Chromatin That Guides Dosage Compensation Is Modulated by the siRNA Pathway in Drosophila melanogaster

siRNA that participates in Drosophila dosage compensation is produced by many 1.688X and 359 bp repeats

Organisms with differentiated sex chromosomes must accommodate unequal gene dosage in males and females. Male fruit flies increase X-linked gene expression to compensate for hemizygosity of their single X chromosome. Full compensation requires localization of the Male-Specific Lethal (MSL) complex to active genes on the male X, where it modulates chromatin to elevate expression. The mechanisms that identify X chromatin are poorly understood. The euchromatic X is enriched for AT-rich, ∼359 bp satellites termed the 1.688X repeats. Autosomal insertions of 1.688X DNA enable MSL recruitment to nearby genes. Ectopic expression of dsRNA from one of these repeats produces siRNA and partially restores X-localization of MSLs in males with defective X recognition. Surprisingly, expression of double-stranded RNA from three other 1.688X repeats failed to rescue males. We reconstructed dsRNA-expressing transgenes with sequence from two of these repeats and identified phasing of repeat DNA, rather than sequence or orientation, as the factor that determines rescue of males with defective X recognition. Small RNA sequencing revealed that siRNA was produced in flies with a transgene that rescues, but not in those carrying a transgene with the same repeat but different phasing. We demonstrate that pericentromeric X heterochromatin promotes X recognition through a maternal effect, potentially mediated by small RNA from closely related heterochromatic repeats. This suggests that the sources of siRNAs promoting X recognition are highly redundant. We propose that enrichment of satellite repeats on Drosophilid X chromosomes facilitates the rapid evolution of differentiated sex chromosomes by marking the X for compensation.

Identification of X chromatin is modulated by complementary pathways in Drosophila melanogaster

Drosophila melanogaster males have one X chromosome while females have two. This creates an imbalance in X:A gene dosage between the sexes. This imbalance is corrected by increasing transcription from male X-linked genes approximately 2-fold. This process involves the Male-Specific Lethal (MSL) complex, which is recruited to Chromatin Entry Sites (CES) and transcribed X-linked genes, where it modifies chromatin to increase expression. Repetitive sequences strikingly enriched in X euchromatin, the 1.688X satellite repeats, also promote recruitment of the MSL complex to nearby genes. Unlike CES, the 1.688X repeats do not recruit the MSL complex directly. The genetic architecture of recruitment by these DNA elements remains speculative. To facilitate dissection of the mechanism of recruitment, we developed a luciferase reporter system for recruitment of compensation to an autosome. The system was validated by knock down of genes known to participate in compensation. Knock down of factors genetically linked to X recognition reveals that 1.688X repeats recruit through a different mechanism than the CES. Our findings suggest that 1.688X repeats play a larger role during embryogenesis, whereas the contribution of 1.688X repeats and CES is equivalent later in development. Our studies also reveal unexpected complexity and potential interdependence of recruiting elements.

Set2 and H3K36 regulate the Drosophila male X chromosome in a context-specific manner, independent from MSL complex spreading

Dosage compensation in Drosophila involves upregulating male X-genes two-fold. This process is carried out by the MSL (male-specific lethal) complex, which binds high-affinity sites and spreads to surrounding genes. Current models of MSL spreading focus on interactions of MSL3 (male-specific lethal 3) with histone marks; in particular, Set2-dependent H3 lysine-36 trimethylation (H3K36me3). However, Set2 might affect DC via another target, or there could be redundancy between canonical H3.2 and variant H3.3 histones. Further, it is difficult to parse male-specific effects from those that are simply X-specific. To discriminate among these possibilities, we employed genomic approaches in H3K36 (residue) and Set2 (writer) mutants. The results confirm a role for Set2 in X-gene regulation, but show that expression trends in males are often mirrored in females. Instead of global male-specific reduction of X-genes in Set2/H3K36 mutants, the effects were heterogeneous. We identified cohorts of genes whose expression was significantly altered following loss of H3K36 or Set2, but the changes were in opposite directions, suggesting that H3K36me states have reciprocal functions. In contrast to H4K16R controls, analysis of combined H3.2K36R/H3.3K36R mutants neither showed consistent reduction in X-gene expression, nor any correlation with MSL3 binding. Examination of other developmental stages/tissues revealed additional layers of context-dependence. Our studies implicate BEAF-32 and other insulator proteins in Set2/H3K36-dependent regulation. Overall, the data are inconsistent with the prevailing model wherein H3K36me3 directly recruits the MSL complex. We propose that Set2 and H3K36 support DC indirectly, via processes that are utilized by MSL but common to both sexes.

