Efficacy of tolvaptan in postoperative volume therapy for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing application of tolvaptan in cardiac surgery, there is no information on the use of tolvaptan in Stanford patients with type A aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative clinical effects of tolvaptan in patients with type A aortic dissection  after tafter surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 45 patients treated for type A aortic dissection in our hospital from 2018 to 2020. These included 21 patients who were treated with tolvaptan (Group T) and 24 patients who received traditional diuretics (Group L). The hospital's electronic health records were used to obtain perioperative data.

RESULTS

Group T did not differ significantly from Group L in terms of the duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative blood required, length of catecholamine use, or the amount of intravenous diuretic drugs administered (all P > 0.05). The development of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly less in the tolvaptan group (P = 0.023). The urine volumes and change in body weight loss were slightly higher in group T than in group L but the differences were non-significant (P > 0.05). Serum potassium, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels did not differ between the groups in the week after surgery, At the same time, sodium was significantly higher in the Group T group on day 7 after transfer from the ICU (P = 0.001). In Group L, sodium levels were also elevated by day 7 (P = 0.001). On days 3 and 7, serum creatinine and urea nitrogen levels increased in both groups (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both tolvaptan and traditional diuretics were found to be effective and safe for patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. Moreover, tolvaptan may be associated with reducing the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Efficacy and safety of tolvaptan after pediatric congenital heart disease surgery

It is not clear whether tolvaptan is safe and effective irrespective of various underlying clinical conditions including the functional ventricle morphology, chromosomal abnormalities, and renal function after complex pediatric congenital heart disease surgery. Also, the appropriate dose of tolvaptan in these patients has not been previously identified. We retrospectively assessed the urine volume, body weight, patient clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and vital signs before and on days 1 and 7 of the tolvaptan administration after congenital heart disease surgery. Also, we assessed the relationship between the tolvaptan dose and its effects. A total of 86 patients were included the study. The mean time from the surgery to the tolvaptan administration was 23.5 ± 3.7 days. After administering tolvaptan, the urine volume significantly increased and body weight significantly decreased from baseline by days 1 and 7 (p < 0.0001). The urine volume significantly increased more in the survivors than the deceased. Of the 22 patients who had low serum sodium concentrations at baseline, 20 had an increased serum sodium concentration on day 7. The clinical effect of tolvaptan was not affected by the functional ventricle morphology, chromosomal abnormalities, or renal function. There was a positive correlation between the tolvaptan dose and change in the urine volume until a tolvaptan dose of up to 0.3 mg/kg/day but not at more than 0.3 mg/kg/day. Tolvaptan administration is safe and effective after congenital heart disease surgery irrespective of various underlying clinical conditions. Though the urine volume tends to increase until a tolvaptan dose of up to 0.3 mg/kg/day in pediatric congenital heart disease patients, there was no further benefit with more than 0.3 mg/kg/day.

Comparable effect of tolvaptan in heart failure patients with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

Background: It is unclear that the difference in efficacy of tolvaptan (TLV) on the length of hospital stay for both heart failure (HF) preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) and reduced EF (HFrEF) patients.Methods: We investigated 369 patients who were hospitalized with HF from February 2011 to June 2016 and initiated TLV. Patients who died in hospital, transferred hospital or clinical scenario 4 or 5 were excluded. Finally, we analyzed 108 patients with HFpEF and 96 patients with HFrEF. We evaluated the relationship between the length of hospital stay and the date of TLV initiation. Moreover, we compared the early use (within the median) and delayed use (the median or later) of TLV.Results: The date of TLV initiation was statistically associated with the length of hospital stay in both HFpEF and HFrEF (HFpEF: r = 0.625, P < 0.001, HFrEF: r = 0.618, P < 0.001). In HFpEF, the length of hospital stay in delayed use group was significantly longer than the early use group (22.2 ± 10.7 days and 38.1 ± 22.6 days, P < 0.001). The result was similar in HFrEF (22.0 ± 15.0 days and 32.1 ± 22.0 days, P = 0.008). On the other hand, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay after initiation of TLV in both HFpEF and HFrEF. Other findings (including the severity of HF) were similar between the early use group and the delayed group in HFpEF and HFrEF.Conclusions: The time until TLV initiation after hospitalization was related to the length of hospital stay in HFpEF and HFrEF patients.

The Role of Tolvaptan Administration After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in fluid management after cardiac surgery compared with conventional diuretic treatment.

DESIGN

Systematic review of the literature with meta-analyses.

SETTING

The Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to July 30, 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 759 patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Tolvaptan administration (n = 397) or standard diuretic therapy (n = 398).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Tolvaptan administration was associated with a significantly faster return to preoperative body weight (mean difference [MD)] -1.48 d, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.92 to 1.03), shorter duration of hospital stay (MD -2.58 d, 95% CI -5.09 to -0.07), lower incidence of acute kidney injury (odds ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.69), and greater urine output (MD 0.47 L/d, 95% CI 0.25-0.69) and sodium levels (MD 2.85 mEq/L, 95% CI 1.90-3.80). No significant differences were present regarding duration of intensive care unit stay (MD -0.09 d, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.15), arrhythmia incidence (odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.33-1.02), and serum creatinine values (MD -0.08 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of the present meta-analysis suggest the promising role of tolvaptan administration in the management of fluid retention in patients after cardiac surgery. Future large-scale clinical trials should be conducted to fully elucidate its efficacy and to assess the optimal treatment protocol to be applied in the clinical setting.

Safety and Effectiveness of Tolvaptan Administration after Total Arch Replacement

BACKGROUND

Postoperative fluid overload in cardiovascular surgery is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Recently, tolvaptan (TLV), a selective vasopressin V2 antagonist, has been used for perioperative fluid management. This study aimed to validate the safety and effectiveness of TLV administration after total arch replacement (TAR) using selective cerebral perfusion.

METHODS

From August 2016 to December 2016, 11 patients who had undergone TAR for thoracic aortic aneurysm were included in this study. In addition to the conventional diuretics furosemide (20 mg) and spironolactone (25 mg), TLV (7.5 mg) was administered orally.

RESULTS

TLV increased urine output 1-3 days after administration. Body weight was gradually and steadily reduced until discharge. Neither renal nor liver dysfunction was recognized during the TLV administration.

CONCLUSION

The concomitant use of TLV and conventional diuretics is safe and effective for fluid management after TAR using cardiopulmonary bypass, selective cerebral perfusion, and hypothermic circulatory arrest.