to decreased H3ac in Hrh3, increased H4ac in Hcrtr1, and decreased mRNA expression of Hcrtr2. The specific METH-induced epigenetic and transcriptional changes described here may be related to the long-term cognitive decline effects of the drug and its detrimental effects on mPFC function. The lack of similar epigenetic effects of chronic modafinil administration supports this notion.

Cell cycle-dependent positive and negative functions of Fun30 chromatin remodeler in DNA damage response

The evolutionally conserved Fun30 chromatin remodeler in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to contribute to cellular resistance to genotoxic stress inflicted by camptothecin (CPT), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and hydroxyurea (HU). Fun30 aids in extensive DNA resection of DNA double stranded break (DSB) ends, which is thought to underlie its role in CPT-resistance. How Fun30 promotes MMS- or HU-resistance has not been resolved. Interestingly, we have recently found Fun30 to also play a negative role in cellular tolerance to MMS and HU in the absence of the Rad5-dependent DNA damage tolerance pathway. In this report, we show that Fun30 acts to down regulate Rad9-dependent DNA damage checkpoint triggered by CPT or MMS, but does not affect Rad9-independent intra-S phase replication checkpoint induced by MMS or HU. These results support the notion that Fun30 contributes to cellular response to DSBs by preventing excessive DNA damage checkpoint activation in addition to its role in facilitating DNA end resection. On the other hand, we present evidence suggesting that Fun30's negative function in MMS- and HU-tolerance in the absence of Rad5 is not related to its regulation of checkpoint activity. Moreover, we find Fun30 to be cell cycle regulated with its abundance peaking in G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Importantly, we demonstrate that artificially restricting Fun30 expression to G2/M does not affect its positive or negative function in genotoxin-resistance, but confining Fun30 to S phase abolishes its functions. These results indicate that both positive and negative functions of Fun30 in DNA damage response occur mainly in G2/M phase.

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) contributes to the high-order structure and stability of heterochromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Heterochromatin plays important roles in the structure, maintenance, and function of the eukaryotic genome. It is associated with special histone modifications and specialized non-histone proteins and assumes a more compact structure than euchromatin. Genes embedded in heterochromatin are generally transcriptionally silent. It was found previously that several mutations of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a DNA replication processivity factor, reduce transcriptional silencing at heterochromatin loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, the notion that PCNA plays a role in transcriptional silencing was recently questioned because of a potential problem concerning the silencing assays used in prior studies. To determine if PCNA is a bona fide contributor to heterochromatin-mediated transcriptional silencing, we examined the effects of PCNA mutations on heterochromatin structure. We found evidence implicating PCNA in the maintenance of the high-order structure and stability of heterochromatin, which indicates a role of DNA replication in heterochromatin maintenance.

Chemical and biological tools for the preparation of modified histone proteins

Eukaryotic chromatin is a complex and dynamic system in which the DNA double helix is organized and protected by interactions with histone proteins. This system is regulated through a large network of dynamic post-translational modifications (PTMs) which ensure proper gene transcription, DNA repair, and other processes involving DNA. Homogenous protein samples with precisely characterized modification sites are necessary to understand better the functions of modified histone proteins. Here, we discuss sets of chemical and biological tools developed for the preparation of modified histones, with a focus on the appropriate choice of tool for a given target. We start with genetic approaches for the creation of modified histones, including the incorporation of genetic mimics of histone modifications, chemical installation of modification analogs, and the use of the expanded genetic code to incorporate modified amino acids. We also cover the chemical ligation techniques which have been invaluable in the generation of complex modified histones indistinguishable from their natural counterparts. We end with a prospectus on future directions.

Nucleosome avidities and transcriptional silencing in yeast

A classical example of "transcriptional silencing" is found in the yeast S. cerevisiae mating-type switch [1, 2]. The gene pairs a1/a2 and α1/α2, positioned at the loci HMR and HML, respectively, are silenced by Sir proteins recruited by proteins that bind sites flanking each locus. Transfer of either gene pair to the Sir-free MAT locus, or mutation of the Sirs, allows expression of those genes at levels sufficient to foster yeast mating. Here we confirm that, in the absence of Sirs, a1 and a2 at HMR are expressed at low levels [3]. This level is low because, we show, the relevant transcriptional activators, which work from regulatory sites located between the divergently transcribed genes, are weak. That property-weak activation-is a prerequisite for effective silencing upon recruitment of Sirs. We use our quantitative nucleosome occupancy assay to show that Sirs (which bind nucleosomes) increase the avidities with which those nucleosomes form at the promoters. That increase can account for at least part of the repressive effects of the Sirs and can explain why silencing is effective in countering weak activation only. We suggest that "silencing" in higher eukaryotes (e.g., by Polycomb or HP1) follows similar rules [4, 5] and note where such effects could be important.