Dicer promotes genome stability via the bromodomain transcriptional co-activator BRD4

RNA interference is required for post-transcriptional silencing, but also has additional roles in transcriptional silencing of centromeres and genome stability. However, these roles have been controversial in mammals. Strikingly, we found that Dicer-deficient embryonic stem cells have strong proliferation and chromosome segregation defects as well as increased transcription of centromeric satellite repeats, which triggers the interferon response. We conducted a CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screen to restore viability and identified transcriptional activators, histone H3K9 methyltransferases, and chromosome segregation factors as suppressors, resembling Dicer suppressors identified in independent screens in fission yeast. The strongest suppressors were mutations in the transcriptional co-activator Brd4, which reversed the strand-specific transcription of major satellite repeats suppressing the interferon response, and in the histone acetyltransferase Elp3. We show that identical mutations in the second bromodomain of Brd4 rescue Dicer-dependent silencing and chromosome segregation defects in both mammalian cells and fission yeast. This remarkable conservation demonstrates that RNA interference has an ancient role in transcriptional silencing and in particular of satellite repeats, which is essential for cell cycle progression and proper chromosome segregation. Our results have pharmacological implications for cancer and autoimmune diseases characterized by unregulated transcription of satellite repeats.

While RNA interference is conserved across species, small RNA pathways are very diverse. In this study, Gutbrod et al. find that non-canonical roles of Dicer in genome stability are in fact deeply conserved from yeast to humans.

When Down Is Up: Heterochromatin, Nuclear Organization and X Upregulation

Organisms with highly differentiated sex chromosomes face an imbalance in X-linked gene dosage. Male Drosophila solve this problem by increasing expression from virtually every gene on their single X chromosome, a process known as dosage compensation. This involves a ribonucleoprotein complex that is recruited to active, X-linked genes to remodel chromatin and increase expression. Interestingly, the male X chromosome is also enriched for several proteins associated with heterochromatin. Furthermore, the polytenized male X is selectively disrupted by the loss of factors involved in repression, silencing, heterochromatin formation or chromatin remodeling. Mutations in many of these factors preferentially reduce male survival or enhance the lethality of mutations that prevent normal recognition of the X chromosome. The involvement of primarily repressive factors in a process that elevates expression has long been puzzling. Interestingly, recent work suggests that the siRNA pathway, often associated with heterochromatin formation and repression, also helps the dosage compensation machinery identify the X chromosome. In light of this finding, we revisit the evidence that links nuclear organization and heterochromatin to regulation of the male X chromosome.

Heterochromatin-dependent transcription of satellite DNAs in the Drosophila melanogaster female germline

Large blocks of tandemly repeated DNAs-satellite DNAs (satDNAs)-play important roles in heterochromatin formation and chromosome segregation. We know little about how satDNAs are regulated; however, their misregulation is associated with genomic instability and human diseases. We use the Drosophila melanogaster germline as a model to study the regulation of satDNA transcription and chromatin. Here we show that complex satDNAs (>100-bp repeat units) are transcribed into long noncoding RNAs and processed into piRNAs (PIWI interacting RNAs). This satDNA piRNA production depends on the Rhino-Deadlock-Cutoff complex and the transcription factor Moonshiner-a previously described non-canonical pathway that licenses heterochromatin-dependent transcription of dual-strand piRNA clusters. We show that this pathway is important for establishing heterochromatin at satDNAs. Therefore, satDNAs are regulated by piRNAs originating from their own genomic loci. This novel mechanism of satDNA regulation provides insight into the role of piRNA pathways in heterochromatin formation and genome stability.

Drosophila Satellite Repeats at the Intersection of Chromatin, Gene Regulation and Evolution

Satellite repeats make up a large fraction of the genomes of many higher eukaryotes. Until recently these sequences were viewed as molecular parasites with few functions. Drosophila melanogaster and related species have a wealth of diverse satellite repeats. Comparative studies of Drosophilids have been instrumental in understanding how these rapidly evolving sequences change and move. Remarkably, satellite repeats have been found to modulate gene expression and mediate genetic conflicts between chromosomes and between closely related fly species. This suggests that satellites play a key role in speciation. We have taken advantage of the depth of research on satellite repeats in flies to review the known functions of these sequences and consider their central role in evolution and gene expression.

