Electrophysiologic effects of intravenous MS-551, a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent, on human atrium and ventricle

Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion as an independent predictor for persistent atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

AIMS

Nifekalant is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that exerts antiarrhythmic effects by inhibiting rapid rectifying potassium channels and extending the effective refractory period of cardiomyocytes. It has a high success rate in converting atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Whether the failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation has not been reported.

METHODS

A total of 92 patients with drug-refractory persistent AF were retrospectively enrolled. After all ablations, intravenous nifekalant was administrated. Patients were assigned to the success group (group 1) and failure group (group 2) based on nifekalant cardioversion results and followed for 12 months to note any episode of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

RESULTS

Each group included 46 patients. After 12 months of follow-up, nine (19.6%) patients from group 1 and 23 (50.0%) patients from group 2 had a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (P = 0.002). AF duration and type 2 diabetes were strongly associated with failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion. Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion, AF duration, and type 2 diabetes were potential risk factors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of nifekalant cardioversion was statistically associated with AF recurrence (adjusted RR = 2.257, 95% CI: 1.006-5.066, P = 0.048). Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion could bring a positive effect on the prognostic differentiation when added into the multivariable model (0.767 ± 0.042 vs. 0.774 ± 0.045, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Failure of nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

A multicenter observational study of the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic agents in ventricular arrhythmias: A propensity-score adjusted analysis

Background

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs) are life-threatening events that result in hemodynamic compromise. Recurrence is common and may worsen a patient׳s clinical course despite appropriate treatment. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs for suppression of VTs.

Methods

In this cohort study, eligible patients were those who were admitted to one of the nine cardiovascular care centers and treated with continuous infusion of an antiarrhythmic drug for at least 1 h to prevent recurrence of VTs after return of spontaneous circulation. To adjust for differences in baseline characteristics among treatment groups, propensity scores for administered agents were generated and used as covariates in regression analyses.

Results

Seventy-two patients were enrolled and 67 patients were included in the final analysis. Amiodarone (n=21, 31.3%), nifekalant (n=24, 35.8%), and lidocaine (n=22, 32.8%) were administered as first-line therapy for suppression of VTs. In the adjusted analyses, the odds ratio (OR) of switching to a different drug was significantly higher in the lidocaine group (OR 37.6, 95% CI 5.1–279, p<0.001) than in the amiodarone group, but not in the nifekalant group (OR 4.1, 95% CI 0.72–23.2, p=0.11). There was no significant difference in mortality rate in the lidocaine group (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.40–6.95, p=0.48) or the nifekalant group (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.15–4.85, p=0.89) compared with the amiodarone group.

Conclusion

Amiodarone and nifekalant are similarly effective in preventing VT recurrence, but their impact on survival rate is minimal. These data indicate that both nifekalant and amiodarone can be used for treatment of refractory VT.

Effects of intravenous nifekalant, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, on atrial vulnerability parameters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Nifekalant, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, has been shown to suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but its effects on AF are unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of nifekalant on the atrial vulnerability parameters in patients with paroxysmal AF. The study included 18 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent electrophysiological study before and after intravenous infusion of nifekalant. The atrial electrophysiological parameters including the atrial effective refractory period (AERP), maximum intraatrial conduction delay, and wavelength index, calculated as the ratio of AERP to the maximum conduction delay, were quantitatively measured at baseline and during nifekalant infusion. The mean AERP was significantly prolonged from 214 +/- 27 ms at baseline to 242 +/- 39 ms after nifekalant (P < 0.001). Although earlier studies have shown that nifekalant does not affect the atrial conduction time, the mean maximum conduction delay of the study patients was significantly prolonged from 59 +/- 19 ms at baseline to 72 +/- 28 ms after nifekalant (P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in the wavelength index at baseline (4.1 +/- 1.7) and after nifekalant (4.1 +/- 2.5). However, when the differences of AERP and wavelength index were defined as each parameter during nifekalant infusion minus that at baseline, the difference of AERP showed a direct positive correlation with that of the wavelength index (P = 0.013). In conclusion, nifekalant may be effective in the prevention of AF due to prolongation of the AERP. However, in those patients who have a lesser degree of prolongation of the AERP by nifekalant, the wavelength index tended to be decreased, suggesting that the drug might augment the propensity for AF.

Intravenous administration of nifekalant hydrochloride for the prevention of ischemia-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with renal failure undergoing hemodialysis

Excretion in the urine is an important pathway for the elimination of nifekalant hydrochloride (NIF), a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent. Three patients with renal failure were undergoing hemodialysis and receiving NIF for the prevention of ischemia-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Because NIF is not dialyzed, dose adjustment at relatively low concentrations was required, with monitoring of the QT interval.