Supplementation Practices and Donor Milk Use in US Well-Newborn Nurseries

A Pilot Single-Site Randomized Control Trial: Investigating the Use of Donor Milk in Late Preterm and Term Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study donor milk (DM) supplementation when mother's own milk (MOM) was unavailable in term and late preterm infants (LPIs) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We hypothesized that this study would be feasible, defined by the rate of consent, diet adherence, and study completion. We further hypothesized that compared with formula supplementation, DM supplementation, for no longer than 7 days from birth, would be associated with an increase in breastfeeding attempts and the percentage of MOM (MOM%) without adversely affecting growth. Breastfeeding attempts and MOM% were assessed over 48 hours at the end of the intervention, which was defined as NICU discharge or at the end of supplementation, whichever came sooner.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a pilot study (n = 32). Infants with a gestational age > 34 weeks admitted to the NICU were included. Infants were randomized to one of two groups: human milk (MOM + DM) or formula (MOM + F).

RESULTS

The consent rate was 52%. Adherence to the study diet was 97%, and completion was 100%. When the MOM + DM group was compared with the MOM + F group, there was no difference in breastfeeding attempts (median [interquartile range]: 3.5 [1.5-6] vs. 1.5 [0.5-4] times, p = 0.1) or MOM% (60 vs. 59%, p = 0.9). Weight and length at multiple time points were similar when the groups were compared.

CONCLUSION

A study randomizing term and LPIs in the NICU to DM or formula when MOM was unavailable is feasible. It remains unclear if DM improves breastfeeding success in this population.

KEY POINTS

· A study that randomizes term and late preterm infants in the NICU to DM or formula supplementation when mother's own milk is not available is feasible.. · It remains unclear if DM compared to formula supplementation improves direct breastfeeding.. · In general, growth was similar in infants who received DM or formula as a supplement..

Physician personal breastfeeding experience and clinical care of the breastfeeding dyad

BACKGROUND

Prior research suggests that physicians' personal experience with breastfeeding may influence their attitudes toward breastfeeding. This phenomenon has not been explored in well-newborn care physician leaders, whose administrative responsibilities often include drafting and approval of hospital breastfeeding and formula supplementation policies.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study, surveying physicians in the Better Outcomes through Research for Newborns (BORN) network. We examined physician attitudes toward recommending breastfeeding and their breastfeeding experience. Qualitative analysis was conducted on responses to the question: "How do you think your breastfeeding experience influences your clinical practice?"

RESULTS

Of 71 participants, most (92%) had a very positive attitude toward breastfeeding with 75% of respondents reporting personal experience with breastfeeding. Of these, 68% had a very positive experience, 25% had a somewhat positive experience, and 6% had a neutral experience. Four themes emerged with respect to the effect of breastfeeding experience on practice: (1) empathy with breastfeeding struggles, (2) increased knowledge and skills, (3) passion for breastfeeding benefits, and (4) application of personal experience in lieu of evidence-based medicine, particularly among those who struggled with breastfeeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-newborn care physician leaders reported positive attitudes about breastfeeding, increased support toward breastfeeding persons, and a perception of improved clinical lactation skills. Those who struggled with breastfeeding reported increased comfort with recommending formula supplementation to their own patients. Medical education about evidence-based breastfeeding support practices and provision of lactation support to physicians has the potential to affect public health through improved care for the patients they serve.

Perspective: Supporting Maternal Efforts to Provide Optimal Infant Nutrition in the Post-Partum Setting

Supporting optimal newborn nutrition and the positive maternal-infant relationship while encouraging safe sleep practices are essential components of maternal and newborn care in the hospital setting following birth. Breastfeeding is widely recognized as the best practice to support the nutritional needs and well-being of the infant, and recommendations have been developed by the WHO, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the United States Centers for Disease Control to encourage and successfully support breastfeeding efforts before hospital discharge. The 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, developed and promoted by the WHO, form the basis of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and have become the international framework for public health initiatives to promote breastfeeding. An evaluation of hospital performance implementing the 10 steps through the process of "Baby-Friendly Designation" (BFD) has been suggested by many breastfeeding advocates as the optimal pathway to attain the goals of the BFHI. However, the WHO has recognized that BFD may not be an appropriate goal in all settings, and indicated, as part of their updated 2018 guidance, that "facilities may make changes in their policies and procedures to obtain the designation, but these changes are not always sustainable, especially when there are no regular monitoring systems in place." In addition, unintended associated issues regarding newborn safety and maternal dissatisfaction with some of the 10 steps have emerged. This perspective discusses the challenges faced by hospitals attempting to implement the BFHI 10 steps and suggests potential solutions to make progress in those efforts with or without BFD and also the efforts needed to support formula feedings when appropriate.

