Correlation between the prognostic nutritional index and outcomes in older patients aged ≥ 60 years with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Nutritional status is related to clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple tool to assess nutrition.

AIM

To evaluate the association between the PNI score and clinical outcomes in patients (60 years and older) hospitalized due to an acute exacerbation of CHF.

METHOD

This was a retrospective observational study. Patients hospitalized for acute CHF exacerbation between July 2015 and May 2020 were analyzed. Patients were followed until January 31, 2021. The primary end point was cardiovascular-related readmissions and all-cause mortality after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with all-cause mortality. Patients were divided into normal nutrition (PNI > 38), moderate malnutrition (PNI = 35-38), and severe malnutrition (PNI < 35) groups.

RESULTS

The study included 355 patients (mean age 78 ± 9 years). The median follow-up was 769 days. Compared to survivors (n = 214), patients who expired (n = 133) were (1) older; (2) had lower PNI scores, lymphocyte counts, hemoglobin, albumin, total cholesterol, and serum sodium level; but (3) had higher serum creatinine levels, log(N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and cardiac troponin I (P < 0.05). Multivariate analyses revealed that PNI was independently associated with all-cause mortality. The hazard ratio (HR) for moderate malnutrition versus normal nutrition was 1.624 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.011-2.609, P = 0.045), while HR for severe malnutrition versus normal nutrition was 1.892 (95%CI 1.119-3.198, P = 0.017). Malnourished patients had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular readmissions and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Lower PNI (malnutrition) was associated with worse clinical outcomes and was independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients with CHF.

Clinical Significance of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Patients with Infective Endocarditis

Risk stratification of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) is difficult. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is an index of immune function and nutritional status. We investigated the prognostic value of the CONUT score in IE and whether its prognostic value differed between IE patients with and without indications for surgery.Clinical records were retrospectively evaluated for 92 patients with IE treated at Nihon University Itabashi Hospital and Nihon University Hospital between January 2014 and May 2019. The CONUT score was determined upon admission, and patients were divided into two groups at the median score (≤ 7 [n = 50] and ≥ 8 [n = 42]). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days after admission.The high CONUT group had significantly higher C-reactive protein and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, as well as a significantly lower hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate (all P < 0.05), and considerably more valve perforation (26% versus 8%, P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that mortality was significantly higher in the high CONUT group (P < 0.001). Even after adjusting for the propensity score based on IE risk factors, a higher CONUT score was still associated with mortality. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that a CONUT score ≥ 8 had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 76% for predicting all-cause mortality. A CONUT score ≥ 8 was most strongly associated with mortality in patients with surgical indications (P < 0.001).In patients with IE, a higher CONUT score was significantly associated with inflammation, heart failure, renal dysfunction, anemia, valve dysfunction, and short-term mortality, especially in patients with surgical indications.