Making Comfort Count: Using Quality Improvement to Promote Pediatric Procedural Pain Management

Decreasing Pain in Hospitalized Patients by Increasing Topical Anesthetic Use for Peripheral IVs

Introduction

Venous access is a common source of pain for hospitalized patients. Topical anesthetics are effective at decreasing needle pain, can improve success rate, and decrease procedure time; however, use before peripheral intravenous line (PIV) placement is inconsistent. The aim was to reduce pain experienced by hospitalized pediatric patients by increasing topical anesthetic use for PIV placement from a mean of 11% to 40% within 6 months.

Methods

The Model for Improvement was utilized. An institutional clinical pathway and PIV order panel were developed. Pre-checked orders for topical anesthetics were added to order sets. Visual aids were placed on IV carts, including reminders for anesthetics, pathway use and scripting examples. Nurses received individual feedback. Statistical process control charts were posted weekly on daily management system boards on medical-surgical floors, and data were shared at daily nursing huddles to increase awareness of performance and discuss opportunities for improvement.

Results

Topical anesthetic use for PIV placement increased from a mean of 11% to 46%. Documentation of comfort measures during PIV placement increased from a mean of 6% to 13%. The percentage of PIV placements with an order for a topical anesthetic in the electronic health record increased from a mean of 14% to 54%. PIV procedures with documentation of placement attempts increased from a mean of 47% to 70%.

Conclusions

Through systems and culture change, awareness of the importance of pain prevention for venous access procedures increased, and patient-centered care improved with greater collaboration between nurses, providers, and families for venous access planning.

Factors Associated With Low Procedural Pain Scores Among 1- to 5-Year-Old Patients Undergoing Facial Laceration Repair

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to quantify pain experienced by young children undergoing facial laceration repair and identify factors associated with low procedural pain scores.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of children's distress among a convenience sample of children aged 1 to 5 years undergoing facial or scalp laceration repair in 2 pediatric emergency departments. We reviewed video recordings and documented pain scores at 15-second intervals using the Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability-Revised (FLACC-r) scale. We dichotomized FLACC-r into low/high scores (≤3 and >3) to evaluate practice variables.

RESULTS

We included 11,474 FLACC-r observations from 258 procedures in the analysis. Two-thirds of 3- to 5-year-olds completed their laceration repair without the use of restraint, sedation, or anxiolytics. Mean distress scores were low (≤2.5 out of 10) across all procedure phases for 2- to 5-year-old patients. One-year-old patients experienced significantly more distress than their older counterparts (mean ≤4.2 out of 10). Odds of having low FLACC scores (≤3) were greater for patients with an expert clinician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.84). Wound infiltration (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93), patient observation of a needle (aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.33), and restraint (aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02-0.06) were negatively associated with low FLACC score.

CONCLUSION

The majority of 3- to 5-year-old patients were able to undergo facial laceration repair without restraint, sedation, or anxiolytics and with low mean distress scores. Our findings suggest that children's risk of experiencing moderate and severe distress during facial and scalp laceration repair may be reduced by prioritizing wound closure by expert-level clinicians, ensuring effective lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine application, avoiding restraint, and concealing needles from patient view.

Sensorial saturation improves infants' procedure-related pain behaviour in the cardiac intensive care unit: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Painful procedures are unavoidable when providing critical care to infants in intensive care units. These adverse experiences during infancy can lead to later hyperalgesia and poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. Thus, appropriate interventions are required to relieve infant pain during these procedures.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the effectiveness of sensorial saturation in reducing pain for infants during jugular central venous catheter removal procedures in intensive care units.

METHODS

This study involved a quasi-experimental, repeated-measures design. Data were collected from participants sequentially recruited from April to June 2019 (control period) and July to September 2019 (experimental period). Participants included 78 infants younger than 1 year with congenital heart disease. The control group (n = 38) received a general nursing intervention using swaddling, a common child-care practice that consists of wrapping infants to restrict movements, whereas the experimental group (n = 40) received sensorial saturation using oral sugar, body massage, and verbal interaction. Infants' physiological reactions to procedural pain were measured by changes in heart rate, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. Infants' procedural pain and behavioural indicators were measured using the Modified Behavioural Pain Scale. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, χ² tests, and repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the experimental group had lower heart rates (F = 53.15, p < .001), respiratory rates (F = 15.19, p < .001), and behavioural pain scores (F = 45.21, p < .001), both during and after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensorial saturation can be used as a nursing intervention in infants. Given the many invasive procedures that are part of infant clinical care, sensorial saturation may be a safe analgesic alternative. The findings of this study could lead to the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the nonpharmacological management of acute pain in infants.

