Otitis, antibiotics, and the greater good

Acute otitis media: antimicrobial treatment or the observation option?

The "observation option" was a recommendation cited in the American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Family Physicians clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of acute otitis media (AOM) in 2004. This option's premise is that antibiotic treatment of some uncomplicated AOM cases can be deferred if certain criteria are met, including diagnostic certainty and disease severity. Although this recommendation was controversial, physicians expressed relief at its publication because they felt that not all cases of AOM needed treatment with antibiotics. Studies of the guideline's acceptability, practicality, applicability, and effectiveness have been positive. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention support it wholeheartedly. Nevertheless, reluctance persists, and the medical community has voiced some objections. During this current crisis of antibiotic resistance, the observation option has become a point of contention.

Failure to achieve early bacterial eradication increases clinical failure rate in acute otitis media in young children

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the association between early bacteriologic failure and clinical failure in acute otitis media (AOM).

METHODS

Children with AOM aged 3-35 months enrolled in studies documenting both bacteriologic outcomes by tympanocentesis on day 4-6 and clinical outcomes on day 11-16 (immediate posttreatment visit) constituted our study group. Bacteriologic outcomes were studied for children with AOM caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae or both. The relative risk (RR) for clinical failure of children with bacteriologic failure compared with children with bacteriologic eradication was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS

Nine hundred seven episodes were analyzed. Clinical failure occurred in 7.3% of 660 patients with bacterial eradication versus 32.8% of 247 patients with bacteriologic failures. The overall RR (95% confidence interval) for clinical failure was 4.41 (95% CI: 3.19-6.11), with little variation between pathogens. After correction for age, gender, ethnic origin, previous otitis history, and previous antibiotic treatment, the rate was 6.52 (95% CI: 4.26-9.99). Across clinical studies with 8 antibiotic drug regimens for AOM, the rate of clinical failure correlated with bacteriologic failure (r = 0.8967; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In young children with culture-positive AOM, failure to eradicate the pathogen from middle ear fluid within the first few days of treatment leads to a significant risk for clinical failure.

Microbiologic surrogate end points in clinical trials of infectious diseases: example of acute otitis media trials

Clinical outcomes that measure how patients feel, function, or survive are the most important and relevant outcomes of therapy in clinical trials and in clinical practice. Surrogate end points, which do not directly measure clinical benefit to the patient, may function as substitutes for clinical end points in clinical trials. Such surrogates are attractive as they may allow measurement of outcomes earlier in time or with a smaller sample size than with clinical outcomes. Microbiologic biomarkers, such as culture results at a specific time after start of therapy, or pharmacodynamic analyses of the effect of drugs on organisms often are proposed as surrogate end points in clinical trials of therapies for infectious diseases. However, evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate end points poses distinct challenges, and only a few biomarkers have been useful replacements for clinical end points. Evaluation of biomarkers as potential surrogate end points first requires an understanding of the differences among measurements of the cause of a disease, risk factors for outcome, and measurements of treatment effects. We will discuss the definitions of clinical and surrogate end points and the reasons why surrogate end points may not predict the true clinical benefit of therapies. We will use the example of the biomarker of microbiologic outcomes from tympanocenteses performed during therapy as the sole measure of clinical effectiveness in clinical trials of acute otitis media to illustrate the challenges in evaluating biomarkers as surrogate end points.

Eficácia e segurança de Sultamicilina (Ampicilina/Sulbactam) e Amoxacilina/Clavulanato no tratamento das infecções de via aéreas superiores em adultos: um estudo multicêntrico, aberto e randomizado

