Discharge Criteria Decrease Variability and Improve Efficiency

Duration of monitoring after cessation of oxygen therapy in infants with bronchiolitis

AIM

There is no evidence for how long bronchiolitis patients should be observed after coming off oxygen therapy and wide practice variation exists. We aimed to investigate whether it is safe to discharge bronchiolitis patients 4 h after cessation of oxygen therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre cohort study of 884 infants (n = 462 in 2018 vs. n = 422 in 2019) aged 0-24 months admitted with bronchiolitis in 2018 and 2019 was conducted after implementation of a bronchiolitis protocol recommending discharge home 4 h post-cessation of oxygen therapy in 2019. We compared the rate of readmissions and Clinical Reviews/Rapid Responses in the pre- and post-exposure cohorts.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in median (interquartile range (IQR)) time to discharge post oxygen cessation by 87 min (510 (370-1033) min versus 423 (273-904) min; P < 0.001) and in median (IQR) length of stay by 6.7 h (2.11 (1.54-2.97) days vs. 1.83 (1.17-2.71) days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between readmissions in 2018 compared to 2019 (0.6% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.317). In 2018, there were two Clinical Reviews and in 2019 there were two Rapid Responses post-cessation of oxygen. There were 89 patients discharged within 4 h of cessation of oxygen therapy (n = 18 in 2018 vs. n = 71 in 2019; P < 0.001) with no readmissions, Clinical Reviews or Rapid Responses in the 2019 cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that patients can be discharged 4 h after cessation of supplemental oxygen without increased risk of adverse events.

Discharge criteria for inpatient paediatric asthma: a narrative systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Criteria-led discharges (CLDs) and inpatient care pathways (ICPs) aim to standardise care and improve efficiency by allowing patients to be discharged on fulfilment of discharge criteria. This narrative systematic review aims to summarise the evidence for use of CLDs and discharge criteria in ICPs for paediatric inpatients with asthma, and summarise the evidence for each discharge criterion used.

METHODS

Database search using keywords was performed using Medline, Embase and PubMed for studies published until 9 June 2022. Inclusion criteria included: paediatric patients <18 years old, admitted to hospital with asthma or wheeze and use of CLD, nurse-led discharge or ICP. Reviewers screened studies, extracted data and assessed study quality using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies tool. Results were tabulated. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes.

RESULTS

Database search identified 2478 studies. 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Common discharge criteria include bronchodilator frequency, oxygen saturation and respiratory assessment. Discharge criteria definitions varied between studies. Most definitions were associated with improvements in length of stay (LOS) without increasing re-presentation or readmission.

CONCLUSION

CLDs and ICPs in the care of paediatric inpatients with asthma are associated with improvements in LOS without increasing re-presentations or readmissions. Discharge criteria lack consensus and evidence base. Common criteria include bronchodilator frequency, oxygen saturations and respiratory assessment. This study was limited by a paucity of high-quality studies and exclusion of studies not published in English. Further research is necessary to identify optimal definitions for each discharge criterion.

Sustaining Long-Term Asthma Outcomes at a Community and Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Implementing asthma Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) have been shown to improve length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates on a short-term basis at both tertiary care and community hospital settings. Whether these outcomes are sustained long term is not known. The goal of this study was to measure the long-term impact of CPG implementation at both tertiary and community sites in 1 hospital system.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using the Pediatric Health Information System database. LOS and 7- and 14-day emergency department (ED) revisit and readmission rates from 2009 to 2020 were compared pre and post implementation of asthma CPG in 2012 at both sites. Implementation involved electronic order sets, early metered dose inhaler introduction, and empowering respiratory therapists to wean per the bronchodilator weaning protocol. Interrupted time series and statistical process control charts were used to assess CPG impact.

RESULTS

Implementation of asthma CPG was associated with significant reductions in the variability of LOS without impacting ED revisit or readmission rates at both the tertiary and community sites. Secular trends in the interrupted time series did not demonstrate significant impact of CPG on LOS. However, the overall trend toward decreased LOS that started before CPG implementation was sustained for 7 years after CPG implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Early metered dose inhaler introduction, respiratory therapist-driven bronchodilator weaning, and electronic order sets at both the community and tertiary care site led to a significant reduction in the variation of LOS, without impacting ED revisit or readmission rate.