Nurses’ roles in changing practice through implementing best practices: A systematic review

Nurses play an important role in the implementation of best practices. However, the role of nurses in changing practice by implementing best practices requires further exploration. No systematic review was found that summarised the best available evidence on the roles of nurses in changing practice through the implementation of best practices. This study summarised the best available evidence on the roles of nurses in changing practice through the implementation of best practices. A systematic review was used to search for studies in the English language, where a best practice was implemented in a clinical context and which included findings regarding the roles of nurses when implementing best practices. Scopus, EBSCOhost (Academic Search Ultimate, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL with Full Text, ERIC, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MasterFILE Premier, MEDLINE Complete), PUBMED, and ScienceDirect databases were searched from January 2013 to June 2021. The search generated 1343 citations. After removing duplicates and applying eligibility criteria, 27 studies were included. Five definite roles were identified as follows: leadership, education and training, collaboration, communication and feedback and development and tailoring of the best practice. These roles are interrelated, but equally crucial in order to implement best practices. This study found five interrelated but equally crucial nurse roles in changing practice through the implementation of best practices.

Educational Intervention to Strengthen Pediatric Postoperative Pain Management: A Cluster Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Pediatric postoperative pain is still undertreated.

AIMS

To assess whether educational intervention increases nurses' knowledge and improves pediatric postoperative pain management.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial with three measurement points (baseline T1, 1 month after intervention T2, and 6 months after intervention T3).

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS

The study was conducted in postanesthesia care units at six hospitals in Norway. Nurses working with children in the included units and children who were undergoing surgery were invited to participate in this study.

METHODS

Nurses were cluster randomized by units to an intervention (n = 129) or a control group (n = 129). This allocation was blinded for participants at baseline. Data were collected using "The Pediatric Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain: Norwegian Version" (primary outcome), observations of nurses' clinical practice, and interviews with children. The intervention included an educational day, clinical supervision, and reminders.

RESULTS

At baseline 193 nurses completed the survey (75% response rate), 143 responded at T2, and 107 at T3. Observations of nurses' (n = 138) clinical practice included 588 children, and 38 children were interviewed. The knowledge level increased from T1 to T3 in both groups, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. In the intervention group, there was an improvement between T1 and T2 in the total PNKAS-N score (70% vs. 83%), observed increase use of pain assessment tools (17% vs. 39%), and children experienced less moderate-to-severe pain.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was observed between the groups after intervention, but a positive change in knowledge and practice was revealed in both groups. Additional studies are needed to explore the most potent variables to strengthen pediatric postoperative pain management.

A Quality Improvement Project on Pain Management at a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital

To assess and improve pain management practices for hospitalized children in an urban tertiary pediatric teaching hospital.

METHODS

Health Quality Ontario Quality Improvement (QI) framework informed this study. A pre (T1) - post (T2) intervention assessment included chart reviews and children/caregiver surveys to ascertain pain management practices. Information on self-reported pain intensity, painful procedures, pain treatment and satisfaction were obtained from children/caregivers. Documented pain assessment, pain scores, and pharmacological/non-pharmacological pain treatments were collected by chart review. T1 data was fed back to pediatric units to inform their decisions and pain management targets.

RESULTS

At T1, 51 (58% of eligible participants) children/caregivers participated. At T2, 86 (97%) chart reviews and 51 (54%) children/caregivers surveys were completed. Most children/caregivers at T1 (78%) and T2 (80%) reported moderate to severe pain during their hospitalization. A mean of 2.6 painful procedures were documented in the previous 24 h, with the most common being needle-related procedures at both T1 and T2. Pain management strategies were infrequently used during needle-related procedures at both time points.

CONCLUSION

No improvements in pain management as measured by the T1 and T2 data occurred. Findings informed further pain management initiatives in the participating hospital.

Usefulness of Child HCAHPS Survey Data for Improving Inpatient Pediatric Care Experiences

OBJECTIVES

Quality improvement (QI) requires data, indicators, and national benchmarks. Knowledge about the usefulness of Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Child HCAHPS) data are lacking. We examined quality leader and frontline staff perceptions about patient experience measurement and use of Child HCAHPS data for QI.

METHODS

We surveyed children's hospital leaders and staff about their use of Child HCAHPS for QI, including measures from other studies. We compared scale and item means for leaders and staff and compared means to other studies.

