Less testing is needed in the emergency room after a first afebrile seizure

An audit of first afebrile seizure management in an Irish tertiary pediatric setting

The objective of this study was to compare the first afebrile seizure management with internationally recognized standards in an Irish tertiary pediatric setting. Twenty-one management standards were derived from a combination of British (NICE 2004) and North American (AAN 2003) guidelines. Cases of first afebrile seizure presenting to a pediatric emergency department between July 2007 and June 2010 were assessed against the standards. On completion, the standards developed were presented to the relevant stakeholders, a nurse-developed parental advice sheet was introduced, and a re-audit was performed from July 2010 to June 2011. Forty children were identified in the initial audit period (A1) and 41 over the re-audit (A2). No case achieved full compliance with the devised standards in the audit period. A median compliance score of 15 (range 5-20) was achieved in A1 and 17 (range 11-21) in A2 [mean rank 31.93 versus 49.85; p(1,1) < 0.0001]. Optimal compliance (total score of ≥17) with devised standards was achieved in 6/40 patients in A1 and in 21/41 patients in A2 [χ (2) = 11.95; p(1,1) = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated an initial lack of compliance with international guidelines on management of a common medical presentation, first afebrile seizure, and demonstrated that improvements can be achieved by identification of appropriate standards and critical appraisal of the compliance with these standards through both formal and informal education.

Neurologic complaints in young children in the ED: when is cranial computed tomography helpful?

MAIN OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to describe the use of emergent head computed tomography (CT) in young children and ask in which circumstances scans contributed to immediate management.

METHODS

We reviewed electronic records of children, aged 1 month through 6 years, who received a head CT at a large suburban emergency department between February 2008 and February 2009. Age, sex, chief complaint, history, physical examination, indication for and results of head CT, red flags in history or physical examination, final disposition, and number of head CT scans performed to date were recorded. Abnormalities on CT scans were classified as significant or incidental, and subsequent interventions were documented.

RESULTS

Emergent head CTs were performed on 394 children. The most common indications were trauma, 65%; seizure, 11%; and headache, 6%. Computed tomographic abnormalities were found in 40% (154 children): 32 significant findings,104 incidental findings, and 22 preexisting abnormalities. Four children with significant findings required immediate intervention. They all had red flags in both history and physical examination, and 3 of 4 children had known preexisting pathology; 1 child had nonaccidental trauma. Only 1 child had a significantly abnormal CT with no identifiable red flags; this child was admitted for observation and was discharged within 24 hours. Approximately a third of children had no readily identifiable red flag for the CT scans that they received. Of note, 20% of the young children had received more than 1 head CT scan to date, and 6% had between 6 and 20 scans.

CONCLUSIONS

Every child in this sample who required emergency intervention had red flags on history and physical examination. The 35% of CT scans performed in young children without red flags did not contribute usefully to their acute management.

Management of children with nonfebrile seizures in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Children with seizures are often referred to the emergency department where they are typically evaluated by a physician with limited knowledge of pediatric epileptology and undergo a costly and extensive work-up that contributes little to the final decision.

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the medical management of children with nonfebrile seizures in the emergency department and to define the potential role of the neurology clinic in this context.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The files of 85 children who made 104 visits to the emergency department of a pediatric tertiary hospital for nonfebrile seizures were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Average age was 7.5 years. Blood tests were performed in almost all visits; a minority also involved the use of brain scans and electroencephalography. A neurologist was consulted in about half the visits. Only electroencephalography and neurologic consultation contributed significantly to the final decision. Hospitalization was recommended in 71% of cases, but it was usually short term and not accompanied by significant changes in the management.

CONCLUSION

In children with nonfebrile seizures, a problem-oriented approach including only the necessary work-up (e.g. electroencephalography) with neurologist consultation can potentially decrease the inpatient load and lower health care costs, while sparing patients unnecessary tests.