Improving Timely Discharges Through Nurse-Initiated Conditional Discharge Orders

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients are often medically ready for discharge before actual time of discharge. Delays are multifactorial, including medical staff workflow, knowledge, culture, and system issues. Identifying discharge criteria in a nurse-initiated conditional discharge (NICD) order facilitates a nurse-initiated discharge, creates a shared mental model for early discharge readiness, and improves workflow delays. The objective was to increase the percentage of morning discharges from 6% to 11% on the hospitalist intervention team, sustaining 11% for 6 months.

METHODS

All patients admitted to a hospitalist service (intervention team) were targeted from July 2018 through March 2020. The primary outcome measure was percentage of morning discharges (6:00 am-12:00 pm). Quality improvement methodology was used to initiate bundled interventions, including NICD order use and education, written tool dissemination, and weekly e-mail reminders (PDSA1). Continued education with dissemination of an instructional module and a resident champion were established to improve resident hesitancy (PDSA2).

RESULTS

Special cause variation was observed for the primary outcome after PDSA2 with a positive shift in the number of early discharges. Special cause variation was observed in the process measure after PDSA1 with 6 points above the mean.

CONCLUSIONS

Through NICD orders, written tool dissemination, and a resident champion to encourage system-wide culture change, patients were discharged earlier, improving patient flow.

Multi-Disciplinary Discharge Coordination Team to Overcome Discharge Barriers and Address the Risk of Delayed Discharges

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Using Quality Improvement Methodology to Increase Communication of Discharge Criteria on Rounds

OBJECTIVE

Clear communication about discharge criteria with families and the interprofessional team is essential for efficient transitions of care. Our aim was to increase the percentage of pediatric hospital medicine patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) that included discharge criteria discussion from a baseline mean of 32% to 75% over 1 year.

METHODS

We used the Model for Improvement to conduct a quality improvement initiative at a tertiary pediatric academic medical center. Interventions tested included (1) rationale sharing, (2) PFCR checklist modification, (3) electronic discharge SmartForms, (4) data audit and feedback and (5) discharge criteria standardization. The outcome measure was the percentage of observed PFCR with discharge criteria discussed. Process measure was the percentage of PHM patients with criteria documented. Balancing measures were rounds length, length of stay, and readmission rates. Statistical process control charts assessed the impact of interventions.

RESULTS

We observed 700 PFCR (68 baseline PFCR from July to August 2019 and 632 intervention period PFCR from November 2019 to June 2021). At baseline, discharge was discussed during 32% of PFCR. After rationale sharing, checklist modification, and criteria standardization, this increased to 90%, indicating special cause variation. The improvement has been sustained for 10 months.At baseline, there was no centralized location to document discharge criteria. After development of the SmartForm, 21% of patients had criteria documented. After criteria standardization for common diagnoses, this increased to 71%. Rounds length, length of stay, and readmission rates remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Using quality improvement methodology, we successfully increased verbal discussions of discharge criteria during PFCR without prolonging rounds length.

When patients get stuck: A systematic literature review on throughput barriers in hospital-wide patient processes

Hospital productivity is of great importance to policymakers, and previous research demonstrates that improved hospital productivity can be achieved by directing more focus towards patient throughput at healthcare organizations. There is also a growing body of literature on patient throughput barriers hampering the flow of patients. These projects rarely, however, encompass complete hospitals. Therefore, this paper provides a systematic literature review on hospital-wide patient process throughput barriers by consolidating the substantial body of studies from single settings into a hospital-wide perspective. Our review yielded a total of 2207 articles, of which 92 were finally selected for analysis. The results reveal long lead times, inefficient capacity coordination and inefficient patient process transfer as the main barriers at hospitals. These are caused by inadequate staffing, lack of standards and routines, insufficient operational planning and a lack in IT functions. As such, this review provides new perspectives on whether the root causes of inefficient hospital patient throughput are related to resource insufficiency or inefficient work methods. Finally, this study develops a new hospital-wide framework to be used by policymakers and healthcare managers when deciding what improvement strategies to follow to increase patient throughput at hospitals.