RESULTS

Almost all leaders, but only one-third of staff, received reports with Child HCAHPS data. Leaders found the data more useful for comparisons to other hospitals than did staff. Both agreed on the validity of Child HCAHPS scores and used these data for improving pediatric care experiences. They agreed the data accurately reflect their hospital's quality of care, provide specific information for QI, and can be used to improve pediatric care experiences. They also agreed on approaches to improve Child HCAHPS scores. Among staff, QI was reported as essential to their daily work and that Child HCAHPS data were integral to QI.

CONCLUSIONS

As uptake of the Child HCAHPS survey increases, our study of one medium-sized, urban children's hospital revealed that leaders and staff believe Child HCAHPS provides actionable metrics for improvement. Our study fills a gap in research about the use of Child HCAHPS for pediatric QI. A multisite evaluation would provide further information about how the Child HCAHPS survey can improve care.

A Cross-Sectional Review of Pain Management Interventions Used for Painful Pediatric Blood Draw Procedures in Hospital

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized children continue to experience procedural pain due to inconsistent implementation of readily available, evidence-based pain interventions.

AIMS

To explore the prevalence of painful blood-testing procedures, pain management interventions, child-caregiver perceptions of effectiveness of, and satisfaction with, pain interventions, and adherence to best practice guidelines.

DESIGN

A single-site cross-sectional study using a combination of child-caregiver interviews and chart reviews for hospitalized children, 0-18 years.

METHODS

Interviews gathered information about the child's most recent blood test, procedural pain management intervention use, and participant perceptions of effectiveness of and satisfaction with these interventions. Concurrently, patient charts were reviewed for procedure documentation and pain management strategies used, including topical anesthetic and oral sucrose orders. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty children were included. At the time of data collection, 34 (68%) had experienced painful blood-testing procedures during their current admission. Pharmacologic pain interventions were documented for only 7 (21%) procedures and were often inconsistent with participant reports. Almost all interview respondents (n = 31, 91%) identified at least one pain intervention for the child's most recent painful blood-test. Twenty (59%) participants perceived pain interventions as effective and most were satisfied with utilized interventions (n = 27, 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-modal procedural pain management approach was infrequently used and documented, highlighting undertreatment based on recommended practices and guidelines. Perceived intervention effectiveness and satisfaction with pain management were however found to be relatively high.

Intraprocedural Back Pain Associated with Awake Neuroendovascular Procedures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The prevalence and characteristics of intraprocedural back pain is not well studied in awake patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study as part of quality improvement initiative in which all patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures in awake state were inquired regarding presence, severity (using a numeric rating scale score ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain possible]), and location (using anatomical chart) of back pain immediately after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with moderate to severe pain (score of ≥3).

RESULTS

A total of 100 (41.3%) of 242 patients reported intraprocedural back pain with a median severity of 5/10 (range 1-10). The mean age was 58.7 ± 16.2 years. The mean duration of the procedure was 82.3 minutes (range 15-410 minutes). The pain was classified as moderate to severe in 86 of 100 patients. The locations of pain were identified in lumbar (n = 77), thoracic (n = 6), cervical (n = 7), cervical and lumbar (n = 8), and cervical with thoracolumbar (n = 2) regions. There was a significant relationship between patients' history of the previous neck and/or back surgery and frequency of moderate to severe back pain (P = .02). No significant relationship was observed between frequency of none to mild and moderate to severe back pain among the strata by patients' age, body mass index, or duration of procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively high prevalence of intraprocedural back pain in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures in awake state must be recognized, and strategies to reduce the occurrence need to be identified.

From uptake to access: a decade of learning from the ACOG LARC program

The Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Program at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) celebrated its 10^th anniversary in 2018. This Viewpoint article reviews opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned by the ACOG LARC Program throughout the last decade. Housed within the largest medical organization representing women's health providers, the LARC Program supports change by developing resources for clinicians, healthcare systems, healthcare organizations, and policy makers. The Program's Postpartum Contraceptive Access Initiative (PCAI) meets specific needs identified by an Expert Work Group using implementation science principles, including improved contraceptive counseling and clinician training, and institution-wide sustainable systems change in billing, coding, pharmacy, and electronic medical record integration. Key lessons learned include the importance of centering patient preferences and autonomy, developing foundational evidence-based guidance, supporting practice change through implementation tools and collaboration with local champions, advocating for insurance and payment policy, and partnering with other health care organizations to develop robust resources to improve patient access to the full range of contraceptive methods.

