Development and Evaluation of High-Value Pediatrics: A High-Value Care Pediatric Resident Curriculum

Factors Associated With Clinician Self-Reported Resource Use in Acute Care and Ambulatory Pediatrics

The objective of this study is to determine predictors of resource use among pediatric providers for common respiratory illnesses. We surveyed pediatric primary care, emergency department (ED)/urgent care (UC), and hospital medicine providers at a free-standing children's hospital system. Five clinical vignettes assessed factors affecting resource use for upper respiratory infections, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia, including provider-type, practice location, tolerance to uncertainty, and medical decision-making behaviors. The response rate was 75.3% (168/223). The ED/UC and primary care providers had higher vignette scores, indicating higher resource use, compared with inpatient providers; advanced practice providers (APPs) had higher vignette scores compared with physicians. In multivariate analysis, being an ED/UC provider, an APP, and greater concern for bad outcomes were associated with higher vignette scores. Overall, provider type and location of practice may predict resource use for children with respiratory illnesses. Interventions targeted at test-maximizing providers may improve quality of care and reduce resource burden.

Pediatric Residents' Experiences With High-Value Care at an Academic Children's Hospital

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates residents incorporate cost considerations into patient care. However, resident experiences with high-value care (HVC) in the clinical setting have not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

To explore pediatric residents' experiences with HVC and its facilitators and barriers.

METHODS

We performed a qualitative study with a grounded theory epistemology of pediatric residents recruited by email at a large academic children's hospital. We conducted focus groups (n=3) and interviews (n=7) between February and September 2020 using a semi-structured guide. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Codes were built using an iterative approach and organized into thematic categories. Sampling continued until saturation was reached.

RESULTS

Twenty-two residents participated. Residents' value-based health care decisions occurred in a complex learning environment. Due to limited experience, residents feared missing diagnoses, which contributed to perceived overtesting. Resident autonomy, with valuable experiential learning, supported and hindered HVC. Informal teaching occurred through patient care discussions; however, cost information was lacking. Practice of HVC varied by clinical setting with greater challenges on high acuity and subspecialty services. For children with medical complexity, identifying family concerns and goals of care improved value. Family experience/demands influenced resident health care decisions, contributing to high- and low-value care. Effective collaboration among health care team members was crucial; residents often felt pressured following perceived low-value recommendations from consultants.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident HVC learning and practice is influenced by multiple factors in a complex clinical learning environment.

Applying High-Value Care Principles in a Pediatric Case: A Workshop for Health Professions Students

INTRODUCTION

The cost of health care in the US is rapidly rising. Understanding the financial cost of medical care is an important competency for physicians and physicians-in-training. Medical students in their clinical clerkships are being exposed to health care decision-making often for the first time and are forming habits they will carry throughout their training and careers. Teaching high-value care (HVC) principles is crucial for students as they will be the future leaders in health care.

METHODS

This 1-hour workshop was interactive and aimed to prepare medical students to apply HVC when making medical decisions. The topic of HVC was initially introduced by eliciting tests that students want to order and highlighting the concept of whether or not a test changes the management of the patient. This exercise was followed by a PowerPoint presentation which discussed HVC, Choosing Wisely guidelines in pediatrics, and how to communicate with parents and patients about this topic.

RESULTS

Of third-year medical students, 125 participated in the workshop, with a survey response rate of 90% (n = 112). Ninety-nine percent reported that this workshop was helpful, and 97% reported that they will change their practice to reflect more cost-conscious care. Most students reported that their knowledge of HVC improved after the session, with 88% reporting scores of 3 (moderately improved) or 4 (significantly improved).

DISCUSSION

This ready-to-implement workshop offered students an understanding of how the cost of medical care impacts patients and families and how to practice cost-conscious care in pediatrics.

Choosing Words Wisely: Residents' Use of Rhetorical Appeals in Conversations About Unnecessary Tests

PURPOSE

To characterize how residents employ rhetorical appeals (i.e., the strategic use of communication to achieve specifiable goals) when discussing unnecessary diagnostic tests with patients.

METHOD

In 2015, senior hematology residents from 10 Canadian universities participating in a national formative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) completed a resource stewardship communication station. In this communication scenario, a standardized patient (SP) portrayed a patient requesting unnecessary thrombophilia testing following early pregnancy loss. The authors performed a thematic analysis of audio transcripts using a qualitative description approach to identify residents' rhetorical appeals to logic (rational appeals), credibility, and emotion.

RESULTS

For persuasive communication, residents (n = 27) relied primarily on rational appeals that fit into 3 categories (with themes) focused on medical evidence (poor utility, professional guidelines and recommendations), avoidance of harm (insurance implications, unnecessary or potentially harmful interventions, patient anxiety), and reassurance to patient (normalizing, clinical pretest probability, criteria for reconsidering testing). Appeals to credibility and emotion were rarely used.

CONCLUSIONS

In an OSCE setting, residents relied predominantly on rational appeals when engaging SPs in conversations about unnecessary tests. These observations yield insights into how recent emphasis within residency education on appropriate test utilization may manifest when residents put recommendations into practice in conversations with patients. This study's framework of rational appeals may be helpful in designing communication curricula about unnecessary testing. Future studies should explore rhetoric about unnecessary testing in the clinical environment, strategies to teach and coach residents leading these conversations, and patients' preferences and responses to different appeals.

Improving the Transition of Intravenous to Enteral Antibiotics in Pediatric Patients with Pneumonia or Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

BACKGROUND

Despite national recommendations for early transition to enteral antimicrobials, practice variability has existed at our hospital.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to increase the proportion of enterally administered antibiotic doses for Pediatric Hospital Medicine patients aged >60 days admitted for uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infections from 44% to 75% in eight months.

METHODS

This quality improvement study was conducted at a large, urban, academic children's hospital. The study population included Hospital Medicine patients aged >60 days with diagnoses of pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infections. Interventions included education on intravenous and enteral antibiotic charge differentials, documentation of transition plan, structured discussions of transition criteria, and real-time identification of failures with feedback. Our process measure was the total number of enteral antibiotic doses divided by all antibiotic doses in patients receiving enteral medications on the same day. An annotated statistical process control chart tracked the impact of interventions on the administration route of antibiotic doses over time. Additional outcome measures included antimicrobial costs per patient encounter using average wholesale prices and length of stay.

RESULTS

The percentage of enterally administered antibiotic doses increased from 44% to 80% within eight months. Antimicrobial costs per patient encounter and the associated standard deviation of costs for our target diagnoses decreased by 70% and 84%, respectively. Average length of stay did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized communication about criteria for transition from intravenous to enteral antibiotics can lead to earlier transitions for patients with pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infections, subsequently reducing costs and prescribing variability.