Heritable capture of heterochromatin dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Heterochromatin exerts a heritable form of eukaryotic gene repression and contributes to chromosome segregation fidelity and genome stability. However, to date there has been no quantitative evaluation of the stability of heterochromatic gene repression. We designed a genetic strategy to capture transient losses of gene silencing in Saccharomyces as permanent, heritable changes in genotype and phenotype. This approach revealed rare transcription within heterochromatin that occurred in approximately 1/1000 cell divisions. In concordance with multiple lines of evidence suggesting these events were rare and transient, single-molecule RNA FISH showed that transcription was limited. The ability to monitor fluctuations in heterochromatic repression uncovered previously unappreciated roles for Sir1, a silencing establishment factor, in the maintenance and/or inheritance of silencing. In addition, we identified the sirtuin Hst3 and its histone target as contributors to the stability of the silenced state. These approaches revealed dynamics of a heterochromatin function that have been heretofore inaccessible.

The molecular topography of silenced chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Heterochromatin imparts regional, promoter-independent repression of genes and is epigenetically heritable. Understanding how silencing achieves this regional repression is a fundamental problem in genetics and development. Current models of yeast silencing posit that Sir proteins, recruited by transcription factors bound to the silencers, spread throughout the silenced region. To test this model directly at high resolution, we probed the silenced chromatin architecture by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) of Sir proteins, histones, and a key histone modification, H4K16-acetyl. These analyses revealed that Sir proteins are strikingly concentrated at and immediately adjacent to the silencers, with lower levels of enrichment over the promoters at HML and HMR, the critical targets for transcriptional repression. The telomeres also showed discrete peaks of Sir enrichment yet a continuous domain of hypoacetylated histone H4K16. Surprisingly, ChIP-seq of cross-linked chromatin revealed a distribution of nucleosomes at silenced loci that was similar to Sir proteins, whereas native nucleosome maps showed a regular distribution throughout silenced loci, indicating that cross-linking captured a specialized chromatin organization imposed by Sir proteins. This specialized chromatin architecture observed in yeast informs the importance of a steric contribution to regional repression in other organisms.

Epigenetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a well-studied model system for heritable silent chromatin, in which a nonhistone protein complex--the SIR complex--represses genes by spreading in a sequence-independent manner, much like heterochromatin in higher eukaryotes. The ability to study mutations in histones and to screen genome-wide for mutations that impair silencing has yielded an unparalleled depth of detail about this system. Recent advances in the biochemistry and structural biology of the SIR-chromatin complex bring us much closer to a molecular understanding of how Sir3 selectively recognizes the deacetylated histone H4 tail and demethylated histone H3 core. The existence of appropriate mutants has also shown how components of the silencing machinery affect physiological processes beyond transcriptional repression.

Structural basis of silencing: Sir3 BAH domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 Å resolution

Gene silencing is essential for regulating cell fate in eukaryotes. Altered chromatin architectures contribute to maintaining the silenced state in a variety of species. The silent information regulator (Sir) proteins regulate mating type in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. One of these proteins, Sir3, interacts directly with the nucleosome to help generate silenced domains. We determined the crystal structure of a complex of the yeast Sir3 BAH (bromo-associated homology) domain and the nucleosome core particle at 3.0 angstrom resolution. We see multiple molecular interactions between the protein surfaces of the nucleosome and the BAH domain that explain numerous genetic mutations. These interactions are accompanied by structural rearrangements in both the nucleosome and the BAH domain. The structure explains how covalent modifications on H4K16 and H3K79 regulate formation of a silencing complex that contains the nucleosome as a central component.

Contributions of histone H3 nucleosome core surface mutations to chromatin structures, silencing and DNA repair

Histone H3 mutations in residues that cluster in a discrete region on the nucleosome surface around lysine 79 of H3 affect H3-K79 methylation, impair transcriptional silencing in subtelomeric chromatin, and reveal distinct contributions of histone H3 to various DNA-damage response and repair pathways. These residues might act by recruitment of silencing and DNA-damage response factors. Alternatively, their location on the nucleosome surface suggests a possible involvement in nucleosome positioning, stability and nucleosome interactions. Here, we show that the yeast H3 mutants hht2-T80A, hht2-K79E, hht2-L70S, and hht2-E73D show normal nucleosome positioning and stability in minichromosomes. However, loss of silencing in a subtelomeric URA3 gene correlates with a shift of the promoter nucleosome, while nucleosome positions and stability in the coding region are maintained. Moreover, the H3 mutants show normal repair of UV lesions by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair in minichromosomes and slightly enhanced repair in the subtelomeric region. Thus, these results support a role of those residues in the recruitment of silencing proteins and argue against a general role in nucleosome organization.