Headache in young children in the emergency department: use of computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to determine whether computed tomographic (CT) scans led to better acute care of young children with headache presenting the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We examined the records of 364 children 2 to 5 years of age who presented with headache to a large urban ED between July 1, 2003, and June 30, 2006. By reviewing initial history and examination findings, we first identified patients with secondary headaches (ie, with readily identifiable explanations such as ventriculoperitoneal shunts, known brain tumors, or acute illnesses, such as viral syndromes, fever, probable meningitis, or trauma). Charts for the remaining patients were reviewed for headache history, neurologic examination findings, laboratory and neuroimaging results, final diagnosis, and disposition.

RESULTS

On the basis of initial history and physical examination results, 306 children (84%) had secondary headaches. For 72% of those children, acute febrile illnesses and viral respiratory syndromes accounted for the headaches. Among the 58 children (16%) who had no recognized central nervous system disease or systemic illness at presentation, 28% had CT scans performed. Of those, 1 scan yielded abnormal results, showing a brainstem glioma; the patient demonstrated abnormal neurologic examination findings on the day of presentation. For 15 (94%) of 16 patients, the CT scans did not contribute to diagnosis or management. For 59% of children with apparently primary headaches, no family history was recorded.

CONCLUSION

For young children presenting to the ED with headache but normal neurologic examination findings and nonworrying history, CT scans seldom lead to diagnosis or contribute to immediate management.

Status epilepticus: evidence and controversy

Status Epilepticus (SE) is a potential and relatively common complication of epileptic seizures. Traditionally, SE was defined as 30 minutes of continuous seizure activity or a series of seizures without return to full consciousness between the seizures. As a practical rule, it is admitted that all patients arriving at the emergency room suffering from epileptic seizures could have SE and should be treated accordingly. It is well known that the longer an attack has lasted, the more difficult it is to control in the next 5 to 10 minutes. On the other hand, once an attack has lasted for over 5 to 10 minutes, it is unlikely to cease spontaneously. Ambulatory intervention should focus on this "therapeutic interval" in acute attacks with the use of first-line drugs such as the intramuscular, rectal, oral, and/or intranasal application of benzodiazepines (BZD). Treatment of SE is a medical emergency, which should include 3 priority objectives: (1) to stop the seizures; (2) to maintain internal homeostasis; and (3) to treat possible complications. Current consensus is that a BZD, notably lorazepam or diazepam, is the initial class of drug for the treatment of SE. Phenytoin, fosphenytoin, or valproate generally is agreed upon as the next drugs to be administered. Failure to respond to optimal BZD and phenytoin loading operationally defines refractory SE.

Childhood febrile seizures: overview and implications

This article provides an overview of the latest knowledge and understanding of childhood febrile seizures. This review also discusses childhood febrile seizure occurrence, health services utilization and treatment costs. Parental reactions associated with its occurrence and how healthcare providers can assist parents with dealing effectively with this potentially frightening and anxiety-producing event are also discussed.

Evaluation of first unprovoked seizures in children by general paediatricians in New Zealand

AIM

To determine current practice of general paediatricians in New Zealand in the investigation and management of a first unprovoked seizure in childhood.

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire was emailed to 109 general paediatricians in New Zealand. The questionnaire presented the participant with three hypothetical case scenarios representing a generalised tonic clonic seizure, a complex partial seizure and an episode of non-specific collapse. The participant was asked to indicate what investigations and course of management was required.

RESULTS

Forty-seven questionnaires were returned. Primary investigations included an electroencephalogram (EEG) in 47% of cases after a first generalised tonic clonic seizure increasing to 89% after a second. Ninety-one per cent of paediatricians were likely to request an EEG after a complex partial seizure. No paediatrician would request neuroimaging following a first generalised tonic clonic seizure. Neuroimaging was requested by 10% of paediatricians following a second generalised tonic clonic seizure and by 47% following a complex partial seizure. No paediatrician elected to initiate antiepileptic drugs after a first generalised tonic clonic seizure, but 49% would initiate treatment after a second generalised tonic clonic seizure. Eleven per cent of paediatricians would start treatment after a single complex partial seizure.

CONCLUSION

Less than 50% of general paediatricians would request an EEG after a first unprovoked seizure. This is an unexpectedly low rate that may reflect accessibility. New Zealand paediatricians had an appropriately low rate of requesting neuroimaging. As currently recommended no general paediatricians began antiepileptic drugs in the scenario of a single uncomplicated seizure in the absence of other risk factors.