Optimal Heart Rate Modulation Using Ivabradine

Effect of the combined use of ivabradine and metoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction early after percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled study

Objective

To investigate the effect and safety of the combined use of ivabradine and metoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

Eighty patients with AMI were randomly divided into the ivabradine group and the control group. The ivabradine group was treated with ivabradine combined with metoprolol after PCI, while the control group was treated with metoprolol only. Both groups were treated continuously for 1 year. Echocardiography-derived parameters, heart rate, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and myocardial markers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The safety outcomes were blood pressure, liver and kidney function.

Results

The LVEF was significantly higher in the ivabradine group than in the control group at 1 week, 3 months and 1 year after PCI. The heart rate of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 1 week and 1month after PCI. The VO2max, metabolic equivalents, anaerobic threshold heart rate, peak heart rate, and heart rate recovery at 8 min of the ivabradine group were significantly higher than those of the control group at 1 year after PCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the one-year total incidence of MACE in the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The B-type natriuretic peptide of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group on Day 2 and Day 3 after PCI. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I level of the ivabradine group was significantly lower than that of the control group on Day 5 after PCI.

Conclusion

Early use of ivabradine in patients with AMI after PCI can achieve effective heart rate control, reduce myocardial injury, improve cardiac function and exercise tolerance, and may reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. (Clinical research registration number: ChiCTR2000032731).

Successful treatment with ivabradine in a β-blocker-refractory patient with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Ivabradine is an established treatment for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, it is not used for acute heart failure treatment. Negative inotropic effects (NIE) often limit the up-titration of β-blockers. Contrarily, ivabradine has no NIE, and enables β-blockers usage for treating patients with acute decompensated HFrEF.

Efficacy of Doppler echocardiography-guided ivabradine therapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantage of heart rate (HR) modulation using ivabradine referring Doppler echocardiography over the conventional ivabradine therapy without echocardiography guide in patients with systolic heart failure.

METHODS

From October 2020, our institute updated the protocol of ivabradine therapy, in which HR was optimized to minimize the overlap between the two left ventricular inflow waves using Doppler echocardiography (echo-guided group). The degree of cardiac reverse remodeling at 3-month follow-up was compared between the echo-guided group and the conventional ivabradine therapy group treated before October 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (62 years old, 17 men) were included, and 18 patients were from echo-guided group. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly in the echo-guided group (from 41% [28%, 49%] to 55% [37%, 66%], p = 0.007), whereas it remained unchanged in the conventional group (p = 0.333). Systolic blood pressure and the daily dose of carvedilol increased significantly only in the echo-guided group (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among those with systolic heart failure, a Doppler echocardiography guide might be a promising therapeutic tool in modulating HR by ivabradine in facilitating reverse remodeling.

Successful Management of Osimertinib-Induced Heart Failure

Cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction is currently of great concern as one of the pivotal therapeutic targets of onco-cardiology. Only a few studies have reported the occurrence of heart failure following the administration of osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor for EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We report on a 74-year-old woman with osimertinib-induced advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, which was treated by the temporal termination of osimertinib and neurohormonal blocker therapy, as well as heart rate modulation therapy using ivabradine. Despite osimertinib-induced heart failure being relatively rare, aggressive neurohormonal blocker therapy using ivabradine if applicable, as well as the temporal termination of osimertinib, might be a promising therapeutic strategy.

Optimal Heart Rate and Prognosis in Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis

Background: Optimal heart rate (HR) that associates with higher cardiac output and greater clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis remains unknown. Methods: Consecutive patients with sinus rhythm who were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis at our institute between February 2015 and February 2021 were retrospectively included. Ideal HR, at which E-wave and A-wave stand adjacent without any overlaps in the trans-mitral flow echocardiography, was calculated by the formula: 86.8−0.08 × deceleration time (msec). The association between optimal HR and cardiac death or heart failure readmission was investigated. Results: Ten patients (median 74 years old, 8 men) were included. On median, actual HR was 64 bpm and ideal HR was 69 bpm. An incidence rate of the primary endpoint in the sub-optimal HR group tended to be higher than optimal HR group: one of the four patients in optimal HR group had events (25%); two of the two patients in higher HR group had events (100%); two of the four patients in lower HR group had events (50%). Conclusions: The optimal HR was associated with greater clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. The clinical impact of aggressive HR optimization in this cohort remains the next concern.