Surgical repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation: one ring does not fit all

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review summarizes the key parameters that can aid in determining the optimal treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).

RECENT FINDINGS

Left ventricular (LV) and mitral valve (MV) parameters are important for surgical planning and risk stratification in IMR. Although LV dimensions is one of the main parameters used in the guidelines, volumes more accurately depict LV remodelling. Furthermore, wall motion abnormalities and wall motion score index can also be useful for surgical planning in treatment of IMR. Viability is best measured with cardiac magnetic resonance, but it is not feasible in certain centres. In contrast, measurement of strain with echocardiography is an emerging and feasible tool for estimating viability. MV leaflet tethering and pattern measured with echocardiography are also useful for MV surgery. Anterior leaflet excursion angle can identify patients in whom undersized ring annuloplasty is potentially unsuitable.

SUMMARY

Treatment of IMR relies on accurate parameters that can determine the optimal surgical approach. In some patients, lack of viable myocardium suggests inadequacy of revascularization and thus, an adjunctive left ventricular reconstruction may be necessary. Degree and pattern of MV leaflet tethering can indicate whether ring annuloplasty, which is the most common repair technique, is sufficient or an adjunctive sub-valvular intervention is beneficial.

Relations of Augmented Systolic Annular Expansion and Leaflet/Papillary Muscle Dynamics in Late-Systolic Mitral Valve Prolapse Evaluated by Echocardiography with a Speckle Tracking Analysis

The mechanism of systolic annular expansion in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is not clarified. Since annular expansion is systolic outward shift of MV leaflet/chorda tissue complex at superior and outer ends, annular expansion could be related to inward (superior) shift of the complex at another inferior and inner end of the papillary muscle (PM) tip and/or systolic lengthening of the tissue complex, especially MV leaflets.MV annulus systolic expansion, PMs' systolic superior shift, and MV leaflets' systolic lengthening were evaluated by echocardiography with a speckle tracking analysis in 25 normal subjects, 25 subjects with holo-systolic MVP and 20 subjects with late-systolic MVP.PMs' superior shift, MV leaflets' lengthening, MV annular area at the onset of systole and subsequent MV annulus expansion were significantly greater in late-systolic MVP than in holo-systolic MVP (4.6 ± 1.6 versus 1.5 ± 0.7 mm/m², 2.5 ± 1.4 versus 0.6 ± 2.0 mm/m², 6.8 ± 2.5 versus 5.7 ± 1.0 cm²/m² and 1.6 ± 0.8 versus 0.1 ± 0.5 cm²/m², P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified MV leaflets' lengthening and PMs' superior shift as independent factors associated with MV annular expansion.Conclusions: These results suggest that systolic MV annular expansion in MVP is related to abnormal MV leaflets' lengthening and PMs' superior shift.

An observational, prospective study on surgical treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation: The SMR study. Rationale, purposes, and protocol

The natural history of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is unfavorable. Nevertheless, there are no evidence that its correction can improve the outcome. If from one side the original cause of secondary MR can be such to limit the possibilities of improvement, from the other side it is possible that the surgical technique widely applied to repair, restrictive mitral annuloplasty, is not adequate to correct the regurgitation. The addition of valvular and/or subvalvular techniques has been considered a possible technical solution. However, we do not know the prevalence of each technique, how many times mitral replacement is used to correct secondary MR. This aspect is of particular importance, as we know that a successful mitral repair causes a better left ventricular systolic remodeling than a unsuccessful repair or replacement. This study is a prospective, observational registry, conceived to understand what is done in the real world. Any surgeon will use the technique he thinks the most suitable for the patient. Every year, for 5 years, patients will have a clinical and echocardiographic follow-up, to evaluate the risk factors for a worse result (death, rehospitalization for heart failure, reoperation for MR return, moderate, or more MR return). This knowledge will give us the possibility to understand which is the technique, or the strategy, more efficient to treat this disease and the real efficacy of the surgical treatment.