Acute effect of sildenafil is maintained in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients chronically treated with bosentan

The Clinical Efficacy of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Therapeutic strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have made remarkable progress over the last two decades. Currently, 3 types of drugs can be used to treat PAH; prostacyclins, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA). In Japan, the first generation ERA bosentan was reimbursed in 2005, following which the 2nd generation ERAs ambrisentan and macitentan were reimbursed in 2009 and 2015, respectively. The efficacy of each ERA on hemodynamics in PAH patients remains to be elucidated. The aims of this study were to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ERAs and compare these effects among each generation of ERAs.We retrospectively examined the clinical parameters of 42 PAH patients who were prescribed an ERA (15 bosentan, 12 ambrisentan, and 15 macitentan) and who underwent a hemodynamic examination before and after ERA introduction at our institution from January 2007 to July 2019.In a total of 42 patients, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly decreased and cardiac index was significantly increased after ERA introduction (P < 0.001) and the World Health Organization-Functional class (WHO-Fc) was significantly improved after ERA introduction (P = 0.005). Next, in a comparison between 1st and 2nd generation ERAs, 2nd generation ERAs were found to have brought about greater improvements in hemodynamic parameters (mPAP and PVR. P < 0.01), heart rate, brain natriuretic peptide, arterial oxygen saturation, and mixed venous oxygen saturation than the 1st generation ERA bosentan.We conclude that all ERAs could successfully improve the hemodynamics of PAH patients and that the newer generation ERAs, ambrisentan and macitentan, seemed to be preferable to bosentan.

Effect of Combination Therapy of Endothelin Receptor Antagonist and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor on Clinical Outcome and Pulmonary Haemodynamics in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of an endothelin receptor antagonist and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor having different biological targets has become an integral part of the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, several clinical studies have reported conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

METHODS

After performing a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted data from seven relevant articles (publications till December 2018). PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis and reporting of findings. The odds ratio and mean difference were calculated to estimate the difference in clinical worsening, 6-minute walking distance, pulmonary vascular resistance and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide between the groups. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool and a meta-regression for probable variables affecting effect size.

RESULTS

The random-effect model analysis revealed an odds ratio of 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.76; p = 0.0002] for clinical worsening, mean difference of 15.64 (95% CI 2.67-28.61; p = 0.02) for 6-minute walking distance, - 1.66 (95% CI - 3.82 to 0.50; p = 0.13) for pulmonary vascular resistance and - 21.04 (95% CI - 26.87 to - 15.22; p < 0.00001) for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The meta-regression showed no statistically significant association between the dose and duration of treatment and outcomes (odds ratio of clinical worsening and mean difference of 6-minute walking distance).

CONCLUSIONS

In pulmonary arterial hypertension, endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination therapy significantly improved 6-minute walking distance, clinical worsening and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide compared with the monotherapy but did not offer any advantage in improving pulmonary vascular resistance.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO

CRD42018091133.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Sildenafil-Bosentan and Sildenafil-Ambrisentan Combination Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension

To elucidate whether the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of sildenafil are influenced differently when it is coadministered with bosentan (S+B) or with ambrisentan (S+A), we evaluated the PK and PD profiles of sildenafil before and after 4-5 weeks of S+A or S+B treatment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of sildenafil was significantly higher in S+A treatment than in S+B treatment (165.8 ng•h/mL vs. 396.8 ng•h/mL, P = 0.018) and the oral clearance of sildenafil was significantly lower after S+A treatment than after S+B treatment (120.6 L/h/kg vs. 50.4 L/h/kg, P = 0.018). In the PD study, incremental shuttle walking distance was superior during treatment with S+A than during treatment with S+B (S+B; 280 m vs. S+A; 340 m, P = 0.042). There were no concerns about safety with either combination therapy regime.

Effects of oral treatments on clinical outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many targeted therapies have been approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), most of which are in oral forms. However, the effects of these drugs on lifesaving are unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of oral treatments on clinical outcomes especially all-cause mortality in patients with PAH.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant articles up to April 2014. Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trials that compared oral agents with placebo were selected. Data for populations, interventions, and outcomes were extracted independently by 2 investigators, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-one randomized, controlled, clinical trials involving 5105 patients were identified in the primary analysis. The overall estimated odds ratio (OR) of combined clinical worsening (CCW) events between active treatment groups and control groups was 0.55 (95% CI 0.47-0.64, P < .001). However, the effect of oral treatments on reducing all-cause mortality was not statistically significant (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.10, P = .192), which was consistent for approved drugs (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.61-1.18, P = .316) and drugs that were not approved (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36-1.44, P = .352). In the sensitivity analysis, a significant reduction was achieved in CCW events (P < .001) but not in all-cause mortality (P = .057).