Dynamic Evolution of Euchromatic Satellites on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and the simulans Clade

Satellite DNAs (satDNAs) are among the most dynamically evolving components of eukaryotic genomes and play important roles in genome regulation, genome evolution, and speciation. Despite their abundance and functional impact, we know little about the evolutionary dynamics and molecular mechanisms that shape satDNA distributions in genomes. Here, we use high-quality genome assemblies to study the evolutionary dynamics of two complex satDNAs, Rsp-like and 1.688 g/cm3, in Drosophila melanogaster and its three nearest relatives in the simulans clade. We show that large blocks of these repeats are highly dynamic in the heterochromatin, where their genomic location varies across species. We discovered that small blocks of satDNA that are abundant in X chromosome euchromatin are similarly dynamic, with repeats changing in abundance, location, and composition among species. We detail the proliferation of a rare satellite (Rsp-like) across the X chromosome in D. simulans and D. mauritiana. Rsp-like spread by inserting into existing clusters of the older, more abundant 1.688 satellite, in events likely facilitated by microhomology-mediated repair pathways. We show that Rsp-like is abundant on extrachromosomal circular DNA in D. simulans, which may have contributed to its dynamic evolution. Intralocus satDNA expansions via unequal exchange and the movement of higher order repeats also contribute to the fluidity of the repeat landscape. We find evidence that euchromatic satDNA repeats experience cycles of proliferation and diversification somewhat analogous to bursts of transposable element proliferation. Our study lays a foundation for mechanistic studies of satDNA proliferation and the functional and evolutionary consequences of satDNA movement.

Functional Significance of Satellite DNAs: Insights From Drosophila

Since their discovery more than 60 years ago, satellite repeats are still one of the most enigmatic parts of eukaryotic genomes. Being non-coding DNA, satellites were earlier considered to be non-functional “junk,” but recently this concept has been extensively revised. Satellite DNA contributes to the essential processes of formation of crucial chromosome structures, heterochromatin establishment, dosage compensation, reproductive isolation, genome stability and development. Genomic abundance of satellites is under stabilizing selection owing of their role in the maintenance of vital regions of the genome – centromeres, pericentromeric regions, and telomeres. Many satellites are transcribed with the generation of long or small non-coding RNAs. Misregulation of their expression is found to lead to various defects in the maintenance of genomic architecture, chromosome segregation and gametogenesis. This review summarizes our current knowledge concerning satellite functions, the mechanisms of regulation and evolution of satellites, focusing on recent findings in Drosophila. We discuss here experimental and bioinformatics data obtained in Drosophila in recent years, suggesting relevance of our analysis to a wide range of eukaryotic organisms.

Conserved chromosomal functions of RNA interference

RNA interference (RNAi), a cellular process through which small RNAs target and regulate complementary RNA transcripts, has well-characterized roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation and transposon repression. Recent studies have revealed additional conserved roles for RNAi proteins, such as Argonaute and Dicer, in chromosome function. By guiding chromatin modification, RNAi components promote chromosome segregation during both mitosis and meiosis and regulate chromosomal and genomic dosage response. Small RNAs and the RNAi machinery also participate in the resolution of DNA damage. Interestingly, many of these lesser-studied functions seem to be more strongly conserved across eukaryotes than are well-characterized functions such as the processing of microRNAs. These findings have implications for the evolution of RNAi since the last eukaryotic common ancestor, and they provide a more complete view of the functions of RNAi.

Widespread gene duplication and adaptive evolution in the RNA interference pathways of the Drosophila obscura group

BACKGROUND

RNA interference (RNAi) related pathways provide defense against viruses and transposable elements, and have been implicated in the suppression of meiotic drive elements. Genes in these pathways often exhibit high levels of adaptive substitution, and over longer timescales show gene duplication and loss-most likely as a consequence of their role in mediating conflict with these parasites. This is particularly striking for Argonaute 2 (Ago2), which is ancestrally the key effector of antiviral RNAi in insects, but has repeatedly formed new testis-specific duplicates in the recent history of the obscura species-group of Drosophila.

RESULTS

Here we take advantage of publicly available genomic and transcriptomic data to identify six further RNAi-pathway genes that have duplicated in this clade of Drosophila, and examine their evolutionary history. As seen for Ago2, we observe high levels of adaptive amino-acid substitution and changes in sex-biased expression in many of the paralogs. However, our phylogenetic analysis suggests that co-duplications of the RNAi machinery were not synchronous, and our expression analysis fails to identify consistent male-specific expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that RNAi genes, including genes of the antiviral and piRNA pathways, have undergone multiple independent duplications and that their history has been particularly labile within the obscura group. However, they also suggest that the selective pressures driving these changes have not been consistent, implying that more than one selective agent may be responsible.