As IVAS em crianças e adultos são os motivos mais freqüentes de consulta médica e os que mais demandam o uso de antibióticos. A crescente resistência bacteriana causada pela produção das beta-lactamases constitui um dos mais sérios problemas atuais. A Sultamicilina é uma pró-droga dupla da ampicilina e do sulbactam, um potente inibidor de beta-lactamases que pode fazer frente a estas dificuldades. OBJETIVO: avaliar a eficácia, segurança e tolerabilidade da Ampicilina/Sulbactan comparada à Amoxacilina/Ácido Clavulânico no tratamento de IVAS, em adultos. METODOLOGIA: 102 pacientes com diagnóstico de IVAS foram randomizados em dois grupos recebendo Ampicilina/Sulbactan ou Amoxacilina/Clavulanato por 10 dias. Foram avaliados 10 e 30 dias após para análise da resposta terapêutica. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença entre os grupos com relação à proporção de pacientes curados ao final do tratamento (visita 2) ou do estudo (visita 3). No grupo que recebeu Amoxacilina/Clavulanato, as proporções de cura foram de 61.7% e 93.2% nas visitas 2 e 3, comparadas a 64.4% e 97.4%, respectivamente, no grupo que recebeu Ampicilina/Sulbactan. A proporção de pacientes que experimentou pelo menos um evento adverso foi semelhante nos dois grupos (p = 0.940). A diarréia foi significativamente mais freqüente no grupo Amoxacilina-Clavulanato (70.6%) do que no grupo Ampicilina/Sulbactan (29.4%), (p=0.0164). CONCLUSÕES: A Ampicilina/Sulbactan é tão segura e eficaz quanto a Amoxacilina/Clavulanato no tratamento empírico de IVAS em adultos. A ocorrência significativamente menor de quadros de diarréia no grupo recebendo Ampicilina/Sulbactan necessita confirmação em estudos posteriores.

Implementing guidelines for the treatment of acute otitis media

The recently published Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media represents a sincere effort by the AAP andthe AAFP to provide management guidelines for the practitioner based upon the best scientific evidence available. Despite many years of research and hundreds of clinical studies addressing various aspects of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of acute otitis media, important questions remain unaddressed or have been addressed in a less than optimal fashion. These gaps in knowledge and deficiencies in several of the studies that formed the scientific basis for the proposed guidelines are the major reasons behind continued disagreement over certain recommendations. Until more comprehensive and careful analyses can be performed, disagreements are likely to persist. Even so, there is general agreement about most of the recommendations made in these guidelines, and these recommendations will provide a very valuable framework for the practicing physician as he or she cares for children with acute otitis media. To briefly review the major points, first is the critical importance of accurately diagnosing acute otitis media using a combination of clinical findings and observable abnormalities of the tympanic membrane and middle ear space. Particularly important is the differentiation of acute otitis media from otitis media with effusion. Second is the value of treating the pain associated with acute otitis media as a regular component of care, irrespective of any decision concerning antimicrobial treatment. Third is the option, for a select group of older patients with nonsevere disease, of withholding antimicrobial therapy for the first 48 to 72 hours, if close follow-up and active parental involvement can be guaranteed. Fourth is the recommendation that if an antimicrobial agent is used, high-dose amoxicillin (80 to 90 mg/kg/d) is the treatment of choice for most children at the time of initial presentation unless disease is particularly severe or the child has recently failed a previous course of the antibiotic. Finally highlighted is the importance of ongoing education efforts on the part of physicians in advising parents about the things they can do in their households to lessen the risk of future disease.

Efficacy and safety of Sultamicillin (Ampicillin/Sulbactan) and Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections in adults - an open-label, multicentric, randomized trial

Upper respiratory tract infections are the most common causes of medical visits in children and adults, demanding massive use of antibiotics. Bacterial resistance caused by beta-lactamase is one of the most serious problems in this matter. Sultamicillin, a double pro-drug of Ampicillin/Sulbactan, is a potent beta-lactamase inhibitor which can face this challenge.

Aim

evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of Ampicillin/Sulbactan compared to Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in upper respiratory tract infections in adults.

Methods

102 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive Ampicillin/Sulbactan or Amoxicillin/Clavulanate during 10 days. They were evaluated 10 and 30 days after treatment to learn about the therapeutic response.

Results

There were no differences between the two groups respecting cure at the end of treatment (visit 2) or at the end of the study (visit 3). Cure ratio was 61.7% and 93.2% (visits 2 and 3) in the Amoxicillin/Clavulanate group compared to 64.4% and 97.4%, respectively, in Ampicillin/Sulbactan group. The adverse events ratio for the two groups was the same (p=0.940). The number of patients with diarrhea was greater in the group of patients receiving Amoxicillin/Clavulanate (70.6%) than in the group receiving Ampicillin/Sulbactan (29.4%) (p=0.0164).

Conclusions

Ampicillin/Sulbactan is as safe and efficient as Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in the empiric treatment of upper respiratory infections in adults. The low occurrence of diarrhea in the group receiving Ampicillin/Sulbactan needs confirmation in other studies.