A Review of Best Practices for Monitoring and Improving Inpatient Pediatric Patient Experiences

CONTEXT

Achieving high-quality patient-centered care requires assessing patient and family experiences to identify opportunities for improvement. With the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey, hospitals can assess performance and make national comparisons of inpatient pediatric experiences. However, using patient and family experience data to improve care remains a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the literature on best practices for monitoring performance and undertaking activities aimed at improving pediatric patient and family experiences of inpatient care.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsychINFO.

STUDY SELECTION

We included (1) English-language peer-reviewed articles published from January 2000 to April 2019; (2) articles based in the United States, United Kingdom, or Canada; (3) articles focused on pediatric inpatient care; (4) articles describing pediatric patient and family experiences; and (5) articles including content on activities aimed at improving patient and family experiences. Our review included 25 articles.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two researchers reviewed the full article and abstracted specific information: country, study aims, setting, design, methods, results, Quality Improvement (QI) initiatives performed, internal reporting description, best practices, lessons learned, barriers, facilitators and study implications for clinical practice, patient-experience data collection, and QI activities. We noted themes across samples and care settings.

RESULTS

We identified 10 themes of best practice. The 4 most common were (1) use evidence-based approaches, (2) maintain an internal system that communicates information and performance on patient and family experiences to staff and hospital leadership, (3) use experience survey data to initiate and/or evaluate QI interventions, and (4) identify optimal times (eg, discharge) and modes (eg, print) for obtaining patient and family feedback. These correspond to adult inpatient best practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Both pediatric and adult inpatient best practices rely on common principles of culture change (such as evidence-based clinical practice), collaborative learning, multidisciplinary teamwork, and building and/or supporting a QI infrastructure that requires time, money, collaboration, data tracking, and monitoring. QI best practices in both pediatric and adult inpatient settings commonly rely on identifying drivers of overall ratings of care, rewarding staff for successful implementation, and creating easy-to-use and easy-to-access planning and QI tools for staff.

Patient satisfaction with pain relief following major abdominal surgery is influenced by good communication, pain relief and empathic caring: a qualitative interview study

Background

Monitoring and improving the quality of care is an ever increasing concern for health care organisations. Measuring the effectiveness of clinical outcomes is done by looking at specific markers of high quality care. Pain management is considered one of the markers of high quality care and satisfaction with pain management is a crucial and important quality assurance marker; yet, we know little about what contributes to a patient's decision about satisfaction.

Methods

A qualitative study drawing on phenomenological approach aiming to evaluate the perspective of patients experiencing post-operative pain. Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were recruited from a Renal Transplant and Urology ward in the North of England, UK. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews and were analysed using Colaizzi's approach.

Results

Ten patients participated in the study and three themes emerged from the analysis. The findings of this study revealed that in order to achieve satisfaction with the management of pain, patient care has to include information delivery which is timely and adequate according to a patient's individual needs, nurses should have a caring attitude and pain should be well controlled.

Conclusion

Satisfaction with pain management is influenced by good communication and information transfer, appropriate pain management and an empathic presence throughout.

Aboriginal children and penicillin injections for rheumatic fever: how much of a problem is injection pain?

OBJECTIVE

To explore young Aboriginal people's and clinicians' experiences of injection pain for the 10 years of penicillin injections children are prescribed to prevent rheumatic fever recurrences.

METHODS

Aboriginal children on the penicillin regimen and clinicians were purposively recruited from four remote sites in Australia. Semi-structured interviews and participant observations were conducted. Views were synthesised and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 29 Aboriginal children and 59 clinicians were interviewed. Sixteen participants appeared to become accustomed to the injection pain, eight did not find pain an issue, and five found injection pain difficult. A further five believed the injections made them unwell. Patients expressed varying abilities to negotiate with clinicians about the use of pain reduction measures. Clinicians revealed good knowledge of pain reduction measures, but offered them inconsistently. All clinicians found administering the injections distressing.

CONCLUSION

Repeated painful procedures in children necessitate well-planned and child-focused care. Current practices are not in line with guidance from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians about effects of repeated painful procedures on children. Initiating the long-term injection regimen for rheumatic fever is a special event requiring expert input. A newly reported finding of a subset of young people feeling unwell after receiving the injection requires further investigation. Implications for public health: Improvement of local and jurisdictional guidelines on use of pain reduction measures for children who have been prescribed repeated painful injections for rheumatic fever is needed.