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis shows the benefits of oral treatments on CCW events in patients with PAH. However, these drugs seem to exhibit less favorable effects on life expectancy in the short-term follow-up, suggesting further evaluation is required.

Medical treatment for an adult patient with eisenmenger syndrome. A case report

Previous studies examining the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) drugs in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) have shown that it may have beneficial effects in some patients with ES; however, experience with additional cases is necessary to confirm its efficacy and appropriate clinical use. We herein report our experience of an adult patient with ES who benefitted from treatment with PAH drugs. A 32-year-old Japanese man with severe ES induced by a ventricular septal defect associated with Down syndrome began treatment with bosentan at 62.5 mg. Eleven months later, he was admitted for tadalafil (40 mg) add-on therapy because his 6-minute walking distance and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level had not improved and his hepatic enzyme levels had increased. However, marked hypotension developed, and the tadalafil dose was decreased. His BNP level subsequently increased, so the bosentan dose was increased to 125 mg. The bosentan was then abruptly stopped because of a low platelet count and high liver enzyme levels. Ambrisentan was then administered for these side effects, but because severe dyspnea developed, the bosentan was started again at 62.5 mg. This resulted in immediate clinical improvement. The patient was finally switched to ambrisentan (5 mg), which was well tolerated. The findings in this particular case show that although it should be used with caution, bosentan may be beneficial in select patients with ES. In addition, ambrisentan may be considered as first-line treatment in some patients as long as liver enzymes and platelets are carefully monitored.

The role of endothelin-1 in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare but debilitating disease, which if left untreated rapidly progresses to right ventricular failure and eventually death. In the quest to understand the pathogenesis of this disease differences in the profile, expression and action of vasoactive substances released by the endothelium have been identified in patients with PAH. Of these, endothelin-1 (ET-1) is of particular interest since it is known to be an extremely powerful vasoconstrictor and also involved in vascular remodelling. Identification of ET-1 as a target for pharmacological intervention has lead to the discovery of a number of compounds that can block the receptors via which ET-1 mediates its effects. This review sets out the evidence in support of a role for ET-1 in the onset and progression of the disease and reviews the data from the various clinical trials of ET-1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of PAH.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension: pharmacologic therapies and potential pulmonary artery denervation treatment

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a group of diseases related to progressively increasing pulmonary vascular resistance, a high incidence of right ventricular failure and premature death. Only a limited number of pharmaceutical therapies have proven to be beneficial for PAH. These therapies improve symptoms, exercise capacity, and haemodynamics; however, the clinical relevance of these effects has been challenged. Therefore, the effect of currently approved treatment options remains inconclusive. Conversely, several new drugs for various aetiologies and clinical stages are expected to provide significant advances for the treatment of PAH. Moreover, percutaneous pulmonary artery denervation treatment may lead to a new therapeutic orientation in patients with PAH. The aim of this review is to present the new developments in PAH treatment, provide a brief overview of future directions in the field and discuss the potential future prospects of these innovative therapies.

Acute haemodynamic response in relation to plasma vardenafil concentrations in patients with pulmonary hypertension

AIMS

To evaluate the acute haemodynamic effects of a single oral dose of vardenafil and to study the drug concentration in relation to haemodynamic effects in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).

METHODS

Sixteen patients with PH (aged 29-85\ years), received one single oral dose of vardenafil (5, 10 or 20 mg). The haemodynamic effect was assessed over a 60 min period. Vardenafil plasma concentrations were measured after 15, 30, 45 and 60 min using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

At 60 min a reduction in mPAP with a median % decrease of -20.3% (range -48.3 to 3.0; P < 0.001) and an increase in cardiac output and the cardiac index with a median % change of 10.6% (range -25.0 to 88.1; P = 0.015) and 12.1% (range -24.0 to 94.4; P = 0.01) respectively was observed. The pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was reduced with a median % decrease of -28.9% (range -61.5 to -5.9; P < 0.001), and pulmonary selectivity was reflected by a median percent reduction of -16.9% (range -49.0 to 16.5; P = 0.002; n = 14) in the PVR/systemic vascular resistance ratio. There was a correlation between the plasma concentrations of vardenafil and change in mPAP (r = -0.579, P = 0.019) and between vardenafil concentrations and change in PVR (r = -0.662, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil causes rapid changes in cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and there is a correlation between plasma vardenafil drug concentration and the acute changes in mPAP as well as PVR in patients with PH.