The Association Between Type of Supplementation in the Newborn Nursery and Breastfeeding Outcomes at 2 and 6 Months of Age

BACKGROUND

Supplementation in the newborn nursery has been associated with shorter breastfeeding duration. However, supplementation may at times be necessary.

RESEARCH AIM

To determine the association between type of supplementation in the newborn nursery (mother's own milk, formula, donor human milk) and breastfeeding outcomes at 2 and 6 months of age.

METHODS

This was a prospective, longitudinal, observational multi-group cohort study. In total, 2,343 surveys were sent to parents who, prior to delivery, indicated intent to exclusively breastfeed. Participants were grouped by type of nursery supplementation. Surveys asked about breastfeeding outcomes when infants were 2 and 6 months old. Our final analytic sample included data from 1,111 healthy newborns ≥ 35 weeks. We used multiple logistic regression to compare future breastfeeding outcomes for infants who were exclusively directly breastfed or who received supplementation during their birth hospitalization.

RESULTS

Both the donor human milk and formula groups had decreased breastfeeding at 2 and 6 months compared to the exclusively directly breastfed group. Notably, for infants who received formula compared to donor human milk, the odds of breastfeeding at 2 and 6 months were 74% and 58% lower, respectively (OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.12, 0.56] at 2 months; OR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.19, 0.94] at 6 months). The donor human milk group had lower odds of breastfeeding at both follow up times compared to the mother's own milk group.

CONCLUSION

Among those who intend to breastfeed, supplementation with donor human milk instead of formula in the newborn nursery may support longer breastfeeding.

Clinical Characteristics and Breastfeeding Outcomes in Term Dyads Following In-Hospital Supplementation with Pasteurized Donor Human Milk or Formula

Background: Pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) supplementation for healthy infants is an emerging practice. Little is known about demographics or breastfeeding outcomes for dyads whose mothers choose PDHM versus formula. Research Aims: To identify relationships between in-hospital supplementation choice and (1) dyad characteristics and breastfeeding intent, and (2) breastfeeding outcomes at 1 month. Materials and Methods: This exploratory prospective cohort study surveyed healthy dyads requiring medically indicated supplementation. Participants completed questionnaires including demographics, breastfeeding intent, and self-efficacy during hospitalization, and self-efficacy and lactation outcomes at 1 month. Results: Of 39 participants, 24 (62%) supplemented with formula and 15 (38%) with PDHM. Formula dyads were more likely than PDHM dyads to have a delivery body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² (58% versus 20%, p = 0.02), and less likely to have attained greater than a college degree (33% versus 7%, p = 0.02); formula dyads also reported lower breastfeeding intent scores (12.0 versus 15.5, p = 0.002). Breastfeeding self-efficacy scores were similar but decreased for both groups over 1 month. At 1 month, mothers who chose formula were more likely to continue to provide breast milk to their infants (84% versus 72%). Direct breastfeeding rates were similar (72% versus 68%); of participants directly breastfeeding at 1 month, PDHM dyads were 1.5 times more likely to provide maternal expressed milk. Conclusions: Differences in maternal education, BMI, and breastfeeding intent were found between feeding groups. Results suggest an association between PDHM choice and initial breastfeeding intent and breastfeeding self-efficacy and provision of maternal expressed milk at 1 month.

Human Milk for the Term Newborn

Human milk provides optimal nutrition for term newborns, but the prevalence of its use is below target, and risks have been identified. Infants of black mothers as well as term newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit are at risk for not receiving human milk. To improve human milk intake, multiple individual-level interventions have been shown to be effective, but some popular system-level interventions are ineffective or harmful. Expressed milk and donor milk may be less beneficial than direct breastfeeding. Nuanced public policies can help support lactation while promoting individual choice and equity.